SOCIETY

Octomom Hypocrisy

Four reasons Nadya Suleman drives us crazy, and why we're wrong.

By Raina Kelley | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Mar 3, 2009 | Updated: 9:27  a.m. ET Mar 3, 2009

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mysticaltyger @ 09/02/2009 11:15:04 PM

    I think the author of this article has forgotten the old saying "Two wrongs don't make a right" when mentioning lots of people abuse the taxpayers money worse than Nadya Suleman. (i.e. the banks). You can always find a worse example. That doesn't make what Nadya is doing ok.

  • Posted By: PEMALDON@MSN.COM @ 03/04/2009 5:29:55 PM

    You know when you talk about people who take government assistance as being dead beats or con artists, where would they be without it? really if you have children thats a full job in of itself. You people need to get a grip, some of you criticizing right now will the first to stand in line to complain to the government when your unemployment checks run out tomorrow which these days can be anyone of us. Yeah outrage for the mom who is trying to take care of her kids using any means possible is what she must do. Do you really think this was her plan all along? You want to rage against something rage against the those fools who are running this country into the ground and getting rich doing it. The money Nadya may get from the tax payer is very small compared to the trillions those well dressed mansion owning bankers, lenders,wallstreeters who have taken us all for fools. Thats where you outrage should be directed! One of her children maybe the one to turn this nation around you never know unless they are given the chance to survive.

    • Posted By: Fjord83 @ 08/28/2009 2:38:51 PM

      I'm not outraged that she's going to she's gov't for aid to raise her kids, that would be hypocritical of me. I get food stamps to help feed my family because we don't earn enough since I was laid off, what I'm mad about is that she had eight kids to get to celebrity status. Went out of her way to have as many kids as possible just so she could be in the lime light. Being selfish and cruel. Do you think her parents really want to help her raise all those kids?! They already did their parenting. Like I said, she needs to have her kids taken from her and put into loving caring homes.

  • Posted By: nikki dee @ 06/29/2009 10:39:08 AM

    And another thing... don't even begin to try and draw comparisons between the Jon and Kate couple (that's a mother and father household) and this single mom who used donor sperm without the man's permission and with no foreseeable way to provide for them once born. Apples and oranges. Jon is an IT professional and Kate was a nurse before their kids were born. Both respectable occupations in comparison to Nadya's days as a stripper. It's people like you, who make excuses for idiots like Octomom so they never have to own up to the consequences of their actions. The author here is truly a moron.

  • Posted By: nikki dee @ 06/29/2009 10:29:49 AM

    Who wrote this crap article? Stop enabling the irresponsible and start holding them accountable.

  • Posted By: ahapertwin @ 06/18/2009 12:06:06 PM

    Case closed!!! Actually, it's not closed until Childrens Services takes custody, but they sometimes take awhile.

  • Posted By: adfas @ 05/30/2009 6:53:56 PM

    This is the land of the Free last I checked. So lets allow people the freedom to do with their lives as they please. This is a woman that wanted many children. Now she has them. She now also has a house, and a new tv show which will enable her to provide for them. So I dont see why anyone should be upset. It is not you taking care of 14 children it is her. We live in a Free country not a dictatorship. So, my advice Back off let her and her children live their lives. As for the jelous hatred fill bunch that keep ranting about Nadya, a bit of advice: If you dont like her: TURN OFF THE TV, Change the Channel, and stop buying the gossip magazines.

    • Posted By: DFBaer @ 06/07/2009 6:03:45 AM

      Yeah, it's the land of the free. I guess we should be free to endanger the health and well-being of anyone we please. We should have the right to make the taxpayers foot millions of dollars worth of medical bills because of our stupidity, narcissism, and greed, shouldn't we. Come to think of it, if we have the right to be happy, and if being serial killers makes us happy, then we have the right to murder, too. And while NS may be in the money now, neither she nor her brats will be able to make it for long on the media gravy train. The whole nasty bunch are becoming less interesting to the public all the time. That ugly witch won't be in the limelight long because she's too despicable and unlikable, even for the American public. Responsible people despise her, and most of the little bit of support she's getting is coming straight from her camp. Czech is an old hand at planting his propaganda on the internet, and these semi-literate letters are the handiwork of his minions.

