SPONSORED BY:
SMALL-BUSINESS DIARY

A Healthy Proposition

If Obama wants to really help small businesses, he should focus on health care.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Like many small-business owners I look forward to my annual medical insurance negotiation with all the joy of a crab about to meet boiling water. This year proved no exception to the pain. Our medical insurance bill rose more than 17 percent, or $180,000. Our family-owned plastic-bag manufacturing company will have to churn out at least 30 million additional bags just to cover the increase.

So when President Obama announced in early March that he intended to tackle the nation's health-care mess, I took notice. Not only because he pledged to help the uninsured, but because he swore he'd find a way to corral runaway costs. While his mid-March proposal to free up lending to small business by guaranteeing loans made by the Small Business Administration helps in the short run, action on rocketing health-care costs remains central to ensuring long-term competitiveness. His commitment of more than $640 billion to fund health reform seemed like a serious acknowledgement that the current system is broken. Better yet, his willingness to build a broad coalition, that includes business, gave me hope that increases might not march on forever, eventually outstripping our ability to sell bags.

 
PHOTOS
What About Us?

Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.


 

Certainly the plan has lots of goodies for small companies. It offers a tax credit for smaller firms that provide health insurance and offers to cover the part of the cost of catastrophic care currently shouldered by business. And the possibility that small business could buy insurance from a public plan would offer the same benefit as purchasing as a group, which should lower premiums since cost would be spread among larger numbers.

But, of course, there are the details. Almost immediately, critics focused on the cost of the plan, some of which would be shouldered by business. To pay for covering the uninsured, President Obama may have to raise taxes on small-business owners like me who already bear the cost of providing insurance. By limiting the deductions for so-called wealthy people making more than $250,000 a year, the administration thinks it'll generate the dollars needed. That's a tough sell given the number of people likely to get nailed with the tax. Failing that, there's discussion of taxing the health benefits that companies currently give employees, a possible penalty on working people.

Dealing with this problem will not be easy. We've been struggling with it for 10 years. Early on, my small business joined a trade-association program, which dropped our expenses by folding our 80-employee company into a pool of more than 5,000 workers. We cut our insurance bill by more than10 percent, but that proved to be only a one-time gain.

Since then we've tried one maneuver after another simply to limit increases. First we began to switch between plans within those offered by our association. For instance, one year we offered a Kaiser Permanente Health Maintenance Organization plan with a $10 copay for a doctor's-office visit, and then jumped to one with a $25 copay the next year. That helped cut our increases by half. Then about four years ago we instituted premium sharing, with employees picking up as much as 20 percent of the cost of their insurance. Not great, but it allowed us to continue covering dependents, making us one of the last companies in our association that does so. About the same time we also started splitting the saved premium with employees who elected to take their spouse's health-care coverage, providing they could prove they did.

Last year, this juggling act no longer seemed possible. Some of our employees were paying close to $200 a month as part of their premium sharing, depending on their age. While our workers make good money (up to $23 an hour for semiskilled labor), their contribution could, on the lower end of the pay scale, amount to 10 percent of their income. Not surprisingly, our employees complained, especially as high gasoline prices siphoned off cash and falling home values threatened many with foreclosure.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: logic_al @ 03/31/2009 2:57:21 PM

    The health care system will not get better until we stop giving 3 dollars out of every ten to the insurance companies who provide no services. We also need to provide incentives to train more health care workers, doctors included. This would drive down costs more than anything, it is the law of supply and demand. Doctors complain about their insurance costs, etc. but drive by any doctor,s house in your neighborhood and then tell me how much they are suffering.

  • Posted By: kshortSD @ 03/31/2009 2:14:30 PM

    The only way to solve this crisis is to instigate programs to motivate people to be healthy, such as the author described in his efforts to provide gym memberships and healthy snacks to his employees.
    I have worked my entire life to eat healthy, exercise regularly, and maintain a healthy weight. I don't smoke, I rarely eat fast food, and I never drink soda or eat chips. I get really angry when I have to pay HUNDREDS of dollars per month to foot the bill for people who neglect their health. If more than half of our population is truly obese, then I can't help but think that I'm getting screwed. If we have to use financial incentives, or even financial punishment, in order to force people into living responsibly for the greater good, then I'm okay with that.

  • Posted By: rho1953 @ 03/28/2009 11:59:09 PM

    Providing universal health care will require cost containment. It will be done through rationing and care directives. Look no further than Canada and the UK to see what follows. People will be sent home to die who previously were treated. Older patients will be denied treatments and surgeries. Triage will be the norm. You may wait days or weeks for routine appointments. You will wait weeks, months or more than a year for chemo-therapy or radiation treatment. I tis the IDEA of universal health care that liberals are in love with. They project the ideal of their own top tier coverage into the fantasy, adding the lure of "free". The reality will be radically different. Do you smoke? You will be denied treatments for anything deemed to be related to smoking if you don't quit. Are you too heavy? You will be denied treatment for the same reasons. There will be massive efforts to control and manipulate your behavior and lifestyle on the justification of what is good for you and the taxpayer. We would be far better off to provide tax credits to be used toward health care coverage. Not everyone wants or needs the same type of coverage. Let's use some common sense. Oh, I forgot. We're dealing with liberals.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.