SPONSORED BY:
THE MEDIA

An Awkward Obituary

Seattle was a two-newspaper town until one went down. How do you cover your competitor's demise?

Kevin P. Casey / Corbis
Final Edition: The Seattle Times has taken over the Post-Intelligencer's subscribers
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The P-I had beaten the competition to the punch. The Seattle newspaper, known formally as the Post-Intelligencer, broke the story in 1988 that Sen. Brock Adams had been accused of sexually assaulting a congressional aide and family friend. The chase was on. The P-I's cross-town rival, The Seattle Times, countered with a three-year investigation, which found eight women who claimed to have been harassed by the senator. Adams, who denied the allegations, decided not to run again, the Times won a slew of awards—and the P-I nursed a grudge. Shortly after the story was published, reporters from both papers found themselves aboard the same flight—one of them armed with accolades, the other empty-handed. "A little bit of the enamel ground off my teeth on that flight," the P-I reporter told KUOW-FM, a Seattle public-radio station.

And so it has gone, for more than 100 years. Whether trading scoops on the construction of the city's landmark Space Needle or entering into a bidding war to see who would be first to summit Mount St. Helens to cover its 1980 eruption, Seattle's two newspapers have battled tirelessly—and, in the words of one local media veteran, "bitterly"—for journalistic preeminence. The combat ceased in mid-March, when declining circulation, plummeting ad sales and a failure to find a buyer led the P-I's parent company, the Hearst Corp., to stop printing the paper. The victor dutifully wrote the obituary of the vanquished. But the intense rivalry made it a tricky assignment. Imagine Barack Obama writing John McCain's life story, or Goldman Sachs presiding at Lehman Brothers' funeral.

Many of Seattle's journalists had worked at both papers, creating conflicts of interest in covering the story. And there were emotional entanglements. "There are people in this newsroom who have spouses who lost their job at the P-I," says Eric Pryne, a Times reporter assigned to the obit, who has been with his paper since the 1970s. "Anytime you see journalists lose their jobs at another institution, there's a lot of sadness." Local blogs crackled with complaints that the Times had given the story short shrift. And some P-I staffers were peeved that the Times highlighted a strike that prevented the P-I from publishing on the historic occasion of FDR's reelection to a second presidential term. (A month after the election, Roosevelt's son-in-law was named publisher of the paper, and the president's daughter came aboard, editing the women's pages.) "The P-I was an icon of the city, even for people not into news," says Eli Sanders, who covered the story for The Stranger, a local alternative weekly. "So the Times had to be careful not to seem like they were dancing on that grave."

The story may be tricky, but it's becoming increasingly familiar. The Rocky Mountain News closed in February, leaving The Denver Post to pick up the pieces. Chicago, Detroit and Honolulu are all two-newspaper towns on the verge of losing one. As many as a quarter of all newspaper jobs will be lost by the end of 2009, according to the American Society of Newspaper Editors. Last week, Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland introduced the Newspaper Revitalization Act, a bill that would give newspapers a nonprofit status similar to that awarded to public-broadcasting stations. And Attorney General Eric Holder has hinted that he may be willing to tweak antitrust policy if it would help preserve the industry. But for now, the economic slump, an aging readership, and an explosion of free journalism online has newspapers heading for the morgue—thereby spiking the kinds of stories made possible by fierce competition.

Of course, the competitive juices don't dry up just because the doors are closing. Just ask Hal Bernton, a Times reporter who called in sick so he could organize a memorial rally in support of P-I staffers. "We've been so competitive for so many years," says Bernton. "It's hard to realize that we're all print journalists, so all our jobs are at risk." But most of the P-I team stayed away, preferring to gather around their city desk and sip a little bourbon.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: knoknock @ 04/09/2009 9:32:58 AM

    Dear Mr. Kurt Soller,
    Let's face it! Print-News has been dieing a slow death for quite some time now. I can't recall the exact date, but around the late 1980's or, early 1990's, Sacramento, California was a 2 newspaper community. The Sacramento-Bee won out-over the Sacramento-Union. I personally prefer Print-News media to the on-line alternative, as many people still do. However, if Print-News desires to maintain a viable presence, they will have to change their entire business model, as they have become way too expensive to operate. For example; my wife and I both own and operate small businesses that require the use of classified advertising, but due to the rediculously excessive cost of advertising, we have completely stopped using the Sacramento Bee classifieds, instead, we use a variety of free online mediums, such as "Craigslist", as well as, low cost, area specific Print-News publications, and our responses are almost as good at the very least. As I see it, changing their cost structures, is the only thing that can possibly save news papers from dieing off and becoming an all electronic, digital compromise!

  • Posted By: AnnDee3349 @ 04/06/2009 1:13:55 AM

    Why cover it at all? Who really cares? There are many, many more pressing matters at hand than that of a fallen rant rag. Give it up, let it die in peace.

  • Posted By: hearstscribe @ 04/02/2009 9:06:26 PM


    Newsweek should improve the quality of its reporting: As a writer for the Seattle P-I on-line, Hearst certainly hasn't silenced me from talking on radio programs about its post-fish wrapper product. As usual, The Seattle Times was allowed to talk at length about a favorite and endlessly-reported subject -- itself.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now