POLITICS

Stand for Something

A conservative strategist argues that the GOP governs too much like Democrats, and needs to give voters a distinct alternative agenda.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mtntexas @ 07/11/2009 7:48:14 PM

    Stand up and identify yourselves as the pond scum that you truly are. You are politicians, we expect that. I know it sounds absurd and too novel or unique to gamble on, but have you investigated this thing called TRUTH. Shock us. Go ahead and announce that your campaign promises are a result of polling and that you have absolutely zero intentions of honoring ANY of them unless it somehow suits your needs. Look the voters straight in the eyes (or camera lens) and admit that you intend to whore yourself out to billionaires, corporations, special interest groups... who ever carries the deepest purse. Stand in a crowd of women and announce that each on is the most beautiful woman ever to walk the earth. Say that you are totally against abortion but you can't get elected while opposing it, so you'll perform them yourself if necessary. Go on record as saying that you oppose same sex marriages but will keep an open mind based upon campain contributions and backing. say you DO think gays and lesbians are snappy dressers. take a chance and shock the nation. stand firmly behind our troops but mention that tyhe VA is overspending it's budget and you hope that more soldiers will integrate into industry and use their company provided insurance. Come right out and state that old people should expect to be sick and dieing isn't so bad, really. You may just find that this 'truth' thing could catch on in a starnge way.

  • Posted By: mtntexas @ 07/11/2009 7:19:45 PM

    We don't really expect you to stand for anything. We expect you to write a book before a campaign so that major contributors can avoid campaign donation laws. We stand for that. We expect you to take cash from Israel / their lobbyists in return for ignoring their aggression and appropriating U.S. tax dollars to fund their agencies spying on us. We stand for that. We expect your wife's dummy corporation and all of your friends and relatives to reap the benefits of war or peace or prosperity or economic recession. We stand for that. We expect voluminous bills laid before Congress hiding pork barrel spending and deals in your home states and those of your 'honorable' co-conspirators due to payoffs, blackmail, and just everyday politics. We stand for that. We expect you to wipe your tails with the Constitution anytime it stands in the way of a profit for the Corporations that put you and keep you in office. We stand for that. We expect long winded speeches about what's best for our nation and why you made an unpopular decision at the expense of tax dollars and civil & human rights while vacationing and planning your retirement at the expense of industry. We stand for that. What we can no loonger stand for is the fact that you act like we, the people, are blind, blithering idiots. We can no longer stand for that.

  • Posted By: wstephenjackson @ 07/11/2009 1:31:07 PM

    Translation: Big Government is bad ... unless it is controlled by Republicans, and then it is good. The National Debt is bad, that is why George W. Bush paid it down to zero .. no wait, never mind that one. The Constitution is Good, unless it interferes with our agenda, when it becomes bad (see cross reference - Democratic Party - Inverse). Immigration is good, as long as it means cheap labor to drive down the price so that we can make more money, and as long as they actually cost us nothing, then it is bad. Torture is OK as long as we are the ones doing it (when it is not torture at all, right?), then it is bad. Nationalized Health Care is evil, it prevents us from trapping our employees in low wage jobs so that we can make more money. Money is always good, as long as we are the ones making it, otherwise it is bad.

    DId I leave anything out? Oh! Yes! .... only specific interpretations of the Protestant Christian faith are good, and everything else is, by definition, the work of Satan. How are we doing so far?

  • Posted By: JoeAmerica1 @ 06/30/2009 8:27:46 AM

    LOL@ANGRY WHITEMEN=Rethgulikkkans,

    The majority of these lone wolf type radicals are anti social, anti democracy anti american in those ways.
    They will not put their country first and support their President.

    They think they are still in control or running the country after the past 8 years of losing respect for themselves and for others.
    they hate everyone.
    that is why they are war mongers, believe in torture , and secret prisons and commit war crimes and want to keep it secret.
    The GOP is the new FLIP FLOP PARTY!
    they cry piss bitch and moan about everything spending, and helping out america get their country back they farmed out to china japan and laos vietnam korea, etc; but yet would not complain during bush years?? yeah go figure.

    they are like a loser group of intolerant racist, and lone wolf types, angry white men. lol

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 06/20/2009 3:18:47 PM

    "I welcome a debate about how we can make sure our regulations work for businesses and consumers," Obama said. "But what I will not accept - what I will vigorously oppose - are those who do not argue in good faith." As this quote clearly points out Obama once again gets to the heart of it and 'calls a spade a spade'. He simply doesn't always have all of the best answers but he really seems to continually have the honesty and conscience to sincerely identify and address the problems, something not seen enough in politics. As far as not always having the best answers, he states he "welcome(s) a debate" and in the past he has completely encouraged compromise with the intent of finding the real best solutions, which actually should be the single focus of an honestly conscientious congress. The Associated Press article continues, [By that, Obama said, he meant those who defend the status quo at any cost. He didn't name any people or organizations, but said special interests are already mobilizing to fight change. He called that typical Washington. "These are the interests that have benefited from a system which allowed ordinary Americans to be exploited," Obama said. The president said he would stand up for his plans, saying: "While I'm not spoiling for a fight, I'm ready for one. The most important thing we can do to put this era of irresponsibility in the past is to take responsibility now."] Really, who can deny that the Special Interests and Republicans who are loudly criticizing and aggressively trying to block everything, while offering no real solutions and only hoping to return to 'more of the same', are nothing more than obstructionists irresponsibly playing politics and focused only on their own selfish interests. Obama's responsible approach to conscientiously focus on what is right for the people is what this country desperately needs but to be really effective it has to be coupled with a Senate and Congress who put politics aside and conscientiously focus on fine tuning everything. Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever should see this truth and demand that our representatives/candidates drop their deceptive and exploitive politics, with their focus on only benefiting a few, and begin to "in good faith" debate and cooperate to achieve what is best for the people, which is their only real responsibility. To loose this opportunity and return to 'more of the same' would be disastrous.

    • Posted By: rhetoricaldoc @ 06/21/2009 10:24:13 AM

      If you believe Obama is being honest, you are truly naive. Obama says one thing and does another. He claims he wants to work with others and then he refuses to allow those views to be shared or incorporated. If you examine any of the bills that have been passed since he has been President, you will see the truth of that.

  • Posted By: earthorbitsthesun @ 05/23/2009 12:27:44 PM

    Now if we could only figure out how to get the Author of this story backed by a new Party, the Calabrese Party sounds good!

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 05/23/2009 10:23:46 AM

    The gap between the wealthy and the middle class has kept expanding and it seems that those few who benefit just aren???t ever satisfied, always wanting more. They look at the poor and the declining status of the middle class and accuse anyone wanting help as promoting liberalism and they offer that their own success doesn???t have anything to do with their abuse of power but rather is the natural result of conservative philosophies. When checking the facts, it says something different as is clearly demonstrated by what has happened on Wall Street, in the financial industry, so many times in corporate America and in general, where those with power and influence take advantage in arrogantly flaunting unchecked greed, self-indulgence and gross dishonesty. The real problem is that they have been encouraged, condoned, excused and even helped by politicians who they then support, contribute to and promise after office compensation (kickbacks) to. It doesn???t have anything to do with conservatism versus liberalism, which is the subterfuge they hide behind, but rather it is a blatant abuse of power always for money with the politicians being co-conspirators. They simply treat the American people as if they think everyone is stupid and easily manipulated.

    Right now we are hearing a lot of rhetoric from many Republicans who strongly tout conservatism, rationalizing all of what the Bush-Cheney administration did and trying to fault the Obama team as being too liberal. Their actions, in contrast to the deception they offer, really tell a different story. In remembering the last eight years we recall their lying about: the value of tax cuts for the wealthy; privatizing Social Security; bringing drugs back into the USA as being unsafe; Global Warming as not being a problem; the value of unchecked deregulation; the allowing of massive exportation of American jobs and taxes; and on and on always benefiting Special Interests and a select few. We saw their deception in saying they were keeping America safe while actually focusing on Iraq and ignoring pre-9/11 warnings, in taking resources from Afghanistan to initiate the falsely justified Iraq War, in manipulating reporting on both wars, in unchecked spending with favored vendors for the wars and for Homeland Security, often providing limited value, in departing from American values and Geneva convention to authorize abuse and torture of prisoners, thereby putting our troops more at risk, in trying to sell our port security to Dubai Ports, and again on and on significantly benefiting a few and always with arrogance and an unconscionable, self-serving sociopathic mentality. All of these actions were totally and stubbornly supported by the Republican Party who now offer no apology or any promise to correct but rather only rhetoric to disguise and justify a return to more of the same.

