There isn't one mention in the entire column of climate change, the reason why there is a "bias" against oil and gas. Where does Samuelson get this idea that it is in the national interest for the US to experience wholesale global climate change? He brands all those who see climate as a problem as "insane" by implication. Expanding fossil fuel production doesn't "offend" many Americans, it is seen as a bad idea. In the face of the evidence, it is expanding fossil fuel production that appears to be, to use Samuelson's word, insane.
- 1
- 2
The Bias Against Oil and Gas
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Improved exploration and production techniques—drilling in deeper waters, horizontal drilling, hydraulic "fracturing" (pumping liquids into fields to open up seams)—have increased America's recoverable amounts of oil and natural gas. The resistance to availing ourselves of these resources is mostly political and psychological. Among many environmentalists, the idea of expanding fossil-fuel production is a cardinal sin. It offends their religion. The Obama administration too often caters to this reflexive hostility. The resulting policies aim more to satisfy popular prejudice—through reassuring photo ops and sound bites—than meet the country's needs.
© 2009
- 1
- 2
My Take
Each Newsweek reader is different—and now your Newsweek can be, too. Use this page to create a experience that's personalized for you and your interests. My Take: it makes Newsweek whatever you want it to be.










Discuss