FACTCHECK.ORG

FactCheck: 100 Days of Spin

What Obama said—and what has been said about him.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Summary
After 100 days in office, we find President Obama is sticking to the facts—mostly.

Nevertheless, we find that the president has occasionally made claims that put him and his policies in a better light than the facts warrant. He has claimed that private economists agreed with the forecast in his budget, when they were really more pessimistic. He's used Bush-like budget-speak trying to sound frugal while raising spending to previously unimagined levels. And he has exaggerated the problems his proposals aim to cure by misstating facts about school drop-out rates and oil imports.

At the same time, there's been no shortage of dubious claims made about the president by his political opponents. Republicans have falsely claimed that Obama planned to spend billions on a levitating train and that his stimulus bill would require doctors to follow government orders on what medical treatments can and can't be prescribed, among other nonsense.

And those whoppers are mild compared with some of the positively deranged claims flying about the Internet. No, the national service bill Obama signed won't prevent anybody from going to church, for example. And no, he's not trying to send Social Security checks to illegal immigrants.

Analysis
Economic Cheerleading
 
Facing some heat from critics who complained that the administration's budget figures are too rosy, Obama offered a misleading defense to a national TV audience during his March 24 prime-time news conference. He said: "Our assumptions are perfectly consistent with what Blue Chip forecasters out there are saying." That wasn't true.

Obama was referring to the Blue Chip Economic Indicators, a survey of forecasts from 50 private economists. In fact, at the time he spoke, the most recent Blue Chip forecast was far more pessimistic than the administration's budget projections. That's no small matter, since a weaker economic performance will produce even larger federal deficits than the Obama budget already forecasts.

Obama's Prime Time Pitch
March 25

Budgetspeak 
Obama also got it wrong when he claimed in that same speech that "we are reducing nondefense discretionary spending to its lowest level since the '60s." His own forecast puts this figure higher than in many years under Reagan, Clinton or either Bush.

Furthermore, he used the same verbal sleight-of-hand that President George W. Bush had used to deflect attention from the larger truth—that total federal spending is (and was) soaring far beyond the government's means to pay for it. "Nondefense discretionary spending" is just a small slice (under 20 percent) of total spending. It excludes military spending, homeland security spending and rapidly rising Social Security and Medicare spending, among other things. So even if Obama's claim had been true, it would have been misleading—pure spin.

Obama's Prime Time Pitch
March 25

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: twiny1 @ 09/03/2009 12:35:16 AM

    How does one argue with a dolt like this?

    Show him the facts and the twisted fantasy world he inhabits won't allow him to see them.

    These people are hopeless.

  • Posted By: Morgan2008 @ 05/29/2009 7:23:35 PM

    If you could buy Obama for what he is really worth and sell him for what he thinks he is worth,...you would be a multi-trillionaire. I think Obama and his administration are about 99% spin. Obama spends 95% of his time jetting around on Air Force One campaigning for himself and his agenda at taxpayers' expense. Just remember approximately half the voters did not vote for Obama and are looking forward to the day when a large percent of the people who did vote for Obama become so disappointed with him that they will be anxious to get rid of him and his radical agenda for America. If left unchecked, Obama will bankrupt America and his economic policies will cause such high inflation that the U.S. dollar will lose in value. Also,...Plenty of people could care less about Michele Obama's arms. It seems like the liberal media is trying to turn the Obamas into Hollywood celebrities or the Whitehouse Stepford Family for Black people since they are the first black first family. America has enough trivial celebrities to occupy the minds of some people in this country. We need a president who knows and cares how to keep America secure and economically strong.

  • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 04/30/2009 5:08:45 PM

    let me ask....

    do you really think McCain would have been any different? mister maverick himself... really? or anyone else for that matter?

    do think we are being told the truth by our government in any aspect is delusional in the first place....

    i mean i know plenty of people that are duped into think they are being told the truth, but it has been the same with every president for the last 50 years or so. nothing really new or innovative from any of them. some where merely great leaders, but not great presidents and "managers" you could say...


    of course we arent being told the exact truth, no other president would have been any different or HAS been any different. im not suprised at all by this article, and as such im not afraid to admit that a human being will error or even blatantly lie, and neither should you. hes your president, hes human, hes not perfect, and neither is the "system" hes "managing" and being a part of..

    washington is completely and utterly corrupt in one way or another at all levels.

    there are my thoughts.


    from an Obama voter (whos only choice was the lesser of 2 evils, which is what every presidential election amounts to anyway).


    ps i was planning on voting for ron paul initially, but i cant feel right about throwing away a vote like that because he never had a chance... the media didnt even hardly cover him at all through the primaries.

    pss- and yes, this article was one of the few political articles on newsweek that has shown the least amount of bias. and it was well written. i love exposing truth.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 

A new ad goes too far when it says Medicare will be "bankrupt" in eight years.