SUMMER MOVIE PREVIEW

We’re All Trekkies Now

'Star Trek' is way cool. How'd that happen? Because the geeks have inherited the earth, and the White House.

 
PHOTOS
Famous Life Forms on 'Star Trek'

Royalty, rockers and other luminaries who beamed aboard shows, films

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

On a February weekend in 1974, when I was 11 years old, I went to the happiest wake I've ever attended. It was called the International Star Trek Convention. Held in a bunch of overcrowded ballrooms in New York City's Americana Hotel, where anxious fire marshals kept interrupting the festivities to clear the aisles, it was a charming, amateurish, collegial celebration—one of the earliest in what became a torrent of Trek conventions over the next few years. I went with my older brother and my dad, and what had brought us and 10,000 others together at five bucks a head was the beautiful corpse of a great TV show that had been off the air for nearly five years. We went to screenings of favorite episodes, watched a parade of people dressed up as "Trek" characters and sat rapt at reminiscences delivered by some of the show's cast, including a surprise visit from Mr. Spock himself, Leonard Nimoy. (William Shatner, a.k.a. Captain Kirk, hadn't yet acquiesced to participate in the convention-scene carny, though he soon would.) You could get away with smoking in hotels back then, and I remember an area called the "dealers' room"—a space where sellers trafficked in comic books, Super-8 home movies, sci-fi books and magazines, and oodles of "Trek" memorabilia—reeking of tobacco.

But it was the company, not the second-hand smoke, that made me lightheaded. I was surrounded, for the first time, by like-minded "Trekkies." (Later that term took on a pejorative ring, and fans coined "Trekkers" instead. Potay-to, potah-to.) We were largely a band of pasty-faced mouth breathers, many wearing thick, black-framed glasses and sporting long, stringy hair. Still, I don't remember feeling a trace of shame. I'd found my people. We spoke the same language. We loved the ritualistic invocation of our favorite catchphrases—"Beam me up," "Warp factor 10," "Set phasers on stun," and Dr. McCoy's perpetual declaration, "He's dead, Jim"—though the clear favorite, uttered by chief engineer Scott, was, "I canna change the laws of physics, Cap'n." We knew the product better than the people who'd made it. More important, we'd begun to push what had been marginal movie-genre ephemera—science fiction, fantasy, costumed-superhero stories—into the mainstream. I couldn't see it then, but we were pioneers in a techno-nerd meritocracy that people like Bill Gates would come to embody. We were witnessing the gestation of a new brand of fan culture, and on our way to a paradigm that would redefine geek as chic.

"Star Trek" debuted on NBC in September 1966, and nothing quite like it had been seen before. Created by Gene Roddenberry, who'd flown B-17 bombers in WWII and worked as a pilot and a cop before becoming a TV writer, the show took the old trope of a multiethnic military unit and spliced it into the most optimistic science-fiction scenario imaginable. It was upbeat, not dystopian or cautionary—180 degrees from paranoid scenarios about nuclear Armageddon and cosmic doom, which percolated through the '50s and came to a high boil in the early '60s. "Star Trek" posited that by the 23rd century, mankind would put aside warfare. The human race would band together to form an interstellar "Federation," exploring planets on humanitarian missions in giant conveyances called starships. The crews would essentially be the Peace Corps, except they would visit worlds instead of countries and they'd carry futuristic guns called phasers. (Conveniently, "Trek" allowed viewers to continue indulging a fear of "the other" in the form of warmongering aliens like the bearded, swarthy, nastily imperialistic Klingons, obvious stand-ins for the Soviets.)

From the start, "Star Trek" generated disappointing ratings, and NBC seemed to view people who loved the show as almost an annoyance. A letter campaign, begun in late 1966 and partly orchestrated by Roddenberry, helped win the series a second season. Was NBC happy about that? Didn't sound like it. On March 9, 1967, a live announcer came on at the close of an episode to make an unprecedented statement: " 'Star Trek' will be back in the fall. And please don't write any more letters." A second outcry—involving phone calls to network brass, at least 100,000 letters (some accounts say more than a million), a student protest at NBC in Burbank, and 5,000 MR. SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT bumper stickers, some surreptitiously stuck on NBC employees' cars—saved the show again late in season two. Such a large-scale plea for a stay of execution had never occurred in TV. But ratings kept sliding, and "Star Trek" finally limped off the air in 1969 after just 79 episodes. Then something unprecedented happened. In the early '70s, "Trek" reruns landed for bargain prices in syndication, mainly on UHF stations—remember those?—and the ratings took off. A new cult audience joined people who'd tuned in for the network run. They started meeting at conventions and discovered others who shared their passion. There wasn't any Internet yet, but the rudiments of the modern fan-boy network—a less fractious, more benevolent version of it—had materialized.

OK, cadets, so much for history. Now let's beam ourselves forward four decades—through five subsequent "Trek" TV series, past 10 theatrical movies (moving at higher warp speeds past the odd-numbered titles, which fans maintain aren't as good as the evens), beyond all the Trekkie jokes—and here we are, at the latest fan-boy fixation. Next week the 11th movie in the franchise, called plain old "Star Trek," lands in theaters. The film is directed by J. J. Abrams, who owes his cool factor primarily to being a cocreator of "Alias" and "Lost" (as opposed to directing "Mission: Impossible III"). Paramount commissioned him to take "Trek" back to ground zero with an origin story detailing how the first Enterprise crew—Kirk, Spock, ship's doctor McCoy, linguist Uhura, Ensign Chekov, navigator Sulu and engineer Scotty—all meet each other.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: AussieClaireBear @ 06/18/2009 1:16:53 AM

    Wow.
    This article gave me goosebumps.
    Just amazingly well written-a pardigm of good journalism.
    You're spot on with the optimistic trekkie view of the future and how we can change the world in the trekkie fashion.
    Thanks so much. This article's a keeper.

  • Posted By: ItaloKnight @ 05/12/2009 4:48:07 PM

    Daly, you have GOT to be kidding me. Tell me that journalism isn't falling off a cliff when I read an article the compares the Spock to Barack Obama.

    If Spock where anything like Barack Obama, he wouldn't have taken action against an aggressor like Nero (who many could say has "terrorist" tendencies), but rather would have convened some kind of a meeting to talk it out first. I'm sure that even-tempered and cuddly Nero would have appreciated such attempts -- even as he acted in open aggression against the Federation.

    Surprisingly, all through your nauseating rant and ridiculous allegory, you miss the real focus of the epic - James Kirk. It was always Kirks swagger, gut instinct, and do-or-die mentality that made the sci-fi epic a cult favorite. It was this ???space western??? appeal to do whatever was necessary to save his crew and protect his ship that kept fans coming back for more!

    But you only have to look at the film you praise to see the proof. Even as ???logic??? dictated that the Enterprise should ???retreat to talk??? to the Fleet after Vulcan???s demise, it was Kirk who wanted to stop the Narada???s advanced on Earth. It was only Kirk???s actions that enabled the Enterprise to confront Nero and the Narada to save the day.

    Sounds very much like taking action without apology to save lives vs. sticking your head in the sand and pretending like events aren't happening. If Spock were really like Obama, maybe for his next move Spock can change terms "galactic threat" or "space terrorists" for "Romulan-made intergalactic contingency operation" --- sounds Obama-esque, no?

    Let me ask you something Stevie: What match-book cover did you fill out to get that journalism degree of yours, eh?

    Do me a favor, don't say you're a "Trekkie" or a "Trekker" or anything of the sort. You give the rest of us who actually enjoy the franchise ??? and think for ourselves ??? a very bad name.

  • Posted By: ItaloKnight @ 05/12/2009 4:12:30 PM

    An adid

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
STAR TREK
Where No Man Has Gone Before

For decades, dedicated fans of 'Star Trek' have postulated a Kirk-Spock romance. A look at 'slash' fiction, 40 years later.