POLITICS

The Enemy Of the Good

President Obama has an ambitious agenda and an economy to fix. Yet hundreds of top government posts stand empty. One reason: over-the-top ethics rules are disqualifying or driving away some of the best and the brightest.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Groveside Diva @ 04/09/2009 1:10:49 AM

    President Obama is a great leader and is doing an excellent job in trying to turn this awful economy around by making some significant changes and if people start playing by the rules by paying their taxes (rich people) then maybe our economy would be better but I have faith in president Obama in getting the job done and I???m glad that he has enforce those strict rules.

    • Posted By: student @ 04/20/2009 5:30:47 PM

      Don't kid yourself, rich people aren't the only ones not paying their taxes. Barbers, hair salons, painters, landscapers, waiters, all sorts of people don't pay their fair share. Any time you pay cash for a service they don't always pay the tax.

  • Posted By: CCinNY @ 04/13/2009 10:17:26 AM

    I am disgusted by the implication that President Obama should have to relax his ethical standards to be able to confirm the "best and brightest" into senior positions. It's appalling that setting a high bar basically disqualifies people who have been in Washington for years. Solution - get rid of the dregs of society and find decent, common people who have played by the rules all these years. PLEASE.

    • Posted By: student @ 04/20/2009 5:27:09 PM

      I agee. There are plenty of smart decent people who have paid their taxes. Maybe they are too busy working so they can pay for the deadbeats.

  • Posted By: drewand @ 04/06/2009 3:09:13 PM

    I have to say that it is good that our leaders are finally being held to a higher standard. It is truely a shame that our "best and brightest" are basically trying to 'cheat' the American people of the tax revenue they owe. Maybe it is time to bring in a whole new bunch of the "best and brightest" to replace these criminals. For too long the shakers and movers have been bluring the line of honesty and integrity and it has to stop. It amazes me that no one is held accountable anymore and that holding certain "important positions" in our society means that these geniuses can break the law, change the constitution and basically steal from the American people. I say embarass them, hound them and prosecute them!!!

  • Posted By: lenfinger @ 03/30/2009 1:12:16 PM

    I've just gotten around to reading this article, after spending the last week putting the finishing touches on my tax return and mailing it! The article bemoans the superstrict rules to which candidates for top positions in the Obama administration are being held, and about how many qualified people have dropped out because of them. To look at the article another way: is anyone besides me disturbed by the admissions of so many of these candidates that they haven't played by the rules in paying and/or filing their income taxes? I don't like the tax laws any more than anyone else does (and I'm a CPA!), but I've found it makes life a lot easier if you just play by the rules. Maybe if some of these rich jerks HAD been paying the amounts they were supposed to, the federal government wouldn't be in quite the lousy financial position it is in today.

  • Posted By: marcotte @ 03/29/2009 5:56:19 PM

    Exactly what kind of tax problems are involved? Don't these people have accountants? It would be interesting to categorize the different issues. Are all these people purposely cheating? Or misusing loopholes? Or sloppy? Or poor at record keeping? Or, would everyone in the country have a tax problem if everyone were audited, i.e., is our tax code so convoluted that is is iimpossible to file an honest return?

  • Posted By: marcotte @ 03/29/2009 5:53:34 PM

    Exactly what kind of tax problems are involved? Don't these people have accountants? It would be interesting to categorize the different issues. Are all these people purposely cheating? Or misusing loopholes? Or sloppy? Or poor at record keeping? Or, would everyone in the country have a tax problem if everyone were audited, i.e., is our tax code so convoluted that is is iimpossible to file an honest return?

  • Posted By: grasslandsgal @ 03/29/2009 10:17:17 AM

    This is the undercovered issue of the times -- that when the ethics screws are tightened, far too many fail to pass the test. The guy who said that anyone from New York would either have a tax or nanny problem -- that's very telling.

    Maybe the best thing to do is to put all people earning over $75,000/year through a one-time vetting process. With all the unpaid taxes, we might be able to significantly reduce the deficit!

  • Posted By: smithyj @ 03/28/2009 5:44:13 PM

    Funny. How many other presidents had this problem... uh uh.. yeh.. its the rules that are the problem. Enemy of good. well worth a laugh.

  • Posted By: gene4655 @ 03/28/2009 12:44:58 PM

    Really strange that for Obama, the "best and brightest" are also unethical enough not to be qualified.

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 03/28/2009 10:24:20 AM

    i hpe obama sticks with his ethics -that is the only virtue which can save the collapse of a very corrupt society

  • Posted By: gkopia @ 03/27/2009 2:02:08 PM

    I find it ironic that the media is now complaining about difficulty finding competent administrators for the Obama administration when for the past several decades it's been the media that defines what defines competence. Newsweek, when you report every blemish, every fault, every gaff every error in judgement of everyone in the public eye, why do you act surprised when the political powers that be ultimately refuse to appoint anyone unless they're records are perfect? And why should you find it surprising that really competent leaders avoid politics simply to avoid the aggrivation? This is a situation that you, in large part, helped to create. Now you get to report (and complain) about the logical outcome of your incessant fault finding. Yeah, it's pretty amazing that Tom Daschle missed paying a lot of taxes, but ask yourselves this.....would that have made him a bad Secretary of HHS? And what other great leaders are we giving up because we won't tolerate error? When the media stops making sensational stories out of every case of bad judgement, then maybe we'll have a chance at getting competent leadership instead of wholly mediocre, but clean, leaders who can't find their way in the dark.

    • Posted By: PoliticsNow @ 03/27/2009 5:00:42 PM

      Generally, I agree with you gkopia. The media, not just newsweek itself, create standards that a great deal of capable people can't live up to. You asked, "would that have made him [Tom Daschle] a bad Secretary of HHS?" and my response to that is yes. I think there are a lot of expectations set by the media that are unrelated to candidates' work performance, but abiding to laws set by the government you plan to work for is a pretty low bar to set. Of those other 300,000 applicants I'm sure there are some that are very well qualified as well as law-abiding citizens. I don't think a clean record can only come at the expense of competency. Those people who are intelligent enough to help get us out of our current situation should also be intelligent enough to follow the fairly straight forward guidelines towards employment. Talent and good leadership skills shouldn't make anyone above the law in the slightest. It may take a little longer to fill these positions with a standard like not keeping $140,000 from the government, but isn't an adequate and patriotic individual worth the wait?

  • Posted By: louisMMVII @ 03/26/2009 3:52:29 AM

    Washington really needs to hire some poor wise men, as Lincoln was. Elijiah(Obama) should know this. Recirculating the same old scum around Washington, whom, "know how the game is played" will not change anything.

  • Posted By: dcs425 @ 03/25/2009 7:05:34 PM

    "A superstrict vetting process has driven off...Tom Daschle...after it was disclosed he failed to pay about $140,000 in back taxes.." Thomas and Barry call it a superstrict process when it's discovered that someone who has been in government most of his adult life and therefore should know the law, fails to pay back taxes equal to greater than three times the median income of the American taxpayers. How exactly is that superstrict????

  • Posted By: dcs425 @ 03/25/2009 7:03:42 PM

    "A superstrict vetting process has driven off...Tom Daschle...after it was disclosed he failed to pay about $140,000 in back taxes.." Thomas and Barry call it a superstrict process when it's discovered that someone who has been in government most of his adult life and therefore should know the law, fails to pay back taxes equal to greater than three times the median income of the American taxpayers. How exactly is that superstrict????

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 03/25/2009 6:12:27 PM

    So when is the impeachment process of Barack Obama starting ?

  • Posted By: jh35180 @ 03/25/2009 5:19:27 PM

    Candidate Obama would have been better off had he not run such a grandiose campaign last year. Too many Obama supporters made Obama look like the second coming. "Nobody" could live up to all that hype. Obama would have been better served had not played the Washington "outsider" so much. It looks like some of may be coming back to bite him in the rear.

  • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 03/25/2009 4:43:38 PM

    "The Enemy Of the Good" whom exactly is suppose to be the good?

  • Posted By: bwlear @ 03/25/2009 1:52:22 PM

    Why use a teleprompter? Because that???s what people do when they have important ideals to express and they want to do so in a clear and concise manner. When you don???t have that, you tend to say stupid things like " Mission accomplished " and " Bring it on". Or even make bad jokes about Special Olympics. That???s why we have those funny paper things called books. When you have something important to say, write it down to make sure you say it how you meant to. President Obama is not an " actor " like the ex-President you Republicans love so much, paid to recite what others have written for him. It's not a line in a script to be memorized and regurgitated. It is the peoples business and that requires a presentation that is professional and reflects the importance of the subject matter.

    All of the people complaining about President Obama doing too much and should be concentrating only on the economy are now complaining about how he only talked about one thing, the economy. Now it's boring and did not inspire the people. Well, if it's inspiration you need, go to church. I need a President to tell me what he's going to do to fix the problems we have. Not someone to tell me every reason why not to do something and no suggestions on how to correct the issue.
    And look at how the market has responded to his proposals. Every standard set by the ??? talking heads??? on the right is indicating progress. Housing is up, consumer purchasing is up, and confidence is growing. And what does the ???loyal opposition??? say in response? ??? I hope the Presidents ideals fail ??? per Rush L., Bobby J. and Fred T. I guess in their minds, the economy is inching forward in spite of the economic stimulus plan not because of it. If we had done as they proposed and???. Wait, they haven???t purposed anything. So I guess their new ideal is ???Nothing new but no to everything???.

    And to those who consider the budget too large and wasteful, I say this. President Obama is investing in the American people with this budget. It says that if I, the government, give you better schools and provide you with access to better resources such as high speed Internet, affordable college loans and health care, you will in turn be able to better compete in a global economy. If I, the government, invest in rebuilding the infrastructure this country and not some foreign nation that we are at war with, that you the citizens will be able to do more with your business for less, faster and more reliably. And that by investing in new sources of energy now, we can create a worldwide demand for American products and not continue to import ourselves to the point that we have to lie about why we are fighting wars and losing American soldiers. And that if I, the government, adjust the tax code to better represent the majority of the population, that you the people will use the entrepreneurial sprit that has made this country the greatest nation ever on the face of the

  • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 03/22/2009 12:39:02 AM

    I'm beginning to woder if the IRS is partisan in some way. Why is it so many Democrats have been audited and so few Republicans?
    I know from personal experiance that to call the IRS insane is a resonable conclusion.
    And it appears Republicans fit that description as well. It certainly is not sanity that has brought America to it's knees..

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 03/23/2009 11:24:18 AM

      Republicans pay their taxes that is why - the GOP Party is underfire and under watchdog type hyper vigilance from the left and their media comrades while a blind eye is turned to the libs and their actions. As one democratic congressman said the GOP should be held to a higher standard than us after all they are the party of morality. That statement alone speaks volumes for term limits and honest media coverage.

      • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 03/23/2009 1:09:15 PM

        both parties are corrupt and morally bankrupt. please, we as a nation need to come to better terms with that.... neither side has squeky clean resumes or history....

        its human nature to seek power through money and corruption. the mind thinks no differently about it now than it did 1,000 years ago. its always been a snatch and grab effort, along with trampling all over the little people along the way...

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 03/23/2009 3:09:28 PM

          Yeah but did you ever notice when a republican does something wrong it is a headline with Republican Congressman so and and so but when a democrat does something wrong it is never a headline and his party affiliation doesn't appear until the second paragraph of the story. Same applies to anti-abortion vs. pro-choice (never pro-life and never pro-abortion) "vast right wing conspiracy" (a Clinton favorite) religious right wing conspiracy, but never a "vast left wing conspiracy" socialist conspiracy, or communist/Marxist leaning conspiracy. Christians are viewed as people with low intelligence, homophobic (because they oppose homosexuality) or even crazy. Non-religious people are viewed as normal, tolerant and non-bigoted. Homosexual bigotry toward the church seldom a headline and always attacks the church as the cause of the incidents. Imagine where Christians would be if they defaced homosexual property (prison) but homosexuals are given a free pass to vandalize and desecrate church property and on and on it goes.

          • Posted By: chris s. @ 03/24/2009 10:06:09 PM

            Are they picking on you again?

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 03/25/2009 9:27:21 AM

              By the way I'm not a republican or a democrat - but if I had to choose today it would be a no-brainer - there is a reason the dems mascot is what it is just look back in history say to the Andrew Jackson administration.

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 03/25/2009 9:09:38 AM

              No I can't be picked on by misinformed people who bobblehead their way through life believing lie after lie as the truth. We have witnessed enough lying by the democrats in the lat two weeks over AIG to make me sick. We need to clean house in Washington D.C. establish congressional term limits and get these bums out maybe if they had to find a real job they would finally "GET IT". Naaa.... wishful thinking I guess!

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 03/24/2009 12:10:56 PM

            "Yeah but did you ever notice when a republican does something wrong it is a headline with Republican Congressman so and and so but when a democrat does something wrong it is never a headline "

            No, can't say I've noticed that.

            • Posted By: John Dough @ 03/24/2009 4:01:31 PM

              That's because you are blind

          • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 03/23/2009 4:59:21 PM

            i agree on alot of those points, the media, right now (since there is a predominent democratic majority everywhere but the supreme court) they wont touch on whos in power. same as when bush was in office. thats kinda how its always been. no one wants those government officials knocking on your door because your digging too deep and reporting too much. although you can never dig deep enough or report enough on the crap that goes on behind the closed doors of government, they think they have limits and they will enforce those limits.

            its truly sad. the once free enterprise and public service that reporting once was, comes down to mere ratings and what makes money.

            the whole damn government minus a few individuals have all abused they're power at some point, they have all cheated taxes, they have all taken some kind of loop hole contribution...

            things are quite dire and will get worse if we dont clean it up...

            i dont want to seem as if i ignore the fact that there is VERY biased reporting, the problem is that we continually fuel the fire with arguments such as this. the reporters eat it up, while every time i click to view a comment on here someone is making a buck off of my rantings...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse