SPONSORED BY:
HEALTH

Six Top Vaccine Myths

A pediatrician debunks the most common misconceptions about childhood immunizations.

 
GRAPHIC
Autism Timeline

Tracking a vexing and mysterious disorder

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Hours after a baby is born, her parents are told it's best that she receive her first shot before she leaves the hospital. And that's just the beginning. By the child's sixth birthday, she'll have had at least 35 vaccinations—if she goes by government recommendations. Meanwhile, during those six years, her parents are likely to see hundreds of media reports and online message-board debates about which vaccines are necessary or even safe. It's confusing, to say the least.

To sort through the onslaught of information and misinformation about childhood immunizations, we asked Austin, Texas-based pediatrician Ari Brown, coauthor of "Baby 411: Clear Answers and Smart Advice for your Baby's First Year," to debunk some of the most common vaccination myths.

Myth 1: It's not necessary to vaccinate kids against diseases that have been largely eradicated in the United States.
Reality: Although some diseases like polio and diphtheria aren't often seen in America (in large part because of the success of the vaccination efforts), they can be quite common in other parts of the world. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that travelers can unknowingly bring these diseases into the United States, and if we were not protected by vaccinations, these diseases could quickly spread throughout the population. At the same time, the relatively few cases currently in the U.S. could very quickly become tens or hundreds of thousands of cases without the protection we get from vaccines. Brown warns that these diseases haven't disappeared, "they are merely smoldering under the surface."

Most parents do follow government recommendations: U.S. national immunization rates are high, ranging from 85 percent to 93 percent, depending on the vaccine, according to the CDC. But according to a 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the 20 states that allow personal-belief opt outs in addition to religious exemptions saw exemptions grow by 61 percent, to 2.54 percent between 1991 and 2004.

Brown is concerned that parents who opt out or stagger the vaccine schedule can end up having to deal with confusing follow-up care, which could produce an increase in disease outbreaks like last summer's measles epidemic. A 2008 study in the American Journal of Epidemiology reported that when there are more exemptions, children are at an increased risk of contracting and transmitting vaccine-preventable diseases.

For more on the pros and cons of staggering or skipping vaccinations, visit MSN's guide or read this U.S. News and World Report piece. For information on vaccine safety, check out the CDC’s information page. To search for your state's vaccine requirements, see the National Network for Immunization Information.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: wvrealitychecker @ 05/28/2009 2:16:39 PM

    Not sure what court you are talking about it being "proven" in - ( see http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/news/20090212/vaccine-court-rejects-autism-claims ) but the fact is that vaccines have saved millions of lives and continue to every day. If you find this article "offensive" then I suggest you stop reading articles in general. The article states what are facts, and not emotional rantings ("when they gave him the vaccine I could see him losing his sole in his eyes) of a person wanting to develop some understanding for what has happened in their life. In our day and age we are mobile coming in to contact with people across the globe. What we vaccinate for others don't and they bring it to our shores. While I feel for those with autistic children they should spend their time looking for cures and not blame.

  • Posted By: vaxinjuredchld @ 03/19/2009 12:55:37 PM

    I have never read anything so contraversial in my life! beeing the mother of a vaccine injured child (proven in vaccine court) i find this artilce highly offensive and misleading. Lets just be honest for once in our lives people. A simple statement is all that is needed. Vaccines are for the most part safe. They do however on rare occasions cause serious, long term side effects and sometimes even death. but is this does happen to you the government is there to help. There is a fund called the Vaccine injury compensation program. If you are injured they can help. Get yourself a good Lawyer and they will take care of the rest.

  • Posted By: kitiaran @ 03/09/2009 2:00:25 PM

    My concern about this is still that its only been done for a generation or two and we still dont know all the long term effects!! human bodies are made to fight diseases and become stronger because of it!! do we fully understand whether they will affect our daughters ability to pass on her immunities to her child. What if something happens and we cant provide immunizations to the next generation, will they still develop immunities naturally? Humanity is great at messing with things that happen naturally then saying oops!!!! the body did that better without us!! Naturally is usually the best way!! I did immunize my children, because of school and daycare I had no choice but am still not comfortable with the idea.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now