We’re All Trekkies Now

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

That may be a tonic for moviegoers beaten down by a surfeit of grim fantasy visions over the past decade, including the dour "Matrix" films, the discontents of Spielberg's "A.I. Artificial Intelligence," "Minority Report" and "War of the Worlds," Alfonso Cuarón's relentless "Children of Men" and even the "Harry Potter" films, which dwell much more on the rise of evil than the eventual triumph of good. Of course, "Star Trek" is also a reboot, a shakeup of sacred "Trek" canon that changes lots of details even as it respects many ground rules. There's always the chance that could go down badly with Trekkies, able to Twitter instantly about anything they don't like all through opening weekend. To smooth over the continuity hiccups, Abrams's screenwriters, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, have devised a black-hole–triggered time-travel scenario that explains away all the differences between the "Trek" universe we've come to know and this one, which is literally an alternate reality. Fans may be debating the logic all summer. But chat-board worrywarts should ultimately be very happy with Abrams's decision to lure veteran Nimoy into the center of this rewritten-history plot, in a substantial role as "Spock Prime." Don't ask us any more details, or we'll have to nerve-pinch you.

It's the Spock plot strands that give the new "Trek" its best shot at once again commanding the zeitgeist. Spock's cool, analytical nature feels more fascinating and topical than ever now that we've put a sort of Vulcan in the White House. All through the election campaign, columnists compared President Obama's unflappably logical demeanor and prominent ears with Mr. Spock's. But as Spock's complicated racial backstory is spun out in detail in the new "Trek"—right back into childhood—the Obama parallels keep deepening. Like Obama, Spock is the product of a mixed marriage (actually, an interstellar mixed marriage), and he suffers blunt manifestations of prejudice as a result. As played by Zachary Quinto, the young Spock loves his human mother, but longs to assimilate completely into his Vulcan father Sarek's ways, eschewing messy emotions the way all Vulcans do. Young Spock is constantly being told by Vulcans and humans alike that he's either seething with inappropriate emotions—indeed, he takes Kirk by the throat at one point—or that he's not emotional enough and shouldn't be so repressed. Obama may or may not be a fan—the White House says he isn't, but Trekkies have claimed him as one of their breed ever since he said, "I grew up on 'Star Trek'—I believe in the final frontier," at a campaign stop last year. If he does check out the new movie, I can imagine he might feel a special empathy for Spock's position, given the chattering class's insistence that he needs to show more emotion, too.

There's one more intriguing allegorical overtone to the new "Trek," perhaps completely accidental. With the willfully hegemonic Bush administration now gone, the tenets of Roddenberry's fictional universe feel very much in step with current events. Whether you're happy about it or not, the Obama foreign policy, at least for now, emphasizes cross-cultural exchange and eschews imperialistic swagger. That sounds very much in sync with the Federation's Prime Directive, which stipulates that humanity should observe but never interfere with alien cultures (no Iraq-style invasions, in other words).

All this metaphoric resonance may or may not strike a chord with a mass audience. Teenage ticket-buyers may not give a darn about egghead-talk overtones. Old-school Trekkies, some of whom say online that they're insulted by Paramount's recent "This is not your father's 'Star Trek' " promo campaign—a blatant attempt to attract younger viewers and avowed non-Trekkies who don't know a tribble from a tricorder—may not care as much anymore about the ritual of keeping the faith with a pilgrimage to movie theaters. I can vouch for my own deep satisfaction at seeing an old favorite resurrected, and at discovering that it speaks so directly to our place and time. A movie built to celebrate diversity, understanding and hope is definitely audacious. It's enough to make anyone feel that right now, here on earth and out in the final frontier, we have liftoff.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: AussieClaireBear @ 06/18/2009 1:16:53 AM

    Wow.
    This article gave me goosebumps.
    Just amazingly well written-a pardigm of good journalism.
    You're spot on with the optimistic trekkie view of the future and how we can change the world in the trekkie fashion.
    Thanks so much. This article's a keeper.

  • Posted By: ItaloKnight @ 05/12/2009 4:48:07 PM

    Daly, you have GOT to be kidding me. Tell me that journalism isn't falling off a cliff when I read an article the compares the Spock to Barack Obama.

    If Spock where anything like Barack Obama, he wouldn't have taken action against an aggressor like Nero (who many could say has "terrorist" tendencies), but rather would have convened some kind of a meeting to talk it out first. I'm sure that even-tempered and cuddly Nero would have appreciated such attempts -- even as he acted in open aggression against the Federation.

    Surprisingly, all through your nauseating rant and ridiculous allegory, you miss the real focus of the epic - James Kirk. It was always Kirks swagger, gut instinct, and do-or-die mentality that made the sci-fi epic a cult favorite. It was this ???space western??? appeal to do whatever was necessary to save his crew and protect his ship that kept fans coming back for more!

    But you only have to look at the film you praise to see the proof. Even as ???logic??? dictated that the Enterprise should ???retreat to talk??? to the Fleet after Vulcan???s demise, it was Kirk who wanted to stop the Narada???s advanced on Earth. It was only Kirk???s actions that enabled the Enterprise to confront Nero and the Narada to save the day.

    Sounds very much like taking action without apology to save lives vs. sticking your head in the sand and pretending like events aren't happening. If Spock were really like Obama, maybe for his next move Spock can change terms "galactic threat" or "space terrorists" for "Romulan-made intergalactic contingency operation" --- sounds Obama-esque, no?

    Let me ask you something Stevie: What match-book cover did you fill out to get that journalism degree of yours, eh?

    Do me a favor, don't say you're a "Trekkie" or a "Trekker" or anything of the sort. You give the rest of us who actually enjoy the franchise ??? and think for ourselves ??? a very bad name.

  • Posted By: ItaloKnight @ 05/12/2009 4:12:30 PM

    An adid

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
STAR TREK
Where No Man Has Gone Before

For decades, dedicated fans of 'Star Trek' have postulated a Kirk-Spock romance. A look at 'slash' fiction, 40 years later.