Point of View

The Opportunity in Autos

Rather than bail out the auto industry, the money should go into a project to produce an electric car.

 
GALLERY
The Most Fuel Efficient Cars

Ten small and stylish rides that save gas and money

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The White House is at this moment trying to save America's auto industry and the tens of thousands of jobs that depend on it. Although nobody knows what the bailout is expected to cost, it's going to be huge—on the order of $100 billion. Spending this kind of money on a salvage operation will not work: business as usual will ultimately result in failure as usual. Incremental technological improvements will not help because foreign competitors will simply match them, as they have been doing for decades.

Instead, the $100 billion should be used in a bold move to transform the auto industry. What's needed is a big push, similar to the Manhattan and Apollo projects, to turn the U.S. auto industry into a world leader in electric cars and sustainable vehicles, and set the stage for a phasing out of internal-combustion-engine cars.

Fifty years ago we were engaged in a space race with the Soviet Union. Today perhaps we are embarking on a "car race" with the Chinese and other industrial powers—a race to be the first to perfect Car 2.0. According to recent press reports, China is pushing electric and green vehicles, with the goal of overtaking carmakers overseas and dominating the global market.

The four-year Manhattan Project, begun in 1942, cost "merely" $25 billion in 2009 dollars, but with that funding, the nation developed the first atomic bomb. Project Apollo, begun with President John F. Kennedy's 1961 speech, cost a total of $125 billion (in today's dollars) over 10 years. During both of these efforts we invented important technology we didn't even know to ask for.

With this much funding, it should be possible to trigger the innovation and economies of scale to drive the price of electric cars below that of internal-combustion cars. Electric cars would be cheaper to buy and much cheaper to operate—especially when oil prices rise again, as they inevitably will. The United States wouldn't be held hostage to high fossil-fuel prices. This would strengthen the economy by arresting the massive continuing flow of oil funds offshore, which would amount to an ongoing economic stimulus. And a clean car would find exports around the world.

It's not really that difficult to make the really useful, affordable, desirable electric cars that people worldwide yearn for. The U.S. already has good electric cars. The greatest challenge to universal desirability may be the battery: we need to improve price, range, power and refueling time. The next generation of batteries must be cheaper, more powerful, quicker charging. This is a challenge, but incredibly easier than inventing, from scratch, atomic power or manned space flight.

Even without advanced batteries, it's possible to move forward. Strategies such as battery-swapping stations overcome perceived range and charging-time constraints. Batteries could be charged directly at generation plants during off-peak times and physically distributing them to local swapping stations (gasoline is often shipped halfway around the world). Or privately generated solar or wind can charge vehicle batteries.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: memo2 @ 05/19/2009 8:27:48 AM

    There is no right thing this is just another part to make the greed keep on business they think I willing to give-up my car for these junk's I don't think so, let me ask you were you see any new places were these cars will be repaired or the new technicians will be only be the dealer ? when do we know people are learning to promote a new car like this,or just put them at the dilership and buy it just like that ? do you know the safety on these small cars ? and other thing all the same pretty nice I do believe the only dilership will survive in this economy will be Ford Motors and I never buy any Ford in my life on the past I have Mersedes and the repair cost you big time as BMW, and others like that good cars good cuality but the thechnicians pretty expensive so be the one to buy one of these cars and when you get on the highway you see , just try !.....

  • Posted By: tired and old @ 05/18/2009 9:31:44 PM

    Puting the bailout money into producing an electric car makes sense; so why would congress suddenly do the right thing ?

    Government waste is what congress represents.

    Doing the wrong thing at tax payer expense is the congressional way of life.

  • Posted By: tdn0024 @ 05/13/2009 2:54:29 PM

    Changing stations? It better work like Nascar. With instant pit stops at traffic lights.

    GM is spending $10k per car for it's 40 mile battery. People won't want to change batteries every 10 miles, or even everyday. So they are going to have to have $10k of batteries.

    Battery improvement? Come on. Industry has had huge incentives to make tighter batteries for cell phones and computers. Even the genius's at Sony burnt their fingers on this when theír battery efforts blew up on some computer owners.

    Ya know, gold is just one proton away from lead. Alchemy has been tried for 2,000 years, but nature won't yield. Anyone who's ever watched lighteing race across the sky has got to wonder just how much electric power will fit in a fixed space. In a battery.

    This article is horrible. They get liberal arts majors at Time or the NYT to write this stuff, as if it were a human interest story. This is the kind of stuff that gets laughed at 20 years later, when on big change has occurred.

    It is an invitation for Obama to fail as Carter did. Better start thinking about how to get around, or at least minimize, the battery. And that is doable. Then electric cars can work. Full blown, big cars, running electric. If you count on the battery for more than about 5 miles, your out of luck on cost. And no innovation is likely to change that.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse