PROJECT GREEN

Crops With Attitude

Poor nations are now starting to shake off the old 'Frankenfood' taboo.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Bob Phelps @ 03/15/2009 1:40:53 AM

    The United Nations' International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) published a very different vision for the future of farming in 2008. The report recommended fundamental changes in agricultural practices and systems to deal with soaring food prices, hunger, social inequities and environmental catastrophe. The 400 scientists involved in the three-year project recommended a global shift from industrial agribusiness to sustainable farming systems, with targeted research and development augmenting local traditional knowledge to help farmers optimise their use of soil and water resources. IAASTD also concluded that GM crops could not play a useful role in solving climate change, biodiversity loss, hunger or poverty.

    The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) claims it will ???feed the world??? with a Gene Revolution - industrial monocultures of Genetically Manipulated (GM) crops, animals and microbes. The Ford, Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, the World Bank, USAID, Monsanto and first world governments (including Australia) back AGRA. These are the same vested interests that conceived, funded and deployed the Green Revolution in the 1950s and 60s, to maintain Western influence over newly independent Asian nations.

    A billion people suffer chronic starvation and malnutrition while another billion are obese. Western institutions only intervene as civil unrest over food shortages and price hikes now threatens national stability. The main causes of hunger are global food trade, unfair terms of trade, poverty and debt, environmental degradation, US and EU farm subsidies and social upheaval. Yet these first world interests will prescribe more of their own technology and chemical inputs as the radical cure for third world hunger - particularly GM crops, animals and microbes.

    Like the Green Revolution technologies, GM crops have already failed to deliver on their empty promises. Despite GM industry hype, industry figures show that GM crops stalled in 1996 when Monsanto first launched commercial GM soy, corn, cotton and canola in the USA with two GM traits - Roundup herbicide tolerance and built in insect killer. Just the same four crops with two GM traits are for sale now.

    In 2008, the USA grew 50% of all GM crops, while Argentina, Brazil, Canada and Paraguay grew 80% of the rest - mainly exported for animal feed and biofuel production. The 125 million hectares of GM crops were grown on just 1.5% of the world's productive land area. Twenty-five nations grew some GM crops but most were on a trial scale and another 170 countries (plus 60 occupied territories) remain GM-free. Less than 1% of the world???s 1.4 billion farmers grow GM crops as they are designed to fit into broad-acre farming systems that require a levelling of the landscape and the alienation of community lands.

    • Posted By: Allen Miller @ 03/16/2009 4:01:20 PM

      Will farmers who see the best-understood, most regulated technology in the history of plant breeding that renders their crop healthy instead of being wiped out by virus agree that "GM crops have already failed to deliver on their empty promises."? This is a technology that can save their livelihood and in some cases prevent starvation. While it may not "feed the world" on it's own, the availability of new traits made possible only through GM technology certainly will help. Regarding developed countries, would the vast numbers of corn and soybean farmers in the western hemisphere pay a premium to grow GM crops if "GM crops have already failed to deliver on their empty promises"? No one is forcing them to plant these crops. Trade practices may indeed be unfair. Don't blame GMOs. It is refreshing if it is really true that GM crops can be grown in Africa without dependence on large corporations, or large-scale monocultural cropping systems. There's no reason why users of GM crops should be beholden to big business or limited to large scale cropping systems.

  • Posted By: Robert Wager @ 03/16/2009 1:08:59 PM

    Google "Why the IAASTD Failed " if you want to undestand the IAASTD for what it really is. It most certainly is not the considered opinion of 400 world experts.

  • Posted By: Robert Wager @ 03/16/2009 1:07:48 PM

    Google 'Why the IAASTD Failed' if you want to understand the IAASTD for what it is.

  • Posted By: Afrimaniac @ 03/14/2009 5:31:58 PM

    See

  • Posted By: Afrimaniac @ 03/14/2009 5:30:50 PM

    Global revolution! Africa will soon feed the world.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse