SPONSORED BY:
Edel Rodriguez for Newsweek
TECHNOLOGY

How to Keep the Bomb From Terrorists

The only thing that can keep nuclear bombs out of the hands of terrorists is a brand-new science of nuclear forensics.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

In 2007, at the very moment Washington was sitting at the negotiating table with Pyong-Yang to hammer out a nuclear deal, North Korean officials were supplying know-how, equipment and nuclear material to Syria to build a weapons-grade reactor only a few miles from Israel's border. When the news came to light, diplomats and nuclear experts were shocked at Kim Jong Il's duplicity. Israel bombed the Syrian site later that year.

What is Kim Jong Il doing now? The question is foremost on the minds of U.S. national-security officials. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, when asked recently what keeps him awake at nights, said, "It's the thought of a terrorist ending up with a weapon of mass destruction, especially nuclear." What if Osama bin Laden offered to pay Kim Jong Il $10 million, say, for a nuclear bomb to be exploded in New York City and $20 million for a second bomb destined for Tel Aviv?

U.S. security officials are now convinced that the only effective way to stop Kim Jong Il is to put in place an effective deterrence against such a foolish action, and that the task is urgent. On the bottom-line question of whether a successful nuclear terrorist attack is more or less likely than it was when George W. Bush entered office, just last month the bipartisan Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism offered a unanimous judgment: "Our margin of safety is shrinking, not growing." The key to a new deterrent is coming up with some way of tracing the nuclear material backward from the explosion in New York City to the Pyongan reactors that forged the fissile material, even to the mines in Sunchon-Wolbingson that yielded the original uranium ore.

The idea behind this type of nuclear forensics would be to put doubt in the minds of North Korean officials. The scenario that U.S. intelligence officials imagine is a debate between two North Korean national-security advisers over the merits of a bin Laden offer—let's call them Hawk and Chicken Hawk—in the presence of their leader, Kim Jong Il. Here's how the debate might go:

"We should do the deal," says Hawk. "Under your enlightened leadership, Dear Leader, we have expanded our arsenal to 10 bombs. If we sold two, we'd still have eight bombs left, which is more than enough to deter the United States or South Korea from invading our country to overthrow our regime. And besides, we need the cash."

The prospect makes Chicken Hawk shudder. "If Al Qaeda successfully detonates a nuclear bomb in midtown Manhattan and kills half a million people, don't you think that when the United States discovers the source of the material it will erase North Korea from the map?"

Hawk leans back in his chair and smiles like Dr. Strangelove. "The Americans will not know where Osama got his bomb," he says. "It could just as well have come from Pakistan, where bin Laden is now headquartered."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: BOFORCE @ 09/18/2009 3:14:06 AM

    Hahaha.........America is fuc*ked in Afghanistan...begging Pakistan to bailout their asss.

  • Posted By: boom shaka @ 09/17/2009 4:28:36 PM

    You make a good argument, but I really don't know if this is a good idea.

    For example, what if the nuclear material is stolen from one of our allies? Or sold by a traitor? Do we nuke Paris because Jean Luc got greedy? Sure, there are a lot of good reasons to nuke Paris, but that's not one of them (I'm KIDDING! sheesh, lighten up :P)

    Another scenario would be a rogue N. Korean scientist/general stealing the materials. This individual would not likely care what happened to North Korea (heck, they may even want to get revenge against Kim) so there would be no deterrent. (The conspiracy theory would have Bin Laden setting it off BECAUSE he knew the U.S. would retaliate and turmoil would ensue)

    There's nothing wrong with developing the science of nuclear forensics. We would need it in a worst case scenario, but to consider an effective deterrent...I don't know about that one.


    Regards,

    BS

  • Posted By: jstepp590 @ 09/17/2009 11:11:52 AM

    This is the idea I had when I thought about it also. I understand some of the skepticism shown by a couple members below but this issue requires innovative answers. Don't make the mistake of Bush by trashing this idea without offering something better. The end result of do-nothing is a glowing hole. Come up with a better answer.

    I like the part of putting in the responsibility back on the regime creating the material because it will cause them to take the destruction of their country into their calculations. Would you sell a gun to someone illegally knowing that they are about to murder someone and the weapon could be traced back to you? If the penalty for selling the weapon was death? Even someone with two lonely neurons crying out lonely in the empty darkness could see the deterant in that!

    Also, I was trained in NBC (nuclear, biological and chemical) warfare by the Army and there are ways to set off nukes that will cause minimal fallout. Airbursts will kill everyone in a city while leaving all the structures intact, while ground bursts are very dirty and throw radioactive materials high into the atmosphere.

    The point is that this idea is better then nothing. What is our other "alternative", some idiotic "Kill 'em all and let God sort them out" platitude? Come up with a better plan to be constructive or get a life.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now