Thank you. I have thought for many years that parenting classes would go a long way toward helping children succeed. I think this is one of the most important steps we can take as a society, and I wish that there was more interest, more funding, more programs, and more incentives for parents to be involved in these programs, regardless of socioeconomic level. I have seen people at all socioeconomic levels make absolute messes of their children, crippling their futures, sometimes by enabling dependency on drugs and alcohol, as they attain young adulthood. I have also seen excellent parenting on all socioeconomic levels, with love and consistency. It would be great if we, as a society, with all of the research that's available, could band together to support good parenting. What a gift to future generations!
THE LAST WORD
Anna Quindlen
A Teachable Moment
Being a parent is easy and intuitive, correct? Well, no—it's just customary to pretend that that's the case.
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Several years ago a psychologist named Laurie Miller Brotman spearheaded a study of young children that yielded stunning results. The kids were from poor and troubled families, the preschool-age siblings of older children who were already acquainted with the criminal-justice system. Brotman's team tested levels of cortisol, a hormone that usually spikes when human beings are under stress. On average, these kids had flattened cortisol in stressful situations; so do many who have been maltreated or have behavior problems.
So far, so bad. But here's what happened to half the children in this study: their parents were enrolled in a program that helped them learn the kind of child rearing that Dr. Spock made popular. Consistent discipline without corporal punishment. Positive reinforcement for good behavior. Even how to get down on the floor and play.
And their kids' cortisol levels changed. Or, as the study itself says in science-speak, "family-based intervention affects the stress response in preschoolers at high risk." By the time those same kids were 11, both boys and girls were less aggressive, and the girls less obese, than the kids in a control group. Having their parents learn the basics of good child rearing had actually shifted the biology of these kids, so that it became similar to that of "normally developing, low-risk children."
Connect the dots here, and the picture you have is mind-boggling—even in tough neighborhoods, with boys and girls whose background and circumstances would argue for a negative future, a little parent training can go a long, long way.
So why is raising kids the most important job we ignore from a preparation point of view? Oh, there are more parenting classes and books than in the days when tutelage was mainly your mother saying, "You'll spoil that child if you pick him up every time he cries." A few high schools give their students a baby doll to carry around and tend, but that seems largely an attempt at libido suppression.
"Parenting is a much more separate, solitary activity than it used to be," says Harold S. Koplewicz, the director of the NYU Child Study Center, where Brotman also works. It used to take a village to raise a child, but there isn't a village anymore. Instead of extended family, there's a playground where everyone pretends everything's fine, and a computer screen behind which women can say, under cover of mommy blogs, "How come this is so hard for me?"
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »









Discuss