TERROR WATCH

A Self-Inflicted Gun Wound

Why is Attorney General Eric Holder backing away from an assault weapons ban?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: TheDevil @ 10/30/2009 4:18:33 AM

    It didn't take 12 months for me to get fed up with the Obama administration. The real problem being ignored by Mexico and the U.S is the inability and lack of desire to control our border.While the U.S. lets tens of thousands of illegal alien Mexicans flood our country with Mexican government support these twits have the gaul to tell us to pass another illegal and unconstitutional gun ban? Get the @#ck outta here. If Mexico would do some enforcement alone the border, thus keeping its invading hordes on its side of the border, they wouldn't have U.S. weapons in their country. Ditto for the U.S. regime. Enforce border policy. Quit molesting US citizens.

  • Posted By: winsettz @ 11/15/2009 8:17:34 AM

    txlibertarian: In England the chavs go around beating people up a la Clockwork Orange. Not the best country to compare to.

    atvfrank: Assault weapons are not fully automatic as those are controlled by the National Firearms Act of 1936. I'm surprised in your vitriol that you don't even know the gun laws or the legal definition of an assault weapon? The "assault weapon" is basically the semi-auto version of an assault rifle: magazine, pistol-grip, etc (If the SKS were shorter had a pistol grip it'd probably be an assault weapon.)

    The cartels can get weapons through ransacking the stockpiles of weapons that WE shipped to them in the '80s to outfit their armies and death squads. What we can do to help is to send arms control people to set up inventory and control practices, and ship excess inventory or have it destroyed in place. I have no doubts that now that all the Latin American countries have settled down, that we can take back lots of weapons from their militaries to keep it from falling into the hands of the cartels.

    The United States is a source of semi-auto weapons for the dealers. I'm sure that every foot soldier has a hand gun, and hand guns are probably bought new from the US. Don't focus on assault weapons people! Hand guns kill people too!

    And there's ammo, though ammo is expensive on this side of the border due to shortages.

  • Posted By: atvfrank @ 10/25/2009 11:40:50 PM

    You people stated 90% of assault weapons in Mexico come from the U.S> Where did you come up with this "fact". Musst be spending to much time in Disney's La LA land. An assault weapon is a fully automatic firing weapon, which has been illegal in the US for over 80 years. Production and control of these weapons is so tightly monitored that one would have to assume that if they were sold in the US to Mexican drug cartels, the Federal Government would have to be involved. What is available to US citizens are "look alike" weapon which do NOT operate in an auto mode. With the billions of dollars the drug cartels have, why would they be buying fake assault weapons in lots of one or two from US gun stores leaving a paper trail, then attemping to smuggle them across the border. It is far easier and cheaper to purchase real assault weapons from the international gun dealers and have them smuggled in by the boatload. It should anger all Americans, not just the NRA, that this false proproganda is not to help Mexico's war with drug cartels, but is manufactured to limit US citizens rights. Recent history shows that when rights that here are covered by the 2nd adminment are lost, soon rights covered by the 1st and 5th are also lost.

  • Posted By: steady22 @ 05/21/2009 11:16:56 AM

    ummm History lesson Helo those contries you mentioned. Canada, England and Australia, have the worlds lowest crime rates. hmmmm yea the criminal may have kept theirs, but there are not many criminals to begin with. Why, their Gov. respects the hunters and gun lovers, but also controls those who don't really need guns. And the reason you don't hear about those who defend their homes with weapons, is because here in PA, even if you have all the right in the world. you fire you got to jail.

    • Posted By: txlibertarian @ 10/23/2009 3:27:08 PM

      The overall violent crime rate for England is 1,390 per 100,000 people while the overall violent crime rate for America is 506.1 per 100,000 people. Now where are your facts??

      These are from the GOVERNMENT of New Zealand

      http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2002/intl-comparisons-crime/section-7.html

    • Posted By: txlibertarian @ 10/23/2009 3:24:09 PM

      Where did you get your stats on English, Aussie, and Canadian crime as they're WAAAYYYY OFF! All three have approximately DOUBLE our murder rate. Research before you post. If anything all three of those countries illustrate WHY GUN CONTROL DOESN'T WORK! England's Civilian Disarmament Law Leads To 100 Year High Murder Rate Newly released statistics reported October 13th show that since the British government passed one of the most stringent gun bans in the world in 1997, Britain's murder rate has risen to its highest level since records began being kept 100 years ago. The number of murders in the first eight months of this year has risen by as much as 22% in some of Britain's biggest cities, which account for the majority of homicides. This builds on a 4% rise in the murder rate in the year to March and is 20% higher than the total for 1997, the first year of Tony Blair's government and the year that strict new gun bans were imposed. Police say random killings are rising. Official figures show the proportion of murders in which the victim is not known to the killer has nearly doubled in the past decade to 31%. The British Home Office reports that handgun crime is at its highest since 1993, while overall gun crimes have never been higher. Since the draconian 1997 gun ban was passed, criminal misuse of handguns has jumped by 40 percent. As in California, much of the gun violence is related to urban youth gang warfare and the illicit drug trade. But petty criminals are now using guns during common street crime. London has surpassed the crime rate of New York City. Robberies, in which criminals use or threaten violence, have gone up by 35 percent in the past year. In fact, Chris Fox, vice-president of the British Association of Chief Police Officers, said the rising murder rate put Britain out of line with America, where it has fallen 12%, and France and Germany, where it has dropped 29% and 27% respectively since 1995. Under the 1997 gun law, law abiding citizens were forced to give up their handguns. Pistols that had been in families for generations, including priceless antiques and Olympic pistols, were confiscated by the government Yet the London Sunday Times reported that Commander Andy Baker, who is in charge of more than 900 detectives investigating all murders in London, blames drugs and a greater availability of guns for the increased violence. And according to Associated Press: "Dave Rodgers, vice chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, said the ban made little difference to the number of guns in the hands of criminals." He acknowledged, "The underground supply of guns does not seem to have dried up at all.: In California, similar past and present efforts to expand gun control laws have been equally ineffective. Despite promises from the promoters of these ordinances, these tried-and-failed schemes have not slowed the rising violent crime and murder rate in those cities.

  • Posted By: Hillbilly56 @ 10/22/2009 2:11:11 PM

    The statistics quoted are a lie. Of the guns able to be traced, 80% were found to have come from the US. They could only trace something like 20% of the weapons confiscated. Check your facts. Most of the weapons are coming from Central and Soutn America. You can't buy machine guns without a special permit or grenades at all in a gun store in the US.

  • Posted By: Sulaymani @ 09/20/2009 6:06:48 PM

    You only have to look to the recent elections in Iran for a compelling pro-gun arguement. Had the populace been able to mount an armed resistance the outcome would have likely been different from how it is today. My view is that the second amendment was put into place as the final tier in a system of checks and balances.

    No, I'm not a right wing pro-gun nut job. I do however think that we have thrown off many of our responsibilities as integral parts of a functioning democracy. The American people have become complacent and lazy, increasingly passing our rights to the government so that we don't have to deal with the upkeep on them. The possible dangers of relinquishing the right to enforce our will on the government, or to mount a last ditch defense of the nation should we ever find ourselves invaded by a competent foriegn military, are horrifying.

    You can say that this arguement has no bearing on us, that we are too civil a nation for a despot to rise, and our military is too large and well equipped to be defeated at home. However these scenarios are recurring eventuallities in every countries history. Look to the blitzkrieg of World War two. How would our efforts there been different if with no armed resistances working throughout France, Italy, or Spain?

    Two quotes, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it", and "The tree of liberty must occasionall be watered with the blood of tyrrants".

  • Posted By: EARPOINT @ 08/22/2009 4:23:29 AM

    There is no godammed reason any normal American citizen needs to own an assault rifle. Hunting rifles, target rifles..sure! Assault weapons are for just that...assault. Is that what we're about these days? ARA,, you're full of ***!!!!!

    • Posted By: sydney123 @ 08/22/2009 3:41:29 PM

      The only difference between an assault riffle and a hunting rifle is magazine capacity. In fact most hunting rifles are more powerfull tha assault riffles.

      • Posted By: Sulaymani @ 09/20/2009 6:41:09 PM

        This is a weak arguement. An assualt rifle is designed to put out a high rate of firepower with control. The only time this would be applicable in a hunting situation would be having dangerous game charge you. When hunting deer you use one shot to the chest cavity, the deer takes off and you allow it to bleed out. Unless you either break the spine on the first shot, or puncture the heart you're not going to get an accurate second shot quickly.

        You could point out that bear can charge, or boar, but they are typically too busy dealing with the dogs to worry about the hunter. And firing innacurate shots in the direction of your pack is a bad idea.

        If you're going to make an arguement, great, but lets at least be hinest about it.

        • Posted By: zz333 @ 10/22/2009 9:01:29 AM

          so what is your point ,exactly!

        • Posted By: PavePusher @ 09/24/2009 9:35:58 PM

          It is apparent that none of you knows the differences between 'assault rifles', 'assault weapons' and semi-automatic rifles. I suggest you look it up.

      • Posted By: Sulaymani @ 09/20/2009 6:40:51 PM

        This is a weak arguement. An assualt rifle is designed to put out a high rate of firepower with control. The only time this would be applicable in a hunting situation would be having dangerous game charge you. When hunting deer you use one shot to the chest cavity, the deer takes off and you allow it to bleed out. Unless you either break the spine on the first shot, or puncture the heart you're not going to get an accurate second shot quickly.

        You could point out that bear can charge, or boar, but they are typically too busy dealing with the dogs to worry about the hunter. And firing innacurate shots in the direction of your pack is a bad idea.

        If you're going to make an arguement, great, but lets at least be hinest about it.

    • Posted By: zz333 @ 10/22/2009 9:00:48 AM

      Who are you, GOD! It is you opinion, the same as mine. You do not rule the day or the country. So blab away!

    • Posted By: stakex @ 09/25/2009 2:08:47 AM

      My friends and I own M4 style AR-15s and enjoy going to the rifle range a few times a year to blow of some steam and do some target shooting. For me, its not fun shooting a one shot hunting rifle... Id rather have my SEMI-AUOT AR and be able to have a little excitement with it. Whats the big deal? Why SHOULDN'T we be allowed to target shoot with assault rifles? Because someone has used assault rifles to kill people? Well Im not that person. Im a law abiding citizen who has done nothing to give anyone a reason to take my gun.

      People have used cars as a weapon... do we ban cars? How about knives? Hell terrorist have used planes to kill several thousand people in one shot. Thats several thousand people more then even the biggest mass shooting in US histroy. Does that mean we should ban air travel? Of course not. You do not punish the law abiding because of the actions of criminals.

      Not to mention its our right to own thoes weapons, just as its your right to voice your opinion about the subject. And if assault rifles were banned... you know what its going to do to the crime level in the country? Nothing. Because not only do assault rifles only make up a very small percentage of US violent crimes... but criminals will still be able to get whatever they want. Laws only affect thoes who follow them.

    • Posted By: JSummerfield @ 08/22/2009 5:27:17 PM

      • Posted By: BigArch @ 09/11/2009 9:21:58 AM

        The Second Admendment gives me that right ,you bonehead.

  • Posted By: zz333 @ 10/22/2009 8:59:20 AM

    Have you ever wondered about the sky rocketinf gun sales after the election. Just go to Chicago and Detroit, you will find out why. Even old ladies carry something. We have raised a bunch of thugs who could not care less about anybody -even their mothers. In Detroit, even dear Rosa Parks was robbed and beaten.
    Hey, you better have that thing loaded because these thugs could not care less what happens to you. They have been kown to slice open a pregrent woman-

  • Posted By: SirThoreth @ 10/09/2009 7:20:14 PM

    What the article doesn't mention is that the disingenious 90% figure being cited is for *traced* firearms, ie. guns with serial numbers that officials are able to trace, which only make up 17% of the guns seized by Mexican law enforcements. The remaining 83% of the firearms being seized, in other words, the overwhelming majority of guns the Mexican government is seizing, can't be traced to the US. These are, for example, Chinese AKs, guns the Russian crime syndicates are smuggling in, or guns obtained through the FARC/Tijuana cartel partnership, or even from the 150,000 soldiers who've deserted the Mexican Army, often taking their guns with them.

  • Posted By: RockinReno @ 10/09/2009 12:32:19 PM

    The estimate is only 7,000 dead? We should be sending weapons across the border by the train-load!! Let the scum continue to clean the gene-pool. It saves our tax dollars from being used for FREE healthcare (which American Citizens CAN'T GET), free housing, free food, free college education, you name it, the illegals get it ALL FOR FREE! To Hell with them!!

  • Posted By: Studeman @ 10/06/2009 3:02:07 PM

    Leave our guns alone!!!

  • Posted By: eddymontana @ 09/26/2009 8:24:34 AM

    Why doesn't Mexico ban assault rifles for themselves?

  • Posted By: halromberg @ 09/25/2009 6:26:24 AM

    The author of this article is an idiot. We are definitely the problem but it's got squat to do with guns. This is about American Drug dollars heading south, not rifles. We need to end the drug prohibition. That will defund the cartells and the government of Mexico can go back to disarming its citizenry and harrassing folks.

    Rolling this into some BS trumped up reason to ban AMERICANS from having guns in a doomed attempt to keep well funded MEXICAN criminals from being mean? Don't insult my inteligence.

    Oh, and to all the folks here talkng about guns for sporting purposes, you're wasting your time and missing the point. Guns are protected in our Constitution not for sporting purposes, but because they'd just had to shoot a bunch of over reaching government types on a power trip and wanted to make sure weretained the option of doing it again if they ever lost control of the government they were building.

    The second ammendment is about making sure the state has to deal with a credible threat of armed insurrection from its populace, in the hope that the threat would help keep the state in line and maintain it as the servant of the people rather than their ruler.

    If you think that's an obsolete purpose, take a look around you today and ask yourself why a government would want to ban civilians from having weapons. My guess is because they see the commoners as a threat when they're armed. They certainly caused a stir the other day in Az when the protesters showed up armed.

  • Posted By: stakex @ 09/25/2009 1:56:01 AM

    Again ANOTHER news article that ignores the fact that even the ATF said the claim that most of the weapons used in Mexico come from the US is a compleat LIE! Only 90% of TRACEABLE weapons come from the US.... but the catch is, MOST GUNS USED IN MEXICO CANNOT BE TRACED. Either way tho, the vast majority of the assault rifles used in Mexico are fully automatic AK-47's which cannot simply be purchased in the US, and even if you own a Class 3 FFL to buy them... they are very rare in the US and cost several thousdans of dollars. And what about the RPG grenade launchers being used by the cartels? Thoes are NOT coming from the US since you obviouslly cannot buy them here. This article simply quotes the scare tactic "facts" the Obama administration was hoeing they could throw out there and make people go "Oh my god! People are dieing in Mexico from our guns... we need to ban them!". Its not going to work.

    The best part tho is the Mexican government is all too happy to try and shift the blame to the US for its own internal crime issues, and seem to take almost no responsability for it themselfs. First of all, even if guns are being smuggled into Mexico from the US, the Mexicans should actually try to stop it. I mean hell, they don't do anything to stop the immigrant and drug smuggling that comes this way... why is the gun smuggling going the other way all our fault? Also, Its no secret that the Mexican police force and army are horribly corrupt, and there are many many reports of Soldiers and police selling their weapons to the cartels... don't see the Mexicans advertising that one do you? Bottom line is the Mexican police force is doing nothing to solve the problem, and are just complaining for the US to ban guns to its own citizens. I wonder what their excuse would be after that when the violence doesn't drop at all.

    Oh and one more thing. With all the guns in the US... IF guns were the main problem, wouldn't the US also be a war zone right now? Hell... everyone on my street owns an assault rifle. Are we killing eachother every day? Nope. In fact, Id say this is one of the safest places to live in the world. So its not the guns... its the people and their motives. Even if 90% of the weapons were coming from the US, punishing the US citizens for the actions of Mexican drug lords isn't going to change anything... the drug lords will just buy their weapons from the Mexican governemtn.

  • Posted By: joesmoke @ 09/24/2009 12:17:58 PM

    Get your story straight!! The only thing that is 90% here is that the story is 90% bullshit!!! The REAL story is that 90% of the firearms SUSPECTED of coming from the US actually are, but they make up about 7% of the total firearms recovered. Even then, most of them were sold to Mexican government agencies, such as the police and military and then have fallen into drug dealers' hands.
    In the US Deparment of Justice study, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, they have shown that the ban did NOTHING to reduce crime in the United States, why should we expect it to do anything in Mexico? Especially since the "assault weapons" they have were obtained from their own Police and Military and not from independent US sellers or traffickers!
    As soon as NEWSWEEK decides to actually tell the truth, then we can talk about what to do about it on NEWSWEEK.

  • Posted By: joesmoke @ 09/24/2009 12:17:45 PM

    Get your story straight!! The only thing that is 90% here is that the story is 90% bullshit!!! The REAL story is that 90% of the firearms SUSPECTED of coming from the US actually are, but they make up about 7% of the total firearms recovered. Even then, most of them were sold to Mexican government agencies, such as the police and military and then have fallen into drug dealers' hands.
    In the US Deparment of Justice study, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, they have shown that the ban did NOTHING to reduce crime in the United States, why should we expect it to do anything in Mexico? Especially since the "assault weapons" they have were obtained from their own Police and Military and not from independent US sellers or traffickers!
    As soon as NEWSWEEK decides to actually tell the truth, then we can talk about what to do about it on NEWSWEEK.

  • Posted By: joesmoke @ 09/24/2009 12:17:24 PM

    Get your story straight!! The only thing that is 90% here is that the story is 90% bullshit!!! The REAL story is that 90% of the firearms SUSPECTED of coming from the US actually are, but they make up about 7% of the total firearms recovered. Even then, most of them were sold to Mexican government agencies, such as the police and military and then have fallen into drug dealers' hands.
    In the US Deparment of Justice study, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, they have shown that the ban did NOTHING to reduce crime in the United States, why should we expect it to do anything in Mexico? Especially since the "assault weapons" they have were obtained from their own Police and Military and not from independent US sellers or traffickers!
    As soon as NEWSWEEK decides to actually tell the truth, then we can talk about what to do about it on NEWSWEEK.

  • Posted By: dkbrown13 @ 09/23/2009 9:44:38 AM

    Why put a ban on guns going to Mexico?? you say they killed 6000, thats that many that won't come to this country, I think we should give them more guns and we won't have to support them for the rest of their lives.

  • Posted By: WalStro @ 09/23/2009 12:28:18 AM

    There's a lot of confusion about "assault" rifles and "semi-automatic" rifles. The latter requries a separate pull of the trigger for each bullet that is fired. The "assault" rifle CAN be fired in semi-automatic mode but is also equiped with some method of fully automatic fire (as long as the trigger is pulled it'll continue to fire bullets). Sem-automatic rifles are as common as oxygen in this country but ANY type of fully automatic weapon requires a Class III license and that's really tough to come by. Semi-automatic rifles are great home defense weapons (but not in ALL situations) and they are great for target shooting and small game hunting. There's really no good reason to ban semi-automatic rifles.

  • Posted By: concerned liberal @ 09/20/2009 11:35:24 AM

    Clue time: The so called "ban" on assault weapons was completely ineffective at anything!

    What did it ban? Well for instance, in almost all cases, the gun was never banned..............it was the clip or magazine!
    That means that if you had a pre-ban weapon, and there were millions in posession, you could have a clip that held more than 10 bullets! Moreover, when you went to almost any gun store or sporting goods store or even bought online, you were still able to purchase high capacity clips for those guns.................but the kicker is that if you had a post-ban weapon, no one would actually check and though the weapon was post-ban and came with only a 10 shot clip...........you could buy 30-40 shot clips with a lottery chance of ever getting caught!

    Now, here is where it get ridiculous. The day that the ban sunsetted, the clip manufacturers put a full court press on selling the overstock of high capacity clips..............cheaply!

    So now there are enough high capacity clips in Americans hands to cover the next 200 years sales of weapons!

    There is the small importance of the supposed fact that we are a democratic country and shooting sports are the #1 most popular sport in the country, and even the fact that shooting sports are the fastest growing sport in the country!

    The ban would never work at doing the things that the clear minority wishes that it would do!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse