SPONSORED BY:

Watching For Supreme Surprises

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: trogers @ 03/31/2009 10:15:49 PM

    Just what we need to insure justice for all is a court where lasting the longest is the main focus of the Justices. How old can you go before you have gone on way too long? Why is there no age limit on the Justices? Are they immune to the laws of nature and science? Or is it so easy to function on the Court even in the darkness of senility or the desperation of terminal illness that nobody notices. No institution in this nation has more urgent need for reform than the Supreme Court. If you think age increases wisdom, insight and intelligence; go visit the nearest nursing home and see how the elderly residents are doing. Most of them are still too young to be contemporaries of the current Court. Really, the 'till death do us part' part of being a Supreme Court Justice must end with a common sense age limit. Letting the judges serve while dying or until death does no justice to any American. Hello! Has anyone heard of retirement age?

  • Posted By: stopdrop @ 03/31/2009 5:29:15 PM

    I'd still love to know the real story of how Rove, Bush, and Cheney got O'Connor OFF the court to begin with...Lawrence Richette.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Newsweek on Digg