SPONSORED BY:
VIEWPOINT

To Win, The GOP Must Outsource Itself

It's not Obama's charisma, or past missteps that are keeping the Republican Party in the wilderness. To come back, the GOP needs to take a page from the Democratic ground game.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

It seems like only yesterday. In 1994 Republicans took control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, and retook the U.S. Senate after nearly a decade of Democratic control. Republicans were also riding high in governorships and state legislatures. Now, Democrats have an absolute lock on Washington for the foreseeable future, and the takeover in the states has been less publicized but just as dramatic. The GOP controls both state houses in just 14 states while the Democrats control both in 27. Governors are now tied at 25 apiece when just four years ago Republicans had a huge 32–18 margin.

The Republican brand has virtually failed at the federal level and is falling like a rock at the state tier. How did this seismic shift come about? There were lots of contributing factors, one of which is that the party leadership has failed to show independent voters or their own base that they stand for something. But the most important factor was that Republicans have been completely out-organized by Democrats. And in what is surely the greatest irony of modern political history, they did it by stealing a chapter from the Republican policy playbook, the one called "privatization."

Conservatives may advocate privatization for government, but Democrats put it into action in politics. All the key party functions have simply been outsourced. The big donors entrepreneurially moved their funding of key political functions outside the traditional party structure, building and paying for separate, private organizations that, taken together, do everything our old-fashioned political parties used to do—without having to get buy-in from political-party officials.

Colorado is a great case study. In just 10 years the state has switched from red to blue, with much of this shift happening since 2004. The Colorado State Senate is 60 percent Democrats, and the State House of Representatives is nearly 60 percent Democratic as well. The governor is a Democrat as are three other statewide constitutional officers. More than 70 percent of the representatives to the U.S. House are Democrats, and both U.S. senators are Democrats. No doubt some Colorado voters changed their views on politics over the past decade. But the real reason for the radical change is a brilliant political privatization plan by Colorado's "Gang of Four."

The group—Tim Gill, Rutt Bridges, Jared Polis and Pat Stryker—are wealthy Coloradans who support liberal politics. Fed up with that sense of unreturned affection that is common among donors who really care about policy, the Gang gave up on hoping for the best from their Democratic Party allies and instead funded every important political-party function outside the party, with private dollars.

Under the umbrella of the Colorado Democracy Alliance, the group built and funded an array of new, private organizations to handle the normal tasks of a political party. The Colorado branch of Progressive Majority recruits and trains candidates, Colorado Ethics Watch investigates, files complaints and even sues, Colorado Media Matters fights "conservative disinformation," the Colorado Center on Law and Policy handles constitutional litigation, the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, Bell Policy Center and Big Horn Center provide messaging, research and policy agendas, Democracy for Colorado, New Era Colorado, Progress Now Colorado and other advocacy groups recruit, identify and activate the grassroots for pressure campaigns and get-out-the-vote efforts. How expensive is this effort? Donations are private so no one knows for sure, but this is easily a multimillion dollar project.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Solving the Palin Puzzle
Solving the Palin Puzzle

See how well you can see Sarah from your house, by taking our trivia quiz.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Dial 'A' for Accessory
Dial 'A' for Accessory

This season's top i-Phone add-ons.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sboss1960 @ 04/17/2009 4:36:11 AM

    I would like to see the GOP stand for competent government and good money management. President Bush was our first MBA president. That certainly turned out well.

    Republicans need to present some well thought-out alternatives. Republicans also need to focus on more than the political side shows that they have been so enamored with for some time and focus on real "bread and butter" issues that most can connect with.

    Extreme deregulation turned out great. We voted for this garbage (we can trust the bankers and finance guys to regulate themselves because down deep they are just good people......right.......!!!) and have now deregulated our way to Socialism. That's what I call IRONIC.

    Republicans, go back to the drawing board and craft some good policy. Dump the "wing nut" entertainer "leaders" that are driving the party into ruin and remake yourselves accordingly. Build coalitions and attract rather than repel voters or you will be in the political wilderness for some time.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 02/28/2009 8:16:25 AM

    You need to get yerself a new brain. The ol one needs at least six new cylinders. [or it needs Tuco to find another grave with a real body in it].

  • Posted By: varacefan @ 02/23/2009 10:14:36 AM

    The author has it right that the Dems just flat out out husseled the Reps in getting out the vote and getting their message out. The Reps also shot themselves in the foot every chance they got even when selecting their canidate in John McCain. I do however disagree with the author on why some of this happened. First, when in power the Reps did a terrible job at curbing goverment spending and downsizing goverment. Because of this many in the Rep. party became unhappy with their own party. Second, The Reps thought that if they sounded nicer and more like the Dems it would help bring in the independant voter. It did not. Third, the Reps. failed to admitt that they will not nor will ever get a fair shake from the press. There are clear double standards when the main stream press reports even the most basic story. How Sara Palin was treated is a clear example of this. The mainstream media was and is in the tank for Obama and will only climb out of the tank when there is no other choice. The challange for the Reps is to hang on long enough for the Dems to hang themselves which they will do given unchecked power. Believe it or not in just one month this has already begin to happen. Many in the middle are already seeing that Obama is far from the middle which many believed him to be. As in states where the Dems have run the gov. for years and times are worse than bad this soon will be the condition of our country. Dem policies although sound good to the uninformed are proven quite quickly to be bad for the country. The problem for the Reps is do they have anyone who is smart enough to step in when the time comes and it will come to show a better way. That remains to be seen.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now