Unsilent Barack

The trajectory of his presidency may have been determined by what he did in his first 100 days.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 04/26/2009 11:35:31 AM

    We really need to put George F. Will on "mute." First of all, there's his complaint about "card checks herding workers into unions." Will forgets that it was Solidarity, a Polish labor union, that brought about the fall of the USSR. As a union member myself. American workers needs unions to protect them. The Bush Administration gave corporations a green light on abandoning safety measures resulting in thousands of deaths and injuries. That's an inconvenient truth that Will forgets.
    I will also point out that during the Bush regime, Democrats did not have much power over anything. In the House, they were not even permitted to speak, another inconvenient truth.
    The third inconvenient truth is medical care. Barbara Bush recently had surgery paid for by the government. Senators enjoy government-sponsored health care. The common man should have the right to buy into a government program like Medicare, which involves a 2% overhead, rather than watching his health care dollar go to profits for Wall Street, and bribery for lobbyists and Senators.
    As for the "rich resources" of the Senate, and the GOP Senators desire to shut down government, Will's words prove once again the ignorance and fanaticism of the GOP, which does not even believe in global warming. The Senate is NOT a democratic institution. For decades the Senate stifled Civil Rights leigislation, with Will's blessing. I hope Obama is willing to resort to reconciliation and the nuclear option whenever the Senate decides to obstruct what this country and the planet need.

    • Posted By: macaulay@msn.com @ 04/26/2009 3:04:53 PM

      Typical Liberal rsponse: First restrict the speech of the author. Second, personally attack the author.

      • Posted By: mac101 @ 04/26/2009 6:32:35 PM

        macaulay: - the use of the term 'mute' here means people are not interested in listening, not preventing someone from speaking. And there is no personal attack against Mr. Will in this comment, only disagreement with him, which is what Free Speech is about. The "attacks," such as they are, are towards the GOP.

        There are some inaccuracies in this comment, which you are welcome to correct, or not, and you are also welcome to disagree with the commenter.

        But please note: It is neither Fascist, Socialist, or Communist to disagree with someone's position, it is American.

        • Posted By: macaulay@msn.com @ 09/03/2009 3:01:20 PM

          You so called Progressives, i.e., Liberals are, in fact Socialists and Communists. You are un-American. Move to Cuba and spout your psuedo intellectual crap;. You will never be mainstream in the USA.

      • Posted By: wildechild66 @ 04/26/2009 7:33:59 PM

        Thank you.

    • Posted By: macaulay@msn.com @ 04/26/2009 2:51:02 PM

      Typical Liberal response to a stinging revelation. First suggest restricting speech (First Amendment) then attack the author. The only perople that believe that is a good idea are Facist, Socialist or Communist. Which are you?

  • Posted By: Zeta517 @ 06/01/2009 5:47:46 PM

    Dear George Will,
    You are getting out of touch my man. I used to read you all the time. You used to have great insight and gave conservatives a good name. What happened? Get in touch with the times my friend. Stop pandering to your ideologies and stick to the realistic, the practical--that's what you have always excelled at. As for the spending, yes, it's terrible, I know, but you need to invest in something that can give you some type of return, which is something that the Bush administration had some trouble with (COUGH War in Iraq COUGH). Give Barack some time, the returns will come. Finally, stop being such a cry baby. Jeez, you were always the one who called out people for their cry baby attitudes. Again, what happened?

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 05/16/2009 7:54:21 AM

    George Will obviously is not a fan, and had nothing to write about.

    The only time I thought I saw too much of Obama is during the campaign when his picture was in the email ads/"billboards": it seemed like too much. Otherwise, I am glad to know what is happening with the President.

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 05/16/2009 7:48:20 AM

    If people stop listening for a few days or weeks, that will not be a major problem. When one is not listening, 100 others are listening. Personally, I have not even seen all of his speeches, and I'm a supporter. I usually, get the sound bites and videos later however. Therefore, I haven seen too much of him.

  • Posted By: bahanson @ 05/16/2009 3:00:38 AM

    I'm tired of him already. He is the only person who, when telprompted, can speak for hours without actually saying anything and still get applause for his skills. His speeches are mostly long strings of slogans and talking points, and often lies(i.e. "we saved x amount of jobs.") When he goes off the cuff he sounds dumber than W., and that guy sounded handicapped. He has NEVER had any substance to his plans, or even legal justification for his agenda. It's a bunch hooey, I'm tired of it, I want him to shut up. He should hole and re-read the Constitution until he actually understands it. (All people should be treated equally, even by class. No progressive tax is legal.)

  • Posted By: michaelmccunepittsburgh @ 05/07/2009 12:31:46 PM

    Why don't we wait and see, George, before we use big words to define a man's time in office after only a little over three months. After all, he could hold the office for close to eight more years.

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 1:57:06 PM

      God help us if he does get a second term he will surely have his much sought after reparations tax added to whites once he is a lame duck. As I said before the election and continue to say now he is out for federal government control of all aspects of ours lives and if allowed to do so by the moron electorate it will happen. Get congress back to the GOP in 2010.

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:24:22 PM

        GOP is dead. The evangelicals made sure of that,..

        You don't only sound sadly misinformed you also sound like you have a borderline personality disorder. You should get that checked... Just a thought...

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 10:15:14 PM

          Wee let's see he controls the banks, car compainies, wages, wants national health insurance, cap and trade, card check, submission to the worls court, HR1966 a dem bill will allow protestors, bloggers and others who oppose the government through peaceful redress to be sent to federal prison and you worried about Bush's communication intercepts as a threat toour freedoms. JUST LOOK WHAT IS Happening. Remember Rahn Emanuel's statement Let's not waste a good crisis. He had and has an agenda that is anti- free republic and is more Marxist in nature.

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:22:11 PM

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:20:23 PM

  • Posted By: greatmidwest @ 05/12/2009 11:22:39 PM


    I guess Dick Cheney thinks losing focus on the "war on terror" and pursuing non-existent "weapons of mass destruction" as well as committing heinous POW atrocities in the likes of Abu Ghraib were an excellent use of taxpayer monies and bolstered the reputation of the USA around the world. None of these objectives saved any American lives, and actually resulted in the senseless loss of both American and Iraqi lives in a war that still has no legitimate reason for having ever been waged...

    For former VP Cheney to be hitting the airwaves and trying to justify the unjustifiable only secures his and Bush 43's legacy as incompetent leaders who led our great nation into a major economic decline domestically and a meaningless war abroad. Americans wanted change and have no interest in looking back at the last 8 years of American decline.
    God Bless President Obama and VP Biden on their mission of setting America back on track., and working on a health
    care plan for America's 46 million uninsured citizens.

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 1:24:36 PM

      Enjoy your free health care which is estimated will cost yo 20% of your income and if you have an employer based plan now don't expect them to pass those cost savings on to you via a salary increase. Can you afford your home with the government taking another 20% of yor income and an additional $2000.00 a year for the job killing cap and trade tax, the new beverage tax, the job killing Card Check legislation and the new Amnesty bill they have propsed for illegal Mexicans to be welcomed here. It is so good we should all become Mexican citizens and then move here right away. This bunch of tax and spend losers have got to go. All we heard for 8 years was the Bush deficits and how they were going to bankrupt us. Obama will exceed 8 years of Bush in two years and anyone who buys that this was necessary to get the economy going is nuts, Reagan had a much worse economy with high inflation and unemployment and he eliminated it by cutting taxes across the board. This group is going the other way and the ta increases we are about to be hit with are going to put federal taxes over 65% if his entire package is implemented. Good Lord get the congress back to the GOP!!!!!!

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:30:16 PM

        The poser GOP was sure happy to sign off on all of the Bush spending that ran us into the ground. What the fk are you even saying you uninformed partison?

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 10:05:08 PM

          Just a remider the dems had half of congress in 2004 and all of it in 2006 they signed off on it too and actually outspent Bush who really became a democrat in his second term.

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 9:20:04 PM

          Bush deficits totaled 2.1 trillion over his presidency Obama may reach that in one year if revenue continues to fall as it always does with massive spending increases and noo reaal tax cuts. Bush looks like an amateur in spending coompared to Obama who is on target to triple the national debt to 30 trillion if re-elected. This is not sustainable we don't have the jobs or the money to avoid bankruptcy at this pace. All of you dems complained vehemently about the Bush deficits it is time to contat your party leaders and say enoughis enough before it is too late.

  • Posted By: anonymous12345 @ 05/08/2009 3:50:30 AM

    ... how does George Will still have a job? He is one of the most biased and partisan people you could ever read. How does he get the back page so often? He should stick to baseball.
    The highlight (which comes up all the time) "his budge calls for doubling the national debt in 5 years"
    Okay how about Bush... he managed to take a balanced budge and, without including the cost of the wars, bring it back into the red. God damn... please stop with the hypocrisy. Every article! If he could just read his own stuff...

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 1:41:56 PM

      The GOP Congress balanced the budget under Clinton with the contract with America. Clinton still left office with a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit for 8 years he did not leave a surplus!!! the budget was balanced for a couple of years. Check your facts!!!

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:26:45 PM

        Not even close, try again. Clinton did come to the center and work with the republicans, that is true, and he signed it as well. Other than that you should get some facts, you are out there more than slightly. I would say you may have a deficit:)

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 9:58:11 PM

          Clinton look office and had the highest budget deficit ever his first year at 240 billion dollars. He left office after eight years increasing the federal debt 900 billion dollars but that is not the whole story. He borrowed over 400 billion from SSI to supposedly reduce the debt. Thus he owed SSI 400 billion more for a deficit of over 1.2 trillion dollars. The contract with America helped reduce the spending too but Clinton failed to re-stock munitions for the military forcing Bush to increase military spending greatly due to the neglect of Clinton.

  • Posted By: Anonani @ 05/09/2009 2:17:04 PM

    There must be something wrong with me and most of my friends. We are not getting tired of hearing Barack Obama. Why? Because he is saying something worth hearing and he says it well! Contrary to the view of media pundits, all Americans do not have the attention span of a gnat. GWB could have gifted America with no voice because we were do disenfranchised that we knew that what the People wanted and needed was irrelevant. He did what he wanted to do and that was nothing for the masses of us. So, now we have someone who appears to care enough to tell us how he is going to undo this mess that he has inherited. Guess what...we are listening...hanging on to every word!

    • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 1:32:47 PM

      Listen Load and Clear:

      Massive Income Tax Increases are coming to stave off deficit bankruptcy for the nation.
      A 20% income tax for "Free Health Care" (Based on Euro models)
      A medicare tax increase (it will be insolvent in 2017)
      A Social Security tax increase (it will insolvent in 2037)
      Cap and Trade $2000.00 increase in utility costs
      Card Check - If passed major increases in the cost of food, goods and services to offset increased labor costs.
      Mexican Amnsety Bill One Trillion dollars in costs associated with giving 20 million illegals a free pass to stay here with no penalties, no requirement to pay back owed taxes, in-state tuition for all, SSI, health care and on and on it goes with these democrats. Kiss our republic good-bye government run and owned hello the new Russia.

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:28:52 PM

        Come to the middle, get off the political bandwagon and leave the talking points behind...

        • Posted By: John Dough @ 05/15/2009 9:30:38 PM

          These are not talking points they are facts that can be checked through OMB and other legit sources. Obama is on course to double the national debt in 5 years and triple it in 8 years. If revenue for the year falls anymore he will exceed the 8 yearBush deficits in one year. He is almost there now at 1.8 trillion for the year (GWB 2.1 trillion in 8 years) This cannot be sustained. We do not have the jobs growth or income levels to sustain this and we will be insolvent as a nation by his second term.

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 04/29/2009 12:45:56 PM

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the biggest joke of a President there ever was. Can't believe there are so many stupid gullible Americans who allow themselves to be walked over by Obama and the rest of this Comedy of Errors government. The world knows Obama is a joke except for the dumb Americans who still believe this phoney. This is why the rest of the world mocks and hates the USA. You guys can never get your act straight and each successive President is worse than the previous one. Can't you dummies break this cycle ?

    • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 5:20:01 PM

      You know something CC??? You are the biggest joke of a blogger out there. You proved yourself to be a fool before the election and you are still doing that. We know you haev an issue with the president, adn also supported president cheney. But you don't have to be such an idiot about it. Like temper yourself some, you appear to have a disorder or something,..

    • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:36:46 PM

      Coming from the internet's biggest idiot and fraud... I am sure mosty everybody on this blog thinks you posess a borderline personality disorder... Get some help...

    • Posted By: Libricrat @ 04/30/2009 12:34:11 PM

      You are exactly right when you use the term gullible. I will admit, that on this past election and for a decade or so now, the republicans have been choosing their weakest candidates but America nowdays simply elects its leaders based on their on stage performance. Actual views about the issues don't matter to many if not most because the average everyday US citizen does not know the issues that much either. They simply vote on image and "who sounds the smartest". My wife and sister in law are perfect example. Neither one of them have any clue what GDP is much less anything else about the economy but " they would have his baby." The older I get the more I fear the legitamacy and viability of our democracy and even democracy in general. Scarey times indeed.

  • Posted By: bmcc94 @ 05/09/2009 10:10:25 AM

    Ammendment to my post of 05/09/2009 8:33:09 am

    It was erroneous to state that "There is no nyperliberal base in play". Of course there is a margin of the party that is hyperliberal. The point should have been that this margin now represents just a fraction of the broad base of support that our President has. I voted for Bush in 2000 having deluded myself into thinking that (1) Gore's sighs in the debates were diminishing and (2) despite his vacuous nature, W would be fine with what seemd at the time a group of seasoned reasoned professionals to bring him along and guide him. How wrong I was. They turned out to be a cabal of incompetent ninnies, and that's the impression left on a massive young voting block of well-educated people who actually were upset enough to get motivated to oust the rascals. That's the face of conservatism not Reagan to these people. By the time the election of 2008 comes, many of them have studied Reagan and found that, relative to their own times the Gipper presided over realtively untroubled times and was largely inconsequential (the USSR having now been well documented to be on the road to implosion regardless of any reagan bully pronouncements) and his inane fiscal policies having driven us into a serious recession. Bush's stewradship being even worse, what with the first invasion of a foreign sovereign country without provocation, rampant moral and other types of corruption among congressional GOP members it doesn't take a genius like Will to see why the GOP has also imploded. The face of conservatism is an ugly anathema to most young voters and many older types who formerly believed what the GOP was selling. With Reagan marginalized to being no better than an average president, Bush's debacle of an administration, it's not surprising that Obama has a very broad and loyal base at the moment, especially among a massive young voting block. Some old hyperliberals remain but they are not the driving constituency. One of the biggest nails in the coffin for radical right-wing conservatism is that it is orders of magnitude easier to establish a young well-educated base of supporters than it is to convert them. Convert them with what? There are no fresh ideas, a virtual dearth of talent. No atrractive constructive ideas and no atrractive candidates. It's going to be another long hard slog for the GOP and fossilized pseudo-intellectuals like George Will,

    • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/09/2009 11:07:06 AM

      Great Post- NOT.

      So let me get this straight- The Dems aren't as liberal as the Republican's are conservative?

      I got 2 names for you- Pelosi and Redd- Enough said.

      Seek help now, especially if you are young because the cases of early onset oldtimers is on the rise:)

      • Posted By: whatisreal? @ 05/15/2009 4:34:46 PM

        There are freaks on both ends of all parties. I just don't want to hear anybody that supported the Cheney administration act as if they haev anything to say after the last years of spending and fuking fiasco. Makes me want to slap them down.

  • Posted By: bmcc94 @ 05/09/2009 8:33:09 AM

    Obama's "Hyperliberal" base? Did you note how many independents (like me and many of my collegues) and Democrat moderates and young people voted for Obama and now continue to fully support him? There is no hyperliberal base in play. You are part of a fossilized ideology that doesn't seem to get the political sea change that has occured in the USA. Reagan is a ghost or at best an average president to most young people. Your GOP hyperconservative base friends seem to want to keep suckling that teet but it's gone dry or never existed for most young Americans.

    • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/09/2009 11:12:29 AM

      Wow. Hperconservative nonthinkers are the base of the party. One question for you. Are you auditioning for a job here at Newsweek? Keep it up- you're a shoe in.

  • Posted By: greatmidwest @ 05/06/2009 12:56:50 AM

    Not a very substantive article by Mr. Will.

    It has the optimism of a hospice patient, the pessimism of a disjointed GOP, and the lackluster read from a journalist who seems either disoriented that America can function better than during the past 8 years of sheer incompentency by President 43, or is just simply depressed.

    The American people don't want to see a nation divided by Red & Blue, a senseless war for nonexistent WMDs, a major American city that can't be rebuilt, an American middle-class losing their jobs and homes, our nation falling behind both scientifically and technologically, ignorance to the ever changing environment, and our country isolating itself from the global communiity...

    President Barack Obama's approval ratings are soaring because Americans wanted CHANGE. They elected our 44th President because they wanted to end the era of cerebral inertia that festered in the White House and led to our nation's decline as a major superpower. Americans are quite content seeing our President and our First Lady set a new pace for our nation and its people. Their unique sense of leadership and conncection with middle-class families suits our nation quite well during this most difficult economic time. Americans and our allies need a steady hand to lead our nation and reinvoke its pride and ingenuity once again. God Bless America

  • Posted By: greatmidwest @ 05/06/2009 12:54:58 AM


    Not a very substantive article by Mr. Will.

    It has the optimism of a hospice patient, the pessimism of a disjointed GOP, and the lackluster read from a journalist who seems either disoriented that America can function better than during the past 8 years of sheer incompentency by President 43.

    The American people don't want to see a nation divided by Red & Blue, a senseless war for nonexistent WMDs, a major American city that can't be rebuilt, an American middle-class losing their jobs and homes, our nation falling behind both scientifically and technologically, ignorance to the ever changing environment, and our country isolating itself from the global communiity...

    President Barack Obama's approval ratings are soaring because Americans wanted CHANGE. They elected our 44th President because they wanted to end the era of cerebral inertia that festered in the White House and led to our nation's decline as a major superpower. Americans are quite content seeing our President and our First Lady set a new pace for our nation and its people. Their unique sense of leadership and conncection with middle-class families suits our nation quite well during this most difficult economic time. Americans and our allies need a steady hand to lead our nation and reinvoke its pride and ingenuity once again. God Bless America

  • Posted By: JE Doyle @ 05/01/2009 2:18:32 PM

    I have always enjoyed reading George Will because I was born a year before he was in a town, Urbana, across the street from the town of his birth. Politically I could be described as a left wing Democrat on most issues and a Goldwater Republican on some issues. Nevertheless, I agree that Obama should step out of the limelight a bit to avoid wearing out his welcome. I also agree that it would be foolish for his justice department to prosecute any of those who were responsible for writing about, authorizing or using torture. I was an employee of Amnesty International in 1973 when the organization through its internal group-The Campaign To Abolish Torture, did substantial research regarding torture and I was angered by the Bush administration denial that they authorized the use of torture. However, I am also aware of the oversight obligations of the US Congress. Congress didn't provide oversight and so any prosecution would have to include a lot of Democrats. Let the UN and the ICJ decide whether or not to prosecute US officials for torture.

  • Posted By: gwen09 @ 04/30/2009 5:56:51 PM

    The importance of whether or not President Obama risks media overexposure really rests on the type of personality manifested in his actions. True, he will have to be a bit more reticent in the future regarding certain issues but I would think an accessible leader would, at this point in our history, be a breath of fresh air. We have spent the last eight years bombarded with a nonsensical leader far too willing to speak about anything other than the 'silent' activities of his administration. I believe the American public will judge 44 on the content of his words and character.
    I wonder, too, if there were critics of FDR's Fireside Chats - "too much exposure" "Don't ruin the mystique!" As if overexposure and maintaining mystique should be one's primary concern when the country is rocked by capitalism run amok.
    G. Davis-Feldman

  • Posted By: rememberwhen @ 04/30/2009 12:52:04 AM

    Mr. Will, I must remind you that you erroneously proclaimed the return of the "grownups" to Washington, when the most "adolescent" of all presidents, George W. Bush, became President. You are now utterly incompetent to project, or even speculate upon, the future course of the ever so much more "adult" Obama administration, now at its earliest stage.

  • Posted By: baeber @ 04/29/2009 11:41:44 AM

    Barack Obama is facing one of the worst economies in U.S. history, and lots of other crises. Personally, I am happy to hear from him. I am happy that he is so involved. If anything, I'm amazed by his stamina. But I'd rather he be "unsilent", rather than not communicating with the American public in a time so fraught with concern.

  • Posted By: charknue @ 04/28/2009 7:40:19 PM

    I think that George Wills is unfortunately, refusing to be objective about President Obama It is likely that history won't remember George Will's column in 300 years either; but will that be a reflection of the future or the past, will that be an advantage or a disadvantage?

    • Posted By: tjnewsandstuff @ 04/29/2009 10:37:13 AM

      OH! My aching head...What are you talking about???????????

  • Posted By: tjnewsandstuff @ 04/28/2009 4:09:51 PM

    George Will is such a grouch! His writing and appearance on Sunday mornings are, without fail, very negative - especially with regard to President Obama - yes , George, Barack Obama is the "President"! Stop being such a grouch and give the man a chance. BTW, if you have had your fill of the President - leave the roon, turn off the tv, etc. perhaps that will improve your disposition about the world overall.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse