POLITICS

Promises, Promises

Soaring expectations collide with harsh political realities. How Barack Obama looks from Chicagoland.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: MLINDO @ 03/24/2009 4:09:14 PM

    "Promises, Promises."..This article would have been a lot more meaningful if it was written at the end of Obama's term and nothing promised was accomplish. But approximately three months into his term you are already expecting promises accomplished? Get real , please!!!!

  • Posted By: Committed Citizen @ 03/12/2009 3:26:57 AM

    I voted for Obama in both the primary and general elections. His speeches have brought tears to my eyes and reinforced my innate optimism about America.
    I, along with many Americans, now find myself extremely concerned that President Obama does not understand the vital contribution that businesses and entrepreneurs make to our national wellbeing. My fears stem from his support of a bill introduced today in the Senate entitled the Employee Free Choice Act, aka "Card check". Andy Stern, head of the Service Workers Union, has stated publicly that this Act represents "payback" from Obama to the unions for their support in his presidential campaign. I am horrified, because I thought that Obama promised not to bow to interest groups seeking favors at odds with the overall wellbeing of the American people.
    The so-called Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) would allow union organizers to bypass business owners and the existing secret ballot process. Worse, if newly unionized workplaces and their employees are unable to agree on contract terms within 120 days, EFCA provides that a government arbitrator would step in and establish contract terms.
    This is clearly at odds with the needs of American employees and the American workplace. Entrepreneurs need to be encouraged to start and expand existing businesses, and they must manage for innovation, competition, and flexibility. President Obama's willingness to impose union and government bureaucracies on the very businesses being counted on to pull America into economic recovery is deeply disturbing.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 02/24/2009 9:18:26 AM

    President Obama has tried to Extend a Peace Palm to the Republican Party and he'll Continue to...

    But, President Obama has to Work within the Ranks that Favor his Agenda and that is Comprised of the Democratic Party, Independent and Moderate Republicans.

    President Obama has been President for 4 Weeks and a Few days, he has 4 years to Cross Party Lines....

    Trust me, he will, but he has 4 years to Cross Those Party Lines and he has a National & International Financial Crisis.

    He's also a Pragmatist, he has said Before, During & After his Election....

    "The Economy will get Worse, Before it gets Better"

    "The Economy took Time to get to this Point and it will take some Time to get out of it"

    Reality....Reality.

    The Wall Street Clan [[Speculators]] are trying to Sway the Nation, but to Hell with [[Speculators]] they knew this was going to be a Long Haul.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 02/24/2009 9:09:49 AM

    In a half-hour segment on "Meet the Press" on Sunday, the varying threads of the GOP political psychology came into sharp contrast. On one side sat Charlie Crist, the Moderate Republican Governor of the state of Florida, who not only openly campaigned for the president's stimulus package but also sent some very public plaudits the Obama's way.

    "I think there is a national leader, his name is President Obama," he told host David Gregory when asked if his own party had national leaders. "The people elected him. And I'm willing to give him a good shot and try to help make this work.

    We're in a tough time, as we talked about before.

    I think we do need to be bipartisan. We need to be, in fact, nonpartisan. We're all Americans. Our country is at a dire point and we need to do everything we can to work together to get America through this."

    Pressed as to whether he thought "the president has the right prescription to ease this recession," the Florida Republican replied, without pausing:

    "I think he's on the right track." Asked if he thought it was a mistake for "the Republican Party to define itself by opposition to the stimulus," he said: "It may be."

    The show's other guest, Bobby Jindal, did not offer such willing praise for the president. The Louisiana Governor, known superficially as the conservative Obama, pledged that the party would and should work in a bipartisan fashion. But his pitch was one of philosophical defiance, especially on matters like the stimulus.

    "The Republican Party has got to offer conservative alternative solutions.

    I think our obligation is to work with the president every chance we can, to be bipartisan," he told Gregory. "We need to work with the president every chance we can.

    But on principle we should be unafraid to stand up on principle and to point out our alternative solutions."

    The two governors, both rumored to harbor presidential ambitions, represent the current bookends of Republican thought.

    Their appearances on "Meet the Press" underscored the complex question facing the party.

    How does the GOP restore its power: through reaffirming principles or expanding its approach?

    Not surprisingly, the two had different diagnoses when it came to rebuilding the Republican brand.

    JINDAL: "I don't think we expand by becoming an imitation of the other party. I think we expand by standing on principle for what we believe in. I think that attracts voters. They may not agree with us on everything, but they will respect our honesty and will respect the results."


    CRIST: "You shouldn't be the party of no. Well, there's a time to say no. But I think you need to be a party that works across the aisle, where you participate.

    Both [Republicans and Democrats] have to do that. I think it's important for both Democrats and Republicans to work together for Americans."

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 02/24/2009 9:06:28 AM

    United States Total Debt (Split)

    End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public

    1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion

    2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 Trillion Bush Years

    2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion
    2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
    2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
    2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
    2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
    2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
    2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion

    2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 Trillion Bush Years


    2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion

  • Posted By: Davole @ 02/17/2009 10:26:53 AM

    Regarding the Porkulus Package, Joseph Epstein was "right on" by stating that this devious omnibus package, although concocted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, was marketed as Obama's.

    Epstein also noted that Obama's approach was that he had won, so it would be his way only, but that so-called bipartisan efforts would be welcomed as long as they agreed with and fostered partisan democrat objectives.

    Today, Barack Obama plans to sign into law the Porkulus Package, which masqueraded as a Stimulus Package, and which was approved by the House democrat representatives and senators who had not seen the final bill, and did not even know what it contained.

    They have the unmitigated gall to call that responsible government!

    Thankfully all of the House Republican representatives and senators, with the lone exception of 3 unprincipled RINO senators, performed their duty and obligation to the American citizens by refusing to approve a gigantic 1,087 page omnibus bill which was suddenly foisted upon them with no opportunity to scrutinize the proposals.

    It???s ironic that the so-called Stimulus Package, which just had to get passed without being read, and without delay, could wait for 4 days to be signed by the President.
    The American public, especially the taxpayers, will have the opportunity to register their disapproval of Congress and the President by voting the democrat representatives and some of the democrat senators who are scheduled to face re-election, out of office soon in 2010.

    And then, a few years later in 2012, Barack Obama could be relegated to joining the ranks of the unemployed as his just reward.

    What option do the American taxpayers have with respect to funding the massive taxation burden that will be imposed on them to finance Barack Obama???s sinister and diabolic enslavement of the masses scheme?

    Why not do exactly what the Treasury Secretary, the top administrator of the IRS, Timothy Geithner has done for the past 5 years - refuse to pay any income taxes - for the rest of Barack Obama???s presidency?

    After all, Barack Obama has stated that he considers tax dodging to be just a minor personal mistake - so a precedent has been set, and everyone should be entitled to the same consideration!

    If a majority of the American taxpayers adopted that strategy, the Porkulus Package would be effectively obstructed and defeated!

    • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/17/2009 10:47:58 AM

      Still finger-pointing, whining and complaining without the offer of a solution except - down with the Democratic President. You don't seem to want to offer a root cause analysis either regarding how we got here.

      Had to be some pork there too right Davvy?

      You sure write a lot for someone who says nothing Davvy.

      • Posted By: Fortunate Fox @ 02/18/2009 3:26:14 PM

        The root cause was offered to you below, but you turned your nose up without looking at it. You're not unlike what you accuse Davole of.... however you write little and say nothing.

        • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:47:18 AM

          I agree more with this guy. Until you get a root cause that doesn't come from some neo-uber-conservative-bighair-hate site - have some grits.

          "I know President Obama won't be negatively affected by the 24/7 blogging, and his 13 million + email strong army and his 50 million + voters and his 70% approving rating, why because we Americans will not stand the media trying to spin his achievements and his decision - just so they can help the Republicans bring doubt on his abilities.

          The media, the GOP and the neo-cons - will understand that no amount of money or influence - or media scrutiny will be allowed, or believed.

          You all had free rain when George Bush was in office and you did or didn't do anything to harm the Republicans image, but did all you could to promote it.

          Frankly, I don't think any of that's changed - but what has changed is the American people will not stand for it this time - we will not allow the media pundits, naysayers, so called political minds - convince U.S. of anything."

          • Posted By: Fortunate Fox @ 02/21/2009 6:29:01 PM

            You mean until we get a root cause that suits you.

            The Republicans didn't have "free reign" during the last two years of the Bush administration. The do-nothing democrat controlled congress was (coincidentally) in charge while the econonomy descended into the bind we're in.

            Amazing, you still think this is all Bush and the Republican's fault, with still no mention of Barney Frank or Chris Dodd and other democrats, who most assuredly have their fingerprints all over this mess. You also fail to mention that your lovely democrat congress has a 14 percent approval rating, even lower than the much maligned Bush! Nahhh... the dems had nothing to do whatsoever with where we are! LMAO!

            Do yourself a favor and take your blinders off.

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 02/20/2009 1:53:54 PM

            Ditto. Alvy, this is one of your very best comments.

            • Posted By: Davole @ 02/20/2009 8:01:28 PM

              Hey Alvin -

              Wow, even Miss Congeniality is giving you a back-handed slap masquerading as a compliment with her statement that "this is one of your very best comments"!

              Obviously she doesn't think (no, change that to feel) that the vast repertoire of your other posted drivel has much merit!

          • Posted By: Davole @ 02/20/2009 7:49:02 PM

            Alvin -

            I chuckle when I read your naive comment -"I know President Obama won't be negatively affected by the 24/7 blogging, and his 13 million + email strong army and his 50 million + voters and his 70% approving rating, why because we Americans will not stand the media trying to spin his achievements and his decision - just so they can help the Republicans bring doubt on his abilities".

            First of all - you, like most democrats, tend to rely much more on feelings than on rational thought and reality.
            You have diddly-squat certainty regarding what you are trying to portray as what you "know".

            Secondly, a bloated heavy number of duped supporters does not ensure success - the facts will penetrate and destroy Barack Obama's futile cocoon, and render him defenseless.

            Thirdly, 70 % was Obama's popularity rating one or two weeks ago - it is now teetering at 60 %, and spiraling downward as more taxpayers realize and oppose his reckless spending packages which are bankrupting the nation and meriting votes on non-confidence from the market sectors of the economy.

            Fourthly, and this one's preposterous - you state in your usual bloated rhetoric (I'll par it down to the essentials) that "The media, the GOP ... - will understand that no amount of ... media scrutiny will be allowed, or believed".
            Great shades of Stalin - now that definitely exposes Barack Obama's pathetic vulnerability in which he has to resort to Stalinist censorship and intimidation to protect his evident frailty.

            Lastly, no one has to "bring doubt on his abilities" - Barack Obama masterfully manages to do that by his daily succession of demonstrated inadequacies!

      • Posted By: brydges @ 02/17/2009 11:13:29 AM

        Here's how we got here. Educate yourself before you critque some one

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU

        • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/17/2009 4:02:57 PM

          Watch a youtube blurb from an angry blogger person who doesn't seem to be cognizant of the last 8 years? Nah.
          I know why and so do you. Burnt brydge just wants to cause trouble trying to get someone to bite into his stupid.

          Point is my sobbing friend, your party leader made a lot of mistakes both war and economy, and you're trying to blame the other party for it. Sadly there is no party that is going to get us out of this any time soon. But it is interesting to watch you squirm, blame - and like Davvy - don't offer any solution except - Down with Obama. Cute.

          • Posted By: Fortunate Fox @ 02/17/2009 10:21:58 PM

            You actually believe Bush and the Republicans are solely responsible for the economic mess we're in, and of course, the democrats are flawless! LMAO!

            At least brydegs had an answer.. And you? Childish, senseless bullshit and drivel.

            • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:04:31 AM

              Actually; I asked what their answer was, then said stop whining. Can't you read?
              Reps, Dems - same thing until there actually is a change.

              But you sir, like the others, you're not that objective - or bright.
              LMAOT

              • Posted By: Fortunate Fox @ 02/21/2009 6:14:01 PM

                Yes, I can read. Can you remember what the hell you wrote? The post I commented on was your response to Brydges youtube reference. Your reply didn't pose a question, only your obvious fear of looking at a solution. Then you went on to call Bush on his economic mistakes, but no mention of the democrats who were right in there with him with Fan/Fred. You also don't know that Bush took reform legislation to congress trying to curb asinine lending practices, which could have averted much of the mess we're in. Them dems scoffed at such an idea. You also fail to mention the number dems that wanted to remove Hussein, even before Bush took office. Yes, they had their hand in Iraq too.

                Take a memory lesson... then stop turning your nose up at where the fault actually lies.



          • Posted By: brydges @ 02/19/2009 1:14:05 PM

            Alvy - Waa my messiah failed me Waa. Blame Bush for all my inadequacies Waa.

            How can you claim to have an argument when your afraid to hear the other point of view. It's sad, week minded, sheepish people like you that are too driven by hate to see the truth, that got us where we are

            • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:29:02 AM

              Never been called sheepish. Then again, I'm not dumb enough to call someone Messiah either. Kinda points out who you are in the grand scheme eh? Listening is one thing, being bombarded by unsupportive naysayers is quite another.

              Poor rep. Isn't it funny how some people forget why we're here?

      • Posted By: Davole @ 02/18/2009 12:18:45 AM

        Alvin -

        So this is the cavern to which you scampered after you asked me to answer several questions on a previous Newsweek thread. I answered those questions extensively, and you obviously either avoided reading them, or else you just "headed for the hills," in order to avoid having to think of a reply. Very grade-schoolish of you!

        You want to know my proposed solution to the economic collapse - Barack Obama should have proposed a stimulus package which only contained measures to immediately stimulate the economy now, in 2009, instead of including a vast number of PORK expenditures which would not occur until 2010 and 2012, coincidentally just before scheduled elections.

        Now do you have anything relevant to say, or will you merely resume your milktoast behaviour by fleeing to another Newsweek topic and climbing onto your soapbox to resume your juvenile accusations and finger pointing?

        By the way - say hello for me to Simon and Theodore - they were the real intelligent and class act portion of your trio!

        • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:24:26 AM

          Too bad Dav's. You missed the perception part.
          So, your "solution" is do it all now and tailor 2010-2012?

          I'm not the soapbox blogger Davster - writing 50 paragraphs complete with "I know Obama better than you" blather.
          I merely said give it time instead of knee-jerk reaction, stupid insults regarding your president, and vague, undetailed "this is what I'd do" ranting.... Emphasis on jerk. Or stupid.

          Anyone can critique Dav-man. That's easy. Most can't offer real solutions. Errrr... propose a package which will immediately stimulate errrr - is kinda common sense Davmeister.

          Typically, I said finger-pointing first, then you followed - sort of like Nahh-na-nan-na isn't it? Difference is - I point out how useless your rants are - and you point out Obama should think like you and the world's problems will be solved.

          Kinda makes you oh...
          ...boring and angry.

          If I were to offer a solution like you I'd say.
          Only the duh, known duh, good things in a stimulus package should happen, duh, and not the bad things - duh. And duh, we shouldn't try new things duh, because people like me will shoot them down duh, before they have a chance to move the plotter. Duh.

          Emphasis on duh.
          I think I'll wait to see if the smart guys plan works - then call him names if it doesn't.
          If it does work, I'll be happy and still won't act like a pushy moron.

          Hey Davster, should I call you milk-toast now so we can be simpatico old man?

          • Posted By: Davole @ 02/20/2009 8:55:43 PM

            Alvin -

            Cut your usual monotonous chipmunk chatter and say something intelligent, or at least something vaguely approaching it.

            Yes, I do believe that a true Stimulus Proposal, as opposed to a Porkulus Package, should be timely and immediate, as opposed to an omnibus bill enabling non-stimulus expenditures which would not ???kick in??? until 2010 and 2012, just before the next round of scheduled elections.

            The marketplace has usually corrected previous recessions within a year, but I do admit that Obama???s Recession is definitely gigantic.

            Would you care to explain how allocating 30 million dollars to protect the habitat of a field mouse in Nancy Pelosi???s district, 300 million for condoms to be distributed abroad, and several hundred million for a back woods vehicle trail would successfully stimulate the economy?

            Also, since you???ve got all the answers, why doesn???t Barack Obama delay the expenditures slated for 2010 and 2012, and introduce them later as yearly budget proposals, thereby allowing them to be discussed and debated?

            Would the reason be that he has never, as a politician, had to propose a budget, state an expected financial total for those expenditures, and later be scrutinized and exposed for his expected gross overspending? If that???s the case, I can appreciate why he would dread having to do so in a presidential capacity. Yes, he???s still frantically groping for that darn evasive ???present button??? that he wore out as an Illinois senator.

            I won???t even bother to try to make any sense out of the remainder of your drivel.

            From the content of your rants, it appears as though you think (if you are capable of doing that) that the purpose of your highschool is to provide a convenient place for you to get ???high???!

            ???Lay off??? the mind altering drugs, although it might already be too late for recovery in your distorted case.

            From the flaky content of your rants, you appear to be one of the sulking cadre of antisocial malcontents who lurk aimlessly in the school stairwells and washrooms, instead of bothering to actually attend classes to gain an education.

            And on the rare occasion when you would actually bother to attend a class, I suspect that you merely hid at the back of the class, and lobbed spit-balls at the competent students whenever your teacher???s back was turned.

            I wouldn???t be surprised that your only accomplishment so far in school was to stick some stale gum under your desk when the teacher wasn???t looking.

      • Posted By: Davole @ 02/20/2009 6:56:29 PM

        Alvin -

        If you and Barack Obama don't know "how we got here", it's only logical to assume that you don't know how to get out.

        That, in simple terms which even you should be able to understand, reveals how ridiculous Barack Obama is for having foisted a Porkulus Package under the guise of a Stimulus Package on the American taxpayer, his and her children, their grandchildren, and their children.

      • Posted By: John Dough @ 02/18/2009 8:25:24 PM

        My solution was to not do the stimulus package because it will not work. If they were intent on doing it then I would have suspended income and corporatios taxes for 3 months freeing up billions oof dollars to spend and iand ibvest. Also when people see how much they have in income minus federal taxes they'd maybe say it is time to do something about our tax rate. I woulo also reduce our corporate income taxes from 35% too 25% to keep and likely bring jobs back here. All of Obama's talk about corporate welfare is BUNK!!! We have the highest corporate taxes in the world and that is hurting our job status too!!!

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 02/14/2009 1:30:30 PM

    Barack Obama and Rod Blagojevich ....both from Chicago .....both the same kind of politician. CORRUPT !!

    • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/17/2009 10:49:05 AM

      Nutcase in the house.

      • Posted By: Davole @ 02/18/2009 10:02:41 AM

        Alvin -

        Yes, you are the self admitted "nutcase in the house", but we do enjoy your rants, mainly for their humourous naive appeal!

        • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:39:43 AM

          Sorry Davster. I keep forgetting how you and the esteemed Concerned Canuck have the exact same trains of thought. I'm sure we should all fall in line with you.

          Sorry Davs. You're the greatest.

          Sorry.

          You should be president. Only people as open and forward as you can align the masses - and change the perception.
          That song Hero was written about you.

          • Posted By: Davole @ 02/21/2009 2:15:51 PM

            Alvin -

            I'd rather have that song written about me, instead of the song Loser written about you!

  • Posted By: judithod @ 02/21/2009 12:11:19 PM

    This article is right on. Obama was marketed extremely well by Axelrod and company to Americans fixated on sound bites and celebrities. Never mind that Obama had a cloaked personal history, had played the sleazy Chicago political game well, and had no significant accomplishments on behalf of others but had three on behalf of himself--two autobiographies and the Harvard Law Review presidency. Never mind that Obama is continuing to prove that he's only a "theatrical presence" as marked by his absences from the Oval Office in favor of stumping around in Air Force One. So far as president, he's all voice, pauses, and hand gestures but has yet to demonstrate leadership.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 02/17/2009 10:13:33 AM

    How refreshing to read Joseph Epstein's well-written poignant article which explains Barack Obama's disappointments and failures to date.

    I agree with most of his comments, except for his belief that Barack Obama didn't introduce the issue of racial concerns and biases into the election campaign.

    True to the Chicago politicians' handbook, Obama interjected race one day, and then claimed that he didn't the following one. Yes, he walked a tightrope, but he did it successfully. His record in that regard is obvious!

    • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 12:21:37 PM

      Absolutely Davster.
      Right again.
      It was the minority who introduced race, totally ignoring the fact that white voters don't really like that - but he took a chance. Those "He's not like us" "Jesse Jackson" " Messiah" "Doesn't understand us" "Racist Church" "Hates white people" "terrorist" "kill him" "traitor" "that one" - which is a really popular t-shirt now - are well earned by him. I can see why people did the Muslim, flag pin, race-baiter, fear-monger and birth certificate things to him. Shame on him for starting all that hate. And that dead chimp on the street cartoon is accurate, right Dav-man?

      You are the man Davs.
      Our man.

      Please anyone reading this, let's be like Davster. Name your children Davvy to pay him tribute. Only he is smart enough to discern the mixed-race man thought it smart and politically viable to inject race. I'll say it again. Davster is a hero. A man amoungst boys. His opinions should be put into a book and read by all grades 1-12. Who needs Moby Dick, The Scarlet Letter and Catcher In the Rye for required reading when there's Davs.

      Thank you.

      Obama is not that bright spinning up the majority and starting all the hate, and getting the bitter and uninformed involved - just when he needed their vote. I have no idea why he couldn't just be sincere and honorable like McCain and Palin.

      The nerve. Really.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 02/18/2009 1:12:31 AM

    Soaring expectations collide with harsh political realities!

    Yesterday, the anointed one descended from his throne and majestically signed the Porkulus Package!

    And the immediate reaction from the financial sector of the economy -

    Dow Jones Industrial Average - at 7,562.60 points - down 298 points, or 3.79 % decrease.
    - almost the lowest point in a decade.

    Standard & Poor's 500-Stock Index - at 789.17 points - down 37.67 points, or 4.5 % decrease.

    Nasdaq Composite Index - at 1,470.66 points - down 63.70 points, or 4.1 % decrease.

    The downward spiral came as President Obama signed the trillion dollar economic stimulus package and executives at General Motors and Chrysler prepared to submit major restructuring plans to the U.S. government after receiving billions in bailout money.

    This expenditure for the current American taxpayers, their children, their grandchildren, and their grandchildrens??? children hopefully will create immediate employment at the American mint.

    If you remember, during the election campaign, Barack Obama whined that he did not look like any of the presidents pictured on the various American bank notes.

    Maybe now is the time, in recognition of his great accomplishments, and since almost a trillion dollars needs to be printed to finance the Porkulus Package, for the government to issue a new three dollar bill, and to slap Barack Obama???s mugshot on the front side, along with Nancy Pelosi???s behind on the back side.

    • Posted By: Alvy @ 02/20/2009 10:42:43 AM

      Anointed One?

      Good God Dav-man, I think you figured it out. Only those who have the acorns to call him that should be regarded as fair. From now on, I'm only going to read your posts until we are all in agreement that you are the Annoyed One. Oops Anointed.

      As it should be.

  • Posted By: cip1735 @ 02/20/2009 9:12:26 AM

    I giggled my way through my oatmeal this morning. I enjoyed this so much I've printed it and copied and am mailing to friends and relative without computer access. It's circulating in our office even now, and there are "Amens", laughing and "Terrifics" being heard.
    This is the best thing I've read in about 6 months of Newsweek. I had decided to let my subscription go at renewal time because you have become so "left leaning" and liberal, I can hardly stomach it. Finally, some realistic observations of the "Man Who Would be King" (by his own estimation only).
    Keep a clear head and fresh eyes on the new President. He's only human and therfore subject to "over estimating" himself. We shall all see that soon enough. This article bears it out.

  • Posted By: stereocilia @ 02/19/2009 6:29:01 PM

    Your article was so boring I had to flip to the cover to make sure I wasn't reading Time magazine. You sound like a jaded high school kid taking about "disappointment and politics".

  • Posted By: markgrogers @ 02/19/2009 10:55:06 AM

    At least Epstein shows his true colors up-front: his negativity is so strong, he votes for McCain, but then ??????woke feeling glad he lost???. The rest of his rant is imbued with more negativity- and distortions. Obama is trying to bring the change and hope he promised. Most Americans see it, giving Obama approval ratings nearing 70%. Yet Epstein suggests that Obama has, ???failed abysmally??? in displaying a strength and bring calm to the country.

    No one is perfect. Obama has stated again and again that there may be missteps or even dead ends. But he IS moving forward and trying to right what is wrong with our economy and our country. It???s been just over a month, and already there have been significant strides made in job creation and help for Americans in mortgage trouble. And by and large, Americans are noticing. Yet Epstein wants readers to believe that because Tom Daschle didn???t declare his free chauffeur and car as income, that Obama???s presidency is disappointing and failing.

    Thankfully, at least two-thirds of Americans don???t share Epstein???s rancor. Perhaps the alternate universe of his ???Chicagoland??? is a dark and negative place where failure looms and hope is squashed by any small imperfection, but he may find himself increasingly alone there. The rest of us have hope, and we can see that Obama is trying, albeit imperfectly to deliver what he promised.

    Newsweek should send Epstein back to writing about dead dancers, where his negativity can flourish- in the past.

  • Posted By: achilli @ 02/18/2009 10:11:50 PM

    "Epstein is the author, most recently, of ???Fred Astaire??? (Yale University Press)."

    Why, when a columnist accuses a Democratic president (who has been in office not quite 30 days) of incompetence, don't we deserve to know more about the columnist than his most recent book - like the fact that he's a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard and a long-time bete-noire of progressives? Why, Newsweek?

  • Posted By: emnri @ 02/16/2009 4:55:43 PM

    Is there some reason why I would care whether a Republican who voted for McCain (i.e., Epstein) is disappointed in Obama after an entire three weeks of his presidency? Epstein must have been desperate for something to write about this week, so he slams Obama with all the garbage he can muster. What a joke!!

    Please inform Mr. Epstein that the vast majority of us Democrats (and most Americans, if we are to believe the polls) are quite satisfied with Obama's performance thus far, especially in the face of unprecedented crises that would have made McCain/Palin throw in the towel and go home.

    I am particularly incensed at Epstein's claim that Obama has failed to be bipartisan in his approach to the stimulus. The reality is that Republicans know how to act only in lock-step and will never cede one inch of credit to anything Obama does as president. In fact, most of us who voted for Obama wish he would put his pledge of bipartisanship on the back burner while he does what is best for the country. Since Republicans care nothing about what is best for the country, they will never join us in common cause, so why bother with them?? Obama was exactly right when he reminded the right-wing that he won and that their tired, failed policies have been soundly rejected by the American people.

    As someone remarked recently, "not all conservatives are stupid people, but all stupid people are conservatives." Whichever--or both--of those categories Mr. Epstein fits into, please tell him that no one cares about his shattered dreams of the Obama presidency. We're doing just fine, thank you, and we don't need you to bring us down with your self-righteous "disappointment."

    May God save this country from the Republican Party!!

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 02/18/2009 8:46:54 PM

      Both that statement is bipartisian alright. We won so shove it? Bipartisian to democrats means going along with them and never questioning them. Bipartisianship to republicans can only be a pipe dream because democrats are never bipartisian.

      Obama was exactly right when he reminded the right-wing that he won and that their tired, failed policies have been soundly rejected by the American people.

      As someone remarked recently, "not all conservatives are stupid people, but all stupid people are conservatives."

      • Posted By: Tabi @ 02/18/2009 9:45:28 PM

        Unfortunately, Obama has decided to turn to the tired and failed policies of LBJ.

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 02/18/2009 8:41:45 PM

      No matter what you think John Mc Cain endured more hell in Vietnam then Obama will endure in his life. Mc Cain is not and never will be a quitter. Save your criticism for your own party you are going to need it.

  • Posted By: brownalex @ 02/14/2009 5:19:56 PM

    As we remember and honor Lincoln, we appreciate Obama's style of leadership and values which remind us of his role model. I wonder why cannot the Republicans use Lincoln as their role model. Why must they always stick to the base of partisanship and break up all efforts which Obama makes to create unity ? A leader who sincerely wants to help the majority of the American people, should not have to court the wealthy 10% and their greed in order to gain approval for programs which everybody who is a good American should support.

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 02/18/2009 8:37:22 PM

      Lincoln was a republican in case you did not know.

    • Posted By: brydges @ 02/16/2009 1:59:23 PM

      what coler is the sky in your world? Oh it's probably hard tio tell with your head so far up your own a**

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 02/17/2009 8:00:53 PM

    Pat Robertson on Desiring the New President of the USA to Succeeds, Opposed to Failing, Unlike Rush Limbaugh...

    Robertson implies that it is [[Un-Patriotic]] for an American Citizen to Wish Failure for it's President...

    I Agree [[100%]]

    In an interview with U.S. News & World Report...

    Conservative Christian Leader [[Pat Robertson]] Denounced talk show host Rush Limbaugh for saying he wants President Obama to Fail.

    "So you don't subscribe to Rush Limbaugh's "I hope he fails" school of thought?" asked interviewer Dan Gilgoff.

    "That was a terrible thing to say," Robertson responded. "I mean, he's the President of all the Country. If he Succeeds, the Country Succeeds. And if he doesn't, it hurts Us All. Anybody who would Pull Against Our President is not exactly [[Thinking Rationally]]."

    After the election, Robertson pronounced himself "remarkably pleased" with Obama and not so happy with President Bush. Robertson told Gilgoff that Obama hasn't been "as skillful" since taking office but that he wants "to give him the benefit of every doubt, and I definitely hope he Succeeds."

    Limbaugh has Repeatedly Expressed his Desire to Obama -- and the Stimulus Package -- to Fail.

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 02/18/2009 8:31:17 PM

      That is not what Limbaugh said. Although I dont' watch or listen to him i saw that interviw. What Limbaugh said was the he wanted Obama to fail if it meant we would ecome a socialist nation. He did not say he wanted hoim too fail only any attempt to socialize oour nation.

  • Posted By: MichaelX @ 02/18/2009 9:48:37 AM

    Anyone notice that we, the people have not recieved any "stimulus" and certainly the only "change" we see is only of the guards in the new regime. Funny, it's still the same ones! We have not been asked what to do, because they are too busy covering their own asses and making arrangements for their cronies to keep getting richer.
    Obama's open trough is a blatant slap in the face to Americans, as we watch America sold out to foriegn investors.
    Oh yeah, what is with all those huge ears?

    • Posted By: Jack999 @ 02/18/2009 4:25:53 PM

      http://www.govteconomicstimulus.com/about-me/david-brown/

  • Posted By: readyfornewleadership @ 02/18/2009 11:22:45 AM

    For someone who woke up on November 5th glad that Obama won - even though you voted for McCain - (something wrong with that picture) you seem gleeful about Obama's supposed failings in less than a month in office. Lighten up! Chicagoans know who they are for, even if it is for cynical reasons.

    • Posted By: kkhan @ 02/18/2009 11:46:03 AM

      Wrong - I gave him full credit for his achievements as a normal politician. That's what he is & always will be, not the Mr. Fix it as others perceived him to be. Didn't vote for Mc Cain either.

  • Posted By: kkhan @ 02/18/2009 10:44:40 AM

    What did the American nation expect from Obama - once nominated & elected President, he threw away the magic wand. The man is one hell of a LUCKY NORMAL POLITICIAN. It's the name of the game - PROMISES. He is no different & he is no genius - but now that he is in, give him a chance to demonstrate that he cannot do what he proclaimed that he ''CAN'' & will do.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse