Commentary and opinion on Georgia and the conflict last summer seem to rely increasingly on a sort of 'lone gunman' theory. It is becoming increasingly expedient or convenient for many groups to dismiss the events of the summer as an aberration brought about by the reckless personality of one man.
However to me this article reads more as a summary of the various pressures the Russians have applied on Georgia, both economic and military, for not behaving like the vassal they expect it to be. The rather trite conclusions that this article seems to make is that without Saakashvili the Russians would be treating their neighbours with dignity and respect. This was certainly not the case under Shevardnadze.
And seeing as how in Georgia, unlike Ukraine, the Russians have no viable pro-Russian anti-NATO candidates, I am sure whoever is in power in Georgia, the Kremlin will find some percieved insult or manufactured grievance that will allow them to continue threatening and de-stabilising Georgia.









Discuss