STARR GAZING

A-Rod’s Turn

Other Yankees have faced this moment. But Alex Rodriguez doesn't appear to have learned from them.

 
PHOTOS
Dope On The Playing Field

Sports Doping Scandals That Shook the World

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

It has become a familiar ritual of spring training in Tampa: a New York Yankees star tries to set the record straight about his use of performance-enhancing drugs. It may be a confession or an apology, or both, or not really either.

Jason Giambi went first, back in 2005. He said "sorry" so many times he wore the word out, but remarkably never said what he was sorry about. (We, of course, already knew because leaked grand-jury transcripts in the BALCO case had revealed that he had used a panoply of illegal drugs.)

Last year was Andy Pettitte's spotlight moment and he detailed his drug use and his regrets for almost an hour and in such revealing and self-lacerating fashion that it was almost more than reporters could bear.

But now those seem like off-off-Broadway productions. This year, after revelations that he took steroids during three seasons with the Texas Rangers, it was Alex Rodriguez's turn for a center-stage solo. And like almost every public moment involving A-Rod, it was remarkable. Most remarkable was how he failed to admit any true wrongdoing, was decidedly short on the apologies and, ultimately, made his misadventures the centerpiece of a plea for every kid to go to college in order to get a chance to grow up.

You see, Alex, sadly, never went to college with "an opportunity to grow up at my own pace." As a teen he passed on a University of Miami scholarship to sign with the Seattle Mariners on his way to becoming the highest-paid player in baseball history. Never mind that he was already in his mid-20s when he jumped to the Rangers and says he began to use steroids. During those three seasons in Texas, when he was injected with a substance that, in 2003, resulted in a positive test for a banned substance, he was "young," "naive," "an idiot," "ignorant," "irresponsible," but apparently not—in his own mind then or now—a cheat.

Rodriguez offered some new details, however sketchy, of his … I guess he'd prefer we call it a "stupid mistake." He said a cousin, whom he chose not to identify, obtained an over-the-counter drug in the Dominican Republic—one reputed to provide an "energy boost." The same cousin, according to Rodriguez, would inject him with it a couple of times every six months. A-Rod insists he never knew exactly what he was taking, exactly how he should take it, what effect it had or whether it was illegal. His only acknowledgement that he had an inkling that he'd crossed some line was his wink-and-a-nod remark: "I knew we weren't taking Tic Tacs."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Celtia @ 02/19/2009 8:36:35 AM

    owlcroft: What you're saying is that because steroids supposedly don't help in the game, we should overlook the sins of the players who use them. The flaw in your thinking is that what the law punishes, along with criminal acts, is intent, and A-Roid's intent was to cheat. In this case, whether the drugs he used actually helped his game is immaterial. His intent was to violate the rules of the game for his own advantage, and to lie repeatedly about it, so he is guilty of a punishable offense.

  • Posted By: Celtia @ 02/19/2009 8:31:49 AM

    This guy has yet to be honest about what he's done. He'll only tell enough to look contrite and sorry, but his chief concern is his image, not his character. I'm not even sure he has character. What makes me angriest about this whole debacle is that he accused the female SI writer of being a "stalker". Typical -- if a woman calls a man to account for his behavior, she must be either a nut or a slut. He's apologized for that, but the the damage is done. Obviously, this man's behavior -- making false accusations of stalking against a female reporter, cheating on and lying to his wife -- indicates a serious issue with women. I will never be able to think of A-Roid as anything other than a cheating misogynyst. I hope he gets harassed wherever he plays...especially by women.

  • Posted By: owlcroft @ 02/18/2009 7:03:39 PM

    Clown guns, that's what all this is about. You know: those toys that look like guns, but when the trigger is pulled fire, instead of a bullet, a litle flag saying "Bang!" Sure, Rodriguez and who knows how many others used various PEDs--but why does everyone accept, as an axoiom, that those substances really produce on-field results in baseball? Rhetorical question: they do so because they--whether fans, sports writers, politicians, or executives--have never made the least effort to check the scientific literature on the matter, preferring to let that well-known research physician George Mitchell do all their thinking for them.

    Numerous sources (notably the web site "Steroids, Other 'Drugs', and Baseball", http://steroids-and-baseball.com/) present the facts from the medical and scientific literature; it is hard to look at those facts and see PEDs as anything but a clown gun (at least in baseball). So for what, and how, and to what degree, do we attach opprobium or punish people for going around and firing off clown guns?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
POSTER
Yes He Did

DOPE: Check out our A-Rod poster.