HEALTH

The Baby Keeper

A Phoenix obstetrician uses controversial methods to help infertility patients and their babies survive high-risk multiple-birth pregnancies. But is he promising more than he can deliver?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: tj48 @ 07/25/2009 11:42:48 PM

    I don't agree with the entire process. Women are not biologically engineered to carry litters of fetuses to term. If implanted women are so averse to selective removal of fetuses, are they willing to accept the responsibility of the death of a child after birth, or the cost to the child and the family of the very real risk of having a profoundly impaired child? I smell hypocrisy.

  • Posted By: cpritchet @ 03/17/2009 7:56:12 PM

    I can only hope that in the future, the number of couples who decide on IVF will decrease. I think its popularity is primarily based on the fact that it's a relatively new procedure, and that we never hear about the heartbreaking ordeals that can come from it - you only read about the 'miracle births'. To me, it's shocking how many women (and their husbands) are willing to spend thousands of dollars and put their health, and the health of the children they are trying to conceive, at risk. We need to step back and take a good look at our lives, and appreciate the children we do have, the husbands who love us, and the friends and family that are by our side. Shouldn't we at least try to be happy with the hand God dealt us? I am not implying that that IVF should never be considered. I realize it's not a black and white issue, few things are in life. What's right for one person, may not be right for another. But, we owe it to ourselves, to make the best decisions we can, and I think IVF needs to be taken more seriously. Before you risk your life for something you think you want, take into consideration all the things that are good in your life that you could be gambling away. As for selective reduction, how can so many women be against it? They have already tampered with nature to get pregnant, and yet refuse to tamper with nature in order to ensure the health and safety of themselves and the child (or children) they wish to bring into the world. These mothers need to step up and take responsibility for their actions, and do what's in the best interest of their family. If you can't bear the thought of reduction, you probably shouldn't even consider IVF. It's time we stop glamorizing IVF, and see it for what it really is.

  • Posted By: RMcD @ 03/04/2009 3:03:16 PM

    I believe it is completely natural for a woman to want a child, and it must be heartbreaking to be infertile. That being said, there is no excuse for going forward with an IVF pregnancy of so many children, or for doing it again after already having more than one child. Considering the realities of our planet and the already massive overpopulation that exists, I believe that people should voluntarily choose to have only 2 children- the number that would replace the parents. Certainly if someone naturally gave birth to triplets, or had one child and then twins, that would be different, but we have all forgotten to think about the old saying, "just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean you SHOULD." There are millions of orphaned and unwanted children in the world, children who desperately need families, just as there are families that need children. It seems to me the epitome of narcissism to insist on children with your DNA when so many need your love. On the other hand, someone who cannot manage to love a child that does NOT have their DNA would be a pretty lousy adoptive parent. Nonetheless, given the expense and dangers of the multiples, adopting the British regulations where government medical insurance covers a certain number of IVF attempts but forbids transfer of more than one embryo at a time, seems like a good idea.

  • Posted By: Concerned Citizen1961 @ 01/31/2009 6:44:38 AM

    Given the current state of world affairs, and the current economic crisis and the risks of global warming, I think it is terribly selfish for any one to have children and it is tantamount to child abuse to give birth to one child, let alone multiple children. My observation of most parents is that they are fulfilling some selfish need in themselves - like looking to have something to love. Then they are raising children who are even more spoiled and selfish than their parents are. All of you folks who think you are great parents are in total deniial. Our society is proof that the children who are growing into adults have no concept of what's right or wrong, and what we should be doing to make the world a better place. We now have three living generations of people focused exclusively on their own selfish needs and not the needs of the community as a whole. It is not about class or economics - even well educated, financially sound folks are raising spoiled brats who do not contribute to society. Most parents I have met think they are great parents, while as an outside observer, I think they are totally lying too themselves and are quite delusional. Most people should quit having babies. Period.

    • Posted By: motherlovemelon @ 02/27/2009 1:06:51 PM

      It's selfish for anyone to have children? Okay, let's all stop as of 2009. In 50 years, when everyone's too old to reproduce and humanity heads toward extinction, we'll have you to thank. What a stupid thing to say.

      Point being, yes, people should probably limit the size of their brood, but it's not exactly feasbile for everyone to be childless, is it?

  • Posted By: Mad_City_Monkey @ 01/31/2009 7:31:20 AM

    It is un-natural, un-healthy, and even dangerous for everyone involved, including the fathers. The euphamistic term, 'super twins,' puts an emotional spin on life threatening behaviors of very self absorbed people who are determined to waste vast sums of money, medical, and even scientic recources, to intentionally fly in the face of nature becuase of other euphemistic terms such as heroism, 'christ like', and special. When the highflying truth comes crashing down around them, i.e. the deaths of the mothers, the deaths of the children, or worse, the long term disability and need for life long governmental support, maybe then more responsible people in our society will work through government to stop these insane behaviors. Naturally these couples are infertal for a reason, religiously God has rendered them barren for His own reason, morally there is a reason childless couples should adopt, and ethically there is a reason good society should step in and stop all of these insane, and un-natural procedures, and treatments, including invetro fertilization. Let's quit being so euphemistic, be more realistic instead. Call this what it is, self appointed Gods bringing litters of babies into a traumatic, and dangerous futures, while simultaniously and un-neccessarily endangering the lives and futures of infertal people. Can't have babies of your own to love? Then do what's right, and start loving your neighbor's cast aways that fill the hell holes of the world's gutters. Love thy neighbor, and not thy self. Isn't that really more 'Chrsit like," in the end? T.Lee Madison, WI

    • Posted By: mrsavizdrav @ 01/31/2009 8:51:22 AM

      I don't understand why people like you who can't even write correctly some of the terms, think they should comment on a topic like this.
      Yes, it is wrong to have fertility treatments if one already has six kids. But to say that in vitro fertilization should be stopped because it's unnatural, is wrong too. Any kind of medical help is unnatural, but I'm sure you go to see a doctor and take drugs when you get sick. Infertility is a medical condition like any others.
      I'm a proud mother of a boy conceived with the help of IVF.

      • Posted By: jendfw4choice @ 02/02/2009 5:44:47 PM

        amen, madcitymonkey! and as for mrsavisdrav, yes, infertility is a "medical condition," but it's NOT a life-threatening one.

        • Posted By: motherlovemelon @ 02/27/2009 11:26:09 AM

          Neither are thousands of other medical conditions people get treated for every day life-threatening, but that doesn't stop them from waiting an hour or so in their doctor's waiting room to get a prescription for a generic antibiotic and be on their merry way.
          In my opinion, it's not IVF itself that's wrong. It's the doctors performing it willing to turn a blind eye to the moral and ethical guidelines about how many embryos should be implanted. Human beings shouldn't produce litters (let alone baseball teams). End of story.

      • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/05/2009 12:36:23 AM

        I agree with Mad Monkey. And I'm infertile so my vote counts. :) IVF shouldn't be an option as long as there are kids without homes. People lamenting their inability to reproduce and comparing it to cancer and other life-threatening diseases make me sick. Adopt! Be a foster parent! Spend that $30,000 on bringing home twins from a Russian orphanage. Do something good for someone else, not just yourself.

  • Posted By: notjustanynurse @ 02/06/2009 5:34:19 PM

    Okay, so I'm one of those 'poor unfortunate women that never knew the joy of giving birth to my very own child'. Poor me - INSTEAD I'm RAISING 2 children when their own mother goes out drinking/partying/sleeping around. Do I WISH oh my god that they LOOKED like me? Do I feel like I MISSED something? NO. I get the whole parental experience - minus passing a football between my legs. I HAVEN'T MISSED ANYTHING. NOTHING. I feel REALLY SORRY for you wasted individuals who feel that the only 'true' thing that has happened in your entire life was giving birth. Cockroaches give birth - humans should strive to raise decent, educated, articulate, productive OTHER humans no matter who gave birth to them. It is NOT a life requisite that you physically reproduced.

    • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/07/2009 8:26:38 PM

      Rigth on. In my opinion, IVF is just as much a waste of money as those people who just cloned their dog. Infertility is natural. Accept it and move on. Do something for someone else!

  • Posted By: tripmom @ 01/31/2009 10:44:45 AM

    For all that are using their faith to argue fertility, remember what the bible says about judging others. Unless you have been faced with infertility, infertility treatments, HOM pregnancy, the decision to keep or reduce, your opinion really doesn't matter. And yes, most couples who utilize fertility treatments, could first afford the IVF procedures that got them to the HOM pregnancy, in our case it was triplets that cost us around twelve thousand dollars to conceive, and I can say the government didn't help one bit. Our babies were born 15 weeks early and are now happy and healthy. We struggle financially and sometimes even mentally (as most parents I'm sure), but I wouldn't give up any one of my children. As I look at these gorgeous little people, I sometimes cry that I could have made a huge mistake and ended one of their precious lives before it even got started. Thank you Dr. Elliot for what you do.

    • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/05/2009 12:30:03 AM

      I'm infertile and I agree with the other posters who mention adoption. There's a difference between wanting to be a parent and wanting to reproduce. One is selfless and the other is selfish.

    • Posted By: GeorginaKlanica @ 02/02/2009 3:22:12 PM

      Infertility should be treated as a bad break in life and overcome by ADOPTION!

      • Posted By: berthawashington @ 02/03/2009 2:41:59 AM

        I completely agree with you. Why don't more people look towards adoption?

  • Posted By: twinmom061608 @ 02/02/2009 3:56:10 PM

    I first of all would like to say to GeorginaKlanica that is the most horrific, back woods, thing I have ever heard!! Why shouldn't everyone be given the wonderfull experience of pregnancy. The advances that we have made in the infertility field are wonderful. Many loving parents would not have had the oppertunity to be parents if not for these advances. Not all infertilty results in "super multiples" You can never imagine the pain and heart ache an woman who is unable to concieve a child on her on goes through. This woman that already had the six children, that is a different story. But please before you say something so heartless please thingk first.

    • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/05/2009 12:24:55 AM

      Not every woman who can't conceive goes through such dramatic heartache. Not all of us feel we're not complete women without babies that look like us. I want to be a parent. I can do that without spending that kind of money or time for unsure results.

  • Posted By: copydiva @ 02/02/2009 7:46:11 PM

    How long does it take for a woman who believes in God to realize He's said NO? God doesn't always say yes. And if a woman gives birth to basically a litter, the size of which would embarrass a cat, there are bound to be health consequences for those babies. In this economy I can't imagine bringing so many into the world -- where -- unless some big company pays all her bills in exchange for advertising -- those children will only know poverty. I think she proved herself an unfit mother by having these children -- something God evidently saw beforehand.

    • Posted By: tripmom @ 02/03/2009 12:18:39 PM

      If you were dying of cancer, would you say no to the medicine? I'm not condoing or defending the mom of 14, I'm simply saying ASKING YOU this question. Would you accept or refuse medication for your medical problem? Would God be telling YOU, too bad so sad, it's time for you to die? So if fertility mediation is available, should we turn it down?

      • Posted By: jendfw4choice @ 02/03/2009 5:24:43 PM

        infertility is NOT a life or death issue. no one is going to DIE because they can't have a baby. so accepting medical treatment for cancer is NOT the same as accepting medical treatment for infertility.

        • Posted By: tripmom @ 02/04/2009 10:41:00 AM

          You are missing the point. If medication is available to cure a disease or change the quality of someones life, should we turn it down? There are many diseases and conditions that are out there for which medication is provided and they are not life threatening. Should stroke victims turn down physical therapy? Should tumor patients turn down surgery? People with excema suffer wihout topical creams? These are all medical interventions for conditions that exist, for which I doubt GOD wishes upon us. How is the medical condition of infertility different. Who are you to say which condition gets treated and which condition is more serious than another. Are YOU trying to play God?

          • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/05/2009 12:22:27 AM

            By your logic we should be cloning and actively promoting stem cell research, just because we have the technology. Do you agree?

  • Posted By: ErinPage @ 02/02/2009 7:52:43 PM

    To those of you who do not have children and are condemning those that do...How in the world do you think you got here?

    For those of you that have gone through fertility treatments to have kids...HOM or not...Congrats on your family.

    For those of you who believe in "selective reduction" you are sick and twisted.

    For those of you who thing the earth is over-populated...Get over yourself.

    For those of you who think that the mother with 14 kids is crazy...I agree...but get off your high horse. Its not your life.

    For those of you who think infertility is part of "God's plan" and you are messing it up by using fertility drugs...Yes adoption is great...but you may not understand the desire to have biological children and the fear that you may never conceive.

    I think that Dr. Elliot is doing a remarkable thing by helping mothers with HOM. My own mother was put on a "mag" drip for pre-term labor and, although she hated it, she and her three children, all singles, all full term due to Magnesium Sulfate, all heathy, are all here because of it. Stop complaining and arguing about something we don't have control of. If its not your life, its not your business.

    • Posted By: North Carolina Transplant @ 02/05/2009 12:19:35 AM

      You know what, I can't concieve. But I'm not so selffish as to waste thousands of dollars and put myself & my family through hell just to have a baby who looks like me. Whatever happened to wanting to be a parent and not just wanting to see a reflection of yourself? IVF is ridiculous. There are plenty of babies and KIDS who need love, in the US and all over the world.

      And if it's not any of our business, it's none of yours either.

  • Posted By: nurset2008 @ 02/04/2009 5:12:32 PM

    why aren't people talking about the rei specialists that are implanting these women with all of the embryos. dr elliott is a great doctor and is just helping these people that are in impossible situations.

  • Posted By: nurset2008 @ 02/04/2009 5:09:51 PM

    one big point peole are not talking about are the rei doctors who are implanting these women with the embryos. why are the people who are dealing with the results of infertility the only one's who are always in the hot seat. dr elliott is a great doctor and helps people in situations that are impossible to them one way or the other!!!!!! so don't judge unless you are willing to walk in his shoes.

  • Posted By: PageWraith @ 02/03/2009 1:55:03 AM

    "Is it her right and her life? Sure.' - Let me rephrase that. My body, My choice. I can't tell you how sad it is that females use this phrase. Ya, I'll tell you why, because the choice your making isn't about your body but the one you are carrying. When you have to play with words like that to make your defense does the defense really exist. The only difference between you and a fetus is time.

    • Posted By: Allronix @ 02/03/2009 7:02:14 AM

      Exactly. Those 14 kids will grow up to be 14 new citizens, each one needing food, shelter, clothing, education, a job, and most will likely have kids of their own and repeat the cycle. It's one thing to cover your literature with pictures of cute newborns, and cite that babies are gifts from God. (Mind you, I'm not a Christian, so the argument doesn't work with me). It's another thing entirely to sit and think about what awesome responsibilites and resource requirements actually go into parenting!

      Now as for that inevitable and spurious comment about my mother that will be coming...I am first of twins, and while I can't begrudge existance, I do wonder what insane deity possessed my parents to sleep together in the first place.

  • Posted By: justathought999 @ 02/02/2009 1:49:43 PM

    Why is it that everyone thinks they have the right to judge this woman? And what's wrong with accepting money for the rights to just about every aspect of her octuplets? I don't hear anyone judging the Duggers (TLC'S 17 Children and Counting) for accepting money for their show. And jps74, are you a mental health professional? And have you examined this woman? I think not...your observation is your opinion. And last, do any of you like strangers judging you and your lifestyle? I don't!! Oh, and by the way, 17 kids in Arkansas is nothing. I know of people with 25+!

    • Posted By: berthawashington @ 02/03/2009 2:33:00 AM

      We don't live in the 20s and 30s anymore. Super families should be thing of the past That woman who is single, living with her parents, who filed for bankrupsy should not be having thoses babies. She doens't have the money, the time, or the resources to take care of them properly. I am not saying she doesn't love them, but she cannot take care of them in the maner they need. Shame on her and shame on the doctor who helped her out.

  • Posted By: momfoursix @ 02/03/2009 2:20:09 AM

    My husband and I have 6 chilren, we each have 3 and we are now a "blended" family. 6 is hard with 2 parents and I don't work. The older kids help out with getting ready for school and homework, but they choose to, I have never asked and certainly don't expect it. My kids are all dearly loved and cherished and we wouldn't have it any other way.

    All I have seen on this blog are put downs, and critisism. Not one of you has to raise these kids and I noticed that none of you plan to help not even with words of encouragement. Shame on all of you.

  • Posted By: Allronix @ 02/03/2009 1:25:15 AM

    Sorry, Erin. I'm an aunt of six, mom of none, glad to be such. Yes, i am concerned about the environmental impact of so many kids. Call me anti-natalist, nihilistic, etc, but reducing our fertility rate would certainly help many of the woes affecting mankind - wars over resources, grinding poverty, starvation, lack of homes and medicine. The Earth only has a finite amount of resources, and unless we want to be living on Soylent Green, we need to acknowledge that reality. The Duggars scare me to death, as does someone who has six kids, no spouse, and no apparent means of supporting kids having enough to fill a bus. Is it her right and her life? Sure. But does that mean it's right?

  • Posted By: Betty06 @ 02/02/2009 3:26:11 PM

    Of course Dr. Evans opposes Dr. Elliot, he threatens his bread and butter - 'selective reduction'. A nice way of saying abortion, which is BIG business, several hundred dollars a pop. State funded of course. I am not saying I think we should all run out there and have multiples, that it is always healthy or safe or best. It is refreashing though to see a male doctor respecting the wishes of the mother, wishes that go against todays grain of 1.6 children per family. I agree that something was not right in the recent situation with the single mother ending up with 14, but are we forgetting Jon & Kate, or even the Duggars - 17 and counting? Both very succesful, loving and functional homes. I am the oldest of 6, all singles, spread out over 15 years. Our parents were our parents, and we were the children. My mother was, and is a veritable super-mom. She chose to have a large family, dedicated herself to that, and was extremely succesful. I only hope that I can do half as well, and I also want a large family. I find it interesting that a woman's 'right to choose' is so well respected as long as that choice is the same one that society chooses - 1.6 children. Much more than that, and there must be something wrong with the woman.

    • Posted By: Allronix @ 02/03/2009 1:11:41 AM

      Check the laws; the Hyde Amendment PROHIBITS state funds being used for that

  • Posted By: decobeach @ 02/03/2009 1:08:30 AM

    She obviously has no sense, the state should take them all away and give them a chance at a normal life.

  • Posted By: benvictor @ 01/30/2009 4:03:05 PM

    This is sick. Now, there are 14 kids that will end up on the public rolls. The doctor and clinic ought to be sued in order to support the kids. As for the mother, get her a job and it does not matter what it is.

    • Posted By: Proud Mother of Triplets @ 01/31/2009 1:03:47 AM

      Please. Stop being so close-minded. She is a fertility patient, and is more than likely high-income and well-educated. As to finding the mother a job...she already has one. Being a mother.

      • Posted By: NC Transplant @ 02/02/2009 11:58:05 PM

        How much does being a mother pay? Because smiles and giggles don't pay the bills. And considering that she and her 6 previous children live with her parents and she's already filed bankruptcy, neither does she.

      • Posted By: Porkchop @ 02/02/2009 11:56:28 PM

        How much does being a mother pay? Because smiles and giggles don't pay the bills. And considering that she and her 6 previous children live with her parents and she's already filed bankruptcy, neither does she.

      • Posted By: Porkchop @ 02/02/2009 11:53:33 PM

        How much does being a mother pay? Because smiles and giggles don't pay the bills. And considering that she and her 6 previous children live with her parents and she's already filed bankruptcy, neither does she.

      • Posted By: DavisB1 @ 02/02/2009 1:14:18 PM

        Unless I am wrong, I don't think the job of "being a mother" pays well enough to support 14 children. Most of the mothers I know also must work full time jobs to support their children in todays economy. I don't feel we as tax payers should have to support her irresponsible actions.

        Maybe I am wrong, being a mother who is offering to sell interviews (which I am sure is just the beginning) may pay well enough!!!!!

      • Posted By: DavisB1 @ 02/02/2009 1:10:38 PM

        A single mother with 6 children (at age 32) who has never been married and lives with her parents; I doubt very much she is "high income". How high would it have to be to support 14 children. One report states that she was paid to have the initro. Regardless it is very irresponsible. I think the clinic and doctor should be looked at very closely. If she actually loves children she would realize that no parent can raise 14 children. If she has help (and someone else is raising them) what benefit is that to her or the children. CNN is saying she is offering her first media interview for $2,000,000. I guess that would certainly help raise 14 children but personally I think the media should say "who cares, go take care of your children" and forget it. Paying her to put herself and her children in this situation is rediculous. In addition she has an autistic child. How much of the special care he needs will he be getting?

        I hope family services is on her doorstep weekly to monitor the care of these children. And not on the doorstep with another check!

  • Posted By: chicichaca @ 02/02/2009 11:39:26 PM

    If we are not human from our conceptions, then we never our. This problem with the world is the lack of the value of the dignity of the human life. Until we value people at all phases of their lives and protect their rights, we will find no peace.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse