Politics Takes a Right Turn in Jerusalem

Just read Netanyahu's plan on how to attack Iran: www.olivetreenews.com

As the Wall Street Journal wrote on May 6th,
"For reasons both telling and mysterious, Israel has become unpopular among that segment of public opinion that calls itself progressive. This is the same progressive segment that believes in women's rights, gay rights, the rights to a fair trial and to appeal, freedom of speech and conscience, judicial checks on parliamentary authority. These are rights that exist in Israel and nowhere else in the Middle East. So why is it that the country that is most sympathetic to progressive values gets the least of progressive sympathies?"

it is therefore very strange that, because of their rabid anti Israel views, these progressives have turned into apologists for Islamic fundamentalists (such as hamas and hezbollah) who loath and despise every progressive belief that these folks hold dear.

if peace were ever to exist, palestine or even worse the "one state solution" (which would result in the demographic destruction of the state of israel) would be just another arab cesspool, where women are despised and oppressed, other religions disrespected (and forbidden) and gay people murdered.

in Israel gay marriage is already recognized and NOW,
Overseas adoptions by gay couples get OK from Israel
United Press International (4/25)

To support the Palestinian Cause is to be anti women, anti gay and anti democracy.

Finally, To focus so much attention on the Palestinians at the expense of the genocide in Darfur (Muslim killing Muslim), the Muslim on Muslim violence in Iraq, the executions of Muslim gay teens in Iran, the violence towards women in Iran--(just for showing their hair), the sentences of stoning or beatings for rape victims in both Nigeria and Saudi Arabia (where woman are also forbidden to drive), The burning to death of young girls in a school in Saudi Arabia, as the religious police would not allow male fireman to save them, because the girls were not wearing their burkahs, the epidemic of honor killings by brothers and fathers of young girls in both Britain, Canada and Turkey is not only morally reprehensible but indefensible.

Peace is not just a means of international diplomacy, but should be an international "principle". Every individual living in the world should internalize this simple rule; so do states. As for states, It sounds much more difficult and complex to agree with this; but at least each and every state must take a step forward to achieve this most humanitarian goal. We, as today's people, should fill in the history books of the future with what we have done for peace; not with what battles we have made. That means, we should also change the language of our official history.

Let's do something for peace wherever we are. RIP_ Rest In Peace_; we want to live in peace "LIP"....

Netanyahu or any of the other Parties in Israel have ever been interested inpeace what they want to do and continue to do is expansion into to Gaza and the West Bank.

Infact the Israelis have continued to find reasons not to settle their difference, the idea that what is claimed by the Israelis that Iran said about them being off the may is a lie and propaganda. The conflict is not with Iran it's with the Palestinians who want peace, and just ask for them to comply with the 1967 agreement.

The fact that there is rocket attacks is because the Palestinians is firing rockets in what should be their own Land, that the Israelis has built on illegally since 1967, so in fact they are firing on their own Land. The settlements built on Palestinian land they are firing on their own land that the Israelis is occuping and they should move from there and stop the attacks against the Palestinian people.

The Americans should stop providing WMD to these Israelis once and for all, many of us would like peace in the world and as long as this continues it is causing worldwide problems in was of extended Terrorism world wide. These illegal behaviours is becoming a way of demanding what people want from their governments who fail to do what is right and just for the people they claim to govern, as a result is spreading into peacefull societies.

This is not a problem that started yesterday it has beeen on going for the last 60 years, by the Zionist and the Nazis, which started befor the 2nd world war. The jewish people who were put in the camps were gathered to geather to send to Israel to form the state of Israel, by a group of Rich Bankers in America and Hitler was only carring out orders because many did not want to leave Germany. It would be an idea to( Google Jim Condit Hitler and the Jews).

Politics in Israel has unmistakably inclined more towards the right after the election, widening the already near irreparable conflict gap.

One would have long suspected that nothing revolutionary about the Israel-Palestine relationship could come out from Mrs Clinton???s first visit to the Middle-East. She regurgitated what had been said by most of her predecessors, not in their exact words but in the similar context. The rest is history.

Most probably rightist Netanyahu (who often tends to be more rapacious than his fellow lawmakers) will clinch the premiership soon. By then, what has transpired between him and Clinton could turn obsolete. Yet another round of endless deliberations among the parties concerned shall begin.
(Tan Boon Tee)

http://www.coaxialkid.web.officelive.com and www.youtube.com/roiler02

Sadly, what happened in Gaza is an example of what happens when democracy is twisted. Until the Palistineans are willing to elect a government thet is more interested in helping its own people then in attacking Israelis, there will be now end to the conflict. Israel has every right to protect itself, and should continue to do so against terrorist attacks. The response that the international community has to any Israeli action is an abomination. If Mexico was shooting rockets at Texas, I don't think the US would restrain itself for 8 years before responding, and world opinion would be on their side. Israel has the same right to defend her people, and the actions they have taken are fully justified.

I think that that noboby in that area to include Israel knows how to solve their problems. If Hamas throw few rockets, Israel retaliate, the last one backfire again against the Israelis. If its not Hamas and the Palestinians, Jerusalem is the topic. Then it's about the muslims, and the jews, and the christian get caught right in the middle of it. It's a big mess, they know it, and the only way I see the problem can be resolved is that everyone start from the beginning. Let a big war solve that problem.

What a bunch of softball questions the reporter threw up. What about the constantly enllarged settlements? What about the embargo on anything coming in and out of Gaza? What about the discrimination against Israeli Arabs? What about some hard questions?

I think the Israel people have made a mistake. I supported the Israel actions in Gaza because I firmly believed they had a right to defend themselves against Hamas.

But I don't see how a hard-lined stance towards the Palestinian people ias a whole s going to make the situation better. Despite its many failings, I think the previous Israeli Government, with Tzipi Livni taking a lead role, had the right approach. Demostrate to the Palestinians the benefits that come from negotiation and rational discussion. That is what has been happening with Abbas and Fatah - and conditions have improved for the Palestinians on the West Bank. The progress has been slow, but there has been progress. If that progress can be continued, then I think more and more Palestinian people will see the way to peace is through Fatah, not Hamas. That is how you topple Hamas - you are never going to be able to do it from the outside.

I am glad Tzipi Livni refused to join a unity government. It's good to know that she will be there to pick up the pieces when the current path that Israel is headed down proves to be a failure.

I'm glad that Netanyahu came into power to counter this Obamation that is presently a wolf in sheeps clothes. Notice that no one dared talked about his Muslim connection and then the first interview he gives is to their television station. Now he proudly displays his muslim background and connections while sypathizing with those who bomb innocent children. If he doesn't care about the unborn he will most definately not care about those innocence in Israel.....Selah!

''Bibi The Imperialist''

Heh. Imperialism -on-the-half-shell for trying to ''grab''land that wouldn't make a decent WAL-MART parking lot here.
It's all of a piece anyway. Dimbulb American and Euro leftwingers who moan over ''illegal wars'' cheering on illegal wars because it is their guys doing all of the shooting [or rocket-lobbing]. Say this much for the Jews. While everyone else talks the deal to death while allowing the dictators to do their own thing with impunity,Israel acts.
Turned out the Syrians were after a bomb after all. [IAEA Feb 21,2009] That they won't get it is because the IDF turned their ''industrial factory'' into an ash-heap. This will insure that Assad keeps his head down for the time being. Nor should the Iranians get too cocky,as one cannot live too well on a nation made into a sheet of glass,which is what Israels nuclear alchemy would accomplish if Ahmedinjezad gets his bomb and wants to try it out on Tel Aviv.
Better ,all the way around,to wait for events and see which HAMAS bagmen end up with the 900 million that we are cranking out to them.

It seems to me that the most direct consequence of Netanyahu assuming power is that in the age of the Iranian Bomb,Israel will be the most secure state in the middle east. President Imawhackjob and the Mullah's may scream that they will exterminate the Zionist entity if its the last thing they do.Now, they will have no doubt that attacking Israel with their new toy will, indeed, be the last thing they do.

What else does one expect from Netanyahu.... who would accept a "Palestinian State", so long as it was small, helpless and obedient to Israel's will..and of course, conducive to its own population being the eternal "gatherers of wood and drawers of water" for Israel. "Hamas" is not a "partner for peace" he says, and Iran is "committed to wiping Israel off the face of the map". Right. Sure it is. How?

Netanyahu and his political admirers want all the land between the Med and the Jordan River, with as few (and subservient) Arabs as possible. They have already made a two-state solution practically impossible, with a quarter million Israeli "settlers" squatting on the West Bank, and with such destruction and deprivation from the perpetual siege of Gaza that it would take Gazans generations to recover, even were the siege lifted. And it won't be.