SPONSORED BY:

The Editor’s Desk

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

On a late winter afternoon, the sunlight fading outside the window, John McCain was sitting in his Senate office—he uses Barry Goldwater's old desk—shaking his head about the billions of dollars in earmarks in the federal budget and talking about the future of his party. Rush Limbaugh was Topic A in the capital; the radio giant's long speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference—one in which Limbaugh repeated his hope that President Obama will "fail"—had led to a tactical Washington tempest. Sensing an opportunity, the White House had singled out Limbaugh as, in Rahm Emanuel's words, "the intellectual force" of the Republican Party. It was not a bad strategy: in the NEWSWEEK Poll, 46 percent have an unfavorable opinion of Limbaugh. (As a point of contrast, Obama's unfavorable rating is 22 percent, and even Nancy Pelosi fares better than Limbaugh.)

In the West Wing on the same afternoon, David Axelrod was musing about the complexities of the politics during the recession. "One way of looking at American politics right now is through the frame of responsibility," he told me. "The vast majority of ordinary Americans are doing what they are supposed to do, and all the other institutions have not, especially in corporate America. And the government, under a Republican administration, failed to hold these institutions accountable. So the problem for Rush is that his position is now associated with irresponsibility."

I asked McCain what he made of the Rush wars. "We all know what Limbaugh is saying—that he hopes the president's philosophy will fail and voters will turn to the Republicans," said McCain, who was first elected to Congress in 1982. "But at the same time, Limbaugh is just one of several voices—we also have Pawlenty, Jindal, Cantor, Palin and other leaders in our party. After a terrible defeat like the one we just suffered, we should let a thousand flowers bloom."

Facebook

But as David Frum—a conservative, and a former speechwriter for George W. Bush—writes in our cover, the party Ronald Reagan built (a coalition of fiscal conservatives, foreign-policy hawks and religious traditionalists) is suffering its most profound crisis since its inception in 1964. A conservative Republican, Frum was president of the Federalist Society chapter at his law school, worked on The Wall Street Journal editorial page and helped draft George W. Bush's "Axis of Evil" address. He is no bleeding heart.

But he is frustrated with his party. To say the least, this is a serious time requiring serious national action. Obama is not perfect, but he seems to be honestly grappling with the world as it is, and he needs—not to be too grand about it, but the country needs—an opposition that is intellectually engaged and straightforward about the challenges of the time. Just saying no to Obama may win votes in the midterms, but it will not substantively improve a deteriorating situation.

Limbaugh, who declined our request for an interview, is the most vivid example of the larger story of the decline of conservatism. (This is not a partisan point; the crisis in liberalism in the decades after Lyndon Johnson was one of the prevailing stories of the age.) "It's the tonalities, it's the anger," says Sam Tanenhaus, the Whittaker Chambers and William F. Buckley Jr. biographer who is writing a book about conservatism's intellectual collapse. "Rush and CPAC want to work themselves up, but the great middle of the country is not going to listen to them. The Republicans now are like the Democrats in 1972—and think how long it took them to really get back to the center under Clinton."

In the White House, Axelrod added: "We all know that politics tends to move in epochs. Nineteen thirty-two to 1980 was liberal; 1980 to 2008 has been a Republican epoch. I think it's too early to say what the coming years will be, but our candidacy was premised on the idea that this is a transformative moment—that the Republican project had run out of steam. There's an opportunity here." There is indeed—and for conservatives, too, if they seize it.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: hanksaz @ 03/13/2009 7:23:09 PM

    First we have weeks of nothing but Obama on the cover, then last week we had a cover in Arabic and now Rush with ENOUGH over his mouth. ENOUGH is correct sir. After 10 years subscribing to your magazine, I am canceling my subscription. I subscribed in the first place because the magazine USED to be more centrist and reported pretty evenly on the actual news. Now it's nothing but the Democratic free press. You truly have lost my respect in your organization. If I wanted to have just one side of the news, I'd watch Olberman and Matthews at night. So...in one sense your cover was right. For this reader, it truly is ENOUGH!

  • Posted By: Orloff999 @ 03/12/2009 12:09:45 PM

    I continue to choke everytime I hear Rush Limbaugh and other Republiican Conservative protectionists use the work "Liberal" in front of every description to descibe Democrats. It has truly been "Liberal Republicans" who "liberally" deregulated the financial markets to allow this entire economic meltdown to take place. From Phil Gramm taking millions of special interest money from Wall Street executives (and his wife taking in over $1 million from Enron and sitting on its Board) to eradicate the Glass/Steagall Act to Republican "do nothing" Christopher Cox as the head of the feckless SEC, the term "Liberalism" has been contorted and misused to mindlessly point the blame at every other party except the Republicans and Limbaugh is their biggest mouthpiece. R.Orloff

  • Posted By: DWPitts @ 03/10/2009 4:15:30 PM

    America doesn???t need a thousand flowers borne from the seed of gamblers, ones who doubled down on the supply side with all the government chips, and let demand wither as little more than a red haired stepchild. For every good thing from the crest of the conservative movement, say 401K plans, one must also consider the ushering in of the management style that killed the Teacher in Space. This management style was gambling. Gambling stripped out safeguards and ignored risk, and doubled down on the pursuit of unbridled accumulation of wealth. Professional gamblers know the house always wins in the end. Now, many are clearly saying, ???Let it stay in Vegas???.

    The elevator many rode to the penthouse, is the same one ridden by the Chinese prior to the 1990s. For them, it was to achieve full employment. Here, many rode it to achieve incredible wealth under a spirit of ???Americans can do anything???. Both were powered by supply side economics, and both failed. Both were misallocations of capital and led to idled or wasted inventories, given little consideration for demand. And both, though different sides of the same $100 chip, were forms of gambling that harmed the public. Essentially, we now know ???Americans can also SAY anything???. But does this elevator go all the way to the top, and should America continue to ???comp??? the behavior?

    The conservative wave crested on American shores, flooding American neighborhoods. As the tide ebbs, and we slog through the outcome, knee-deep in a backwater of idled inventory, salvaging what we can from our waterlogged pasts, leaving behind so many failed beliefs, we shake our heads at the tin-eared diatribe passed off as public debate. As we move on in search of higher ground, we care little for "movements", or ???carpe diem???. We are truly tired of politicians and gamblers, ones who have never considered us as anything more than red-haired stepchildren. We simply push forward through the flood.

    The speakers of division do owe us a deep apology. When we view America???s past, we find battlefields stained with American blood, both conservative and liberal, and that's what made America, not some cynical triangulation designed to disenfranchise Americans. ???There are no Red States, there are no Blue States, there???s only the United States of America.??? If all one hears is slogan, then they miss the gentle whispering carried on the rising tide. As some head down this old creek away from the mainstream, remember: The American public has the paddles. Your businesses will fail. Your banks will fail, and lastly, your ideology will fail, until you become foremost, the honest guardians of the American public. To protect and serve the American public, and not the corporate gambling interests of the few. That???s our strict bottom line. And you should already know what's said about heading up THAT creek without paddles.

    Man must find and know his limitations, before somebody or

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now