SPONSORED BY:
JUDGMENT CALLS

Tax Dodge Myths

Are multinationals not paying their fair share?

 
PHOTOS
Superrich, Superbad

In the Company of Madoff: Excesses and low-finance shenanigans of the world's moneyed elite

 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The U.S. tax code is "full of corporate loopholes that makes it perfectly legal for companies to avoid paying their fair share."
—President Obama, May 4

Like it or not, ours is a world of multinational companies. Almost all of America's brand-name firms (Coca-Cola, IBM, Microsoft, Caterpillar) are multinationals, and the process works both ways. In 2006, the U.S. operations of foreign firms employed 5.3 million workers. Fiat's looming takeover of Chrysler reminds us again that much business is transnational.

For most people, the multinational company is a troubling concept. Loyalty matters. We like to think that "our companies" serve the broad national interest rather than just scouring the world for the cheapest labor, the laxest regulations and the lowest taxes. And the tax issue is especially vexing: How should multinationals be taxed on the profits they make outside their home countries?

Listen to President Obama, and the status quo seems a cesspool. Pervasive "loopholes" engineered by "well-connected lobbyists" allow U.S. multinationals to skirt American taxes and outsource jobs to low-tax countries. So the president proposes plugging loopholes. Some jobs will return to the United States, he said, and U.S. tax coffers will grow by $210 billion over the next decade.

Sounds great—and that's how the story played. "Obama Targets Overseas Tax Dodge," headlined The Post. But the reality is murkier; the president's accusatory rhetoric perpetuates many myths.

Myth: Aided by those overpaid lobbyists, American multinationals are taxed lightly -- less so than their foreign counterparts.

Reality: Just the opposite. Most countries don't tax the foreign profits of their multinational firms at all. Take a Swiss multinational with operations in South Korea. It pays a 27.5 percent Korean corporate tax on its profits and can bring home the rest tax-free. By contrast, a U.S. firm in Korea pays the Korean tax and, if it returns the profits to the United States, faces the 35 percent U.S. corporate tax rate. American companies can defer the U.S. tax by keeping the profits abroad (naturally, many do), and when repatriated, companies get a credit for foreign taxes paid. In this case, they'd pay the difference between the Korean rate (27.5 percent) and the U.S. rate (35 percent).

Myth: When U.S. multinationals invest abroad, they destroy American jobs.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Gone Rogue
Gone Rogue

How Sarah Palin hurts the GOP … and America.

The Decade's Best Quotes
The Decade's Best Quotes

NEWSWEEK's 20/10 Project recalls the lines we'll never forget.

Best Celebrity Mugshots
Best Celebrity Mugshots

10 unforgettable arrest photos from the 2000s.

An Evolutionary Edge
An Evolutionary Edge

How grandmas may play favorites.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: shylove @ 06/11/2009 1:59:32 PM

    So when Halliburton gets cost plus contracts and they have moved headquarters to Abu Dabia or somewhere like that what taxes are they paying to take care of all the soldiers with PTSD and injuries needing treatment. Doesn't Wallmart have lots of products made in China so the jobs for making them would be in China right?. Isn't GM parnering with China and selling their car expertise which will soon produce Chinese cars being marketed her? Does privatization of war make wars a priority? Is war a form of rape and pillage of teh global village?

  • Posted By: bighappy @ 05/17/2009 11:59:09 PM

    How easy, $200 billion increase.
    In fact, this idiot will not see a penny from his "plugged" tax "loopholes". And will give up million of jobs.

  • Posted By: mikekohr @ 05/17/2009 11:22:14 AM

    I worked for UPS for 17 years. In the early '80's they formed an off-shore corporation named Overseas Partners LTD,, based in Bermuda. Operating initially as a re-insurance company it efectively sheltered all insurance revenues collected in the US from taxes. My division manager eagerly descrtibed OPL as a "tax dodge,"..."that was going to make us (managers) all rich."

    During the Clinton administration the IRS won a $1.8 billion ruling against UPS and OPL which was overturned on appeal and then dropped by the Bush administration.

    In addition to the tax dodge, OPL, UPS also operates one of the largest political PACs in Washington,. UPSPAC which was a corporate sponser of the "Contract With America," and 80% of their contributions go to Republicans.

    Follow the money. Thieves rob with guns and knives. Corporations rob using lawyers and lobbyists .

    mike kohr

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.