Moving Beyond Gut-Check Diplomacy

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 7:47:07 PM

    40YearR- It also annoys you that I know that Dubya's megalomaniacal, ideologue puppeteers fired or disregarded the experienced military both on Afghanistan and Iraq, and did it 'their' way instead.

    Gates said he was removing Gen. David McKiernan after only 11 months in command after deciding that ???fresh thinking??? and ???fresh eyes??? were needed to implement the expanded counterinsurgency strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan ordered by President Barack Obama.

    What up with that 40R? Barry lining up the "yes men?" LMAO

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 05/11/2009 8:35:33 PM

      greg, Pia thinks you are siding with Paul. Don't be a parrot now, Harley is not here to give out the crackers.

      • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 10:32:10 PM

        No cruising the internet at work, Pia:)

      • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 8:37:57 PM

        Thanks Polly- do you want one:)

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 05/11/2009 9:08:31 PM

          greg, we know I'm not Polly. Come now, this was meant for you.

          • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 9:13:53 PM

            :) Pia, there is an old saying, "Polly wants a cracker." Google it:) Polly the parrot:) hehehe!

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 05/11/2009 9:15:32 PM

    Pallisor, in case any of the links are broken, the three BF songs are, More Than This, On The Radio and Avalon Live (1988-1989.) Also I just came across this one, I Put A Spell On You.

  • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 7:42:03 PM

    IZAGEEK: I think Covert is brainwashed! Left, Right, Left.

    Geek, That is the smartest post that you've had up here at NW:) I agree with you. Unlike some, 40R and others, I have absolutely no problem admitting something if it's true. I personnally feel that that is a good trait to have and one of the reasons why I have been somewhat successful at this thing called life.

    I don't know how anyone could do 24 years in the Army and not be brainwashed. I probably have a different definition than you of the word, but I sure I am. I'm braiwashed from the standpoint that, if I'm going to error, I will always error on the side of the soldier. Do you think I would error on the side of some politican who bases his vote on a bill on how many votes it will get him over a soldier brave enough to kick in a door when he knows not what is on this other side- perhaps instant death? I'll go with the soldier- everytime, right or wrong- GUILTY AS CHARGED GEEK.

    "The mothers and fathers will give you their sons and daughters with the confidence in you that you will not needlessly waste their lives. And you dare not. That's the burden the mantle of leadership places upon you. You could be the person who gives the orders that will bring about the deaths of thousands and thousands of young men and women. It is an awesome responsibility. You cannot fail. You dare not fail." -Schwartzkopf

    I know 40R thinks Bush was just a cowboy who wasted a lot of lives in Iraq. Maybe he was and did. I know a lot of people think that we should have never went to Iraq, including you, Geek. Maybe your right.

    Maybe everybody was right! However, right or wrong, no matter what, I will always be on the side of the soldier. I think about them all the time. When I drive home to my nice house w/ac; when I'm at the Mall; on vacation soaking up the good life. I'd rather by wrong with those brave warriors then right with a political hack wantabe on NW or a career civil servant who writes some blowhard report with a slant because he got passed over for a promotion. Make no mistake, errors on BOTH sides have taken to the point we're at- although the democrats like to point to W.

    I'm brainwashed- Guilty as charged:)


  • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 6:44:02 PM

    IZAGEEK: I think Covert is brainwashed! Left, Right, Left.

    Geek, That is the smartest post that you've had up here at NW:) I agree with you. Unlike some, 40R and others, I have absolutely no problem admitting something if it's true. I personnally feel that that is a good trait to have and one of the reasons why I have been somewhat successful at this thing called life.

    I don't know how anyone could do 24 years in the Army and not be brainwashed. I probably have a different definition than you of the word, but I sure I am. I'm braiwashed from the standpoint that, if I'm going to error, I will always error on the side of the soldier. Do you think I would error on the side of some politican who bases his vote on a bill on how many votes it will get him over a soldier brave enough to kick in a door when he knows not what is on this other side- perhaps instant death? I'll go with the soldier- everytime, right or wrong- GUILTY AS CHARGED GEEK.

    "The mothers and fathers will give you their sons and daughters with the confidence in you that you will not needlessly waste their lives. And you dare not. That's the burden the mantle of leadership places upon you. You could be the person who gives the orders that will bring about the deaths of thousands and thousands of young men and women. It is an awesome responsibility. You cannot fail. You dare not fail." -Schwartzkopf

    I know 40R thinks Bush was just a cowboy who wasted a lot of lives in Iraq. Maybe he was and did. I know a lot of people think that we should have never went to Iraq, including you, Geek. Maybe your right.

    Maybe everybody was right! However, right or wrong, no matter what, I will always be on the side of the soldier. I think about them all the time. When I drive home to my nice house w/ac; when I'm at the Mall; on vacation soaking up the good life. I'd rather by wrong with those brave warriors then right with a political hack wantabe on NW or a career civil servant who writes some blowhard report with a slant because he got passed over for a promotion. Make no mistake, errors on BOTH sides have taken to the point we're at- although the democrats like to point to W.

    I'm brainwashed- Guilty as charged:)

  • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/11/2009 6:43:57 PM

    IZAGEEK: I think Covert is brainwashed! Left, Right, Left.

    Geek, That is the smartest post that you've had up here at NW:) I agree with you. Unlike some, 40R and others, I have absolutely no problem admitting something if it's true. I personnally feel that that is a good trait to have and one of the reasons why I have been somewhat successful at this thing called life.

    I don't know how anyone could do 24 years in the Army and not be brainwashed. I probably have a different definition than you of the word, but I sure I am. I'm braiwashed from the standpoint that, if I'm going to error, I will always error on the side of the soldier. Do you think I would error on the side of some politican who bases his vote on a bill on how many votes it will get him over a soldier brave enough to kick in a door when he knows not what is on this other side- perhaps instant death? I'll go with the soldier- everytime, right or wrong- GUILTY AS CHARGED GEEK.

    "The mothers and fathers will give you their sons and daughters with the confidence in you that you will not needlessly waste their lives. And you dare not. That's the burden the mantle of leadership places upon you. You could be the person who gives the orders that will bring about the deaths of thousands and thousands of young men and women. It is an awesome responsibility. You cannot fail. You dare not fail." -Schwartzkopf

    I know 40R thinks Bush was just a cowboy who wasted a lot of lives in Iraq. Maybe he was and did. I know a lot of people think that we should have never went to Iraq, including you, Geek. Maybe your right.

    Maybe everybody was right! However, right or wrong, no matter what, I will always be on the side of the soldier. I think about them all the time. When I drive home to my nice house w/ac; when I'm at the Mall; on vacation soaking up the good life. I'd rather by wrong with those brave warriors then right with a political hack wantabe on NW or a career civil servant who writes some blowhard report with a slant because he got passed over for a promotion. Make no mistake, errors on BOTH sides have taken to the point we're at- although the democrats like to point to W.

    I'm brainwashed- Guilty as charged:)

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 05/11/2009 2:40:53 PM

    Dunno.

    Obama is being backed into a corner by the Islamics, expertly displayed by this weekends New York Times interview with Jordans King Abdullah, in which he describes a hazy, non-specific ''right of recognition'' for the State of Israel if this country bows to all that the Islamics demand, which have always proven themselves to be false promises to begin with.
    Jerusalem for the Palistinians as capital. ''Right of return'' , Withdraw from the West Bank and more importantly ,from the Golan,end of settlement and the allowance of free Paliesntian workers passage throughout Israel.

    And in return?


    Nothing.

    Even Obama cannot be this ignorant. It is important to observe two pertinant regions here. One is Lebanon and Obamas fumbling of the relationship vis-a-vis this nation and HEZBOLLAH and Syria, which we looked at earlier. The other is the Golan, previously used as a Syrian springboard into Israel,as these ''Heights'' look down into the southern terminus of the Bekka Valley and thus are excellent positions from which to place tanks and artillery in order to blast Jewish towns in the valley below,[which is Israel proper and not contested territory]. As this region is but a crossing of the Syrian border,this will be the area from which HEZBOLLAH would fight the IDF,as Syria/Iran has made this terrorist group into a regular standing army, lacking only the important prerequisite of an air force, which Syria can provide. The luck going for the Israelis here is that they have superior pilots,while those of the Islamics are wretched. The future success or failure of Obamas foreign policy lay in this region,as well as being able to keep the Pak mess in check.

  • Posted By: mac101 @ 05/10/2009 10:30:23 PM

    Tom Clancy, the author of "Patriot Games," "The Hunt for Red October," etc. defines a terrorist about the best I've ever heard - "a true terrorist is willing to throw a live grenade into a full kindergarten classroom to further his cause."

    I believe Obama gets that Al-Queda and the Taliban are terrorists that fit Clancy's definition, I believe if the rubber hits the road, he won't hesitate to allow his generals to take these characters out. He plays his cards close, and figures he can start out conciliatory to leaders of Venezula, N. Korea, even Iran, because if they don't respond, he can get tougher, but with more of our allies on board because he tried diplomacy first.

    He's a lot tougher than people think, and he's got great survival instincts. You don't survive politics in Southside Chicago by being a wimp.

    Obama will do us proud, wait and see.

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 05/10/2009 10:33:56 PM

      Spot on, mac. Thanks for the excellent post.

  • Posted By: The Messiah @ 05/09/2009 4:18:59 PM

    ScumBama has depended on DUPING NAIVE FOOLS. That in fact is how he got elected. Now these SHEEP are starting to understand they were gullible fools who got suckered and that ScumBama is nothing more than a Liar in Chief out to exploit America for all he can steal. Now let's have our weekly Stevie Wonder sing-along and some KFC while 700,000 Americans lose their job every month and Tens of Millions more lose their homes, retirements and lives..

    • Posted By: JustAJoe @ 05/10/2009 5:51:47 AM

      George Bush inherited a budget surplus and left office with the largest deficit ever and the worst economy since the Great Depression. Before someone parrots the Republican line that somehow it was the Democrat's fault, that dog don't hunt. Giving billions to your buddies on no bid contracts is taking advantage of the American people. Obama has done nothing to deserve such comments.

  • Posted By: icemyst01 @ 05/09/2009 9:13:25 PM

    when people write comments can we PLEASE have them actually to do with what the artic is actually about??? This article says NOTHING about collateral damage, and nothing to do with detainees. This article talks about how most modern politicians take their "gut feelings" toward other political heads of state and make that feeling the rule of law with said state. This article then points out how Obama doesn't make personal connections with heads of state he uses lodgic and things about things. So instead of blabering on about some crap you want to spew to the rest of the world think before you write.... kthx

  • Posted By: BcdErick @ 05/09/2009 8:25:20 PM

    This is silly. I guess you missed Obama's recent apology tour through Europe. If he could have been more sniveling it is frightening to contemplate. He is naive, foolish but extremely good at reading other people's words on a teleprompter. Perhaps someone should whisper in his ear and mention that there are real, fundamental disagreements between the US and Europe and just because the Bush haters blamed Bush for everything they didn't like that doesn't change reality.

  • Posted By: pnkearns @ 05/09/2009 5:09:22 PM

    A President with zero foreign policy experience whose primary talent is teleprompter speeches that do not dazzle and impress Islamic nations.

    It's 100% Obama's watch now Eleanor.

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 05/09/2009 5:30:13 PM

      Not anything like that Dubya 'foreign policy'... thank God... you betcha....

      • Posted By: gregcovert @ 05/09/2009 5:52:52 PM

        Still going with those same old "Hawaiianized" posts huh 40R :) LMAO

    • Posted By: 40YearR @ 05/09/2009 5:25:13 PM

  • Posted By: TheReason @ 05/09/2009 3:33:11 PM

    No, the biggest story is yet to happen. But, media has no stones to investigate it.

    The politicians are not the ones in power people. It is the banks or i should say the Federal Reserve

    This story really kills me. And you have a PRIVATELY owned bank like the Federal Reserve who cannot track or explain where 9 trillion dollars went?

    Why hasn't ANYBODY audited the PRIVATELY owned Federal Reserve? They are owned privately just like Wells Fargo. Why was the Federal Reserve not in the stress test?

    Where is the missing 9 TRILLION dollars?

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_seyret&Itemid=91&task=videodirectlink&id=1389

    Here is video of one senate meeting you wont find in the media because this information would cause hysteria.

    I used to laugh at these black helicoptor people. I am not laughing anymore.

    • Posted By: MJ000777 @ 05/09/2009 4:09:07 PM

      Most of them would go after it if it indited Republicans only, but since both parties are involved.........silence.

  • Posted By: kenfromillinois @ 05/09/2009 12:09:35 PM

    Obama, unfortunately, is relying on the analysis of information that is weak, biased, and often inaccurate. He does not have learned, unbiased advisers. His advisers all seem to have an agenda. The first thing a good manager learns is that the key to making good decisions is to have diverse, unbiased, learned reports. Anyone with a current or past agenda cannot be trusted. The second thing a successful manager learns is that he or she must be able to make gut decisions based on the input. Science, for example, is an ongoing study. When there are competing theories for a condition and know proven theorems, you know that the topic is NOT understood and must not make a rash decision. If the science moves the other way, you have just destroyed something or someone! All great leaders in business or science have gone with their gut because they knew they were on the edge of knowledge. Social and economic decisions have to also be tempered with the same reasons. Probably, even more so as their is no "science for these fields. It is all based on the gut! We do know that the Pareto Principle holds: whatever you do to an economy will make the rich richer and the poor poorer. The math curves for Pareto analysis have been working since Pareto. A leader must make good gut decisions; trusting advisers with weak information will always create a bad decision - leadership 101.

    • Posted By: MJ000777 @ 05/09/2009 2:59:24 PM

      Great post Ken, but it probably went over the heads of most of the Obama fans. Their response is likely to be that we tried this for the last 8 years.....blah, blah, blah.

  • Posted By: JohnInAustin @ 05/09/2009 11:54:06 AM

    Even we liberal Democrats sorely miss President Reagan???s leadership. We strongly disagreed with his policies and shamefully underestimated his intellect, but we couldn???t doubt his compassion, conviction and good will toward all. Now of course we all recognize him among the great presidents of history.

    How will President Obama meet the inevitable mortal crisis? We don???t know yet. But I am old enough to have watched the Air Force load B-52s with nuclear weapons during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and I have never had more confidence in a president.

    President Obama has the intelligence, coolness, toughness and judgment to lead the United States and the world in these dangerous times. We are blessed to have him.


  • Posted By: yesacaevets @ 05/09/2009 11:21:59 AM

    Apologizing? I've heard that simplistic summarization of Obama's foreign - albeit shortlived - policy. That's a laughable response coming from a group of people and a past administration that continually side-skirts the law and it just doesn't stand with Americans who believe in the values held by our nations founders. It's called owning up to the responsibilities to obey international laws not "apologizing" - something Bush and friends were never understood. On a personal level, the commenters who make these silly accusations should question what this says about themselves. A bit of honest reflection is a good thing - you may want to try it.

  • Posted By: wilsan @ 05/09/2009 9:40:48 AM

    Obama is a murder. Pelosi & Reid are Murders.

    They are running around, killing innocent people in Pakistan & Afganistan... And to what end? A pitiful increase of US troops is not going to be able to change Afganistan. We will be there for 50 years or a hundred years...

    Blood is on Obama. Pelosi, and Reid's hands. When they are removed from office, the US government MUST try them for Crimes against Humanity.

    PS: I don't believe any of the above - Because I am a Republican. If I were a Democrat, well, ...

  • Posted By: rjcameron @ 05/09/2009 8:47:14 AM

    Nothing looks more sillier than a President running around the world apologizing. It's almost hysterical , every country around the world was complaining about Gitmo; so the minute the President gets into office he orders the closing of the prison. Now he doesn't where he's going to place them. All of a sudden no other country wants them, why; because they got sense enough to know that they may just be dangerous. I'll take gut check diplomacy anyday over I'll lay down and let you walk all over me diplomacy.

  • Posted By: smithjeffr @ 05/09/2009 8:32:38 AM

    Obama ihas been flying around the world appologizing to everyone for America's actions under Bush. In doing this Obama is demonstrating a fatal weakness. Obama is showing the rest of the world that he does not have the backbone to make the tough decisions and will try and analyze and talk everything to death. There comes a time when all of the analysis and the talking is done (and failed) and it is time to take some action. You can not negotiate with terrorists, fanatics, or the power hungry. There is only one thing they understand and that is might and the willingness to use it. Obama is to hung up on gaining concensus and being the good guy to make the unilateral decision to use America's might when it is called for. This demonstrated lack of will to use America's might is what is causing the recent flare up of insurgent activity in Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. The only question left is how bad things will need to get before Obama wakes up, if he ever does.

  • Posted By: TZ192583 @ 05/09/2009 2:42:52 AM

    'PEACE INITIATIVE' - FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS OF GLOBAL PROBLEMS of Respected Pope Benedict XVI & US President Barack Obama under their highly positive Patronization - is obviously a right direction requires an outstanding 'passionate' efforts to cool down animosities that have been bursted by an unfotunate Bush-Fire misleading into flames that are still dangerously polluting social-climate of our human-globe since last several years, and impacted a highly negative 'distrust' that must have be converted now in 'Mutual-Trust' gradually (step-by-step) by contribution of practical testimonies of national+regional+international development works leading to prove a visible'harmony' by an honest confidence-development 'strugle' instead of any 'War' on our planet - i.e. The Planet - the Human Earth created by "An Engineering-Hand Behind This Cosmos" for just equal rights of "Development-For-All" positively with an 'un-biased' human civilization, without any discrimination of religions, races, colours, languages,nationalities.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 05/08/2009 4:26:41 PM

    Uhh, Clift.


    The iranians and Syrians are not Russians. Thus your entire thesis falls as usual, flat on its ass.

    What Obama has done,and without much ''analysis'' is to singlehandedly dismantle Lebanons ''Cedar Revolution'' clearing the path for the expected HEZBOLLAH takeover due solely to the fact that Obama is allowing himself to be gulled by Syrias Assad. Obama will thus be in absolutely no position to demand Israeli concessions with a HEZBOLLAH hostile parked on its northern border. Obamas tinkering is going to widen this conflict, rather than diminish it. Say what one will regarding Bush, his backing of the Cedar Revoution was sound, as it nullified HEZBOLLAHS aims which was forced to settle for political assassination as opposed to total national takeover [here,the incredibly stupid American left which has absolutely zero credibility, announced that ''We Are All HEZBOLLAH Now'' and took to the American and British streets with their yellow [ just the correct colour for cowards], flags joined by, of all groups, feminists, while the stooge press swallowed every line given them by HEZBOLLAH propagandists], even after the finger of blame for the 2005 murder of Lebanese PM Hariri was placed upon HEZBOLLAH, which has never renounced its violent intentions. As Pakistan and the greater ME become worse, Obaman apologists like Clift and NEWSWEAK at large look more stupid and gulled. It is long past time for these to cut their crap worship, and provide Americans with incisive critiques of the various crises that are now upon us.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 05/09/2009 12:40:13 AM

      One day, Lee, hopefully you will learn that you attract more bees with honey than with vinegar...

    • Posted By: Uday Salizar @ 05/08/2009 5:29:57 PM

      Hezbollah and Israel having good time, yes? Is sport for them. Like bowling.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse