TERROR WATCH

Sanctioned Degradation

A new Senate report says Bush officials quickly abandoned 'humane' interrogation techniques.

 
PHOTOS
A Torture Timeline

For hundreds of years, atrocities have been committed in the name of empire-building, religion or national security

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

When the U.S. military began sending terror suspects to Guantanamo in 2002, President Bush proclaimed that it was unwavering U.S. policy that they would be treated "humanely." But according to a report made available to NEWSWEEK and other organizations, internal Defense Department memos show that U.S. interrogators quickly strayed from that approach, devising elaborate plans to break down the resistance of two high-value detainees by stripping them and forcing them "to bark and perform dog tricks." These techniques were derived in part from classified U.S. military training slides that recommended subjecting detainees to "religious disgrace" and a process of "degradation" that included addressing them as though they were "an animal," the memos show.

The memos, which relate to the interrogations of Mohammed al Khatani and Mohammedou Wali Slahi, are contained in a newly declassified Senate Armed Services Committee report to be released Wednesday by its chairman, Democratic Sen. Carl Levin. While the basic outlines of these interrogations were previously known, the report provides new details and will likely add fresh momentum to calls for a "truth commission" or similar Justice Department investigation of U.S. interrogation practices—both of which President Obama suggested for the first time Tuesday that he was willing to support.

The report, an advanced copy of which was provided to several news organizations, draws on newly declassified documents that Levin says bolsters his principal message: That the abuses at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and Guantanamo were not caused by "a few bad apples," as Bush administration officials repeatedly asserted. Instead, Levin said in a statement Tuesday, it was the product of high-level White House decisions to utilize a controversial series of "enhanced" and coercive interrogation techniques despite vociferous warnings by U.S. military lawyers and FBI officials that they could subject U.S. officials to prosecutions for torture and war crimes.

These techniques, many of which were simultaneously adopted by interrogators working for the CIA, originated with psychologists who worked on the Defense Department's Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) training program, which is intended to teach U.S. military personnel to resist interrogation tactics like those used by Chinese Communists during the Korean War. In the days after the 9/11 attacks, Levin's report states, these tactics were adapted by SERE psychologists for use against terror suspects. Training slides obtained by the senate panel show SERE instructors recommended such techniques as an "invasion of personal space by a female" and "stripping the individual, having the guards address the individual as if that person were an 'animal' or 'very low status' and controlling use of the latrine."

According to the minutes of one October 2002 meeting attended by U.S. military officials at a visiting CIA lawyer at Guantanamo, also cited in the Levin report, other techniques discussed included subjecting detainees to waterboarding to simulate suffocation and identifying the phobias of prisoners—such as "insects, snakes, claustrophobia"—and using those fears against them. Those minutes and other documents quoted in the report shed new light on an Aug. 1, 2002, internal Justice Department memo, made public last week, describing CIA interrogators' plans to put another high-value detainee, Abu Zubaydah, into a dark, cramped "confinement box" and then unleash an insect inside—in an effort to exploit his fears of insects.

Some of the aggressive interrogation techniques covered in the various memos recently disclosed (including stress positions, hooding and sleep deprivation) were adopted and approved for use against Khatani, a Saudi native picked up in Afghanistan who U.S. officials have identified as a member of Al Qaeda and the 20th member of the 9/11 hijacker group. A Jan. 17, 2003, memo describing the techniques "used" against Khatani during the previous seven weeks cites "stripping, forced grooming, invasion of space by a female interrogator, treating Khatani like an animal, using a military working dog, and forcing him to pray to an idol shrine."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mikewadestr @ 11/01/2009 12:25:36 AM

    The Abu Gharib soldiers who were just following orders got used like a bunch of sorry suckers by the military by pleading guilty and spending time in jail. Only a fool would join the US militart,

  • Posted By: concerned liberal @ 09/30/2009 4:54:56 PM

    No suspected terrorist deserves to be treated as well as my dog!

  • Posted By: colpittman@msn.com @ 09/28/2009 9:01:17 AM

    When a nation does not have the resolve to do whatever is necessary to protect its people and soveriegnity, does not export unconditional violence and aggression towards ANY person and ANY nation that does us harm, and employs tactics and strategy that is weaker than its enemies and emboldens rather than destroys the enemy will to win - it has already lost. This country ceased fighting wars in a manner that would ensure vcictory about 1945, and now the same mentality that ushered in the loss of Vietnam, the growth of Islamic fundamentalism, and the utter disregard of American military and political power by third world despots, butchers and madmen permeates the halls of Washington and blogs. Torture is pulling off fingernails, electro-shocking genitals, cutting off fingers, breaking bones, and beheading and dismemberment, and anyone who grew up in the 1950's and prior knows the difference. Those who continue to hammer the very methods that we employ, and employed to obtain intelligenve that has saved lives of our citizens are worse than our enemies, for they undercut one of the most effectice methods to get information quickly from those that might someday blow a weapon of mass destruction on our children. If you don't get the drift of what I'm saying, talk to your great-grandparents about what THEIR generation did to win WW2; talk to a Vietnam combat vet who, if they are honest, will tell you what THEY and their enemies did to try and win - and THEY (our enemies) did it better than us because a previous generation or pacifists, peace-niks, and yellow belly cowards who let others fo to war ijn their place instead of serving their country. Weakness and FDR style isolationism and appeasement has cost the world over 5 million dead since 1975,, and only during periods of demonstrable strength, resolve to do whatevver was necessary to get the point across the we will NOT go quitely into the closet while our enemies flourish has the US remained safe. Once again we have a political structure where, like FDR and LBJ, ignorance and appeasement is in vogue, and spending vast amounts of money on political agendas in lieu of winning a war is generating an exit out strategy and destroying American trust and reliance in out allies, and once AGAIN, we will surely pay as a nation in the future for out stupidity.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now