Have We Softened Up On Torture?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: treeman210 @ 04/26/2009 3:38:28 AM

    It seems exceptional to not believe that Rodney King???s beating could have constituted torture if it was prolonged, supervised over a period of months, and was used to extract any kind of knowledge that Rodney King may or may not have had regarding criminal activities in the Los Angeles region. The illustration is useful, because in the case of Rodney King, there was evidence of wrongdoing on his part, and certainly videotaped evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the LAPD. Yet, did his actions really warrant the brutality that was afforded under the adrenalized circumstances?

    Since our efforts at truth gathering fail so often in the face of the sociopolitical racism that is endemic in America . It would seem that this selfsame racism and the sociopolitical forces that sustain it are now being buttressed by the vindictive attitudes of the many in power that were caught off guard by the mission of the jihadists.

  • Posted By: treeman210 @ 04/26/2009 3:37:47 AM

    As a nearby resident to one of America???s Safest Cities, I???m assured that tough policing is a probable factor to that status. Tough tactics are certainly justified when there is a true cause for such action. Why not just rewind history a little to March 3, 1991.
    From a Chronology of the Rodney King trials:
    (http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/lapd/kingchronology.html)
    ???About 12:30 A.M., King's Hyundai is spotted speeding on the 210 freeway by two California Highway Patrol officers, Tim and Melanie Singer. The CHP officers pursue King at speeds of over 110 mph. King's vehicle is finally cut off about fifteen minutes later. As the Singers, with guns drawn, attempt to arrest King, Sgt. Stacey Koon and three other LAPD officers (Laurence Powell, Theodore Briseno, and Timothy Wind) intervene. From his nearby apartment, George Holliday videotapes the scene, as three officers strike King over fifty times with metal batons before finally handcuffing him. King is taken to a hospital by ambulance.???

  • Posted By: martialguy @ 04/26/2009 2:44:54 AM

    A lot of American soldiers were tortured during the Vietnam war and other wars to extract information to benefit the captors. One noted example was Sen. McCain in Hanoi Hilton. Any rationale for torture helps us stand in the same class with our former enemies.

  • Posted By: joyo @ 04/25/2009 9:19:43 PM

    The only reason I have a hard time condemning these torture tactics is that there seems to be no other way to extract information from the plotters, nor is there justification for our government to refrain from extracting information from them. It is a dirty job, but it must be done through the government. There is a vigilante type of alternative, but it is much worse than anything I care to imagine.

  • Posted By: mmagliaro@bnisolutions.com @ 04/25/2009 4:28:02 PM

    Why does nobody see the 800 pound gorilla in the room? We have most likely subjected prisoners to torture far exceeding what has ever surfaced publicly. I say this without reservation. I'd bet anything that during WWII, we tortured Nazi prisoners mercilessly, right to the point of death, to get important information out of them. When the cameras are off and nobody is looking, I bet we have ALWAYS done this. I further posit that deep-down, everybody knows this must be true. THAT's why there is no outrage over torture. It's not because we have become desensitized to it. it's because we know it goes on, we even know (in a deep dark place in our hearts) that sometimes it has been necessary and has won battles, no matter how brutal and inhumane we tell each other it is.

    So please, stop all this posturing about Abu Ghraib and water boarding. I bet we've done far worse. I bet sometimes it has worked, and sometimes it hasn't. Learn to live with it. War is brutal, savage, and animalistic. You wanna win? Better be prepared to shut up and fight dirty, because that's what our enemies do and that's what it takes.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 9:00:19 PM

      Yeah, if there's one thing that's come out of the whole Iraq War thing that I would have never guessed, it's a serious reexamination on my part of the notion that we were nothing but "the good guys" in World War II.

      I was taught about our Japanese-American interment camps in high school, and knew about our propaganda for a good bit - "slap a Jap" and et cetera, even Dr. Seuss did propaganda drawings for our goverment - but I would be willing to be that you are indeed right, and that a lot of things went on beneath the surface there which never made it into the history books. Our tactics against Communism in the immediate aftermath of World War II were certainly nothing to hold up on a moral pedestal. The CIA actually started providing support to Saddam Hussein in the 1960s, who used the same murderous tactics he eventually used against the Kurds and Kuwaitis against Iraqi Communists with the full support of the CIA, and most people don't know that the conservative military-industrial establishment under Reagan actually provided a good deal of equipment and intelligence support to Iraq for the entirety of the Iran-Iraq War as a means of practicing a black-ops war against Iran. It certainly sheds a new light on how that dictatorship got to be in the state it was in by the time we invaded.

      We did a lot of good in World War II, but it would behoove us to take the blinders off about our military tactics.

    • Posted By: deusXmchna @ 04/25/2009 5:12:46 PM

      Your points are certainly all true. Theres a parallel in the medical world. Doctors have been assisting the deaths of patients for... well, forever- but they've also been doing it in America in recent and current history. It was quiet, not discussed, and just a fact. Kevorkian went public (with good intentions, but poorly executed) with his assisted suicides- and a firestorm erupted.
      I believe thats whats happening here with torture/interrogation. We all knew what was going on, we just kept our mouths and camera lenses shut and got the job done quietly- now it's in peoples face and in todays highly charged partisan atmosphere, they feel they must take a moral stance, when they don't even really understand the situations or the context.
      What I find disturbing is that Gitmo is the Ritz compared with the overcrowding, bug infested food, and daily beatings/rapes in the average US prison- but no one seems to be concerned about that.

      • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:52:43 PM

        I'm plenty concerned about that. One of the reasons Obama appealed to me despite some misgivings - his one good accomplishment was achieving some bipartisan consensus for reform of the IL prisons.

        I'll argue however that your analogy is flawed. If government practices torture on rare and quiet occasions where necessity is clear - that's one thing...a giant public torture program is another all together. It is specifically because the use of torture was systematic, and a part of the normal processing of every prisoner that was taken regardless of circumstance in Baghdad, Abu Graib, Kabul and Bagram. It is the wide spread and systematic program that is fundamentally and deeply offensive to any freedom loving person who really takes a good look at this.

        The argument is always shifted to the idea that some nuclear attack was stopped because we got some guy and drilled him - yet that's not the case is ANY of the questionable actions that we are discussing. This remains a systematic program whereby people tortured as a matter of process and it can only be so that it will have a quelling effect on the population at large. It's population control through intimidation.

        I'm very sad that this continues with the new administration at Bagram.
        One of the major disappointments with Obama so far.

  • Posted By: Old_Red @ 04/25/2009 8:55:24 PM

    Can you imagine the flurry of activity at the Whitehouse, when the Abu Ghraib pictures were released? Can you imagine how much or your money was spent on public relations to prove that the Administration doesn't torture and therefore it was the "bad apples" that came up with the abuse idea? Can you imagine how much of your money was spent by the Whitehouse to get the "bad apples" convicted, to ensure that the Whitehouse didn't get convicted?

    Do you remember the "I was appalled" talking point, put out by the Whitehouse and used by everyone in the Administration et ux. (and et al.) and also used by Army TOP brass.

    Well there is still a "bad apple" in prison. We now know the abuse ideas did not come from the "bad apple", they came from people that had a much higher pay grade.

    The "bad apple" in prison was convicted because the Whitehouse told us that he was the "ringleader". We now know that the ring was lead by the last Administration, not the soldiers.

    It's time to release the soldier.

  • Posted By: jimmy d @ 04/25/2009 4:47:18 PM

    judge the result's, if you libreal's would for once stack up thousands of amercia live;s as against one sumbag terrorists , what do you think they do to our men. if someone told you your famly would all die in an hour, i would guess you your self would stick the sumbag head in a bucket of water. get a real life jerk.

    • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:32:51 PM

      A: There's nothing liberal or conservative about torture. It only seems that way because if the current partisan divide.
      B: I don't let the conduct of a terrorist dictate how I act. That's what winning is.
      C: Why would a terrorist save my family because I was torturing him? He would just lie to get me to stop. How would I know if what he was saying is true? It's a stupid plan instituted by young and inexperienced people.

      • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:53:16 PM

        Most career intelligence operatives worldwide agree that torture degrades, not improves, the quality of information obtained from prisoners in custody due to exactly the reasons you mentioned - which is to say, false positives given by people who will say anything to get the pain to stop.

  • Posted By: bdoggy @ 04/25/2009 1:17:46 PM

    Ohhh, pooor muslim murderers!!! Did the water hurt you that bad? Better yet, is our country full of pathetic, weak minded, politically correct wimps, that are more concerned with attacking our own interests than protecting our own well-being. These prisoners were killling our people. If we leave it up to these Muslim nations to make the rules, they would be perfectly happy committing genocide on everyone else like in Turkey (1915). Think about what your fighting for! The artists, homosexuals, feee-thinkers, and media would be the 1st people to die.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:51:10 PM

      " is our country full of pathetic, weak minded, politically correct wimps"

      This isn't likely to win votes over to your side next election cycle, you know.

    • Posted By: iamahyperbola @ 04/25/2009 8:05:33 PM

      The fact that you refer to those "Muslim murderers" as such shows your ignorance.

  • Posted By: ajshannon @ 04/25/2009 1:10:02 PM

    The planner of 911 was waterboarded 300 some times, by my casual math thats about 3000 short of the number of ppl he killed. Why soft liberals think we should coddle and bottle feed cold heartless maniacal killers is beyond me. The kind of terrorist animals that we tortured would slit the throat of any of the "infidel" cry baby liberals, who are campaigning for more PC interogation methods, in a second if they were face to face with the milk fed soft liberal veel calves that alternate their weekends between pro pot and anti torture rallies.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:50:17 PM

      If you're willing to go through waterboarding even once, and then continue to call it "coddling and bottle feeding", I'll agree to consider your opinion on torture.

    • Posted By: iamahyperbola @ 04/25/2009 8:07:01 PM

      Ah. We SHOULD stoop to their level.

  • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 8:32:21 PM

    waterboarding is not torture, period. Staying awake for 11 days is not torture, period. Getting slammed against a wall is not torture, period. Getting your head slowly cut off is torture. Having to jump out of a burning building is torture. Cutting off fingers one at a time is torture. Hooking up elctrical current to the genitals is torture. If you can;'t see the difference between these examples, you never will.and this topci can never be debated with you. The fundemental difference is night and day with no hope of reconciliation. This is the reason that this country is divided. It all started when one President in our recent pass tried to redefine the word "is". Whenever definitions of basic words get rewritten (similar to the way our history is being rewritten) then you will always have opposing sides. Not unlike the debates leading up to the revolutionary war. Definitions of right and wrong, States rights, etc.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:49:06 PM

      Also, weren't WE the ones using testicular electrical torture at Abu Ghraib?

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:47:49 PM

      "If you can;'t see the difference between these examples, you never will.and this topci can never be debated with you"

      It doesn't look as though you actually believe this.

      Also, I will agree to consider your opinions on torture if you are willing to go without sleep for so much as six days to understand what it's like, or to be waterboarded even once.

      By the way, in laboratory experiments on rats, sleep deprivation eventually leads to severe weight loss and death.

      "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation#Torture"

  • Posted By: treeman210 @ 04/25/2009 5:20:15 PM

    As an avid fan of Jack Bauer in the fantasy 24 hours, and often minutes leading to disaster, torture seems entertaining. However, in truth, torture is most definitely an abhorrent practice that should be stopped regardless of the circumstances. The worldwide network that espouses torture as a solution to intelligence gathering should be exposed, and all its supporters and perpetrators should be outed to face criminal charges for violations of law.

    A sobering piece about US citizens who feel that they are "targeted individuals" (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399.html) certainly gains some plausibility in light of the fact that anyone can be labelled, targeted, or deemed an enemy of the State because of social, cultural, and religious differences or even a hint that they might not like the Good O'l USA and the current estabilishment. of a power hungry intelligence elites.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 04/25/2009 8:43:47 PM

      Interestingly, for all that many conservatives frequently say things to liberals like "you've been watching too many Hollywood movies" (we've got a comment like that over on the Selective Declassification signal/noise comment thread right now), "24" was actually quoted repeatedly as a justification for the use of torture in the original policy papers formulating for the use of these "harsh interrogation policies" in the first place. Newsweek had an article about this sometime last year.

  • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 4:34:51 PM

    deusXmchna is dead right - only the self rightrous, couch riding, babykillerobama supporting, ignorant imps would ever question how the professionals keep this country and its people safe.

    • Posted By: lmktacwa @ 04/25/2009 7:35:21 PM

      I love it when the rightwingnuts start name calling. Sore losers, the lot of you. You are wrong. The people on the correct side of the law are right. you are so funny! hey, did you know when you get all 'babykiller" on us you get orange Cheeto spit all over your monitor. WWJD? You represent the losing side well. Keep at it... for every one of your 4 year old nanny-nanny-boo-boo remarks you make, another republican leaves the party and comes over to the good side. Munch on munchkin!

      • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 8:36:49 PM

        This poster is a perfect example of the self-righteous, couch riding, babykillerobama supporting ignorant imp.I was referring to. Im sure I hit a nerve and my description is dead on - that's why he/she/it didn't argue my point. BTW Obama is a baby killer. He is using your tax dollars to fund abortions. That's a baby killer in my book.

  • Posted By: Old_Red @ 04/25/2009 8:32:21 PM

    Can you imagine the flurry of activity at the Whitehouse, when the Abu Ghraib pictures were released? Can you imagine how much of your money was spent on public relations to prove that the administration doesn???t torture and therefore it was the ???bad apples??? that came up with the abuse idea? Can you imagine how much of your money was spent by the Whitehouse to get the ???bad apples convicted??? to ensure that the Whitehouse didn???t get convicted.

    Do you remember the ???I was appalled??? talking point put out by the Whitehouse and used by everyone in the Administration et ux. and also used by Army TOP brass.

    Well there is still a ???bad apple??? in prison. We now know the abuse ideas did not come from the ???bad apple???, they came from people that had a much higher pay grade.

    The ???bad apple??? in prison was convicted because the Whitehouse told us that he was the ???ringleader???. We now know that the ring was lead by the last Administration not the soldiers.

    It???s time to release the soldier.

  • Posted By: HaroldAMaio @ 04/25/2009 8:02:01 PM

    Have "We" Softened Up On Torture?


    You say "we." Who is your "we?" Many of us objected, long and loud. We are watching for international law to be followed and prosecutions to start. You say "we," your metaphor too small. Your "we" is an abstraction of convenience, we are real.

    Yes, we were there when the realities were veiled, and yes we were aware of the veils, the carefully constructed linguistics to persuade us failed, even as they appeared in the media, themselves not all that ethical observers.

    Harold A. Maio
    khmaio@earthlink.net

  • Posted By: pedro321 @ 04/25/2009 5:54:30 PM

    This is yet another example of situational ethics and excuses for the Bush administration to project a sense that they were and still are above both federal and international law. Most of the legislators who now call for the forgetting of the violations of human decency and international standards of conduct are chicken hawks that never served a day in the military defending their country. Dick Cheney was ???too busy??? to serve in the military. The justification and obtuse arguments are all drivel. The men who pushed and continue to push the torture techniques did not act out of love of country, but rather love of power. There are absolutes in life and banning torture is one of them.

    • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:44:11 PM

      These situational ethics are what drove me away from the Democrats and made me more conservative. I mean, I knew that some things are right and some things are wrong and there's no arguing it when you know the difference. How disappointing to see the supposedly conservative party one-up Bill Clinton. Sad that many who began as conservatives have been lead by the Republican party here. Now I have to choose between the champagne brigade and the torture nuts when I vote. I'll vote champagne over torture any day.

  • Posted By: Skavaka @ 04/25/2009 1:50:21 PM

    Are you kidding? This country isn't going soft. It is going insane if you think this can be justified on any level. If pictures of our soldiers and airmen were shown as POWs in these conditions we would be outraged. By allowing this to happen we have emboldened the Muslim fringe like never before. They hate us because of our freedom? Get real, we compromised our standards of treatment of prisoners, started an unjust war in Iraq, Bin Laden was never captured. Looks like we have taken the bait and now it is eroding us from the inside out. Good job of protecting our freedom Dick. Oh yeah, Virginia Tech.,Oakland, Pittsburgh, Binghamton....these guys were Americans.

    • Posted By: iamahyperbola @ 04/25/2009 6:36:25 PM

      I dislike how many people who have commented believe that "Muslim" is synonymous with "Radicalism". The former, being followers of an Abrahamic religion, the latter being the enemy.

  • Posted By: madhatter868 @ 04/25/2009 3:26:21 PM

    When the other side quits showing beheading an American on the internet I guess we could tone it down a bit. Why do we always have to be the guys wearing the whitec hats.

    • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 3:33:47 PM

      Who is the other side? Where is "terrorist" headquarters?

      We are fighting civilians. The Red Cross has published that some 80% of the people detained at Abu Graib were innocent of any wrong-doing.

      "he Red Cross report also says that coalition intelligence officials said to International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) that nearly 70-90 percent of the captives are caught by mistake."

      These prisoners aren't convicted terrorists - if they were, another conversation might be taking place. These are people who have been simply rounded up because we paid impoverished tribal rivals to point out the terrorists and just rounded up anyone they pointed out.

      "The Red Cross report also says that coalition intelligence officials said to International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) that nearly 70-90 percent of the captives are caught by mistake."

      • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 4:41:24 PM

        And the Red Cross know everything, right? LOL - I have some Idaho beach front property I'd like to sell you too. LMAO

        • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:28:54 PM

          I expected a more reasoned argument from "babykillerobama".

    • Posted By: byronv @ 04/25/2009 4:36:06 PM

      We wear the white hat because we are the "Good Guys" This is the USA and that is what we stand for. I'm am not the bad guy and I bet you don't think you are either. But maybe you do.

      • Posted By: deusXmchna @ 04/25/2009 4:57:52 PM

        We only think we wear the White Hats. The other side(s) think they wear the White Hats. Thats the problem with war- every team thinks they are on the side of right and on the side of god(s). No one thinks they are advancing evil. Even Hitler thought he was the good guy.

  • Posted By: Clemsy @ 04/25/2009 4:32:02 PM

    "Torture gets results."

    Yes. It does. Here they are:

    It justifies the torture of Americans.

    Causes America to be reviled by the world community.

    Makes American human rights demands a hypocritical joke.

    Compromises American justice.

    Compromises American honor.

    Betrays the American revolution.

    Betrays every soldier who died for American principles.

    Those are the results.

    • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 4:39:35 PM

      Show me one case were an American was tortured during these events? Show me evidence that our honor is compromised, What the hell do you mean by "betrays the American Revolution? Do you meam left wing radical socialism cultural revolution? In no way does this betray any soldier who died for America. Obviously, you are no soldier.

      • Posted By: Clemsy @ 04/25/2009 4:44:43 PM

        If you're justifying torture, you';re betraying the principles upon which this country is founded If you don't understand that, I pity you.

        • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 4:46:20 PM

          You can't answer my questions can you? Typical liberal response.

          • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:27:56 PM

            You know, a little more than half this country feels this way. Who has poisoned you against your neighbor? When you dismiss somebody as a "liberal" then you aren't listening - you are just labeling. That's an American you are talking to...you just called the American Revolution a "socialist revolution". Listen to yourself.

            There are people who use this partisan "liberal vs conservative" divide to destroy the unity and civility between American citizens. They are usually getting rich in the process. There's nothing patriotic about hating half this country - liberal or conservative as they may be.

          • Posted By: Clemsy @ 04/25/2009 4:51:19 PM

            Despite what we tell our children, there are stupid questions. Actually, I answered yours.

  • Posted By: cemoor @ 04/25/2009 4:49:23 PM

    The moment a country compromises humanity for the sake of safety, they have lost their integrity and any possible claim to moral ground. Anything can be excused if we twist words hard and long enough - but it is a truly hollow justification. We need to be honest, admit the wrong, and move forward. Anything less is cowardice.

    • Posted By: babykillerobama @ 04/25/2009 4:52:57 PM

      How much moral ground did it take to fill the World Trade Center hole?

      • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:24:12 PM

        What meaning does it have if we just let Bin Laden turn us into a nation of terrorists?

  • Posted By: amckerral @ 04/25/2009 4:59:50 PM

    Ms. Lithwick, please speak only for yourself. I still find those pictures repulsive in the same way I continue to find the pictures taken at the liberation of Auschwitz repulsive - more so in fact because this time there were U.S. armed forces doing this instead of Nazis or Imperial Japanese soldiers.

    Those responsible for this breach of humanity and the rule of law-both Republican AND Democrat - must be brought to justice. This has been going on for so long that we must take this opportunity to clean house now before this country descends into the lowest common denominator of swill that the conservative movement in this country has brought us. At this point we have no more credibility to chastize North Korea or anyone else about human rights abuses than the Japanese or the Germans did in 1945.

    • Posted By: pwhited @ 04/25/2009 5:15:21 PM

      I guess you've never read much about Nanking, in China, and what the Japanese did there. Throwing babies into the air and spearing them on bayonets, and you compare our troops with THAT? Don't be ridiculous... Humiliation isn't "torture", and believe this: If ANY of our troops were captured they received REAL torture and had their heads sawed off. Oh, but America is the EVIL one. Get real.

      • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:21:42 PM

        "Oh, but America is the EVIL one. "

        I don't think anyone said that.
        So tired of this kind of hyperbolic inflation of common sense dialog on an issue.

      • Posted By: Hamoth @ 04/25/2009 6:20:15 PM

        " Humiliation isn't "torture","

        Nor is that the sum of the torture program.


Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse