The Party Of Goldwater?

Gee, all the Republicans have to do for a repeat performance is find another Richard Nixon to install in the Oval Office. Then a Reagan to do away with all those pesky and un-American regulations put in place to fix our current economic crisis and by that time a whole new crop of Bush babies will be old enough to take over the reins of power and steal everything. Repeat as considered necessary.

Is it possible the Mr. Limbaugh is a racist and hiding behind the "I'm an entertainer " line, when in-fact he's unhappy that the GOP recently appointed chairman, Mr. Steele is African American?...I disagree with Mr. Limbaugh's political views but I've always thought of him as an intelligent person..."he's not sounding so intelligent these days". I find it hard to believe that he believe's what he's saying.

Is it possible that Mr. Limbaugh really is a racist and hiding behind the "I'm an entertainer " line..when in fact he's upset that the newly appointed GOP chairman Mr. Steele is African American?..I don't agree with Mr.Limbaugh's political views, but I've always thought of him as an intelligent man..."he's not sounding so intelligent these days".

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/economic_stimulus_package/support_for_stimulus_package_falls_to_37

We were warned:

See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

Last I checked, McCain was whining and Palin seemed like a hateful woman who probably would be at home in the deep South riding around in a pick up truck with a shotgun in a rack and KKK bumperstickers on it. I hated that image, and McCain probably lost because of his whining and the choice of Palin. I honestly hope that see doesn't run ever.

If it was Bushes deregulatory zeal tell me which financial regulation laws did Bush repeal?

Keep in mind that Bush passed one of the largest financial regulation bills in the past 50 years the Sarbanes Oxley act...

Is author true idiot or pretends to be? Thi sso-named stimulus contains 30% real stimulus and 70% liberal Democrats agenda which will not only negate the stimulus part but will prolong recession (if not depression) for years. Any aconomist would say (as we know, new finance Secretary is not a one, he even can not count his taxes) it is better no stimulus that this one. As for Hoover/Bush analogy - it is most likely that Obama will be new Hoover because like Hoover he inhereted recession, and for next 50 years Democrats will be known as party of Obama (thanks God, not party of KKK as they were in Goldwater time).
As for Obama, he has no clue what to do. Enough to say three of his finance-involved appointees are either tax evaders or even worse, do not know tax laws.

Here's a good one!

???Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce our laws to the letter. ??? Sen. Tom Daschle, Congressional Record, May 7, 1998, p. S4507.

JFK put it best, not that it is not known to every first year economics student.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9505E2D6163BF93BA2575AC0A962948260

From the NY Times Published: September 18, 1984 : Rationale for Kennedy's Tax Cut

In a speech before the Economic Club of New York on Dec. 14, 1962, President Kennedy said:

''Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that, no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenue to balance the budget - just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits. In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low - and the soundest way to raise revenues in the long run is to cut rates now.''

How Blowhard Boehner can lead a vote against an economic stimulus package when his home state of Ohio is slowly going down the tubes portends very bad news for the GOP for many years to come. Can anyone here say they can rule out a new born Independent Republican suckling from the right-leaning Democratic and the left-leaning Republican electoral voters' nipples in 2016? Sounds stimulating doesn't it? Hillary vs. Hagel or Cuomo vs. Crist? Your choice Pay-Per-View, ORDER NOW!!!

Let's look the history of the Communist party for a moment.
For nearly 3 decades, Joseph Stalin, a mass murderer, was the Communist party. His successor Nikita Krushchev blamed all of the problems of the bad, old USSR on Stalin and even kicked Stalin's corpse out of the Lenin-Stalin Mausoleum. His attempt to turn Kazakhstan into Iowa led to his downfall in disgrace, and Leonid Brezhnev saw to it that Krushchev was buried in the Novodevichy Cemetery, a sort of burial ground for the disgraced.
The Communists in the Brezhnev era were obsessed with restoring the party to the party of Marx and Lenin, even calling themselves Marxists-Leninists instead Communists. It didn't matter that the Soviet Union was falling to pieces in front of their eyes. Their only concern was some sort of endless theological argument about who was and who was not a true Marxist-Leninist, and deportations to Siberia for all those who were ideologically impure.
Republicans have history all wrong. By the time Reagan challenged Gobrachev to tear down the wall, the USSR was already on the verge of extinction, not by Reagan's defense build-up, but by the accumulated errors of its own institutionalized stupidity, not mention the rise of independent labor unions in Poland which spawned other opposition groups.
The Republicans have their Marx and Lenin: the sacrosanct gospel of Milton Friedman, and President Ronald Reagan. They have their Joseph Stalin, former president G.W. Bush. Like Krushchev and Brezhnev, they blame all of the failures of the last 8 years on President Bush. They conveniently forget that problems really stem from their blind adherence to the doctrines of Milton Friedman and their deification of Ronald Reagan, the same sort of corpse worship you'd witness at the Lenin Mausoleum back in the bad old days.
Selecting Michael Steele as the new leader of the RNC won't solve the problem. That's about as meaningful as putting a picture of George Washington Carver on jars of peanut butter contaminated with salmonella. Label aside, The Republican party remains the same toxic mixture ignorance, bigotry, greed, stupidity, and fanaticism. Nothing will change that reality.