Isn't it interesting how this article mentions 2 Republican First Ladies as being queen like and a Democrat First Lady as being regal. And then of course it couldn't help but slam one of our most elegant and loyal First Ladies, Laura Bush, (R) for spending money on China even tho' adding, begrudgingly I'm sure, that the money was donated to pay for it. No mention of the bossy, angry and foul-mouthed democrat Hilary Clinton and other democrat First Ladies that I'm sure were real "winners." From what I've read about Michelle, she has been described as a shrew (presumably by her own husband) and wearing the "pants in the family." I guess we'll just have to wait and see how she turns out to be in her four years in "The House." Really, the House? How dare they, how dare this woman try to change things so fast to make our national treasure, The White House, which the American people own I might add, diverse just so she can bring along her own agenda. But we must have Mexican, Asian, Am. Indian, Afro-American artists. Not just plain artists and not just plain Americans. Yes this is diversity at it's worst. This woman is a racist as are her bosses. The House is called the White House because of the color it is PAINTED!!! Good Grief! What an abomination, and I pray dear God, that they are only able to destroy the White House for four years instead of 8. The Clintons, the Shrew and the Screw, had 8 long years to destroy the White House and did. If Ms. Rogers cares about image, maybe she should help Michelle soften her approach and not go telling school children that when in school and would speak she was told she sounded like a white person. Is that a bad thing, Michelle? Yep, it's going to be a long 4 years with this racist family and staff in the WHITE HOUSE!!!









Discuss