SPONSORED BY:
Illustration by Zohar Lazar for Newsweek
JUSTICE

Men Will Be Men

When guys lose jobs, the TV, den and gym win. Women? Sex? Not so much.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Bankers no longer buying bottle service? Laid-off construction workers unable to summon the swagger to whistle at a pretty girl? Urban tales of the emasculating effects of unemployment in a society that still measures men by their bank accounts are perennial. But that doesn't explain the recent media frenzy over Dating a Banker Anonymous (DABA)— a blog where the female partners of Wall Street warriors ostensibly vent about how the economic meltdown has morphed their men into "emotional train wrecks," deflating their sex lives along with the Dow. As co-founder Laney Crowell admits, the site was a "joke" in which the rants were in fact amped-up parodies, snookering readers because they echoed an emerging bit of conventional wisdom: that this recession is messing with men's heads.

Most guys still derive the bulk of their self-esteem from work, psychologists say, which makes the latest unemployment data ominous for the male ego: of the 3.6 million people canned since the downturn began in December 2007, more than four fifths have been men. Women are poised, for the first time in history, to become the bulk of the labor force, while fewer than seven in 10 men over the age of 20 are employed at all—the lowest number since World War II, says Heather Boushey, an economist at the Center for American Progress.

That's the bad news. The worse news is that despite stories (in the New York Post, Advertising Age, and The New York Times, among other publications) that some men are embracing new roles as diaper changers and domestic engineers, the fall in workplace testosterone is unlikely to lead to a decline in the kinds of behavior usually associated with boom-time male hormones. That's because the fundamentals of American manhood have gone remarkably unchanged over the last century. Sure, we men today may be taking care of our kids, our skin and our feelings more than Grandpa Ralph ever did, but we still grapple with the same core problem: proving that we weren't just born male—we've become Men. And during economic crises, men humiliated by their loss of work often compensate by reasserting their worst hypermasculine impulses—doubling down on old alpha-male stereotypes, rather than happily baking the bread that women now win in the workplace.

Let's start with the myth of the new diaper daddies. The American Time Use Survey shows that in fact laid-off men tend to do less—not more—housework, eating up their extra hours snacking, sleeping and channel surfing (which might be why the Cartoon Network, whose audience has grown by 10 percent during the downturn, is now running more ads for refrigerator repair school). Unemployed women, in contrast, spend twice as much time taking care of children and doing chores. Nor do former working stiffs necessarily reconnect with their families: following alcoholics and drug addicts, they're the most likely demographic to beat their female partners.

But if we look behind us, male misbehavior during recessions shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, as American men have responded to layoffs with consistency through the years: seeking solace in the bottle, railing against women, walling themselves away in all-male enclaves and searching for vicarious achievement through sports and popular culture. During the first three decades of the 20th century, for instance, when thousands of men lost their jobs in a series of recessions and many more found themselves crowded by a new breed of fast-talking, cigarette-smoking gals around the office, the male reaction was typical.

According to "Manhood in America," sociologist Michael Kimmel's history of masculinity under trial, big-city saloons flourished, despite flooding the market with more than one taproom per 200 residents, while bookstores overflowed with guy-friendly tales of the mythical lumberjack Paul Bunyan (1910) and the new adventures of Tarzan of the Apes (1912). Men also carved out their own new space in the house, christening "the den" around 1905 in the depths of another 20-something-month economic meltdown. Meanwhile, rather than extend a hand to the fairer sex, men blamed women for their professional woes. Author Norman Cousins even offered a straightforward, albeit ridiculous, solution to the Great Depression: remove the silk-kneed imports. "Simply fire the women, who shouldn't be working anyway, and hire the men," he advised. When that didn't happen—women were paid far less than men—many laid-off men went to the gym—which was good news for Angelo Siciliano, a.k.a. Charles Atlas, who opened his first training center in 1927. By 1942, Atlas Bodybuilding was the most successful mail-order business in U.S. history thanks to men who pumped their bodies as their egos deflated.

So how do we break this cycle of sitcom behavior? A good first step would be for men to stop defining masculinity in market terms—and for women to feel comfortable with that. As the DABA girls suggested, laid-off men are often less sexy to their female counterparts. During the Depression, one study found that almost 60 percent of men experienced a chilling effect on their conjugal relations. "When money goes, love flies out of the window," said one man. Of course, not everyone is losing in this shifting male landscape. PornHub.com now has more monthly traffic than Fox News.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: albyonfloats @ 03/18/2009 4:31:14 PM

    Nice generalizations everyone. It's nice to see us set aside our differences in favor of name-calling and gender discrimination. That'll fix everything. Here's a thought. The author is just selling sensationalized ideas to stir up controversy. Perhaps to serve his own agenda? Believe the guy or don't believe the guy, but if you have a legitimate point, it only looks weak when you have to resort to name calling in the process of making it. Make your point and save the name-calling for the playgrounds. At least if you did it there, no one would be surprised.

  • Posted By: Orientdan @ 03/12/2009 8:12:58 AM

    This is just a nasty attack on the thousands of American men who have lost their jobs because of the greed and carelessness of the rich bosses.
    Unemployed men hit the bottle, beat up their wives and lay around doing nothing while their poor wives slave away looking after the children and doing the housework. What a bunch of nasty misandrist bile!
    You would think during this time of financial crises some people would have more sympathy. I cannot believe you as a man would write such a thing. Actually I can as you sound like one of those wet men who have been brainwashed by the man hating feminist lobby into believing you and all other men are the scum of the earth and the cause of all the world's problems.

  • Posted By: LanceSmith @ 03/11/2009 9:00:29 PM

    Actually, as discussed at GlennSacks.com, you piece is full of lies and half-truths. The question I have for the author: why do you hate yourself and your gender so much that you must make up lies to make yourself feel better? Or is this simply a way for you to sell you column?

    In terms of your so-called statistics from the BLS, you have to do is go to pages 19 and 20 of the survey and look at the numbers. They show quite clearly that unemployed men devote more time to Household Activities, Purchasing Goods and Services and Caring For a Household Member than do their employed counterparts. Also according to the BLS, unemployed women spend about 90 minutes per day more on those activities than do employed women. That's a little less than a 50% increase. Unemployed men increase their household chore time about 39%. Considering these men are newly unemployed and most likely depressed, that's pretty good!

    You should also note that It turns out that women too spend more time "snacking, sleeping and channel surfing" when they're out of work than when they're working. About 16% more actually. Another key note from glennsacks:

    And there's a growing body of social science that says that mothers - again strongly encouraged by popular culture - tend to see the household as their proper sphere of influence. To maintain that influence, they act as gatekeepers of male involvement. The predictable result is that many men simply opt out, and many women prefer it that way.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now