    (continued below)

    • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 05/23/2009 10:24:49 AM

      (Continuing from above)

      As an ex-registered Republican, a moderate conservative, I think we really need a strong and responsible Republican Party to provide choice, balance and honest competition. This is not possible with their current mentality and focus, with their loyalty only to a small segment of the American people who greatly benefit from their actions as the majority gets only, apathy, the costs and an abundance of subterfuge. It isn???t about conservative versus liberal; it is about having honesty and a sincere and responsible focus on benefit for all of the people. It is now really up to the voters to diligently see through the deception and to demand better, to never accept the rhetoric offered only to cover the self-indulgence and the rationalized drastic neglect!

  • Posted By: memo2 @ 05/22/2009 9:30:08 AM

    Just my comment about Mrs:Pelosi if you remember early this year She was the number one on the Obama's Administration why because She was approving all the Financial rescue by Mr:Obama now She stop because we criticize it and some way now She is in trouble? why , Regarding Limbaugh I still don't know how he manage to keep on radio after the disappointment situation just a cuple of years ago, and Mr:Chney I never agree with his ideas but right now he have a good argument regarding the Guantanamo and Deteinees, like I said just my comment !.....

  • Posted By: memo2 @ 05/22/2009 9:17:40 AM

    My concern is the people ane unemplyed will be permanently out of job, can we afford that is clear this administration can't handle it I don't think no body can what about if all the people in this Country just go in Bankrupt and we force Bak Institution's and Landers to give-up all this years of abuse they been make enough money for 31 years so far they still in the same business and what this Administration is been doing is support them why?. can you response to this question !......

  • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 05/21/2009 11:35:37 AM

    Cheney and Limbaugh are not leading the party. the GOP don't have a leader right now. Cheney and Limbaugh COMMENT... like Bill Clinton, Gore and Carter.
    For some reason the news media types are all upset by this and so unilaterally designating a "Republican leader" to stand up to attack down!
    I think it's funny! The Liberals don't know who to attack or why!

  • Posted By: memo2 @ 05/21/2009 7:59:08 AM

    Like I said before the more they get the les they can take,too late voter's we are in trouble again !,...

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 05/20/2009 12:54:34 PM

    Just to observe the politicians in action is enough to disgust anyone. The obnoxious, boldly irresponsible and just self-serving behavior of so many politicians and their supporters, where they don???t even try to address the interests of the majority, is offensive. They just arrogantly and stubbornly present their positions with their total focus being on winning, only on blocking and faulting their opponents while they pursue their individual interests and their party???s goals. To see Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed or John Boehner and Mitch McConnell tell their slanted views as they rationalize their lack of any real cooperation, while they concentrate only on their biased interests to benefit the few, should totally alienate the neglected majority. This is especially true coming from the many Republicans (Michael Steele, Jon Kyl, Sarah Palin, Lindsay Graham, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O???Rielly,,) who now want to rationalize Bush-Cheney???s irresponsible behavior, that was aimed to benefit only the very few (who returned support, contributions and promised after office ???kickbacks???), and then to justify returning to more of the same. Several of the Democrats are also guilty of only focusing on their self-interests and neglecting their responsibility to the majority. It is simply a real pity to see all of their aggressive efforts to attack, discredit and defeat each other without ever having any sincere concern for benefit to the public. Their expressed concern is always focused just on winning, on criticizing and overcoming the opposition, on rationalizing and disguising their self-focus and never on real concern for the people. What they all fail to understand is that what won so many over to Obama was his ability to convey his sincere interest in all of the people and his refreshing demonstration of a real conscience. Even if voters don???t completely agree with all of Obama???s positions, which can simply become adjusted through compromise and update, his conscientious focus on the majority has to be attractive and impressive. The politicians, the parties and their influential supporters aren???t what are of major importance, only the people really are.

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 05/20/2009 12:31:47 AM

    Its really makes sense and better of ,to steal from Rich give to the Poor,Rather then what Bush dd,Stole from the Poor,then give to Rich.

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 05/16/2009 2:50:16 PM

    Republicans, conservatives and Libertarians hate government regulation. Therefore, a communter airline should be able to hire whoever they want to pilot a plane, even if the pilot is unqualified. They should be force pilots to accept horrible working conditions, even if this means a pilot is too tired to effective fly a plane. Airline tragedies, such as the one we witnessed last February, are a small prise to pay for "freedom" from pesky government regulations.
    The same rationale applies to all the conservative arguments. The bottom line is that the "free market" only cares about the bottom line. It does not give a rat about human life. We've already tried that. (Go back to the safety record of railroads and steam boats in the 19th century, not to mention child labor and working conditions.) If you want a society free from government regulations, try Somalia. In Somalia, there are no public schools, no gun control laws, no taxes - and no governmment. Piracy is just another way to make a living. That's the GOP vision of the future.

  • Posted By: Democrats are a joke @ 04/14/2009 11:12:50 PM

    Democrats are a party of hate. They hate Christians unless they are quiet and do not live out their faith. They hate tollerance, unless you believe as they do. They hate free speech, unless it bashes Christians or Conservatives. They hate the military, unless it suppresses the population. They hate talk radio, unless it is perverted or left leaning. They hate people who take care of themselves. They hate the unborn. They hate the truth. They hate democracy, unless it agrees with their agenda. If it doesn't they go to court. They hate America, wanting instead the UN to rule.

    Democrats are a joke, especially when they say that Republicans hate. See the crazy things democrats do on the blog www.democratsareajoke.com

    • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 05/15/2009 12:13:03 PM

      really because im liberal i have no problems with chrisitians or talk radio. i believe in the rule of law and our constitution. i think abortion should a last resort to prevent people who are unfit to raise children from bringing upon a life they cant support and throwing them into social services with the hope they find a decent existance. where i differ from conservatives is that i would rather pay higher taxes and know that all my fellow citizens have aleast some social safety nets and standard of living. if that makes me a joke then i'll be laughing to my grave

    • Posted By: kruedawg @ 04/15/2009 4:47:15 PM

      Well, you DO have a right to your own opinion, though I don't see a single one of the examples you gave as being true or valid. Sounds to me like you disagree with the Democrats and have resorted to just calling names and crying rather than making sense.

      • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 04/15/2009 10:38:42 PM

        Krue,

        The GOP is the party of blaming their own faults on other people. Which was the party who called anybody who disagreed with Bush unpatriotic? Which wanted to take filibuster away from Congress? Which downright the voice of the people by fighting TO PREVENT a recount in Florida from taking place?

        It's a Rovian trick, they blame others for their own worst faults.

        • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/16/2009 12:04:08 AM

          Strange. I do not recall Rove dismissing hundreds of thousands of peacefully protesting Americans as ''noisemakers'' ''testicle bags'' , or ''rightwinged conservatives''.


          Yet all of the above descriptions for ordinary Americans came from,in order,

          Rachel Maddow of MSNBC,

          David Schuster of MSNBC

          and a CNN reporter in Chicago today.

          These are those who are playing the un-American games,by the use of placing ''the other''label on Americans whom these see as a threat to their White House master. Worse than Rove really,as these are the praetorian guards of the Ist Amendment, who avow ''impartiaity'' while becoming the most partisan voice in the history of this nation, who call all who disagree with the economic policies of this president,something even worse than ''unpatriotic''. Namely,a threat. Worse still,they are blaming these others [ are doing it right now in fact on CNN,NBC,and MSNBC] without even acknowlaging that they even have a fault. Thus arrogance and hubris that no Rove can match.

          • Posted By: cm4297 @ 04/17/2009 12:31:47 AM

            I do recall not only the Bush Administration, but the media as a whole painting anyone who disagreed with the war as unpatriotic. Lets not even talk about the invasion of privacy.

            • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/17/2009 12:53:26 AM

              Then back your play with accurate citation and quit wasting my time. Which member of the ''Bush administration'' called Americans opposed to his policies,especially Iraq, as ''unpatriotic''. Who is calling Americans worse than this now in your ''media''?

              • Posted By: BG.Bryan @ 04/17/2009 7:00:45 PM

                How does your colon look? I'm sure you have a great view from your head's current position--the chairman of the Joint Chiefs was forced to resign for disagreeing with the level of involvement that would be necessary for the Iraq War, Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA agent because her husband dared to tell the truth about his mission to assess Iraq's nuke ambitions, Colin Powell was set up to lie to the U.N. (whose adviser, Blick, turned out to be correct) and then left to twist in the wind afterwards. Kerry's service (modests though it was) was smeared mercilessly, McCain, a true hero, was described as mentally unstable and the parent of a non-caucasian when convenient, do you need any more examples victims of the Bush/Rove propoganda machine?

                • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/17/2009 7:23:37 PM

                  Probably the same shape as your brain. I demanded a specific example of where the administration called critics ''unpatriotic''.

                  • Posted By: BG.Bryan @ 04/17/2009 9:33:20 PM

                    I suppose I should apoligize for the unkind beginning of my response to you--subsequent discussion with you has shown you to be pretty well-versed; however, that just makes it more apparent that your "demand" for specific instances of the Bush administration calling someone "unpatriotic" is disingenious--the examples provided in my earlier response are clear examples of a questioning of patriotism, without the actual word. If you really don't see that, then perhaps I was incorrect in my assessment of you....

          • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 04/16/2009 10:01:07 AM

            "Strange. I do not recall Rove dismissing hundreds of thousands of peacefully protesting Americans as ''noisemakers'' ''testicle bags'' , or ''rightwinged conservatives''. "

            Naw. I think the right referred to them as "traitors" and "terrorist appeasers" when the lefties protested, back in the day.

            Turnabout is fair play. Deal with it.

            • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/17/2009 12:50:35 AM

              Hold the phone. I specifically mentioned ''Rove''. You mentioned ''the right''.


              Indicate with citation any time or any place where Rove referred to Bush critics as ....


              ''traitors''.

              Heres that ''turnabout'' you yourself mentioned earlier regarding the use of non-politicals [Rosie O'Donnell in that case],whereupon you provide non-political figures in order to make your own point [ Hannity and Limbaugh,who do not serve in government].

              So. I was correct after all,as you helpfully provide. Both are the two horns on the same goat, as we see today from Illinois Democrat US Rep. Scharkowsky[ Chicago Tribune] ,who called the ''tea party'' Americans,


              ''despicable''.

              ...without mentioning of course,that what is truly ''despicable''is her husband Robert Creamer,arrested,tried, and jailed for wire-fraud ,perjury,and other crimes that helped rip off hundreds if not thousands,of American investors,a sort of mini-Madoff.

              But trust me, I will not observe that you are,shall we say,


              ''a little hypocritical''.

              As you seem to be one of the more lucid in these parts.

            • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 04/16/2009 12:13:12 PM

              You ''think''.


              Then provide citation,as I have helpfully done. And was your ''right'' representative of bloggers or ordinary Americans,

              or major American news,which has no damned business acting in this manner? [ or ,not if they are ever again to be taken seriously].

              • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 04/16/2009 1:47:20 PM

                You really need a cite to Hannity and Limbaugh saying that?

        • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 04/15/2009 10:42:12 PM

          ... "downright denied..." I meant to write!

    • Posted By: sms29s66 @ 04/15/2009 2:51:39 PM

      Give me an example of fundamentalist Christian tolerance (an oxymoron if ever there was one).

    • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 04/15/2009 1:56:30 PM

      Keep on screeching.

    • Posted By: Heartlight3 @ 04/15/2009 12:33:18 AM

      This is called "projection".

      • Posted By: jlowell1 @ 04/15/2009 1:03:15 PM

        In addition, it's also called "delusion".

        But it once again is typical of the infantile "are know you are but what am I" stupidity that a lot of Republican arguments seem to boil down to. This guy above just got there a lot faster.

        It was good for a chuckle, so he gets some points for that!

  • Posted By: illmetaphysics @ 04/19/2009 11:18:54 AM

    I don't know what these people have been smoking, but the person that got everyone in this mess was "DUBYA"
    So, if anyone wants to talk about the worst, that is your man. Don't disrespect someone who is trying to help his whole country, oh wait.... helping people is TOTALLY socialism, right guys?

    • Posted By: LIMPbaugh @ 04/20/2009 1:13:42 PM

      If helping people is Socialistic, the GOP Party of Hate better hope it never stops. 22 of the 23 Red States so defined by november's presidential election, all except Texas, recieve more tax Payers Money than theiy pay in. in contrast only 7 of the blue states get more back. God bless the blue States that are willing to be charitable, even in the face of being labeled a socialist. The question is: where would the Southern Red states be without the Democtatic handout?

      while the southern Red states live in proverty, they are diverted by their elected hate mongers using the Guns and abortion issues. both bogus issues that are essential the those seeking reelection or election on the GOP ticket. Out they come from the campaign weapons vault every election cycle and returned when it's completed. Never planning to change the abortion law and lose the best campaign weapon ever concieved, the politians make fools of their gullible base. How, desperately feeble they are. I may be called a socialist for giving money to the poor Republican states but I think a lot more of the people living hand to mouth, than their own politians do.

      • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 05/15/2009 11:49:26 AM

        haha surprisingly conservatives seem blissfully ignorant of this fact. i wonder if people even know what socialism means

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 04/16/2009 10:29:05 PM

    As I predicted over 2 years ago. Dumb Americans will vote for the radical left-wing Muslim nutbar Obama as President and only a few months into his Presidency , the American people will rise up to his marxism and take the government and their country back. I predicted this would happen.

    RISE UP AMERICA !! REMEMBER YOUR FOREFATHERS !! REINSTATE YOUR CONSTITUTION !! IN GOD WE TRUST !!

    • Posted By: BG.Bryan @ 04/17/2009 6:36:20 PM

      I just checked the various news outlets, and somehow I missed any reporting of any U.S. uprisings. Yeah, we "left wingers" elected Obama--what the hell is that to you? I must of missed the report of Obama's muslim status, too (was that aired with the wide-spread reports of unrest in the States?) Anyway, who cares. Don't worry, though--America will address it's current problems and rebound (even without Republican or Canadian help) and continue and prosper. I'm sure there will be enough left-overs to continue to support our 51st state (some call it Canada)

      • Posted By: MJ000777 @ 04/19/2009 2:16:13 AM

        Bryan,
        Yeah you lefties with the help of a lot of illegals, dead people, disgruntled moderates and many many clueless people elected the worst President ever. The man is a a mental midget economically and will destroy the US economy in less than 2 years. If the Dems somehow survive the midterms, then another 2 years and it will be the "worst economy" since the Jimmy Carter years. You see BO has been spreading the big lie that we were experiencing the worst economy since the Great Depression, but once he took office, he took a bad economy and started driving it over a cliff.

        So yeah, lets have universal health care (Can't afford it), Cap and Trade (Disastrous), etc., etc. Sure Fed tax rates are low for most people right now,

        News Flash: Tax cuts would work if they were tried. Cut taxes on corporations and small business at the Federal and State levels significantly and for announce that it would be for at least 5 years and and we would see economic stimulation. Lowering taxes usually lead to increased revenue to the govt, but Dems can't stand for someone to make too much money, so they have to punish the small business owner, or the high paid executive. Give people significant tax breaks for buying houses and you would see the housing market improve.

        Or the Dems can just keep borrowing and printing money to try and stimulate the economy and inflation will soon be another problem. Can you say $10 for a gallon of milk?

        So Bryan, go home and wait for BO to give you your Green job and your subsidy check.

        • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 05/15/2009 11:43:17 AM

          id love to have a rational debate about the economic policies you describe but somehow i feel like my argument would fall on deaf ears

        • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 04/23/2009 5:23:06 PM

          "Yeah you lefties with the help of a lot of illegals, dead people, disgruntled moderates and many many clueless people elected the worst President ever. "

          James Buchanon?

        • Posted By: BG.Bryan @ 04/21/2009 3:44:33 PM

          You are right about one important thing: We will see. Taxes have been cut so much over the past 20 years that the average joe isn't that very motivated on that issue--how low can you cut them and still provide services? Healthcare?--if you think that isn't an issue, congratulations, you must be one of those who have both excellent insurance and ample financial resources to handle a serious illness--that must be a nice feeling. For the rest of us, you know, those who live one health issue away from financial ruin, national healthcare sounds pretty damn good. Call it socialism if it makes you feel better--we don't care, as long as it comes

        • Posted By: MJ000777 @ 04/19/2009 2:31:15 AM

          CORRECTION TO ABOVE POST ??? ADDED PORTION OF SENTENCE IN QUOTES: So yeah, lets have universal health care (Can't afford it), Cap and Trade (Disastrous), etc., etc. Sure Fed tax rates are low for most people right now, ???but State and local have gone up significantly in most states and people are paying a higher percentage of their income to all entities of the govt.???

    • Posted By: Osama Bin Login @ 04/17/2009 11:49:55 AM

      Keep your nose our of our business. Thanks.

  • Posted By: sms29s66 @ 04/28/2009 1:12:59 PM

    And now they can say goodbye to Specter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: sms29s66 @ 04/27/2009 10:00:55 AM

    I heard Pat Buchanan and Jos Scarborough this morning discussing the most recent poll which shows that merely 21% of Americans call themselves Repubican these days. Astonishing.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse