Illlustration: Brian Stauffer for Newsweek
ECONOMICS

The Myths Of The Recession

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Remember "decoupling"? It was the notion that emerging economies had detached themselves from the developed world, and that Asian consumers could make up for falling demand in the rich world. An Indian steelmaker would not only fail to sneeze at the first sign of a cold in the United States, but might even hold the key to a cure.

So much for that theory: emerging-market stocks have plummeted some 50 percent in the past year, even further than the S&P's 36 percent nose dive. Decoupling was a powerful myth, but only one of many in this global recession. The crisis is moving so fast, and in so many different directions at once, that the shelf life of conventional wisdom is shrinking exponentially. Just a few weeks back, analysts were saying the worst had passed for the financial sector; today Citigroup is imploding. Throughout 2008, forecasters predicted the demise of the dollar. Now it's the euro and sterling that are falling. What's behind these and other recession myths, and why haven't they come to pass? Below, we investigate.

Myth: The Credit Crisis Is Over
By early January, headlines had been free of major bank failures for a few months, and many experts had begun to breathe a sigh of relief. "We have probably seen the worst of the credit crisis from the standpoint of the banking balance sheets," said Bill Gross, manager of PIMCO, the world's largest bond fund, in mid-January. The TED spread, a carefully watched measure of risk, had fallen to more normal levels by mid-January, a sign that banks had begun lending to each other again. Most promisingly, in the first full week of January, companies sold $153 billion of debt to investors—the highest volume since the beginning of 2008.

Unfortunately, those numbers were misleading. The five biggest corporate debt sales in early January had government support. General Electric, for instance, tapped into a Federal Reserve program to borrow $9.9 billion. Meanwhile, Bank of America's recent woes provide a highly visible reminder that 2009 holds the potential for another fiery financial-sector crash. The company booked a stunning $15 billion loss last quarter, the result of major indigestion after absorbing troubled investment bank Merrill Lynch. The federal government had to step in with a $142 billion bailout in January. Citigroup, too, has gone hat in hand to the government moneymen recently, and the company—once the poster child for bigger-is-better banking—is splitting itself in two.

Globally, banks have already absorbed about $1 trillion in losses on mortgages and other bad debt holdings according to Jan Hatzius, chief U.S. economist of Goldman Sachs. That's a startling figure, but his group's models indicate the financial-sector meltdown hasn't even reached the halfway point: Goldman expects another $1.1 trillion in losses. Until that bad debt is accounted for, the memory of the collapse of Lehman Brothers will stay fresh.

Myth: All Industries Are Suffering
What's more surprising is that outside the financial sector, things don't look half bad. It's a common myth that corporate balance sheets across all industries are increasingly beleaguered. That was certainly the case in the 2001 downturn. In the years leading up to that recession, companies borrowed heavily to take advantage of new technologies and upgrade their IT infrastructure. The spending binge meant corporations had just $352 billion in cash when clouds gathered in 2001—clearly not enough to weather the storm, as the bankruptcy rate soared to 10.6 percent that year.

But natural selection has since worked its magic; the CEOs left standing are a thriftier breed. They used years of record income growth—average profits among blue-chip firms rose at a double-digit clip for 18 consecutive quarters between 2002 and 2006—to pay down debt and build up rainy-day funds. According to Standard & Poor's, the financial-research and credit-ratings firm, companies had a cash hoard of $616 billion by 2008, and debt as a percentage of net worth was a third less than 1991 levels. Smaller, debt-laden companies are still at risk, but accountants at ExxonMobil, Apple and other large, thrifty firms are, for now at least, still smiling.

Myth: The Dollar Will Collapse
In the first half of 2008, smiles were a rare sight among dollar holders. With the U.S. recession-bound, investors shunned the globe's default reserve currency, and it struck new lows against its major competitors. Gold broke $1,000 an ounce as traders stampeded away from the dollar. Steve Forbes dubbed it a "junk currency." With the Federal Reserve pumping money into the economy, the supply of dollars outstripped demand, an imbalance that weighed on the greenback's value.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Dredd @ 04/06/2009 3:32:47 PM

    May I mention another myth of the recession ... that some banks are too big to fail:

    http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/04/too-big-to-flail.html

  • Posted By: MominRR @ 04/04/2009 1:27:45 PM

    "The stimulus package may be what we need. It puts hard cash back into the hands of the spenders in the short term and creates jobs in the middle term." ?

    Oh yeah, the extra $10 a paycheck is going to help out *so* much! I almost can't decide what to spend my windfall on first. I think I'll go for my son's school lunches, this will go a long way towards helping to cover them. The credit cards will just have to wait for my next $10 windfall. After about 500 of those, I can consider going out and *buying* something with that $10. Whoo-hooo! I'm rich!

    Not.

  • Posted By: MominRR @ 04/04/2009 1:09:24 PM

    I agree about the builders needing to build smaller homes. I got the smallest 3 bedroom home I could find -- $125K five years ago. Now they are going for $165-175K. Even at $125K, my payments, with taxes and insurance, are $950/mo. Very hard to cover everything else with that big a chunk taken up in house payments! And I'm at the median income for my state.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now