SPONSORED BY:
Getty Images
HEALTH

For Whom The Clock Ticks

A growing body of research supports the idea that there are biological disadvantages to late-in-life fatherhood. But will society's view of male fertility ever change?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

In season two of Bravo's wildly popular television series "Millionaire Matchmaker," host Patti Stanger rants against older men who perpetually search for 20-somethings to date. What Stanger knows intuitively and what researchers are illustrating empirically, is that men 50 and older, no matter their financial stability, aren't always the greatest catch.

Even if they can theoretically father children till the day they die, a growing compendium of knowledge points to a male "biological clock" largely driven by the replication of sperm with damaged DNA. According to a number of recent studies, offspring of older men have increased chances of a wide range of problems from autism to psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Unlike women, who are equipped with their life's supply of eggs at birth, men replicate sperm from their bar mitzvah to their funeral. It's like a Xerox copy of a Xerox copy millions of times over. The damage can be caused by glitches in the process of replicating DNA millions of times over, reduced efficiency of the DNA repair mechanism, or attributed to environmental factors like stress, smoking or heavy drinking.

But the bottom line is: as men age, the percentage of damaged sperm they carry in their testes tends to increase. "Men are making millions of sperm all the time, and the chance for a copy error is much higher," says Dr. Ethylin Jabs, director of the Center for Craniofacial Development and Disorders at Johns Hopkins, who has conducted extensive research on paternal age and mutations within sperm. Where older women may be concerned about the viability of their remaining eggs, the problem for men, says Jabs, is "quantity not quality."

Semen samples of men over 45 showed impairment to sperm in three categories: their motility (swimming capability), vitality and DNA integrity, according to Dr. Sergey Moskovtsev of Mount Sinai Hospital's Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine in New York. Moskovtsev's research shows that men older than 45 have twice as much damage to their sperm as men under 30. Researchers believe that an increase in the percentage of damaged sperm can have a number of consequences.

A report released in PLoS Medicine last month establishes a link between reduced intelligence and children who were fathered by older men. Using a sample of 33,000 children tested at the ages of 8 months, 4 years and 7 years, John McGrath of Australia's Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research and colleagues found that children of older fathers ranked consistently lower in cognitive ability tests than the offspring of younger fathers. For example, 7-year-old children born to 50-year-old dads performed two IQ points lower than peers born to 20-year-old fathers. This difference in IQ is of course subtle, and McGrath says that the results of his study shouldn't be cause for individual men to stop having children.

But he cautions that the mounting studies pointing to a male biological clock are worth considering on a macro level. "As a researcher, I am concerned that we have neglected the issue of paternal age," McGrath says. "Worryingly, the mutations associated with advanced paternal age can be passed on to the next generation. As the population delays parenthood, these mutations could, theoretically, accumulate. Other researchers—not me—have called this process a 'mutational time-bomb'."

Normally, individual sperm with impaired DNA would perform a kind of cell hara-kiri, killing themselves in a process called apoptosis. But research out of the University of Washington has shown that the sperm of men over 35 are less likely to go through that process. Coupled with higher amounts of semen bearing damaged DNA, the likelihood of a child born with an abnormality increases. In a study of hundreds of thousands of psychiatric records conducted by the Israeli draft board in the 1980s, Dr. Abraham Reichenberg of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, and the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, and colleagues showed a six-time increase in autism spectrum disorders for children of fathers over 40, compared with those 29 years and younger.

Since that report came out in 2006, Reichenberg says that efforts to link autism and other psychological disorders to older dads have been bolstered by similar results among sample groups from different countries. Another psychological disorder that has been linked to damaged sperm is schizophrenia. Men over 50 are 3 times as likely to have offspring with the debilitating mental disorder than fathers under the age of 25.

As news of this kind of research filters into the public consciousness, there may be a societal shift in the way we think about late-in-life fatherhood. Travis Stork, a 37-year-old M.D. on CBS's medical-news program, "The Doctors," recently did a feature on the link between paternal age and autism. He is fascinated by the way male and female fertility is viewed differently. "Women always take heat for their biological clocks," Stork says. "This should give men a reason to question their own reproductive system beyond the implications of fathers who won't live to see their child's high-school graduation," he says.

But Stanger, the TV matchmaker, says that even if older men understand the disadvantages of their age, some will still feel entitled to faster cars, fancier toys and younger women. But given the new information about older fathers, they may have to hope that those young women they're chasing don't feel entitled to a man with young sperm. Because even in the age of Viagra and Botox, there are some things money can't buy (yet).

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: EE7011 @ 04/29/2009 12:45:44 PM

    There are more and more women having babies in their 40's now. I think it is due to the fact that many women have careers and continue their education. The fact is if men are with young women just so they can prove something to themselves and other men, that is sad. If women are only with older men so they can have financial security and go on shopping sprees, that is sad too.

  • Posted By: irateredhead2008 @ 04/24/2009 12:44:39 PM

    It is so amusing to hear the comments talking about how this article is "discriminating" against older, mostly very well off men who are enjoying hitting up women who could be their daughters or grand daughters. You know, demographics who already get listened to whenever they open their traps. Money and "financial security" is helpful, but it never has and still cannot buy some of the most important things we humans cherish.., most importantly not a parent who has died before a child has had a chance to grow and gain the full benefit of the "mature knowledge" or the parent themselves. I think it's nothing short of selfish and vain to go so out of ones way to keep having children when they know they really won't be around in the end to do their full duties as parents.

    Suck it up guys, everyone ages and everyone's bodies deteriorate over time no matter the maintenance, prevention, pills or surgeries. Even gray haired...ooops... "distinguished and mature" people who enjoy calling the shots and reaping the benefits and privilages in most other cultural areas. We all age, things don't work as well when it happens and we all eventually die. Can we now as a society please move on to more important things than pointless and fleeting vanity chasing and chest beating?

  • Posted By: irateredhead2008 @ 04/24/2009 12:43:42 PM

    It is so amusing to hear the comments talking about how this article is "discriminating" against older, mostly very well off men who are enjoying hitting up women who could be their daughters or grand daughters. You know, demographics who already get listened to whenever they open their traps. Money and "financial security" is helpful, but it never has and still cannot buy some of the most important things we humans cherish.., most importantly not a parent who has died before a child has had a chance to grow and gain the full benefit of the "mature knowledge" or the parent themselves. I think it's nothing short of selfish and vain to go so out of ones way to keep having children when they know they really won't be around in the end to do their full duties as parents.

    Suck it up guys, everyone ages and everyone's bodies deteriorate over time no matter the maintenance, prevention, pills or surgeries. Even gray haired...ooops... "distinguished and mature" people who enjoy calling the shots and reaping the benefits and privilages in most other cultural areas. We all age, things don't work as well when it happens and we all eventually die. Can we now as a society please move on to more important things than pointless and fleeting vanity chasing and chest beating?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now