Obama Gets Gun-Shy

Criminals will always be able to get guns of all typesdon't kid yourself into beleieving differnt. Just look at drugs today and prohibition in the 1920's The United States has 16000 homicides a year. less tah 1% or under 160 are committed by assault weapons.Drunk drivers kill 25000 people a year should we take away the cars of those arrested fro deunk driving? The media hypes murders with assault weapons because as a whole they ooppose them. Hillary just said 90% oof thoseweapons are of Mexican origin. The Mexican Mafia use Russian Weapons AK-47's noot U/\.S. made waeapons. Be realistic would you take away everyones drivers license because of the drunk drivers? They certainly kill more people then assault weapons.

Those who so desperately wish to disarm American citizens might recall that recently the United States Supreme Court, after fat too long a time, took on the issue of the Second Amendment, which was clearly enacted as much to allow Citizens to protect themselves from a hostile government, as from any foreign enemy. Once they actually set out to make a ruling in the matter, it was difficult to come to any other conclusion. My suspicion is that this ruling had a great deal to do with some of the apparent change of heart. I fully realize the complexity of the subject matter, but it is part of the United States Constitution. Perhaps we should ask the American people if they wish to remove this 'outdated' amendment. Now if they do, then the problem of violent crime and drug cartels will surely be solved .... will it not? ... the again .... perhaps there are enough Citizens remaining who understand its purpose, and have no wish to repeal it.

The vocational-supremacist, social separatist, entitlement-minded, self-righteous Jackbooted Thugs are outnumbered 1000 to 1 in the u.S. It's often called "Officer per population ratio". Their best odds are in NYC with about 245 to 1. In any case, The People can make quick work of them in a Civil War, which is a fully legal, lawful, and Constitutionally MANDATED endeavor. The People have "the RIGHT, the DUTY" (that's a MANDATE), "to ALTER or ABOLISH" bad government by exercising their RIGHT to have and bring to bear (USE) arms if necessary. No approval from the UN, Congress, White House, the Senate, or ANYBODY is required. It's a CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED RIGHT. Our Bill of RIGHTS contains no "privileges" that any mere public SERVANT must "allow", so when you hear some Police-State lusting PIG with a badge say "We'll allow it", tell them to effoff.
Remember, we'll be DISEMPOWERING them and sending them away from the noncompetitive PUBLIC TROUGH to where they'll have to COMPETE in commerce, and they don't have what it takes. They're where they are, vocationally, because they don't believe the customer is always right, unless they're the customer. It's also due to their jingoist attitude that being "employed" by the government equals PATRIOTISM. They aren't competitive, except during their egomaniacal pursuit of attention. They can't produce, market, sell, service, compete, or anything. They're mere public SERVANTS. Badged CIVILIAN Peace Officers, etc. When facing DISEMPOWERMENT, they'll go into SHOCK such as a herion addict suffering withdrawals. As a consequence, they'll show their true self-centeredness and violent nature, frothing for the control and power that's being taken from them.
Let them make their move. The People are waking up and taking notice. We'll finally set ourselves free of the "Parasitic sloth of the public trough" that live to leech and lord-over. Let's get it started (the song goes). Had enough? What are you waiting for? Sic semper tyrannus. De oppressor libre. Live free or die. Freedom! Liberty! Privacy! Death to the police state. Death to big brother.
Go!

Skallywag wrote:

"Go live in Mexico, Colombia, or any other "macho" drug hot spot. "

I live within a few miles of Mexico, and am quite aware of the attendant dangers. However, I will not leave my home because of your hatred for our constitutional freedoms. Instead, I suggest YOU leave, perhaps to a country that does not have these freedoms that terrify you so.

I saw no where in this article the fact that the 911 operator new this nut had weopons and did not inform the officers of such. Assault weopons have been illeagle in the USA for many many years.. The so called asault weopons ban did nothing at all to curb gun knife or baseball bat violance. Wake up. The ban is just about outlawing semi auto guns.

My heart goes out to all of the victims and their families of these sense less tragedies. Trying to ban guns (of any kind a gun is a gun) from all citizens however is counter productive and doesnt address the real issue. What is causing these psychos to snap and commit these atrocities? Should they have already been in jail or in a mental treatment program? Like it or not personal firearms are essential to a free people. A citizenry must be able to defend its self when a political system breaks down. The argument that a society cannot defend its self from a government with tanks and airplanes if false. Anyone that has been in the military can tell you that all of those assets are guarded by an individual with a rifle. There are not enough tanks and airplanes in the country to over power 250 million armed citizens. A current example is the problems we???ve had in Iraq. We have every weapon system known to man. The terrorist pretty much only have home made bombs and AK47s. Six years later that conflict is still going on. Each law abiding citizen having their own arms is the only way (if all else fails) to keep the power with the people. You cannot oppress enslave or commit genocide to an armed citizenry. The banning of fire arms of any type or style (any rifle can be an assault rifle if used that way) is only a feel good measure that diverts attention away from the real issue of how to prevent these psychos from wanting to kill by any means.

BORING, No one running for election or reelectional for President will ever sign a gun control bill. it would assure an automatic loss. just another bogus issue like abortion that the Southern republican uses to keep their supporters distracted for their poverty ridden states.

"Or given that Mexico's insanely violent drug cartels are arming themselves with high-powered assault weapons purchased at U.S. gun stores and later smuggled south of the border."


Is a lie.

Mexican drug gangs are using automatic rifles (which cannot be casually bought in U.S. gun stores) provided by corrupt people in the Mexican government (which in turn was supplied by the U..S., and other governments), or imported from China, or former ComBlock countries. I defy the authors of this anti Gun Rights propaganda to supply solid record of sale evidence of this charge.

Larry Farrell
Gun Owners of NJ
GONJ@gonjsite.com

Newsweek is a bottom-feeder, they are just trying to stir to pot for $. They know it is a loosing battle. Just because some politician relabbled the fire-arm "assault-weapon", does not negate the fact that it is and always will be, an inanimate object. It is the soul pulling the trigger that is the cause of harm.

Quit your leftist quibble and do what is right (pon intended), start supporting riffle clubs and gun safety for children. Teach them the history and safey and let them have their right to own and bear arms. It is true that "a armed society is a polite society."

I find it highly ironic and offensive that you progressive types will spend so much time and money on teaching our children that sleeping around is ok and even show them how to have "safe sex" when they are more likely to be assaulted by an STD than by a well informed, law abiding citizen carrying a firearm or an armed assailant for that matter.

We need to heed what our brothers and sisters in Britian are telling us, their omniscient parliment passed well intentioned gun laws and it backfired. The crime has skyrocketted, their citizens are now scared sheep backed into the corner of a pen and perfect for the pickens. For their troubles, they get thrown in jail for protecting their property and the perp gets out and sues the hell out of him. The caveat here is that now the "bobby's" have to carry!! LOL Thats precious!!

Newsweek is a bottom-feeder, they are just trying to stir the pot. They know it is a loosing battle. Just because some politican relabbled a firearm "assault-weapon" does not negate the fact that a gun is an inadimate object. The soul pulling the trigger is the cause of harm.

Quit your leftist quibble and do what is right (pon intended), start supporting riffle cubs and gun safety education. Teach kids about gun safety and allow them their right to own and bear arms. It is true that an armed society is a polite society.

I find it ironic that you progressive types will spend so much time and money on telling our children it is ok to sleep around and even show them how to have "safe sex", when they are more apt to be assualted by a STD than a well informed, law abiding citizen carrying a firearm or an armed assailant for that matter.

We need to take heed of what Britian is going through, their well intentioned gun laws have made their citizens like scared sheep in the corner of pen, perfect for the pickins. Their crime rate has skyrocketed and law abiding citizens are going to jail for protecting their lives and property. The caveat is that the "bobby's" now have to carry firearms lol That's precious!