REAL ESTATE

Vigilante or Hero?

Why one Chicago sheriff is defying the courts and refusing to perform evictions.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bhenry68 @ 03/11/2009 7:57:08 AM

    He absolutely need to be terminated. He is not doing the job correctly. Maybe morally right, but legally wrong. When a legitimate landlord has an eviction for non-payment of rent, is this guy going to let them stay because the kids are in diapers? This guy cannot be judge and jury. A legal order is a legal order and it is his JOB to carry out the legal order. If he is too emotionally involved, let someone else do the job correctly. Many people are looking for work.

    • Posted By: Emilli @ 03/11/2009 8:00:24 AM

      Thank you finally someone is getting it. The last thing we need is men and woman of law bending the law they see fit. It breaks down the fabric of order.

      • Posted By: jath123 @ 03/11/2009 9:01:54 AM

        Right on Emili! Follow the law no matter what! So when the law says that all Jews must wear armbands and be sent to camps, you would say "let's round 'em up"! Ahhhh... blind worship of unjust laws; the hallmark of every fascist.

        • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 11:52:53 AM

          Well how about the Ozark_Sunshine. I have 3 kids, I have a fulltime job, 4 cars, a rv, and a harley Davidson. All are covered by insurance- all bills are paid when due and my tax dollars are being taken to cover illegal immigrants to bottom feed off this country who voted for a president who is in favor of taking care of these people so the americans have nothing. I am very educated, a republican. Kids are screwed up by having screwed up parents! My kids are normal, healthy law abbiding citizens with compassion for those who have less. They have respect for gun rights and what there purpose in life is. Guns don't kill people, people kill people with guns. If words are misspelled, lets blame the danm pencil not the person holding the pencil. You are the one who is diluded and ignorant. Must have voted for Obama didn't you!

          • Posted By: losinghope @ 04/16/2009 9:25:03 PM

            Your Republican President got us in this mess at the first place

            • Posted By: speakmymind77 @ 05/11/2009 4:59:05 PM

              Yes, he did it all by himself! Give me a break, enough already. Who voted for the president?

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:23:54 PM

            "and my tax dollars are being taken to cover illegal immigrants to bottom feed off this country who voted for a president who is in favor of taking care of these people so the americans have nothing."

            Illegals can't vote, you twit.

            • Posted By: losinghope @ 04/16/2009 9:24:22 PM

              even legal aliens cannot vote. they have to become citizens first.

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:25:11 PM

            Wait. Was that sarcasm?

        • Posted By: ChiLakeview30 @ 03/13/2009 5:19:27 PM

          Loser. Comparing this to the Holocaust.

        • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 10:46:02 AM

          And just what if this is you one day!! Maybe if all of the people who think the sheriff is wrong should donate to a cause to help people who are doing things properly and getting the wrong end of the stick. You people are amazing. GOD IS WATCHING YOU- WHere will you be when he comes again!!!!

          • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 11:45:05 AM

            Again...sarcasm employed here...come on...

      • Posted By: tab135 @ 03/11/2009 8:07:44 AM

        Did you read this at all? This isn't renters failing to pay. This is about renters who pay their rent and their landlords have not paid the mortgages. So think again. We are talking about people who paid in good faith and were unaware that the rents they paid were not going to the mortgage. Read the article before you start passing judgement on innocent people.

        • Posted By: richie755 @ 03/11/2009 8:20:14 AM

          well i hate it... should have rented from someone they trusted... or at least went to court house and tried to find out something... property information is public information.. easy enough to find out what's going on.... or even if they landlords did not pay i am sure they have some kind of legal recourse...

          • Posted By: earmstr1 @ 03/11/2009 9:34:03 AM

            Why would they do that? You're living your life, paying your rent, going to your job and taking care of your family. Have you ever rented before? I know I wasn't asking my landlord every month if she was paying the mortgage with the rent money I paid. What a rediculous thing to say! Unless there are suspicous things going on or you're unable to contact your landlord when you need them, you would have no clue anything was wrong and certainly not think to check county property records. Rent from someone you trust? Sure, you can ask around and get some recommendations, but I sure don't have a lot of friends in the renting business that I would be able to rent from. People need homes and sometimes have to settle for what they can get to have stability for their families.

            • Posted By: ChiLakeview30 @ 03/13/2009 5:17:08 PM

              Exactly, you are settling fof what you can get.

            • Posted By: cinda0311 @ 03/11/2009 10:41:50 AM

              I agree with this sheriff, thank God I moved out of my duplex a month before the tenants next door, they were paying their rent on time even early and the duplex was forclosed on and they were kicked to the curb. Their rent was $1000 a month and they paid theirs, but yet the "Slum Lord" didn't pay the mortgage and didn't have enough decency to call my neighbor to inform them the property was forclosed on. So until you are actually in that situation don't judge, you have no clue what it is like for some people out there.

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:23:17 PM

            You are truly an idiot.

        • Posted By: Emilli @ 03/11/2009 8:11:07 AM

          So what your telling me is renters just don't bother to stay in contact with their landlords?

          • Posted By: stupidpeoplebotherme @ 03/11/2009 1:57:10 PM

            Yes, I do stay in contact with my landlord. Every 2nd of the month, I call her and ask her if she paid the mortgage with my rent money.Then, when she tells me "yes," I ask her if she's lying. Then I ask her to take a lie detector test to prove she's not lying. One month later, we do it all over again...........I hope you don't have children. Heartless a-holes like you shouldn't be allowed to breed.

            • Posted By: ChiLakeview30 @ 03/13/2009 5:13:58 PM

              People are responsible to rent from reputable landlords.

            • Posted By: Fedupwiththissystem @ 03/12/2009 12:30:02 PM

              That was great!!! Thanks for the laugh!! Stupid people bother me too.

            • Posted By: Fedupwiththissystem @ 03/12/2009 12:28:19 PM

              That was great!!!!

          • Posted By: bsuperstar @ 03/13/2009 5:13:35 AM

            There are a lot of landlords that only connect with tenants when the rent is due, or if there is a serious repair problem on the premises. Plus, there are landlords that just flat out lie about any number of things, from 'yes the two washing machines will be fixed' to 'yes, the mortgage has been paid and is current'. I want to live where you live, Emilli, where everyone is honest, and everyone owns their own home, and foreclosure lists happen in other countries, and safeguards to keep innocent renters from being wrongfully evicted, are simply not necessary, because the banks are always perfectly scrupulous about their due diligence. Aaah, Utopia, Utopia.

          • Posted By: meadhbh @ 03/12/2009 5:15:47 PM

            No. Landlords do not stay in contact with thier renters. I live in an apartment complex in SC. The owner is in NJ. How do I know where he pays his mortgages to, if they are being paid. I don't. With all the banking privacy laws in place, you cannot just call a bank and ask about these things. I have to TRUST that he is being honest and paying his bills. And let's be real here.. How many times have you gotten mail for a person who no longer lives at your address? So yeah, think about how many people are NOT getting notices.

          • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 1:47:06 PM

            emilli,
            HELLO?!?!?!
            Maybe the landlord omitted that bit of information. Maybe he/she was greedy, and just wanted the rent money without paying the mortgage on that home.
            If you had a logical thought come from your brain, i'll bet it was a fluke.

            • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:22:00 PM

              Emilli just likes to see people get stepped on. That's really all there is to it.

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:21:18 PM

            Why, yes, because landlords will ALWAYS tell their tenants when they're about to be foreclosed on.

          • Posted By: aries__46 @ 03/11/2009 11:48:02 AM

            Yes renters stay in contact with their landlords. It is the landlord who cares for one thing and that is getting their rent money. However, not all landlords choose to pay their morgage payments , which is what normally happens with the rent money, unless you already own the place. If a landlord does not get their rent money, they are the first one on your door step wanting to collect. So why shouldnt the bank want their money. The question is why isnt the landlord paying the morgage and why should the people renting be thrown out on the streets because the landlord isn't paying his morgage? What I don't understand is why are you so hard on renters? They should get the same respect as anyone else. Just because they dont own their home, doesnt mean they mean they ar beneath you.. IF you are doing so great with life, why do you not help those that need help. Not everyones circimstance is the same. Until you walk in their shoes, don't judge those less fortunate than you. You are not any better than anyone else. Leave judgement for the lord and right now he is probably judging you for lack of compassion to others. Keep going sherriff. The Lord will bless you in many ways.

          • Posted By: broman @ 03/11/2009 11:38:37 AM

            Emilli ,,,your one of the biggest a holes i have ever had the displeasure of reading about,,one day you will get your turn of hardships and i hope it is a person like you that you go to for a helping hand.

          • Posted By: Virginia_Girl @ 03/11/2009 10:50:31 AM

            I think you are missing the point. There are instances where people are paying rent, however the landlord is not paying the mortgage. These people are in contact with the landlord, but the landlord is acting deceitfully. The renter has no clue that the property is being foreclosed. The renter is acting in good faith. How dare you judge these people are placed in a precarious situation due to the onwers deceit? Your judgement is misguided, misplaced and callous. Shame on you.

          • Posted By: Virginia_Girl @ 03/11/2009 10:49:36 AM

            I think you are missing the point. There are instances where people are paying rent, however the landlord is not paying the mortgage. These people are in contact with the landlord, but the landlord is acting deceitfully. The renter has no clue that the property is being foreclosed. The renter is acting in good faith. How dare you judge these people are placed in a precarious situation due to the onwers deceit? Your judgement is misguided, misplaced and callous. Shame on you.

          • Posted By: Fedupwiththissystem @ 03/11/2009 10:29:54 AM

            Emilli...you are an idiot! Why dont you just shut the H*ll up, ok? I'm a single parent, I work hard, have my own house and struggle like hell. Unfortunetly we can all be as lucky and together as you. THE STORY WAS BASED ON TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF BY LOW LIFE LANDLORDS!!! I guess you have just been one lucky son of a *itch to not have had to deal with an absent landlord. You seem like a heartless person......get of the site!!!

          • Posted By: Fedupwiththissystem @ 03/11/2009 10:25:00 AM

            Emilli you are an idiot....just shut the *ell up, ok?

          • Posted By: MV1956 @ 03/11/2009 9:34:41 AM

            Do you really think the landlord is going to tell you that they have not paid their mortgage? NO!!! it is happening all over the landlord is collecting as much rent as possible from the renter while the house is being foreclosed on. The lender cannot give you any information regarding the borrower in this care the landord.

          • Posted By: GustoMaybe @ 03/11/2009 9:23:31 AM

            The landlord isn't your buddy. It's a business arrangement. You already setup the agreement before you move in and you only contact the landlord if something goes wrong in the place (per your agreement). Otherwise, all the landlord needs to make sure is that you pay your rent on time and makes sure you're not doing anything that would be in violation of the agreement.

            The only time I ever needed to see my landlord is when I paid my rent in person or if something broke that needed fixing that was in our agreement.

            In these circumstances in the article, the landlord should have contacted the tenant. The tenants paid their rent, why do they need to contact the landlord?

      • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 10:39:12 AM

        WOW! That is all I can say for bhenry68 and emilli! Do you work for the devil? Do you have any morals. What makes you think some of these folks who are being evicted didn't pay their rent or their bills? Ever stop to think that maybe they were doing their part correctly and the guy on the other end was in the wrong- you know-pocket the rent and forget the mortgage! Innocent until proven guilty and I give that sheriff a mor pat on the back for wha he is doing. Remember this man when you are struggling and they come knocking on your door and you did everything right. God help you because negativity for someone trying to help those in need doesn't fair well with the big man upstairs. You day will come!!!

        • Posted By: Ozark_Sunshine @ 03/11/2009 10:49:41 AM

          Kimber it is you who have no morals. You are to obey the laws of the land, not pick and choose which ones you will obey. It is your example and that of liberals why so many kids are screwed up today. People go out and buy cars, HDTVs, DVD players, DVD and CD collections, computers, etc. and then they choose not to have car insurance, health insurance and don't pay their bills on time. Then they scream about not having these items. It is all about choice and personal responsibilty. You have no morals and ethics when you attack those who are doing the moral and ethical thingg, following the law. Take your twisted logic and ignorance elsewhere, we educated people aren't buying it.

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:25:44 PM

            "You are to obey the laws of the land, not pick and choose which ones you will obey. "

            An unjust law is no law.

          • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 11:43:56 AM

            Hey Ozark--you would probably consider me a liberal because I voted for Obama. Guess what? I'm educated, too! GASP! I still think this is wrong. It isn't wrong to evict a tenant for non-payment of rent, but it IS wrong to evict someone who has been paying rent to a smarmy landlord who has screwed them over. That goes against my morals--law be damned. Lots of things that are immoral in this country aren't illegal, and vice versa. Heck, you can't even spank kids in some states yet a rapist gets only 5 years in jail. Doesn't make sense.
            I won't even begin to try to refute your ignorant statement that people choose to not have health care. You obviously have a good job that provides it for you. My dad, however, has worked his fingers to the bone for decades and still has crappy health care through his employer. But yeah...I guess he "chooses" not to have it. Even though he drives a 10 year old truck, paid off his mortgage early, and lives frugally so he can put some money away for retirement. You're ridiculous.

          • Posted By: mel0321 @ 03/11/2009 11:43:10 AM

            EDUCATED? i DON'T KNOW WHAT SCHOOL YOU WENT TOO, BUT THEY OBVIOUSLY DID NOT TEACH THE GOLDEN RULE. i CAN REMEMBER NOT TOO LONG AGO THAT ALMOST ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES HAD THE QUOTE "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" THEY WERE APPOINTED TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE INNOCENT NOT THE CROOKS. NOT ALL LAWS PUT IN PLACE BY OUR "PERFECT" GOVERNMENT RECENTLY HAS BEEN FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE BUT MORE FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH GAIN. i AM SURE YOU NEVER SPEED, ALWAYS USE YOUR BLINKER, SHOW ALL YOUR INCOME DOWN TO THE LAST PENNY ON YOUR TAXES, DON'T HELP THE DIABLED OR ELDERLY (SINCE GIVING THEM MONEY COULD STOP THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY IF THEY WERE HONEST AND REPORTED IT), SO YOU SEE THERE ARE ALOT OF SO CALLED LAWS THAT GO AGAINST GOOD JUDGEMENT AND MORAL ETHICS. YES A PERSON SHOULD OBEY THE LAWS, BUT IF THE LAW WILL HURT THE INNOCENT - THEN HELL NO THEY SHOULD NOT. I AM SURE YOU WERE SOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY WITH THE STATE TROOPER WHO TICKETED THE MAN WHO SAVED THE TWO OLD LADIES LIVES FOR JAY WALING AND IT ALMOST COST HIM HIS OWN LIFE! i AM SURE YOU APLAUDED THE STATE TROOPER FOR DOING HIS JOB - I AM SURE YOU WERE THINKING THAT THE TWO LADIES SHOULD HAVE BEEN HIT SINCE THEY WERE NOT EDUCATED ENOUGH TO NOT CROSS THE ROAD !

          • Posted By: mel0321 @ 03/11/2009 11:40:45 AM

            EDUCATED? i DON'T KNOW WHAT SCHOOL YOU WENT TOO, BUT THEY OBVIOUSLY DID NOT TEACH THE GOLDEN RULE. i CAN REMEMBER NOT TOO LONG AGO THAT ALMOST ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES HAD THE QUOTE "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" THEY WERE APPOINTED TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE INNOCENT NOT THE CROOKS. NOT ALL LAWS PUT IN PLACE BY OUR "PERFECT" GOVERNMENT RECENTLY HAS BEEN FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE BUT MORE FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH GAIN. i AM SURE YOU NEVER SPEED, ALWAYS USE YOUR BLINKER, SHOW ALL YOUR INCOME DOWN TO THE LAST PENNY ON YOUR TAXES, DON'T HELP THE DIABLED OR ELDERLY (SINCE GIVING THEM MONEY COULD STOP THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY IF THEY WERE HONEST AND REPORTED IT), SO YOU SEE THERE ARE ALOT OF SO CALLED LAWS THAT GO AGAINST GOOD JUDGEMENT AND MORAL ETHICS. YES A PERSON SHOULD OBEY THE LAWS, BUT IF THE LAW WILL HURT THE INNOCENT - THEN HELL NO THEY SHOULD NOT. I AM SURE YOU WERE SOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY WITH THE STATE TROOPER WHO TICKETED THE MAN WHO SAVED THE TWO OLD LADIES LIVES FOR JAY WALING AND IT ALMOST COST HIM HIS OWN LIFE! i AM SURE YOU APLAUDED THE STATE TROOPER FOR DOING HIS JOB - I AM SURE YOU WERE THINKING THAT THE TWO LADIES SHOULD HAVE BEEN HIT SINCE THEY WERE NOT EDUCATED ENOUGH TO NOT CROSS THE ROAD !

          • Posted By: mel0321 @ 03/11/2009 11:40:10 AM

            EDUCATED? i DON'T KNOW WHAT SCHOOL YOU WENT TOO, BUT THEY OBVIOUSLY DID NOT TEACH THE GOLDEN RULE. i CAN REMEMBER NOT TOO LONG AGO THAT ALMOST ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES HAD THE QUOTE "TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE" THEY WERE APPOINTED TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE INNOCENT NOT THE CROOKS. NOT ALL LAWS PUT IN PLACE BY OUR "PERFECT" GOVERNMENT RECENTLY HAS BEEN FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE BUT MORE FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH GAIN. i AM SURE YOU NEVER SPEED, ALWAYS USE YOUR BLINKER, SHOW ALL YOUR INCOME DOWN TO THE LAST PENNY ON YOUR TAXES, DON'T HELP THE DIABLED OR ELDERLY (SINCE GIVING THEM MONEY COULD STOP THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY IF THEY WERE HONEST AND REPORTED IT), SO YOU SEE THERE ARE ALOT OF SO CALLED LAWS THAT GO AGAINST GOOD JUDGEMENT AND MORAL ETHICS. YES A PERSON SHOULD OBEY THE LAWS, BUT IF THE LAW WILL HURT THE INNOCENT - THEN HELL NO THEY SHOULD NOT. I AM SURE YOU WERE SOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY WITH THE STATE TROOPER WHO TICKETED THE MAN WHO SAVED THE TWO OLD LADIES LIVES FOR JAY WALING AND IT ALMOST COST HIM HIS OWN LIFE! i AM SURE YOU APLAUDED THE STATE TROOPER FOR DOING HIS JOB - I AM SURE YOU WERE THINKING THAT THE TWO LADIES SHOULD HAVE BEEN HIT SINCE THEY WERE NOT EDUCATED ENOUGH TO NOT CROSS THE ROAD !

          • Posted By: dianeesp @ 03/11/2009 11:37:00 AM

            You talk about following the law, isn't it the law to give due process and due notice to the people who have paid their rent. This sheriff is a true hero where the greed of the landlord and banks abound.

          • Posted By: nicoler721 @ 03/11/2009 11:27:38 AM

            Wow!! I cannot believe that you could say such a thing. Did you not read the article? The sheriff is not helping out the deadbeats not paying their rent on time but those who have. It is the Landlords who are not paying their morgage and pocketing the rent money. Why should the innocent renters have to pay for the deceit of the horrible Landlords? The sheriff is doing his job. His job is to fight for what is right and just. There is a lack of due-process in these cases and that is what the Sheriff is standing up for. He is standing up for the law and to make sure that this law is abided by.

      • Posted By: CR_in_VA @ 03/11/2009 8:18:27 AM

        Are you serious?? If people did not question things they believe are wrong, where would we be now?? We would all be robots! Thank God someone decided to treat people as humans and not turn a blind eye to them like you would. As a renter myself, I know the feeling of having a landlord who is impossible to contact. So Emilli, maybe you should not be so quick to pass judgement. The only way I cen get my landlord's attention is to duct-tape a letter around my rent check. It is not the renter's fault the landlord has defaulted on payments! If there is something wrong with the process, do something to correct it. Just because its the law, doesn't make it right.

        • Posted By: Emilli @ 03/11/2009 8:28:22 AM

          Judgment, na I just think the sheriff is wrong.

          • Posted By: pattigirl10 @ 03/11/2009 1:59:13 PM

            I had a home in Tennessee and went through a divorce, while on active duty in the military. Not wanting to "let the property go" and, because it was upside down on LTV ratio, I decided to rent it out via a property management agency. As an out-of-state landlord, I was unable to meet my tenants but paid a property management agency screen tenants and stay in constant interaction with the renters (monthly). They were on a no-pet lease and paid their rent on time for two years (it went directly to the mortgage--no profit). I got a call from a concerned neighbor who'd seen several cats in the windows and the blinds were destroyed. The renters left one day with no warning and, because of pools of cat urine, feces and so on the property had to be completely overhauled. I was unable to do this and, without rent coming in was unable to pay the mortgage. The agency claimed it had no liability because they went into the house with no pets. Ultimately, it was determined that they had 7 cats, 3 dogs in the house and 3 pot-bellied pigs in the back yard. I did everything I could as owner of the home to ensure things were taken care of and the agency assured me, upon entering the contract, that they would ensure the upkeep of the house.
            My point is, sometimes, as a landlord, we do all we can given the circumstances and it may be the fault of the caretakers. I let them go a month here and there without paying rent when they fell upon hard times. They pled with the agency to not evict them because of the animals, unbeknownst to me. IT's not always possible for the tenants to "know" the landlord (it's not like I can fly 2300 miles to have a cup of coffee) but it is possible for whoever's responsible for the property to be involved. Every case of home ownership and/or rental in this nation is unique, which is why it's shallow minded to make blanket statements about tenants or homeowners being torn from their homes and lives. I admire the sherriff for having the decency and humane common sense to give those less fortunate a conduit for due process. I managed to sell the property (short sale) in its damaged condition to a person willing to do the 5,000 worth of work--they turned around and sold the property for nearly 100K over it's sale price. Smart buyers!

          • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 11:51:10 AM

            ...and it's my (and others judging from the responses) opinion that YOU are wrong Emili

          • Posted By: NASM00 @ 03/11/2009 8:39:06 AM

            Now this is a real amreican, who up holds the law on both sides. Finally an american that will stand up for what is right and just. We should vote him into office for president. Funny how when some one stands up and is honest the crooked goverment gets up in arms. Hats off to a real american.

      • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 1:44:07 PM

        Emilli,
        No, the last thing we need is another prick like you.
        I hope someday someone comes to evict you from your dwelling.

      • Posted By: kghareus @ 03/11/2009 8:31:30 AM

        Someone who gets it?

        I really worry for the future of this country when there are people who read a story like this and still think the man is wrong to stop the process until safeguards are in place. I would ask that those who think this man is wrong go out to the homes themselves and face to face tell the person and their family that they have to get out. Financial institutions saw the housing bubble as a way to make quick money but here we are in the worst recession in decades and now they are rushing in for a landgrab. Over 8 percent of people out there are unemployed, savings have evaporated and what we need is a little common sense. For a start, if a landlord is delinquent in paying the mortgage but the renter is up to date on rent the bank should begin taking rent directly, yes foreclose on the property but at least have the common sense to let the property generate money. Also, there should be a weekly list of banks that have foreclosed on families where common decency was absent in the process, I want to know if I should continue to use these faceless robotic institutions. One more point, if we do not place a moritorium on foreclosures then please explain to me what will happen to your neighborhood when house after house lies empty and uncared for? Where the list of homeless grows evey week and the overwhelming landscape is gray despair?

        • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 11:52:58 AM

          kghareus,
          Finally, someone who thinks logically. Why does "red tape" have to be so complicated?
          If this country got rid of 90% of it's laws, we would be a much happier country.

      • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 11:32:53 AM

        Let's see how you respond when someone comes knocking at your door, wanting you out of your house, when you have made all your rent/mortgage payments up to date. This has nothing to do with emotions. It's about doing what's right. By law, tenants are allowed 30 days before they can be evicted. If there was no notice of this, the sherriff should not kick them out.
        In case no one has read the article fully, this sherriff was not evicting anyone without notice, or who had entered into an agreement, where they were not aware of a forclosure notice on the home they were renting. Please read the article before making uninformed comments.

      • Posted By: GustoMaybe @ 03/11/2009 11:01:44 AM

        You do have something in common with the Law...

        You're both full of flaws.

      • Posted By: CR_in_VA @ 03/11/2009 8:20:21 AM

        Are you serious?? If people did not question things they believe are wrong, where would we be now?? We would all be robots! Thank God someone decided to treat people as humans and not turn a blind eye to them like you would. As a renter myself, I know the feeling of having a landlord who is impossible to contact. So Emilli, maybe you should not be so quick to pass judgement. The only way I cen get my landlord's attention is to duct-tape a letter around my rent check. It is not the renter's fault the landlord has defaulted on payments! If there is something wrong with the process, do something to correct it. Just because its the law, doesn't make it right.

        • Posted By: richie755 @ 03/11/2009 8:31:14 AM

          If you can't get up with the landlord go to courthouse find out who owns the building. Then, get a lawyer have some legal document sent ( I am sure a lawyer would know exactly what you could do...). Sue even.... But you have to do something not just sit on your but and think someone is going to take care of it for you... because no they are not...

          • Posted By: earmstr1 @ 03/11/2009 9:43:19 AM

            Where did you read that these people were expecting to be taking care of? Did you miss the part where it said they were completely shocked when the law showed up and had no idea what was going on? Even if they did have some clues and had started to try and find out, the legal system works at a snails pace so they would have been thrown out of their house before anything was resolved. Due process, people! As the article points out, it is a constitutional right! I have a feeling that a lot of the people saying here that the Sherriff is wrong are the same ones that scream is it their constitutional right to carry a gun with them everywhere illegal to have Christmas trees up on government property, both misinterpretations of the rights as they were intended. Let me give you a clue, separation of church and state was to protect the church so people could worship how they wanted and not establish a state religion. The right to bear arms does not mean you get to carry a gun into the grocery store with you! Due process means that you are fully informed of the legal action being taken against you and what your rights are in terms of representation and counsel. Get a clue! A bulk of these evictions were illegal, therefore he was doing the right thing by not following through with them.

    • Posted By: bsuperstar @ 03/13/2009 5:18:35 AM

      It's not legally wrong, it is incumbent upon the banks to provide correct and current information regarding who is living on the premises. If Jane rents a house to Jill, where Jill always pays her rent, but Jane doesn't pay the mortgage, and Jill was never notified of the foreclosure, how is this Jill's fault? And why should it be perfectly acceptable to put her out on the street? This is why due diligence is required - because landlords are sometimes rats, and banks sometimes overlook terribly important details, and sometimes, Jill gets put out, even though she's never missed a month's rent.

    • Posted By: mkm@1961 @ 03/11/2009 8:12:27 AM

      "He absolutely need to be terminated. He is not doing the job correctly. Maybe morally right, but legally wrong. When a legitimate landlord has an eviction for non-payment of rent, is this guy going to let them stay because the kids are in diapers? This guy cannot be judge and jury. A legal order is a legal order and it is his JOB to carry out the legal order. If he is too emotionally involved, let someone else do the job correctly. Many people are looking for work."

      You obviously did not read the entire article, he stated the eviction process was not being done correctly. Landlords and Banks are not giving proper notification of the evictions, which is part of the due process. (You need to help a teacher out with extra work and take some reading and comprehending classes)

      • Posted By: asens57 @ 03/11/2009 8:33:36 AM

        For those, who want the sheriff terminated: Let's see, if you are still going to talk like this, when this should happen to you. You should be happy, there is at least one person out there, that cares for people. Is he upholding the law, no, but I think, the Banks are the real villain here, they are getting all this money from the goverment and still want these ghouses, so by the time the country turns around, they can make a nice profit. My advise, think next time, before you speak (or write).

        • Posted By: Emilli @ 03/11/2009 8:40:52 AM

          asens57 it wont happen to people like us because one we have enough sense not to rent from anyone. Two always have money as back up in case of emergency like this. Three know who and the place you are renting from. Read the paper in the foreclosed and legal action section. There are some of us who are self sufficient that don't need oversight..

          • Posted By: YankeeCat @ 03/12/2009 5:11:43 PM

            oh Emilli how very special to be you. how very nice that you have too much sense to rent. gosh, I wish that back when I was young I bought a house right away rathyer than savingt up my money...while RENTING. only a completely self absorbed moron would make a blanket statement implying that renting means you do't have any sense. sometimes Emilli renting means you have no down payment.

          • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 9:01:32 AM

            Oh yeah, because when I was renting I TOTALLY know I checked out the papers 3 months in advance of moving and recorded every single foreclosure in a little notebook to take along with me to make sure the places I checked out to rent weren't in foreclosure. Anyone that doesn't do that is irresponsible and deserves being kicked out on the streets with sick kids in the dead of winter. In fact, anyone who rents are bottom feeders that don't deserve shelter in the first place! Only home owners are worthy of compassion!
            You make me sick.

            • Posted By: amorris33 @ 03/11/2009 9:56:55 AM

              How can you be so cruel!!? Renters are bottom dwellers? My husband and I make $70,000 a year and rent a home in a town that has an excellent school system for our 2 kids. We can not afford a home in this town but can rent, ave house price is $450,000. So are we bottom dwellers? Didn't your mother ever teach you think before you speak? You have insulted a lot of hard working people who just want the same things we all do - health, a steady job, a roof over our heads and the best for our kids - no matter what your income is or if you are a renter! Shame on you!!! All I can say is Karma - what goes around comes around. Your day will come and hopefully no one will offer you any compassion - you are a evil person.

              • Posted By: cadre @ 03/11/2009 11:05:40 AM

                amorriss33 - summer4077 was sticking up for you! read emilli's stupid, shortsighted and gramatically incorrect post and then note that summer's is a reply to that post...i think you'll see that it's actually emilli who makes you sick, and that's an appropriate response to everybody and anybody who doesn't think this crisis is a national tragedy.

                • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 12:05:37 PM

                  Lol thank you! I'm like...wow...people I was being sarcastic! I was trying to make a point to emilli and like 20 people jumped on me. Apparently sarcasm doesn't translate well? :)

                  • Posted By: dvsdog @ 03/11/2009 6:11:43 PM

                    I got your sarcasm right away. All the people who got so offended by your post were actually unwittedly agreeing with you.

              • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 12:04:21 PM

                Oh jeez. My post was pure sarcasm people!!!

                • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 12:12:43 PM

                  Thank you for clarifiying that. I apologize. Now lets help the rest of these greedy people who don't understand what doing the right thng and getting the wrong end of the stick must be going through. Great day to you.

                  • Posted By: surfer64 @ 03/11/2009 12:26:15 PM

                    please kensey and the like only care about one thing(themsheves)dont waste ur time,their types have brought america down and wont stop.

              • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 10:58:21 AM

                summer4077- You are either sarcastic, diluded, or on serious drugs. Haven't firgured out which but you need help!

                • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 12:06:26 PM

                  So why do I need help if I was being sarcastic? Wow, you don't even know me and you are being extremely rude. Who needs help?

                • Posted By: Sunday Morning @ 03/11/2009 11:02:15 AM

                  Geez louise, people. Summer was being sarcastic! She was mocking Emilli.

              • Posted By: hogansdogans @ 03/11/2009 10:17:33 AM

                • Posted By: kensey @ 03/11/2009 11:16:51 AM

                  Amen, ask anyone who has became terminally ill. Your savings and investmests go fast in the medical community. I have a friends who's dad got too sick to go to work. He had savings and he had a great job with medical but you can't be terminally sick and work. So basically he lost his job, lost his medical and than lost his house. He now is living with his children now. So I think all need to seriously think about what our idea of enough "savings."

                • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 10:59:39 AM

                  AMEN TO amorris33!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

            • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 12:04:35 PM

              summer4077,
              Someday you two will know the pain of these people who cannot afford to buy a house.
              Renters are not bottom-feeders like you say.
              You are probably a stuck up person who has had everything handed to you on a silver platter.
              Sound like a "paris hilton" wannabe.

              • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 12:17:44 PM

                This is the last one I'm responding to because obviously you people are not reading the posts. I was being SARCASTIC! I am not some paris hilton wannabe--thanks for the insult. I work my butt off just like everyone else and was a renter until I bought my first home about a year ago.

                • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 12:34:20 PM

                  Summer congrats on the homeownership. Isn't it great. Honestly, I never rented. I bought my first house at 21 for $1000.00. Remodeled to make livable for myself and my duaghter who was just turning 1. With property taxes, homeowners insurance, mortgage insurance, property values plumeting- I understand why alot of people choose to rent. But then they come across situations like this. i applaud the sheriff for his compassion for what is right and for having to be the bad guy when it has to be done. Do not wish to trade from the job I have everyday. Again, sorry for the pervious misunderstanding.

                  • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 5:58:32 PM

                    No problem. I'm a pretty regular poster on Newsweek so I guess I just assumed people would know I was being sarcastic--my fault! :) I don't see how people think what the sheriff is doing is wrong...personally, I could never stand idly by and let innocent people be kicked out onto the streets when they have done everything right.

            • Posted By: flaggy36 @ 03/11/2009 9:14:59 AM

              Didn't you say YOU rented? Hmmmmm, interesting. Your attitude shows there is alot lacking in your life...like the most important thing..GOD. I will pray for you that you have a softening of your heart and attitude towards others who are less fortunate than you...

              • Posted By: summer4077 @ 03/11/2009 10:04:37 AM

                Um...smitty and flaggy...it's called sarcasm lol. "You make me sick" was directed at emilli. I was pointing out how ridiculous he is... :)

                • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 12:55:25 PM

                  summer,
                  Were you even remotely aware that sarcams does not carry the same impact in text as it does coming out of your mouth?
                  How can anyone tell that you were being sarcastic?

            • Posted By: surfer64 @ 03/11/2009 12:27:41 PM

              wow not that hard to undestand,i agree

            • Posted By: kensey @ 03/11/2009 12:24:19 PM

              Your a moron, your basically calling your self a bottom feeder since you rented before. Everyone rents once in there life. If not they live with mommy and daddy or some either "gave" them a house with a silver spoon.

            • Posted By: kensey @ 03/11/2009 12:18:48 PM

              Your a moron, and you basically called your self a bottomfeeder since you rented before. And normal person rents a place once in their life unless they live with mommy and daddy or someone gives them a house.

            • Posted By: kensey @ 03/11/2009 12:14:29 PM

              Your just a moron. No more needs to be said.

            • Posted By: kimber516 @ 03/11/2009 10:55:03 AM

              emilli- do you think these people expected this to happen tho them. People who live in glass houses should never throw stone!!! Never say never- and when all he savings is gone- then what? When the jobs are all gone- THen what? Hope those drugs you take at night to help your conscience sleep will be enough to redeem you in your next life. GOD IS WATCHING!

            • Posted By: Smittysbuttafli @ 03/11/2009 9:36:15 AM

              I really hope and pray nothing ever happens in your wonderful life that you have created. How do people have the nerves to write this. Sickens me!

            • Posted By: flaggy36 @ 03/11/2009 9:14:18 AM

              Didn't you say YOU rented? Hmmmmm, interesting. Your attitude shows there is alot lacking in your life...like the most important thing..GOD. I will pray for you that you have a softening of your heart and attitude towards others who are less fortunate than you...

          • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 12:00:02 PM

            Posted By: Emilli @ 03/11/2009 8:40:52 AMasens57 it wont happen to people like us because one we have enough sense not to rent from anyone. Two always have money as back up in case of emergency like this. Three know who and the place you are renting from. Read the paper in the foreclosed and legal action section. There are some of us who are self sufficient that don't need oversight..
            ======================================================================================
            In response to the above comments. You sound like you're life is going good, im happy for you.
            The one thing I fear that you don't understand, is that a good percentage of people cannot afford to buy houses, or are between homes, and need some place to stay. There is NOTHING wrong with renting. In these ecomonic times, renting seems to be the fiscally efficent way of saving money.
            Also, saving for emergencies is not always as easy as you may think. You probably don't have kids, car payments, doctor bills, and more than likely have a cushy job with a government entity. Good for you. Remember this though, one day, you may be in the same situation. So, please don't judge.

          • Posted By: broman @ 03/11/2009 11:50:42 AM

            Emilli,,,you are by far the biggest a hole that has posted thus far, i can only hope that soon that bubble you live in bursts and you find yourself facing the realities of real life. Not all people are so well off as you may be. I'd bet my bottom dollar your political preference is to the right.

          • Posted By: God'sOwn! @ 03/11/2009 10:49:47 AM

            Emilli.....sometimes it's easier said than done to save for emergencies, especially when you have families with children who need diapers, food, clothing, the bare necessities in life, and sometimes life just isn't so easy as it must be for you to be so judgemental!!! This man IS a blessing to those who could be out on the streets through no fault of their own. Most of the landlords I have ever dealt with are nothing but greedy slumlords who don't give a damn about their tenants, the one's that are paying them to live in hell because the landlords turn a blind eye to what is going on in their buildings, so before you are so quick to judge next time, why don't you walk a few miles in their shoes?? I agree with the person above....this man is a hero, and I pray that God blesses him immensely for standing up for these people!!!

            • Posted By: aries__46 @ 03/11/2009 11:32:26 AM

              God's Own!. I agree with you whole heartedly. Before anyone makes judgement on someone they should walk a few miles in their shoes. Not everyone gets things handed to them on a silver platter. People who work hard and pay their bills and rent, doesn't deserve to be threw out on the streets. I think the sherriff is a hero and may God bless him for standing up for the citiizens of his county. I think we need more sherriffs out there who care and will stand up for peoples rights when he sees they are being done wrong. It was not there fault that the landlord was not paying the mortgage. That is where the rent money should have went, to the bank. When you think about, when you rent, you are the one actually paying for the house/apartment. I just want to end with Sherriff keep up the good work and Thankyou for caring.


          • Posted By: jath123 @ 03/11/2009 9:05:02 AM

            LOL. Emilli, you silly little creature. If you never rented, then that means you must have lived with your mommy and daddy until you saved up for a house purchase. So how old were you when they finally threw you out? 30? 35? Did they still tuck you in a night? LOL....

          • Posted By: warnerpeter @ 03/11/2009 9:01:07 AM

            What? Are you serious? Didn't you read the article? You have little to no understanding of what is happening in America and your comments are very, very shallow and self-centered. Not all people can be as smart and self sufficient as you, apparently. You don't seem to realize that America is in BIG trouble and a majority of lower to middle income people live from paycheck to paycheck-------------IF they have a job at all. Not everyone has a Savings account and, in fact, the new statistics show that American savings now has a NEGATIVE value. Instead of being compassionate like this Sheriff in the story, you choose to be critical and judgemental. Thank God most Americans are more "in-tune" with reality.

          • Posted By: airborne82nd @ 03/11/2009 8:52:53 AM

            three cheers for you Emilli. you"re the biggest *** here. there are a lot of people that are not as lucky as you to put away money and dont even have health care. You are worse then the banks putting people out. You win the fingle finger of fate award.

        • Posted By: sprues2 @ 03/11/2009 12:34:07 PM

          The Sheriff, said..
          Not his call, a judges issued the order.. Lock him up for contempt.
          The sheriff may decide next week, that left handed people are being discriminated against and quit arresting them

        • Posted By: georgewilliam @ 03/11/2009 8:52:00 AM

          Forgive your pun;way to go sheriff!!!It's about time the liuttle man stuck it to the big man!!Yes, Mr. Sheriff,way to go!!you will have good returned to you!!You just stuick to your guns(sorta speak)!!George Kovalchuk

      • Posted By: rjsfl @ 03/11/2009 10:58:26 AM

        You and a couple of idiots on this site are a bunch of uncaring a-holes! I wish to God that something like this happens to you or one of your family members! You are probably some rich bastards who think that nothing like this can happen to them or anyone they know! With this economy it could happen to any-one. I can't wait to see one of you on the news in this position. It would give you all a taste of reality

    • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/11/2009 6:15:08 PM

      Read the article, idiot.

    • Posted By: vintner @ 03/11/2009 1:57:51 PM

      That's the man's point: it's NOT legal. When one law contradicts another, older law, it is null and void. Due process supercedes those local eviction rules.

    • Posted By: celticdreaming @ 03/11/2009 12:26:19 PM

      Ahhh..but the key word here is "legitimate". From what I can tell from the information in this article and from the previous story in October, is that many of the eviction notices have NOT been given due process. The banks are not filing proper paperwork or doing everything that the LAW says they have to before they file for eviction. They don't have all their paperwork in place or researched the way the law requires. Also, a landlord who does not pay the mortgage while STILL collecting rents is not a legitimate landlord in my opinion. So a stand has to be taken at some point and I'm glad that this Sherrif is doing that. He is not being judge and jury...but he IS requiring that ALL the steps required by the law on the part of the banks and landlords are carried out BEFORE any eviction takes place. That is only right and JUST. Good for him. Requiring that all the information and paperwork be correct slows down the banks and they don't like that. It puts the ball back in their court and they don't like that either. If they did thier jobs right the first time around....then they wouldn't have a problem. So good for this gentleman! Keep up the good work.

    • Posted By: celticdreaming @ 03/11/2009 12:25:00 PM

      Ahhh..but the key word here is "legitimate". From what I can tell from the information in this article and from the previous story in October, is that many of the eviction notices have NOT been given due process. The banks are not filing proper paperwork or doing everything that the LAW says they have to before they file for eviction. They don't have all their paperwork in place or researched the way the law requires. Also, a landlord who does not pay the mortgage while STILL collecting rents is not a legitimate landlord in my opinion. So a stand has to be taken at some point and I'm glad that this Sherrif is doing that. He is not being judge and jury...but he IS requiring that ALL the steps required by the law on the part of the banks and landlords are carried out BEFORE any eviction takes place. That is only right and JUST. Good for him. Requiring that all the information and paperwork be correct slows down the banks and they don't like that. It puts the ball back in their court and they don't like that either. If they did thier jobs right the first time around....then they wouldn't have a problem. So good for this gentleman! Keep up the good work.

    • Posted By: linziafortieri @ 03/11/2009 12:23:34 PM

      The point wasn't that the children were in diapers. If you read to article again, the tenant in question was in possession of a legally valid, duly notarized lease agreement that took place AFTER the forclosure process started..That means the tenant had avery right to be there and not to be evicted, in fact, the owner of the property was at fault for entering the agreement and not notifying the tenant.

    • Posted By: chicago man @ 03/11/2009 12:13:05 PM

      When a legitamate landlord has an eviction being served and the police are there to remove tennants it has happened durring a process where the deadbeat tenant has known the possible outcome, recieved tons of warnings and has not left on their own.

      These people are totaly unaware have paid their rent. What kind of idiot are you? And as for the other persons comment about the "fabric of order" Does anybody else see just how easy it is for uninformed stupid people to be jaded to the fate of others? Totalitarian is a word you should look up.

    • Posted By: nemesis122003 @ 03/11/2009 12:08:44 PM

      ...WRONG!!! The problem is that there are banks and companies abusing there rights to this system and that is why it was stopped. Like the man said people have a right to DUE PROCESS. What they were doing is evicting people without notification. Like some one coming to your home in the next five minutes and saying hey you gotta leave and you don't know why cause you signed the lease and payed the bills. To Louddogsbark please about the redistribution of wealth crap. The people with money are owners of companies that are constanly taking advantage of people in bad situations. What about the people who did plan and save. Had a 401K and had to use there savings from what little they do make (While the owners of the companies make like 360 time what they do) and end up broke with no contingency plan cause they were trying to survive. while gas was 4 something a gallon (again an example of ceo's and companies taking advantage of the average working person) and jobs were being cut. Don't assume that everyone they are talking about was irresponsible. In fact, I would say that was a small facttion. Besides, how do you save when you can only afford the bare minimum anyway?

    • Posted By: macaddict3032 @ 03/11/2009 11:38:00 AM

      Did you even read this article?
      The sheriff was seeing a terrible trend happening here. He was doing what was morally right. That's more than I can say for most law enforcement officers. Most of the evictions that he was not obeying were people who had no idea the property they were renting were in forclosure. Why should someone be evicted for paying thier rent? It's not their fault that the landowner is shady and rents a property even though it's in forclosure.
      I for one, applaud this kind sheriff (lord knows those are rare these days), for his actions, even though it may get him in alot of trouble. Now if we could get our federal government to follow suit.

    • Posted By: oharris30 @ 03/11/2009 8:26:27 AM

      you didn't even read the article properly. Tenants should not be responsible for landlords not paying the mortgage. This happened to someone I know.

      • Posted By: exallspanian @ 03/11/2009 11:30:44 AM

        Yeas - the same taxpayers who are fronting the cash to bail out the banks, are being evicted by the banks getting the bailouts....Hmmmmmm
        And, as to the empty houses - why can't the banks collect the rent if people want to stay? It would create a positive cash flow, allow the people to have a place to live, and keep the houses in better repair (A lived in house has a much better likelihood of maintenance than a vacant one.)
        The landlords - yes they are pretty underhanded in their actions are merely the little fish compared to the banks - theses are the ones who screwed up the entire financial system, and are still allowed by the political powers to evict the innocent ones. How is this ever going to help anything?

    • Posted By: best of times @ 03/11/2009 10:39:45 AM

      The sheriff is morally and legally correct in his actions if the people he are going to evict are renters who do not own the property. It is the landlord's responsiblity to make the morgage payments in a timely manner and if they are unable to do so they have a responsibility to inform the renters so they can look for other living arrangements. The sheriff deserves a medal of honor.

      • Posted By: Concerned 1234 @ 03/11/2009 11:29:07 AM

        Some people need to read the article a little better. I have a friend who is in the very situation (but the landlord DID make contact to let her know the house was in foreclosure.). She has a contract with a rental company, not with the landlord. Since her contract is with the company and the company has a contract with the landlord, the company will need to find them a new place to live - hopefully before they get the knock on the door saying Eviction! I agree with the Sheriff - the landlord SHOULD be telling the renter, but becasue he's dishonest, he's showing up at all hours of the night to kick out upstanding people who have paid their rent on time and are unaware that there is a problem with the property. Would placing a notice on the door of the property 60 days and then 30 days and maybe even 15 days before eviction be too much to ask?

    • Posted By: aries__46 @ 03/11/2009 11:10:24 AM

      bhenry68. I disagree. The sherriff should not be terminated. He may have went against the court system, but you just don't throw a family out on the streets, that have been paying there rent. They need to throw the landlord in jail for collecting rent from tenants when he was in foreclosure. The landlord should be held accountable . The rent collected by the tenants should have went to the bank for the morgage payment. I personally am very happy that the sherriff had the *alls to stand up and refuse. Hopefully he will continue the good job he is doing in protecting the innocent.

    • Posted By: rrhouse @ 03/11/2009 9:54:03 AM

      I can see where you are coming from but the sheriff is not evicting a tenant for not paying rent to his landlord. These are people who ARE paying rent to a landlord that is nt paying his mortgage. I guess the point is, if a bank is going to foreclose on an apartment building then they should not only give the mortgage holder notice of foreclosure but also the tenants that are living there because actually when the foreclosure happens you are not evivting the owner you are evicting the people that are really paying

      • Posted By: etsidoyehi@msn.com @ 03/11/2009 10:11:22 AM

        Because of disclosure laws,banks are prohibited from giving financial information out about their clientele to anyone except to those with whom the person has stated and other lending institutions such as when they are applying for loans etc.

    • Posted By: earmstr1 @ 03/11/2009 9:29:35 AM

      Maybe you missed the part where the article explained that most of the eviction proceedings were illegal? He said he was doing the ones that were appropriate. This is how you build trust in law enforcement, actually letting them follow the law and not some bank's orders.

    • Posted By: jath123 @ 03/11/2009 9:08:14 AM

      Your elementary school diploma should be revoked until you learn how to read a simple news article. Landlords weren't performing evictions of renters for nonpayment of rent; banks were performing evictions of PAYING renters because the landlord defaulted on the mortgage but still illegally rented out the apartment to them anyway. Do you have any more uniformed comments up your sleeve?

    • Posted By: flemingfran1 @ 03/11/2009 8:47:52 AM

      It's not just about work. It's about doing what's right. How is it that we as taxpayers can bail out these banks for their
      mismanagement of funds and they have no consequences for their wrong actions and they think they can just throw
      someone on the street withou due process. And what's so wrong with working with these people to modify their
      loan so they can still pay their mortgage. Afterall, what is the bank going to dowith an empty house. That's the
      problem now with the economy, they are sittiing on all these empty houses!

    • Posted By: oharris30 @ 03/11/2009 8:24:54 AM

      what a cold calculated response. I hope that you will be next to be evicted

    • Posted By: frustratedamerican @ 03/11/2009 8:24:09 AM

      You evidently sound like a banker or a landlord. Has this country gone that low that all we think about and care about is the bottom line. How much I can make at whatever and who ever we hurt. I commend this Sheriff for standing up and taking the people into consideration over a bankers or landlords greed and selfish ideals. We need more of this compassion in this country for our citizens. What does it solve to have home after home sitting empty and deteriorating because banks and landlords are greedy. No good whatsoever. Wouldn't it make more sense to receive some money from homeowners or renters than nonthing? Only in the USA can we justify tossing people in the streets.

    • Posted By: richie755 @ 03/11/2009 8:10:16 AM

      yes....

  • Posted By: losinghope @ 04/16/2009 9:06:41 PM

    I lost my job 6 months ago and have been actively loking for a job ever since. Because I am a single mother I was not able to pick up shifts at the restaurants or retail stores because they want you to work night shifts.
    I have 2 degrees and I have never been w/o a job in my life. I made a good living for my child and I all these years, paid my taxes. Guess what I can barely afford food now or take my child to school and am 2 months behind in my rent.

    While the government is bailing out AIG and all the others why are they not helping honest people who are willing to work but cannot find work? Isn't the government responsible to create jobs? Why did I bother studying all those years if I am NOT able to find a corporate job? Why did I bother paying taxes?

    I am facing eviction in about 20 days and have no idea where I am going go? I am probably gonna be on the street, raped and murdered pretty soon. But yeah, who the hell cares right?

  • Posted By: collegevoter @ 03/13/2009 6:32:54 PM

    You're an idiot Chi. An absolute idiot. Did you even bother to read the article? "Own responsibility"? I tell you what, why don't you GO down to some of these neighborhods in Chicago (I've seen them) and see what these people are living with.

    As for the ridiculous "own responsibility" canard, landlords brokers, real estate investors, and BANKS have responsibilities as well. Their "own responsibility." We got in this mess because they (largely the BANKS) abandoned these responsibilites. And you want to lecture individuals on responsibility? Give me a break.

    As for comparing it to the Holocaust, well it's pretty bad out here. And you strike me as exactly the type of moron to regularly compare something to either slavery or the Holocaust then get mad when someone calls you on it. The person made a comparison (probably to draw attention to this issue.) Was it a bad one? Sure but people make dozens of those every day. And it wasn't anywhere near as bad, annoying or condescinding as your analysis. You're the real loser. Enjoy being miserable.

  • Posted By: 13urton 12ider @ 03/13/2009 4:05:18 PM

    It amazes me how the system is failing the people. Billions of dollars in bail-outs to banks, are you serious?!?! They're putting the rats in charge of the cheese, and once again the great silent majority is getting hammered. Generations to come will be smothered in taxes and debts because of what our "leaders" are doing today.
    Give 10,000 dollars to every person who has been employed and paying taxes for the past five years and say good-bye to this B>S> crisis which served to make the rich richer and the middle class poor. Give 5,000 to those who haven't been working because of SPECIFIC hardships. Some will get out of the red on their mortage, others will buy a home for the first time. Still, others will use it as a down payment on a car...etc...etc. Instead, let's give BILLIONS, thats alot of money, to banks that have failed, so that their executives can go on retreat. I think I'll apply for Canadien citizenship.

  • Posted By: algorhythm1-2 @ 03/13/2009 1:22:59 PM

    Who's responsible for posting these disgusting pictures of people's fat hairy stomachs all over the internet? With the "after" picture showing an unrealisticly flat stomach? Who's propagating these unpalpable pot-bellied pictures?

  • Posted By: bsuperstar @ 03/13/2009 5:00:27 AM

    For those of you arguing against the moratorium, you're missing the logistics of the situation. If the bank doesn't know there are renters on the premises, how is it that the bank is supposed to notify them? I find it AMAZING that the banks are being absolved of all responsibility. A friend of mine, who has NEVER missed a rent payment, was nearly evicted four months ago. She works for a living and she has one child. She is not on welfare, or on food stamps, she doesn't 'shop' at food banks. But she was nearly evicted because the landlord failed to make mortgage payments, and the bank failed to verify who was living on the premises. How can this POSSIBLY be her fault? She moved into the premises three YEARS ago, yet she should have miraculously known her landlord would default on his loan at some point in the future? If that's the case, maybe no one should rent from anyone. As for researching an apartment to find out if it's on the foreclosure list...I work twelve hour days. I have a four year old son. When would I have time to sit down and sift through hundreds of foreclosure listings and drive around verifying properties? That's unrealistic. Landlords have an obligation TO PROVIDE THE HOUSING THEY ARE BEING PAID TO PROVIDE. I find it terrifying that the only people being held responsible for this are not the banks or the landlords, but the very people being victimized. How very American - blame the victim.

  • Posted By: duanenorris @ 03/12/2009 5:38:59 PM

    Reading these comments is very depressing. Apparently, it's not longer possible for adults to read simple English with any kind of comprehension at all. bhenry68 and emilli didn't even understand the scenarios the Sheriff was facing. Dummies. Ozark_Sunshine likewise couldn't comprehend the actual point of the Sheriff's argument, but does like spouting off about unrelated (and entirely wrong-headed) assumptions. The Sheriff clearly states he was facing a high proportion of eviction orders that were legally deficient in terms of meeting due process requirements. He suspended evictions until the process was cleaned up. That's not a public servant letting his sympathy stand in the way of doing his job -- that's a sworn officer of the court refusing to carry out illegal, improper orders that were deficient. What a bunch of morons these reactionary dimwits who attack the Sheriff prove to be.

  • Posted By: news or not @ 03/12/2009 1:06:45 PM

    I have never read a more confused article or posts. An unlawful detainer is the court action for eviction of a tenant. The court action is brought by the property owner against the named tenant. Of course the tenant is notified of every action. It is the same with any court action against a person. You are assuming that can be done without the person having the opportunity to appear in court? Every action has a step by step notification. If the defendant doesnt show up in court or reply to the notification, of course he loses.......For the dummies that keep replying that I havnt read the article, maybe, just maybe you can understand when I say that the article was flawed by the journalist(?) giving false or at the least incomplete information. The people writing articles like this are striving to create controversy. I am surprised that you still have the gullible belief that all media are pure and clean beyond any doubt.....Grow up..Also the posts are being shuffled so that there is no continuity. Why would they do that???

    • Posted By: bob54z @ 03/12/2009 4:52:11 PM

      if you really believe that you always get proper notice think again.....2 years after i moved out of a house i got a letter from a collection agency my former landlord got a judgement against me for $7000 seems vandels destroyed his house and i'm responsibile for it even thoughy i gave him a 60 day dotice i was moving

    • Posted By: Bona Phide @ 03/12/2009 2:06:02 PM

      News or Not. The facts are pretty clear. The renters paid their rent in full. In one example the tennant had a notorized lease signed after forclosure had already started. That right there proves the landlords were not disclosing the fact they were in forclosure. I think the "grown up" thing to do is to make sure that the tennants are receiving ample notice that they will need to find a new residence don't you?

  • Posted By: capealava @ 03/12/2009 1:44:55 PM

    Finally a "LAWMAN" following his heart instead of blindly following the law.

  • Posted By: news or not @ 03/11/2009 8:59:51 PM

    Also, a court ordered unlawful detainer is due process of a court action against a tenant. That is the judges statement that according to law, a tenant must move. Here the sheriffs dept doesnt get spelled out arguments on the court order. Just the information that the tenant must move. I dont know how the sheriff gets the ability to know all the specifics that this one is using to overide the courts decision as mean and cruel.

    • Posted By: Bona Phide @ 03/12/2009 12:35:48 PM

      A tennants lease supercedes change of ownership, or forclosure. Also, in most states a tennant must receive 10-30 days notice prior to eviction. A court ordered eviction is not due process in, and of, itself. It is only following due process if the court order was followed by proper notification to the tennant.

  • Posted By: news or not @ 03/11/2009 8:47:26 PM

    This is a follow-up post. I stated earlier that in most states tenants get up to three notices and two court dates prior to actual eviction. I am not from Illinois, but I bet their laws are similar. A couple smart-ass people responded that I must be stupid because these are foreclosures. They may or may not be. The Sheriff acts on a court order and I have a real tough time believing that a court ordered unlawful detainer is done anywhere without notification to the tenant being evicted. A responsible journalist would have at least done enough background work to know that. An unlawful detainer can be done by the person that legally represents the ownership of the property under the same laws that landlords do. The story that the Sheriff and six others dressed in black descend upon a tenant with no warning whatsoever is quite unbelievable. Here, one officer from the sheriffs dept shows up 3 to 7 days after the last notification to the tenant. Sometimes they are not even tenants, but just someone who has obtained access to an empty unit. They are evicted as John Doe and all others.This whole story is fishy and it appears that a lot of facts were left out. (media frequently does that). This is an over simplified story responded to by some oversimple posters that see themselves as heros. The sheriff appears to be a grandstander and likes his name in the news as a hero to the poor, but I doubt that he can be trusted to really do his job. It is not his say, he has a court order and an obligation to carry it out. He is not the Judge or the court system. If he wanted to be he should quit his job and look for one of those.

    • Posted By: Bona Phide @ 03/12/2009 12:10:49 PM

      Hey News or Not. I'm not sure you have a high reading comprehension bud. It says right in the story that the sheriff is only serving evictions when he can determine that the tennants were given proper notice. The problem he has seen is that very few of the tennants have been given notice. If the landlord doesn't disclose to the tennants that the property is in forclosure, then there is no way the tennants would know until the police descended on them to evict them. I highly doubt anyone on here, myself included, considers themselves a hero for seeing what's right, and applauding those that uphold it.

      You, on the other hand, are a wierd case of someone who ignores the facts of the story, and throws in a mix of his/her own hypotheticals. Your conclusions are flawed, because they are all based on your hypotheticals, and not the facts. Please re-read the story, and revise your opinion using facts...

    • Posted By: jdmy @ 03/12/2009 11:56:40 AM

      In these cases, the court sends notifications to the homeowners who in default on their mortgages. The people who are renting the homes/units from the owners do not know what is going on until the Sherif Dept. shows up at the door to enforce the court order. These people have not idea that the home is in foreclosure because they do not own it, they rent from the owner.

  • Posted By: ew2westy @ 03/12/2009 8:50:15 AM

    Glad to hear there at still people in this world who canl see the human aspect of a situation... Protect the innocent, punish the wrong; the true definition of a sheriff.

  • Posted By: ew2westy @ 03/12/2009 8:47:07 AM

    Glad there are still people in this world who look at the human aspect of a situation.

  • Posted By: ddarkangel @ 03/12/2009 8:44:50 AM

    Looks like a few children left behind here? Any of us is a paycheck, a medical or natural disaster away from financial ruin at this point. No one has a safe job. Retirement? We will be working until we drop...tread softly before you judge other people-it really could be you. No one is immune. I admire the sheriff for standing up to the banks. Just check your bank statement-they are not always right

  • Posted By: jaross1807 @ 03/12/2009 6:48:32 AM

    Good for you Sherrif. It is time soemone stopped the banks throwign their weight around. Wish you lived here in South Africa as the banks are doign exactly the same and flout the laws wiht impunity.

  • Posted By: Oscar1975 @ 03/11/2009 11:00:39 AM

    THIS ENTIRE MESS OUR COUNTRY IS IN HAS BEEN CAUSED BY A CORRUPT AND GREEDY FEW. How can we let our country get so messed up? This is our country people. I understand that if you don't pay your Rent or Mortgage then yes you should be removed from your house, but in the case where a renter trusted his landlord and the landlord did not pay his mortgage then that is a different story. ALL of THIS MESS HAS BEEN CAUSED BY GREED and Laws that are meant to protect the interest of the Wealthy Few......Doesn't anyone see this???? That almost every law we have pertains to protecting something or someones interest (in this case the BANKS) Banks are corrupt institutions. How do you buy a house for say $100,000 dollars and 30 years later pay about $300,000. How is that possible???????? Greed is the only answer. I am a Christian, but even in the Muslim faith you are not allowed to charge interest, this is according to the Coran. (BTW, not pimping Islam nor do I support it) But just making a point as to how Interest that has you pay 3x the amount of anything is WRONG and IS PLAIN AND SIMPLE ROBBERY. Get involved and Call you Senators, or Congressmen, if they won't work for the people then Remove them from Office by Voting for someone Else.

    We do not work for Washington DC or the President. They work for US, make yourselves be heard instead of being sheep and doing nothing about it while there I TYRANNY BEING COMMITED IN THE LAND OF THE FREE, HOME OF THE BRAVE.

    When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny - Thomas Jefferson

    The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty - Abraham Lincoln

    • Posted By: ggllww @ 03/11/2009 11:49:05 PM

      Oscar - How many times you going to post this...this is about 4 I have seen.

      We get your point Dude, now go play on Craigs list or somewhere...HUH!

  • Posted By: scootchpooch @ 03/11/2009 12:04:04 PM

    WHAT ARE YOU THINKING TO SAY GOD BLESS HIM ? He and his department and fellow crownies are the problem to start with. How many people did he victomize BEFORE he saw the light? I bet you'rer one of the idiots that put King George in office too!!! It all goes back to the commander in chief and his followers. MORRONS

    • Posted By: ggllww @ 03/11/2009 11:44:40 PM

      Hey Scootch, your post seems like you been hitting the bottle a little too HARD. Come back when you sober up, and post something worth reading.......

  • Posted By: news or not @ 03/11/2009 9:56:06 PM

    We have to remember that this story is about Chicago. That is where unusual people vote in unusual politicians.

  • Posted By: mrhamilt46 @ 03/11/2009 9:54:22 PM

    The sheriff cannot be a vigilante, because he is a lawman. A vigilante is a citizen who takes the law into his or her own hands by apprehending and punishing suspected criminals. The sheriff is failing to execute court orders so he is in contempt of court. He is a contemptuous hero.

  • Posted By: bootlegger @ 03/11/2009 9:48:59 PM

    News or not Has a point, He sounds like a lawyer or slum lord with knowledge in this area. However my hat is off to Sheriff Dart For having a human side, and the brass balls to say, HEY THIS IS NOT RIGHT!!!!!! If Bankers (which we've now have proof that they;re not all that bright) and Judges ran this country, with out the objections off individuals like Sheriff Dart and many others we would really be in trouble. After all that is how this country was built! After all there seems to be victims that are involved. It is time to take back our country and tell the people that live in a one sided world that the world is round and it needs a heart if we are ever going to exist. Freedom of speech AIN"T IT GREAT

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse