Getty Images
A Holistic Approach: Caring for women--before and after babies
OPINION

A Ceasefire in the Culture War

By making 'abortion reduction' a priority, Obama courts his frenemies.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

How does a democratic, pro-choice president avoid engaging in a culture war? This is the question that faces Barack Obama as he begins to shape his domestic policy. His presidency is not yet 100 days old, and already Obama has been excoriated by gays (for inviting Rick Warren to pray at the inauguration); by conservative Roman Catholics and evangelicals (for his position on stem cells); and by secularists (for the wide-ranging mandate of his faith-based office).

White House officials say the president is as determined as ever to encourage the old warriors on all sides to lay down their swords. Forging common ground on reducing abortion and teen pregnancy and supporting maternal and child health is a top priority, says Melody Barnes, Obama's domestic-policy chief. This is why the president revoked the Mexico City rule—which prevented organizations that receive federal funds from providing abortions and abortion counseling abroad—on a Friday at 7 p.m., after most reporters had gone home for the weekend and not, as his Democratic predecessor Bill Clinton did, in broad daylight on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. ("He's really smart," says Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. "He didn't go out of his way to poke pro-lifers in the eye.") Conciliation is also the rationale behind the diverse list of religious leaders appointed to the president's Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships—a list of 15 that includes the progressive Rabbi David Saperstein and the conservative former president of the SBC, Frank Page. (More will be announced soon.)

Since at least 2006, Obama has been talking about "abortion reduction," a holistic approach to pregnancy and parenthood that includes not just legal abortion, but also sex education; access to birth control; good prenatal care and postnatal support; and adoption services. The goal of reducing abortions is, in principle, embraced by many on both sides and is one of the four stated policy goals of the faith-based office. Together with the White House Council on Women and Girls, the office will form a committee to come up with an abortion-reduction initiative, Barnes says. The group will meet for the first time this month and Page—who calls himself "a pro-life person, unashamedly"—has been asked to join.

On the right, the old guard remains mostly unimpressed. Obama may say he is open to conservative points of view, they argue, but the domestic policies he's enacted so far reflect a clear liberal agenda. He rescinded the Mexico City policy nicely—still, he rescinded it. He reversed President George W. Bush on stem cells. He initiated a revocation of the "conscience clause," the broad language Bush instated late in his second term that allows health-care workers to refuse to provide services, including abortions and birth-control prescriptions, because of a moral objection. His Health and Human Services pick, Kathleen Sebelius, is a pro-choice Catholic who has been reprimanded by her bishop. Obama "campaigned as a center-left person domestically, but he's governing hard left," says Land.

On the left, old-style women's groups remain wary of a conciliatory approach. "I tried a common-ground thing in 1979," says Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority. It fell apart, she says, over the right's insistence on limiting access to birth control.

Opposition is to be expected—especially from the right and from groups at both extremes. "There's a culture-war industry on both sides," says Joshua DuBois, director of the faith-based office. "What's helpful to the president and to us is a lot of people are weary of that. People are looking for ways out." But some centrists who initially supported Obama are beginning to express anxiety that his outreach to them may have been a vote-getting ploy. David Gushee is a professor of Christian ethics at McAfee School of Theology. In March, he was tapped by the left-leaning group Faith in Public Life to lend his name to a letter in support of Sebelius. The letter praised the governor's achievements in the area of abortion reduction in Kansas despite her pro-choice voting record. Weeks later, Gushee wrote an op-ed in USA Today retracting his signature and calling on Obama to put some substance behind his rhetoric by moving quickly on his abortion-reduction promises. "My article was not 'I've given up on you,' it was 'Please do this.' You're at risk of losing the hope and confidence of those who are waiting for this."

The White House says it is just getting started, and Rachel Laser, who works for the centrist group Third Way and is an advocate for abortion reduction, agrees. She is in regular touch with DuBois and believes a substantive initiative will come. "There's a gravity in this town that pulls people to extremes when they're governing," she says. "Given that gravity, we have to be patient. No one can work miracles." As the hopeful wait, you can almost hear the warriors sharpening their knives.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Old Fashioned @ 05/06/2009 9:23:24 AM

    Abortion and birth control have killed the lower classes. Where was AIDS back in the mid 60s...I am waiting for mass genocide, the usual evolution to the educated eilte utopian society. No family, no sexual morality, AIDS and other STDs skyrocketing, birthrates in developed countries that promise to eliminate themselves in a generation or two, genetic engineering only Mengele could have loved...they don't get it and never will, but they have plenty of Yale and Harvard degrees to back them up. Richard Dawkins and Polly Toynbee are touting the "new atheism and humanism", but it sounds like the old Mao, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot routine...and it didn't work last century! If I knew I were carrying a Down Syndrome kid, I would gladly welcome it, but if I knew I were carrying a doctor or a feminist or a college professor or a Hollywood actor or a media journalist I would be tempted to abort.

  • Posted By: petergauhar @ 04/21/2009 7:12:59 PM

    The Early Christian View
    In sharp contrast, early Christians took a firm stand against abortions. Durant adds: ???Abortion and infanticide, which were decimating pagan society, were forbidden to Christians as the equivalents of murder.??? So while family limitation became an outstanding social phenomenon of both the Greek and the Roman eras, the Christian community stood firmly on a strict moral code that built respect for the sanctity of life. As in ancient Israel, children were a mark of the Creator???s blessing. The psalmist states: ???Look! Sons are an inheritance from Jehovah; the fruitage of the belly is a reward.??????Psalm 127:3.
    It is evident from God???s Word, the Bible, that Jehovah, ???the source of life,??? recognizes the right to life of the unborn child. How? First, the Bible shows that he deems the unborn to be more than just a glob of tissue. God???s interest in his marvelous creative arrangement is described by the psalmist this way: ???You [Jehovah] kept me screened off in the belly of my mother. . . . Your eyes saw even the embryo of me, and in your book all its parts were down in writing.??????Psalm 36:9; 139:13-16.
    Further, God calls to account the individual who accidentally interferes with the natural course of events involving an unborn child. Notice that the Mosaic Law put a heavy responsibility on such ones, stating: ???If men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart, and yet no harm follow; he shall be surely fined, according as the woman???s husband shall lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if any harm follow, then thou shalt give life for life.??????Exodus 21:22, 23, American Standard Version.
    Now if Jehovah views an accidental interference with the unborn child to be a matter of such serious consequence, how much greater accountability would there be with deliberate interference, as in the case of abortion! Also, since God gave no limitations as to the age of the unborn in his law expressed at Exodus chapter 21, arguments based on age become moot.

  • Posted By: NancyJ27 @ 04/07/2009 2:05:42 PM

    Safe, legal, and RARE. What a joke.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now