SPONSORED BY:

WORLD XTRA

Sumit Ganguly

Nuclear Nonstarter

Despite the Taliban's advances, Pakistan's nuclear weapons are safe.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mesmer @ 05/13/2009 1:59:59 PM

    What mindless drivel are you spouting boy!

    The world knows that India castrated Pakistan when they liberated Bangla Desh.

    Now Pakistan is itself committing Hara-Kiri even as it splits like an Amoeba into multiple entities

    Does this justify Jinnah's two nation theory or what?

    Many of you Pakistanis who write here need some serious ECT therapy for your psychiatric problems

  • Posted By: mesmer @ 05/13/2009 1:53:19 PM

    Articles like Ganguly's are plants to reassure the International Reader that Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons are safe through puerile obfuscating arguments and pseudo logic

    The more likely truth is that Pakistan's nuclear weapons were all deactivated and taken into safe custody by the US soon after 9/11 and/ or after the discovery of Pakistan's flourishing nuclear weapons supermarket run by A.Q. Khan was busted

    Thats how Pakistan's nuclear weapons are safe!

    To placate the Pakistani people and army this fact is not disclosed publicly by the US as it makes the Pakistani's feel helpless as their only deterrence against India is Nuclear Weapons (or the fiction they still have and control them)

    Nuclear weapons never deterred India at Kargil and they will not deter India when it has a strong government with a party that believes National Security is more important than US pressure

  • Posted By: manbearpig @ 05/12/2009 1:32:08 AM

    Mr. Ganguly is oversimplifying. The issue is not only whether Pakistan's current nuclear arsenal is in safe hands. As the author asserts, it probably is - Pakistan's military being highly professional and all.
    What Mr. Ganguly is overlooking is the possibility of an AQ Khan-like deal with the Taliban. Say for instance the Taliban is successful in creating an Islamist psuedo-state carved out of the tribal and NW regions of Pakistan. Given the history of "unofficial" proliferation from Pakistan, what is the guarantee that nuclear know-how or material is not transferred to this new pseudo-state, even when Pakistan's official stockpile and arsenal is safeguarded? It happened before and it could happen again.
    Last I heard, AQ Khan is alive and well and pretty much un-restrained.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now