  • Posted By: nikki_r_smith @ 06/06/2009 7:16:36 PM

    Every single mother has a problem supporting a child, let alone 14! Give the woman a break! Whose going to make the childrens lives harder? Their molther or the media? I think everyone should leave the family and the donor alone!

  • Posted By: ahapertwin @ 06/06/2009 11:21:57 AM

    let's allow people the freedom to do with their children's lives as they please also. Children are collateral, right? If we want to use our children just to get attention, we have that right too!!!

  • Posted By: ahapertwin @ 05/28/2009 2:43:44 PM

    Perhaps octomom's mom should have used birth control.

  • Posted By: PerryW @ 05/14/2009 8:47:06 AM

    Ridiculous piece of writing. Surely Kelley realizes that the American public is infuriated at this situation because an unemployed, semi-retarded and opportunistic woman brought fourteen children into the world with no means to care for them besides government assistance. Suleman's actions are indefensible and this essay attempting to serve as an apologia for those actions isn't worth using to line the bottom of the bird cage.

  • Posted By: Brendan P Bartholomew @ 05/09/2009 6:34:57 AM

    This article is the first intelligent thing I've seen written about the "octo mom" situation. While the rest of the world is parroting the same tired jokes and angry comments over and over, this piece dares to point out that the unthinking masses really are unthinking, and the opinion-makers in the media are just as stupid as their viewers and readers. My respect for Newsweek has just gone way up!

    • Posted By: DavidAtUCLA @ 05/12/2009 11:47:15 PM

      This so-called article is a sorry excuse for journalism. It's is merely an example of the shoddy and meaningless writing that passes for serious commentary today. It is not based on anything except unsupported opinion and spurious reasoning. Newsweek, this is not your finest hour.

  • Posted By: Fook Phuck @ 05/04/2009 11:42:34 PM

    I do hope by authoring this article, you know you are, "... sensationalizing her, we're inviting more trivialization ..." Look at me, I am making the situation petty too . It is alright if we do it though, because we won't end up doing exactly what we had set out to do by not making light of this grave situation. Can't wait to read another of Raina Kelly's constructive blurbs.

  • Posted By: GeorgiaGrits @ 05/02/2009 12:24:42 AM

    A huge problem with the article is that it implies, "All things being equal..." and they are not, when comparing Octomom to the Gosselins, the Duggars, and a host of other multiples families. For one thing, she is single. Smart, single women do not choose to havemore children when they already have 6 under the age of 7 (or whatever). This one fact lies behind most people's animosity - choosing to have a procedure that would surely result in a multiple birth when you already have been blessed (?) with six, have no husband or even a father figure, and no income. There is nothing virtuous about what she elected to do, and everything selfish and stupid. I feel so much sympathy for the children. This woman has more children than some at-home child care givers are allowed. Suppose she gets a reality show: what are we supposed to do - watch her sit there and smile all day? Some people are reality show material: this woman is not. Some people do an admiral job: this woman does not, and has not. By the way, you mention the Gosselins were unemployed when they brought home sextuplets, however Jon did not remain unemployed, and Kate had worked as a nurse before the birth. Because she stayed at home with her 8 children (wouldn't you, cause who could afford child care?) while Jon worked is hardly the same, and they are not on public assistance (another major bone of contention). I don't watch the Duggars and don't have a clue where their money comes from, but not for a moment do I believe they are on public assistance either. BIG difference. Stop comparing this selfish, attention-seeking baby machine to people who are clearly NOT in the same category. As a final comment, I understand that one of her earlier six children is autistic. With this challenge, and this child needing extra care, she elected to have MORE babies? She's more than selfish, she's stupid.

  • Posted By: Fideliz @ 03/05/2009 2:10:33 AM

    It is very difficult to determine if Nadya is reality based. Had she done the math in assessing whether she could solely take care of her children as a single parent being both father and mother, jobless, and whether she could live with her decision knowing that the public would despise her for exorbitant expenses of taxpayers money in healthcare and food and necessities, she could have pursued a more reasonable approach to bringing these children into the world. Surrogate mothers could have brought each child to term for adoption. For the nurturing of these children, it would take a tribe, if the children can survive and thrive. Such mindlessness of treating embryos like litter with the expectation of entitlement borders on child abuse and neglect. Nadya should be grateful that our government and people cannot deny these children a semblance of care and a chance at life. If this were to occur in other countries, especially third world, these children would never have a chance. Can each of these 14 children truly feel cherished?

    • Posted By: ImaNanna @ 03/05/2009 2:18:01 PM

      My mother was 1 of 12 and they all felt cherished. My husbands mother was 1 of 11 and his father was 1 of 17 and they all felt cherished. Who are any of you to say she does not cherish any of her children ? Everyone has seen the footage and the attention with reactions from her 1st 6 born. They love her and she loves them. If everyone would stop reacting to all of these T.V. shows who are the only ones actually profitting from her being on there shows because she isn't being payed to be there. Everyone else is profitting but her children. Does anyone see this at all ? Some of the McCaughey Sextuplets are challenged and what I have heard recieve assistance for them, but, that's okay ? This whole situation is so much like the Dionne Quintuplet's birth & turn out. Their parents had 5 or 6 before the Quint's were born, Canada came in and took them. Built a hospital accross the street from their Mother & Father's home. They put them on display, sold books etc., the family had to fight for years to get there children back, by then they barely new who they were. They all left home at the age of 18 and never had anything to do with the family after that. There is only 1 alive according to some of the websites. They were miserable. Is that what everyone wants for these babies and there siblings and mother & grandparents ? Better yet, what if it was you ? You would not want any one to take your children away. It's easy for everyone to sit back a judge her. How could anyone whether they meant to do it or not hurt the children ? You are everytime you take a pot shot at there mother. When they get older, read all of this stuff, I would bet money the publis is going to get the blame more than their Mother in their eye's. She wanted them all, loves them all, and the public wants in their eyes to do nothing but hurt them all, including their Mother. Every one needs to step back and lay off the pressure for awhile and pay more attention to your own lives.

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/05/2009 3:11:28 PM

        People like you are exactly why Nadya exists. This is NOT ok. Having 14 kids under the age of 8 is drastically different than having 11 kids at staggered ages. I'm sure your husband's grandparents WORKED to support their family, not leeched off the system. And what footage have you been watching? The most recent footage I saw showed her kids biting and slapping Nadya, and saying they didn't want the babies to come home. They're already feeling neglected, obviously. A mother who loves her children does NOT beg for money and publicity like Nadya. She's more concerned with herself than her kids--getting her nails done, out shopping, using money for IVF when she should've used it to buy a house or help her mother who was raising her kids! This is not acceptable by any means.

        • Posted By: ingenue @ 03/08/2009 7:01:28 PM

          *Urgent Memo for Summer4077*
          Babies bite. Babies slap. Babies pull hair. Babies even pee on their mothers. Guess what? I'm pleased to tell you that these actions are NOT because the babies don't love their mother! It's been proven.
          And to think, all the times my son pulled my hair, scratched me, and peed on me I never once doubted that he loved me because he was a BABY at the time.
          The fact that you're acting as if her babies acting like babies PROVES that they hate her is H Y S T E R I C A L. They don't hate her, you do.
          When my older brother learned he had a baby sister on the way he didn't want me to come home either-- but then he was a 4 year old and didn't knoww that I wasn't there to replace him. So, you know, maybe her previous children are doing what little kids do, not taking some kind of STAND against their mother.
          Some of you will do ANYTHING to justify your hatred. Just admit you hate her and you're not overly concerned about her children, its more honest.

          • Posted By: lorro @ 03/09/2009 7:14:14 PM

            memo to ingenue; most babies neither slap, pull hair, or bite. A two-year old child who does this has a problem. I'd hate for my kid to have to be in day-care with him. So when you say this is normal, perhaps you are thinking of ill-bred chimpanzees rather than human children. You are also twisting what the previous poster is saying: she never once says that the children hate Suleman. Your logic and reasoning are spurious and manipulative (and ineffective as well), and your mendacity and hypocrisy are epic--and are almost as over-the-top as Suleman's sociopathic behavior.

            Why don't you find something else to do besides attacking everyone who has a reasonable complaint about the Suleman situation? As you love to say to everyone you seem to hate, get a life! Clichéd, I know, but perhaps cliches will resonate with you and you can understand what I'm saying. You are a bombastic bully and you've made that very clear with your innumerable vitriolic postings. We've got your number, but we won't be calling on you unless we need a load of fertilizer--and that would really stink!

            • Posted By: amsteimer @ 04/11/2009 4:08:51 PM

              I have to disagree. I have worked with pre toddlers and toddlers for many years now. I have a degree and have had many trainings in early childhood development. While biting, hitting, pulling hair and scratching is not considered acceptable, they are normal for pre toddler and toddlers. Not every young child is going to bite because every child is different but because a child bites, hits or scratches does not mean there is something wrong with them. Children are learning. They are not equipped at such a young age on how to deal with their feelings. They don't have the words to express themselves and often get frustrated. Children have to be taught in a positive way. Lets take biting. Biting can be frustrating because it can leave nasty bite marks and sometimes bruising. No parent wants that to happen to their child. But the child who is biting isn't trying to hurt the other child. They just don't have the words to say "I want you to leave me alone" or "you are too close to me." And let me tell you, biting is so hard to prevent. But there are many things you can do help the child. Like I said children bite for many reasons.....frustration, anger and for sensory purposes. The child may be teething or they may even be learning. I had a child once who bit because of the reaction to the bite. Cause and effect. The other child would cry and bite marks would appear and the biter would just look at the bite marks in amazement. Not everyone is familiar with early childhood development. But I hope I shed some light on the issue.

              • Posted By: MomAndTeacher2 @ 04/11/2009 9:40:44 PM

                I've worked in preschools with normal, disadvantaged, and handicapped kids, and have known very few children who exhibited this kind of unacceptable behavior. I have a number of degrees also (for what it's worth, armteimer: Suleman has one too, supposedly, and we know how much she learned!!!) and am the mother of three successful adult children. Slapping, hitting, and biting are not normal behaviors and are the hallmarks of future bullies. This behavior should be addressed and stopped. If it is not, the child will remain an unrepentant bully throughout his school years and probably his entire life.

                Parents, if another child is abusing, biting, or slapping your child or his teacher then you should question the quality of the preschool and see that such behavior is not tolerated. Again, this behavior is not normal and SHOULD BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY.

              • Posted By: MomAndTeacher2 @ 04/11/2009 9:39:47 PM

                I've worked in preschools with normal, disadvantaged, and handicapped kids, and have known very few children who exhibited this kind of unacceptable behavior. I have a number of degrees also (for what it's worth, armteimer: Suleman has one too, supposedly, and we know how much she learned!!!) and am the mother of three successful adult children. Slapping, hitting, and biting are not normal behaviors and are the hallmarks of future bullies. This behavior should be addressed and stopped. If it is not, the child will remain an unrepentant bully throughout his school years and probably his entire life.

                Parents, if another child is abusing, biting, or slapping your child or his teacher then you should question the quality of the preschool and see that such behavior is not tolerated. Again, this behavior is not normal and SHOULD BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY.

          • Posted By: bz133 @ 03/10/2009 9:15:30 AM

            I have 2 year olld twins,-and biting, hitting, and pulling hair, (especially toward their Mother,) is NOT OK or 'normal'. Even in their 1 year old class there was onlly one child who bit and acted that way, and it was addressed and stopped quickly because other parents were so upset about it. and were threatening to remove their children Why would you try to eexplain this behavior away as nornal? It reflects a great deal on the amount of quality time she spends with her chilldren and her MOthering skills.

          • Posted By: Zwygrat @ 03/10/2009 1:25:31 AM

            ingenue, you sound like a great little mommy yourself. FYI, kids are NOT supposed to slap their moms, pull their hair, or scratch them. If your kid does this, he needs to be taught better before nicer kids have to put up with him. He's a bully just like his mom.

            You keep jumping on anyone who makes a reasonable criticism of NS. What's your problem? I think your brother should have objected a lot more strongly when your folks brought you home. Your ranting, raving, and screaming (you do love to throw those accusations about, don't you?) would have made me run away from home if I were him.

            As far as your writing style, JUST USING CAPS and creative spacing for variety, being nasty as heck, making fallacious arguments, and accusing everyone who says anything negative about Suleman of hating her isn't too imaginative. Dream up a new approach--this is getting boring. I've got an idea--go get your kid to pee on you. You'll smell better.

        • Posted By: TexasToo @ 03/10/2009 5:42:01 AM

          I agree with you. What Suleman did is not acceptable on any level. She is obviously not putting her childrens' needs first or even second, apparently. It's all about the Nadya, isn't it!

      • Posted By: Zwygrat @ 03/10/2009 1:54:11 AM

        Gee ImaNanna, you say that the Dionne quints were put on display and books were written about them. Did their own mother want to make them the centerpiece of a reality show? The Dionnes were not produced by any type of fertility treatment when they were born in 1934, and the Canadian government didn't take them for the children's protection. They took them to exploit them just as Nadya is attempting to do with her own children The three surviving Dionnes (Annette, Cecile and Yvonne), wrote to Bobbi and Kenney McCaughey when the McCaughey's children were born. In that letter, the Dionnes said that multiple births should not be confused with entertainment, nor should they be an opportunity to sell products. They go on to say that to those who would seek to exploit the growing fame of these children should beware. Their words are just as appropriate for the Gosselins and Suleman as they were for the McCaugheys.

        To compare Suleman to the Dionnes is wrong. The Dionnes didn't ask for what happened to them. They were just victims of circumstances and a over-bearing system. Nadya Suleman is a victim of her own stupidity and greed, and unfortunately she's going to make plenty of people suffer for it. Especially her own children.


        Multiple births should not be confused with entertainment, nor should they be an opportunity to sell products ...

        And to those who would seek to exploit the growing fame of these children, we say beware.

        We sincerely hope a lesson will be learned from examining how our lives were forever altered by our childhood experience. If this letter changes the course of events for these newborns, then perhaps our lives will have served a higher purpose.

        Sincerely, Annette, Cecile and Yvonne Dionne

    • Posted By: TexasToo @ 03/10/2009 5:39:27 AM

      Good thinking, Fideliz.

  • Posted By: ex-gop @ 04/05/2009 2:06:22 AM

    This article is lame. Poorly written, and of no consequence. Newsweek, you have really fallen on hard times.I will read anything. Always hoping to be enlightened or amused. Serious stuff. Silly stuff. This article lacked substance. It lacked a reason to be published.
    Newsweek, spend some real money. Buy better talent.
    Of course, there are multiple comments...it is because of Octomom, not your article. She is our freak of the month. John Mark Carr one month. Octomom the next. Who is next? Who cares...it is fun, after a long day at work, to come home and relax a little. Kick back. Think, OMG, I didn't know humans could do that. A fascinating revelation.
    As for Octomom's coverage in all media, freaks have always, always fascinated people. And to Octomom, the world shouts: if you can't afford 'em, don't have 'em. How nice it would be if you would learn to keep things shut...your mouth and your legs.
    As for the commentators who implore "stop the judging"...everyone judges. Including you. You are judging folks who judge. Perhaps you lack self esteem. Feeling in some ways akin to Octoman in that she is never going to be accepted in normal society. Feeling you have been judged in the past, you dismiss all who judge as "haters". Makes you feel better. At least, you surmise, you aren't a "hater".
    I think you are...I think you hate the fact that you can't quite fit in.

  • Posted By: gmc276 @ 03/28/2009 11:33:02 PM

    You know, I am starting to feel likes she not ALL that bad. Yes, she is seriously misguided, but it is obvious that she does love her children, all 14 of them! To tell you the truth, if Gloria Allred wanted to "help" me out, I would run the other way. That woman is frightening, and some of the people interviewed from Angels in waiting seemed rather nasty. I would want calmness surrounding my children, not people who are using my family as a platform to shout to the world what an awful person and mother I am. She (Nadya)is using the help provided by the hospital, and I think that's the right thing to do. I'm not perfect, so I really can't judge too harshly. Maybe we all need to take a step back. By treating her so poorly, we are also doing great disservice to her many (but loved and beautiful) children.

    • Posted By: DanoAMano @ 03/30/2009 2:01:49 AM

      Yeah, gmc276, it's so obvious that Suleman loves her kids, isn't it. That's why she spends so much time with them!!!!

      I suspect that those children may not even be from her eggs. They crooked quack Kamrava and duck-lips Nadya probably used eggs other couples had abandoned. It would save money, wouldn't it? Ready-made meal-tickets, right? That's why that filthy piece of trash, Nasty Nads, is so coy about the babies' fathers. She may not even know who they are. I'd sure hate to have used Kamrava's services. I'd be watching those children as they grow to see if they looked like me.

      And I think the reason this slut has been able to get so much help is because her dad used to work for the Iraqi military. He probably has some connections in high places. The Sulemans seem to be crooks, cons, and users par excellence.

      This woman is a waste of stretched, botoxed skin. She's ugly both inside and out, and she makes responsible people sick.

  • Posted By: DanoAMano @ 03/30/2009 1:59:43 AM

    Yeah, gmc276, it's so obvious that Suleman loves her kids, isn't it. That's why she spends so much time with them!!!!

    I suspect that those children may not even be from her eggs. They crooked quack Kamrava and duck-lips Nadya probably used eggs other couples had abandoned. It would save money, wouldn't it? Ready-made meal-tickets, right? That's why that filthy piece of trash, Nasty Nads, is so coy about the babies' fathers. She may not even know who they are. I'd sure hate to have used Kamrava's services. I'd be watching those children as they grow to see if they looked like me.

    And I think the reason this slut has been able to get so much help is because her dad used to work for the Iraqi military. He probably has some connections in high places. The Sulemans seem to be crooks, cons, and users par excellence.

    This woman is a waste of stretched, botoxed skin. She's ugly both inside and out, and she makes responsible people sick.

  • Posted By: bz133 @ 03/30/2009 12:40:29 AM

    Nadya, I mean gmc276, do you really think anyone buys the whole 'her children are so well loved' thing when nadya is always out shopping or doing something - alone, without kids- for photo ops for the paparazzi and not even home with her kidsr? And when she's not shopping, does a loving mother spend hours and hours locked in her room responding to mail (or on the computer defending herself on threads like these) instead of spending time with her children or bonding and feeding her newborns she supposedly loves so much? Let me ask you, is it normal for 'well loved' children to have no bedtimes or structure at all and regularly stay p alll night? Do 'well loved' 2 year olds bite, hit, and pull the hair of their Mother as we witnessed in her video? I have twin 2 year olds, and 1) they do not bite me, pull my hair, or hit me and 2) I can't even remember the last time I went shopping without them let alone had time for acrylic nails and pedicures, and even radio talk shows! No time for those things for me, my life revolves around THEM,... and by the way I work hard yet can't afford a nanny. Nadya just said on the talk show interview w/ Big Boy she had TWO nannies when she was preg... that was while on food stamps, medical, SSI, and disabillity. If anyone can afford two nannies they do not qualify for that welfare help. They have strict income guidelines and that's fraud. Give us a break about how 'loved' those kids are. They are Nadya's mean ticket to the fame and fortune she craved and that is why she had so many children. Period.

  • Posted By: I B Trucking @ 03/28/2009 10:17:47 PM

    Nasty Nadya is just this.....NASTY. Did you see how she was liiving at her Mom's house. It was NASTY. Give her a few weeks and the "new" house will be the same. She is what she is NASTY!!! Her Dad bought her "new" house in his name so the hospital or Creditors can't put a lein or attachment on this house when Nadya wants to sell it for a million dollar house. STOP THE DONATIONS....IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY FOR THIS WELFARE QUEEN. Next she will be getting a Limo with her personal driver. She makes me want to PUKE. SHE IS SUCH A PHONY THAT IS STRICKLY INTEREST ONLY IN MONEY. She care NOTHING about any of her kids. She needs to go back being a stripper/dancer. Listen to the interview last Thursday, March 26th where she admitted to being a striipper/dancer. SHE IS NOTHING BUT TRASH!!! STOP THE DONATIONS AND MONEY!!! She is just laughing all the way to her Designer Stores and to the bank.

  • Posted By: I B Trucking @ 03/28/2009 10:12:36 PM

    Nasy Nadya is all about MONEY. She planned to have all of these kids so she would NEVER have to work EVER. She ihas been on Food Stamps and received FOUR DiSABLITY checks each month from the government for herself (bad back hummmmmmm) and three of her six kids with disability. Probably some of the "new" eight babies will also be disabled. This is cruel to bring kids in the world with disabilities. Three kids who are disabled would be hard in itself. Nada doesn't worry about any of this. Her mom kept the first six kids and now she hss nannies 24/7 while she is out SHOPPING AND ON TV AND RADIO SHOWS. STOP THE DONATIONS AND MONEY TO THIS WELFARE QUEEN with the Michael Jackson NOSE and Donald Duck Lips. MONEY IS THE MOTIVE FOR ALL OF THSE 14 KIDS. IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY. NASTY NADYA IS LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO HER DESIGNER STORES.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse