WORLD AFFAIRS

Fading To Black

Moldova's would-be color revolution fails. Chalk one up for the Kremlin.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Seen from the Kremlin, the scenes of protesters overrunning Moldova's parliament and ransacking its president's office looked chillingly familiar. More than five years ago, young pro-Western protesters toppled Moscow-friendly regimes in Georgia and Ukraine. Those "color" revolutions marked the nadir of Russia's power in the region and became the cornerstone of Kremlin policy ever after. At home, Moscow stamped out foreign-funded NGOs, abolished local elections and concocted youth groups to counter the possibility of anything similar happening inside Russia. Abroad, the Kremlin's priority has been asserting its right to a sphere of influence and fighting back the tide of Western influence. The outcome of Moldova's latest unrest, then, is about much more than a disputed election: it's a key test of both Russia's soft and hard power in the region.

The unrest in Chisinau erupted last week as students—many summoned by messages on Facebook and Twitter—gathered in the Moldovan capital's central square to protest the ruling Communist Party's suspiciously large electoral victory a few days earlier. Protesters set fire to government buildings, built barricades and some waved Romanian flags—an uncomfortable reminder that two thirds of the country is composed of ethnic Romanians and some wish to reunite with the neighbor, from which they split in 1940. Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin called the unrest "an attempted coup d'état" and accused Romania, a NATO and European Union member, of fomenting the protests. Heavy-handed police quickly restored order after arresting more than 200 people.

What's important about the abortive "Twitter Revolution" is what it revealed about Russia's ability to project power and protect friends like Voronin. For at least four years, Moscow has mounted a campaign to woo Voronin away from the EU and NATO with offers of subsidized gas and closer economic ties. The charm offensive seems to have paid off. Even though European trade accounted for 51 percent of Moldova's economy last year, compared with just 20 percent with Russia, Voronin pointedly refused to join Brussels's Eastern Partnership program in January, calling it "a plot to surround Russia."

Russia also scored a quiet victory against the EU last month over the breakaway republic of Transdniestria, a sliver of territory between Moldova and Ukraine that split from Chisinau in 1992 and whose independence from Moldova is maintained in part by the presence of 1,000 Russian peacekeeping troops. The EU, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and other Western bodies had pushed Moldova to insist that Moscow remove its troops as a precondition to any peace settlement. But in March, at talks hosted by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Voronin dropped the demand for Russian troops to leave, giving Russia a continued foothold in Moldova's politics. "Keeping troops in Transdniestria gives Moscow a bargaining chip," says Valeriu Druc, a parliamentary aide for the opposition Liberal Party. "They can use it to gain something from Europe, if they want—but the price [for us] is that it will put back peace for years."

Last week, Moscow was quick to back Voronin's claims that Romania was behind the violence, suggesting that Russia wants to encourage a split between Chisinau and Bucharest. "Radical nationalistic groups of Romania are involved in an attempt to take in Moldova," says Duma deputy and Kremlin loyalist Sergei Markov. "This is an attempt to accomplish an 'orange coup'."

Many young Moldovans resent their leaders' turn toward Moscow—as well as the role of the Communist Party. "Omg i feel so sick that i am living in Moldova back to the ussr," read one of the thousands of Twitter posts labeled with the tag "#pman," shorthand for the Romanian name of Chisinau's largest square. And with a shared border with the EU and more than half a million Moldovans working there, there's little chance that Moldova could turn its back on Europe entirely.

Yet Moldova's opposition is small and not nearly as organized as the colored revolutionaries in Kiev and Tbilisi. The Moscow-backed ruling Communist Party enjoys a genuine approval rating of roughly 45 percent, and it owes at least part of its popularity to the economic ties to Moscow fostered by Voronin. The opposition's approval rating is about 25 percent, and as the economic crisis shrinks the possibility of joining the EU, Russia seems to Voronin and the Communists "like a richer and more reliable ally," says Pavel Khoroshev of Moscow's Academy of Political Sciences. That means the Kremlin can finally chalk up a victory—a potent mixture of aggressive diplomacy, money and political support has helped stem this would-be colored revolution in the bud.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: nimh @ 04/15/2009 9:05:15 AM

    Moldova did not "split" from Romania after WW2; at most it *was* split, by the occupying Soviet army and state. There was nothing voluntary about it.

  • Posted By: punctdevedere @ 04/11/2009 7:08:36 AM

    1. You state that the communist government is genuinely popular, with approval ratings of around 45% while the opposition has around 25%. In fact, the communists are genuinely unpopular. The last major poll before the election gave them 35% versus 39% for all opposition parties combined, with 26% undecided. In Moldova, due to the climate of fear, opinion polls typically overstate communist support versus actual election results by between 5% and 10%. Also note that in the last election in 2005, 3/4 of the undecided vote went to the opposition.

    2. A second very important issue is the roll played by the major western players - the EU & the US. Both came out with statements shortly after the election appraising it positively. In fact, the election was anything but free and fair and the result was clearly rigged, mainly through allowing multiple votes by Communist supporters. It very quickly became apparent to Moldova's opposition and their electorate that the result had been stitched up by the Communists and that the EU and the US were prepared to acquiesce, probably out of fear of Russia. This in turn led to desperation on the part of Moldova's youth, who had worked very hard to achieve a victory for the liberal parties of the opposition, had seen that result stolen from them, and had seen the EU and US fail to stand up for democratic values. Protest was their only option.

    3. The main protest on Tuesday morning was a very peaceful affair attended by 30,000 young people. That protest ran from about 10am in the morning to around 1pm, when the opposition party organisers asked everybody to go home. The violence happened in the afternoon, and there is now increasing evidence that it was sponsored by the regime and its allies. On YouTube you will see videos of policemen breaking up concrete slabs for the vandals to use in their assaults on the Presidency and the Parliament, police supporting the young men who hoisted the Romanian flag, police presenting no real resistance to those trying to enter the two buildings, members of the Communist-allied PPCD among the instigators as well as a group of skinheads recently released from jail under an amnesty signed by the President.

    4. The EU and the US need to atone for their sin of omission in failing to qualify the election as fundamentally flawed and in failing to deal properly with the terror and repression that has followed. An appropriate course of action would be to seek to establish a 1-year EU mandate over the country to allow pluralism and democratic institutions (especially a free media) to be restored, at the end of which fresh elections would be held. The EU & US could achieve this agreement through carrots and sticks - If the regime agrees, its leaders would receive an amnesty from prosecution, if they don't, charges will be brought against them in the ICJ, travel bans imposed and personal assets held in the West frozen.

  • Posted By: fri-anon @ 04/10/2009 10:44:08 PM

    Further, I want to point you to a couple of key issues. First, we in the West do not have much detailed information about what is happening in Moldova right now.

    However, it is known that the number of protesters who stormed and damaged the inside of Parliament and the Presidency was very small. It would have been *trivial* for the Communist authorities to prevent the protesters from entering those buildings but they did not. This speaks volumes.

    In fact, Mr. Voronin has given interviews in which he (essentially) said that he ordered the police to allow the protesters to enter those buildings. These are Voronin's own words, in an interview to the media, and you can verify them, for example here http://www.rian.ru/interview/20090408/167536093.html - this Russian news source is more likely to be pro-Voronin than against.

    The opposition claims that it was not students who devastated those buildings, but planted provocateurs. If you are a journalist, this is a claim worth investigating. Other jouranlists did. Take a look at this picture, where "students" remove Moldova's flag from the Parliament and place an EU flag, while uniformed security forces look on. You can view this here http://www.jurnalul.ro/stire-externe/dovezile-provocarii-503961.html - the site explains where to find the videos - if you have a video you can be much more sure that it is not doctored.

    Several journalists in Moldova took huge risks, and shot footage in the streets that raises crucial questions about who organized these acts of vandalism. These journalists have been arrested, beaten, and some have disappeared. If you are a journalist sitting in a comfortable chair in a Newsweek office in a country where the freedom of press can be taken for granted, you at least owe those journalists to take a look at their evidence.

    How about this? This is a footage of a Moldovan security van, with a Moldovan license plate in front. But, the license plate in the back is from Transnistria??? http://www.jurnaltv.md/?article=2000

    If you look at more of these internet videos, you can see that the journalists are agitated, and perhaps a little partial. You would be too, if police were beating you up while you were trying to report. But at the very least, you owe these journalists a little more research.

    Finally, the Kremlin hasn't won anything yet. The opposition is still demanding a recount or revote, the (weakened) free press managed to put out enough evidence to raise doubts. It is shocking how little research you did, and how easily you are ready to jump to conclusions.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now