The Hanoi Hilton, that was torture, POW camps in North Korea and the Japanese empire that was torture!! What we did to these butchers is NOTHING
The Hanoi Hilton, that was torture, POW camps in North Korea and the Japanese empire that was torture!! What we did to these butchers is NOTHING
Trouble with that reasoning is that we (the United States) prosecuted and punished others (Japanese officials) for precisely the SAME war crimes...including beatings and waterboarding. rramjet is simply wrong on the facts.
rramjet is living in the wrong country.
He's living in the wrong century.
Because we did it.
Gotcha, hero.
You are no American.
Correct.
If nobody is prosecuted after they violate a written law, then it isn't really a law. At best its "advice"... at worst its hypocritical cover, a false claim of official disapproval of the conduct. Either way, it only invites contempt.
WE decided at Nuremburg that "I was only following orders" was not a sufficient excuse to commit war crimes. If rule of law is to have any meaning, the law must apply the same way to everyone. Whatever (weak) excuse can be offered for failure to prosecute the interrogators who committed torture, there is no excuse at all to exonerate those who gave the orders to torture.
Prosecute Feith, Addington, Cheney, Yoo and the rest. Restore the rule of law in the United States.
"WE decided at Nuremburg that "I was only following orders" was not a sufficient excuse to commit war crimes."
That was a long time ago, mate. This new breed of Yank is a lesser strain.
The U.S DOES NOT TORTURE!!!...bugs, water, walling? Child's play!! Are you kidding me?!!! Try decapitating, cutting off fingers, and genital mutilation...THESE are TORTURE techniques. THESE are the techniques used DAILY (without preapproval, or advanced notification) by the Terrorists on the innocent. If you think these thug terrorists were "tortured," wake up! T he fact is that these techniques saved lives-that is a fact. That is why 3 prior and THE CURRENT CIA Director opposed the release of this "Top Secret Memo." The term T'op Secret," implies that if it is declassified, a grave threat to human life will result. EVERY SINGLE PRIOR AND CURRENT CIA DIRECTOR told Obama this fact. Releasing these memos serves no purpose other than trying to score political points with Europe, and the far Left. Obama has only weakened our Country today-as he has done for the past 3 months...I in my life have never seen ahything like this! I voted for him, and am regreting every lie he told me on the campain trail about "being a Moderate, Change, and Hope"....as are a lot of other people. He really is digging a hole he will never get out of. The problem is, the Country is paying dearly. The "torture memo," is just another item on his long list of horrible judgment calls..
"The U.S DOES NOT TORTURE!!!...bugs, water, walling? Child's play!! Are you kidding me?!!! Try decapitating, cutting off fingers, and genital mutilation...THESE are TORTURE techniques."
Torture does not require amputation.
In the interest of truth: as the article points out, Robert Gates, current Secy. of Defense and former CIA DIRECTOR advocated the release of the documents; therefore it is incorrect to state that all former CIA directors opposed this. Further, the Military establishment opposes the use of torture (knowing that our open use of it invites the subjecting of any captured U.S. military personnel to the practice), as does Sen. John McCain (a true hero) whose knowledge of it far surpasses that of anyone who is currently posting on this issue....
True, all of it, I too voted Obama into office and i will have to admit that he is on his way to a single term career.
LUANIS, you like dogs right? I mean we should treat them in a humane manner. Dogs are cool.
LAST MONTH THE VERY SAME PEOPLE YOU SAY WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE 'NICE" TO STRAPPED BOMBS TO A DOG AND SENT IT IN TO THE US CAMP WHERE MY BROTHER AND OTHER SOLDIERS WERE SLEEPING! The shame you carry must be overwhelming in forgetinng those who died on 9/11. Oh wait, George Bush did that too. YOU IDIOTS
They do NOT, I repeat, do NOT, think like you do!
So what's your solution? torture everyone with brown skin?
Hmmmmmm, Kosovo--Clinton?
Hmmmmmmmmmm, deregs on mortgages--Clinton signed the bill?
Hmmmmmmmm
I think its time to apply those non torture methods to those arrogant but incompetent bushies. This maybe will make
them more competent. Lets start with Cheney.
This tacic makes no sense. Many of these people come from areas so tough that we can hardly imagine what they???ve endured, let alone simulate it. Not to mention there are plenty of people in the States who endure torture on a regular basis (e.g., sexual, physical abuse) and never even tell anyone because they???re afraid. And we expect these suspected terrorists to give up secrets based on torture? Humans can withstand a lot of torture if they???re determined. Why go that route on the 1% chance we???ll get something, when there are so many other possible strategies that don't require inhumane treatment and don't set us up for retaliation?
There were few things in law and government that the right wing nut jobs in the Cheney/Bush administration did not screw up. They left behind one hell of a mess, part of it being the economic disaster that we are living through now.
Covering up the corruption and incompetence simply means that we will be living through more disasters in the future if the politicians are confident that there will be no exposure.
Another Cheney/Bush administration could destroy our democracy and better the lesser pain now than the greater pain later.
Glad to see the memos published. Rather than making us more vulnerable, as a few misguided conservatives claim, it remove a valuable Al Queda recruiting tool, and lets the world know our intentions - we don't torture on humanitarian grounds, and we don't torture because the intel is suspect. We believe in the principles of our own Constitution which includes due process and the writ of habeaus corpus, and the Geneva Convention.
Glad to hear that the CIA operatives will not be prosecuted, because if we aren't going to prosecute their superiors - Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Gonzalez, Wu and Rice - we certainly shouldn't be prosecuting the CIA men and women in the trenches.
And while a small, petty part of me would love to see the above mentioned people prosecuted for war crimes, a more adult part of me knows that would serve no good purpose at this point in time - it is time to look forward, not backward.
.
.
You know, it's funny...I don't see any evidence that the detainees had to make a choice between burning to death and jumping out of a window of a skyscraper. I don't see where any of them were sitting behind a desk and unexpectedly slammed into by an airplane. I don't see where any of them were forced to wade through the blood and carnage of their friends, family, and co-workers. I don't see where any of them were crushed as the building they were stuck in collapsed. Those acts seem to describe torture...I'm sure any one of the thousands of dead Americans would have much preferred that the terrorists tortured them with caterpillars.
Dear Former "intel figure"
Being a former special forces figure with more real world intel I cant help but laugh at the absurd posture of you and the whole premise about sharing the memos. Lets get a bit real for a moment. First releasing the memos does absolutely nothing!!!! Why... the information on our so called "secret" techniques is already out there. Since they were released in 1969... In case you didn't know... the CIA didn't just make something new for the war on terror. They reinvented what had already been done for over 20 years in the School of the Americas. Seven full volumes of manuals called Kurbark spell out all this info and much much more. So to say this pose a security problem like you and mr Hayden just said in public is complete B!@#$%^&%$# So fro someone who has actually tortured people...get a grip, get a brain, and shut up about crap you dont have a clue about. The intel community has never had any leverage. Thus we have never won anything, not southamerica, iraq, terror, communism....None has been won or will be won.
-former realworld doer
I was amazed at the lack of any sort of responsibility displayed by the author of this article. However I should refrain from succumbing to hyperbole, even if the author was unable to. In a democracy, people are supposed to behave responsibly. What was done to these terrorists went beyond justice and was firmly in the shadow of revenge. I completely dismiss any suggestion that these people "deserve it." Whatever they might deserve, we are a nation of laws, we are a just nation. Exceeding the limits of justice demeans us. Keeping this in context, just because a number of politicians told CIA operatives that it was OK to exact revenge does not make it just.
The reason I am aghast at the suggestions of the author of this article is that he seems to equate revenge with good human intelligence. If all the CIA is capable of is taking revenge after the fact, then we are better off without them. They are useless to us. Perhaps I was mistaken, but I was under the impression that the "risks" the CIA was supposed to take were to keep track of threats to the country before they materialized, not to take revenge on scoundrels.
Having been in the military, we were told that you were to obey "lawful" orders. It was your responsibility to know what "lawful" meant. So the excuse that "my superior told me so" was insufficient. I don't know what if any laws apply to these individuals, but just becasue a lawyer tells you you can does not mean you can.
It is a tragedy that the leaders of the most powerful nation on earth felt it necessary to stoop to such levels to fight a rag-tag bunch of knuckleheads that are Al Quaeda. Just imagine what license they would think they had if we were fighting a more dangerous adversary.
Look, as much as some people want to believe that we only torture people that know anything useful, have done harm, or intend to do harm to our country; well that is the farthest thing from the truth. Unfortunately, covert intelligence isn't like it is in the movies. More often that not, we get the wrong guy. Now I know most of you don't care. You don't care that the guy we pick up in Baghdad has terrorist ties, or if he's just a father and husband going to and from work that our shoddy intelligence can't tell the difference between. I mean, since he's an Iraqi, they all deserve to be tortured, right? For those of you who think that, I wish I knew where you lived so I could send you to explain this particular belief to your Maker sooner rather than later.
Furthermore, it would seem that others condone the use of torture. I speak not with the difference between torturing the guilty and the innocent or the innocent versus the guilty. I'm just speaking of using torture period. That's great, you can believe that all you want. But guess what? It's ILLEGAL to do so. Now before you all start jumping up and down about how we shouldn't have to obey international law when it's our country at risk yadda yadda yadda, understand that YES we do have to follow international law. We agreed to do so. Now I know that United States has the absolute most horrible record of following international laws, but that consistent stupidity does not sanction continuing stupidity.
But Ok, fine. Let's say the United States can just thumb its nose at whim at international law. In case you didn't know, which I'm sure you didn't because you are uneducated enough to believe that torture is perfectly hunky dory, we have laws here in the United States that forbid torture. Wow, new idea huh? We have laws that apply strictly to the United States governing torture. Which means that anyone who does not follow these laws is a ................drum roll please........A CRIMINAL!!! Careful, now don't have an aneurysm on me! Yes, anyone in the CIA who did not follow our laws, anyone on the FBI who didn't follow our laws, anyone in the Justice Department that gave authorization that was contrary to law, is a CRIMINAL.
Putting bugs on people doesn't sound like torture to me. From all the fuss, i expected to hear that the CIA was hooking electrical wires up to their genitals. Now that's torture.
Great post! It is a crime, nationally and internationally and may I add spiritually. (that goes for the Bush crowd and Islamic crowd or any other groups or individuals) And what about using prevention by playing fair. Instead of waiting for repercussion years latter, by the ones done in.. Stop unfair practices and there will be more humanity and peace and no incidents like we have recently seen. (if only Mr. and Mrs. Kerry had been elected---what a different world it would have been)
Glad to see we have an expert C.I.A. interrogator, involved in the discussion...BTW...what about the trhee Somali teens....Unreasonable force??? What about PrezBo-Zo "air-raiding villages and killing innocent civilians" in Pakistan...Touch of hypocricy??? You talk a lot...but you say little....
NOBAMA!!!
Those 3 Somali teenagers were Muslims. I thought you wanted all "Mohammeds" dead. You should be cheering this one. Consistency, please!
What the hell does that have to do with anything. Of course if you're holding someone hostage you're probably going to get shot. I don't disagree with our killing the pirates holding the captain. We knew who they were and what they were doing; we didn't randomly grab them off the street because we "though" they were doing something. Oh, and, no I don't believe in air raids that kill random civilians. Regardless of who is ordering it.
It amazes me that the Obama aura blinds the MSM to a huge contradiction in his actions. BHO is willing to kill pirates who were threatening, at most, one American life, when BHO would not sanction the use of waterboarding to save NYC from a dirty body or other WMD. So killing is ok, but using techniques that leave someone alive, techniques that can saves thousands, are prohibited. Just asking, so I hope that doesn't make me a Right Wing threat.
Are we allowed to ask Why? Or is that considered unpatriotic? Again the question is why are some Islamic people behaving so desperate?
First, the Bush administration refused to abandon land mines, fragmentation bombs or accept the supremacy of the international court of justice, now, the Obama administration issues a blank check for torture "in the wake of terror". Why the heck do Americans need to constantly mess up human rights declarations that could make this world a safer and more human place?
How many terroists did the Bush administration create. Many people hate another, but will not act out the hate unless given a reason. Many of the people in the Mid East who hated the U.S. would never have taken action until the Bush Administration gave them a reason.
How about this solution for those scrupulous upholders of human rights. We immediately transfer the "alleged Jihadists" to the U.S.prison system. After Bubba and his friends beat the cr@ap out of them, cut them with an improvised knife, or gang rape them, they might be more willing to cooperate.
Ask why are radical Islamic factions so upset? And for the love of truth, lets not go on and on about it being indicative of the religion, cause all religions are guilty ) Why would some Islamic people be so upset that they would do some desperate acts? Why?
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss