Tehran or Bust

A journey through the heart of Iran.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 05/27/2009 8:50:09 AM

    Mr (Dr) Ahmedinejad, always seemed to me an agreeable person, who was not a warmonger. I do not feel, that he will go to war against any nation, unless his nation is attacked. That he feels for his brothers in the West Bank, and that too strongly, should not be seen as threatening. But there must be other ways of bringing peace to the West Bank, than to sound aggressive. Iran is indeed a noble nation, and how can Ahmedinejad be any different?

    • Posted By: Alexa2 @ 05/30/2009 10:49:27 PM

      I totally agree with your comment. Indeed Iran is a noble country and the MSM has done much to demonize the Iranian President who has not threatened the US or any other country. And before someone comments about the "wipe off the map statement" - this has been the biggest rumor of the century. The Iranian president's statement has been mis-translated and is being used as a pretext to further create another mythical enemy.

      • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/01/2009 11:58:00 PM

        Indeed, Ahmadinejad said "the present Zionist regime occupying Israel must vanish from the pages of time", not "Israel must be wiped off the map". It's unfortunate to see the degree to which that mistranslation has spread.

    • Posted By: zz333 @ 05/28/2009 11:44:47 AM

      Go look into India's history. You will find the new conquerers originated from Iran and destroyed most of northern India

  • Posted By: Havoc29 @ 05/29/2009 2:03:43 PM

    Mr. Majd,
    What is your point behind this article? I suppose that all good Iranians are just like us in the West. They just want to go about their business and raise their families, yadda, yadda, yadda . . . You paint Iran as this idylic place not bothered by the wars in the neighboring countries to the East and West.
    Yet you fail to mention that it the Iranian leader that wants to wipe Israel off the map, that he and his country beholden to Hezbollah butchers. You also fail to mention that there is growing unease amongst the population that the Islamic Revolution is losing its luster and many Iranians would like to be more Western. You fail to mention that it is the Iranian leaders who will start the next nuclear hulocost if left to persue their nuclear weapons aims, not the West
    Please spare the peaceful Iranian . . . oh, I forget you are writing for Newsweek. America=Great Satan, Islamofascists=freedom fighters. Never mind.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/01/2009 11:57:01 PM

      "Iranian leader that wants to wipe Israel off the map"

      Ahmadinejad never said that, he said "the present Zionist regime occupying Israel must vanish from the pages of time", which is not the same thing. "Wiped off the map" is a mistranslation by various worldwide news agencies; the phrase doesn't exist in Farsi.

    • Posted By: Alexa2 @ 05/30/2009 11:00:37 PM

      Mr. Majd does not need to mention a statement which has been purposefully mis-tranlated to justify another war based on false pretext. And yes, Iran is definitely a peaceful nation - it has not attacked any other country for the past 200 years which unfortunately can't be said about the US or Israel. Islamofascist you say - another oxymoron label to create fear and hatred about Islam and Muslims.

  • Posted By: HST1 @ 06/01/2009 6:34:37 AM

    Disappointing in this article is the consistent comparison of Iranian life to US comparables for the benefit of western audiences, the KIA-like car as an example. Other cultures should be embraced as just that without reference the perceived baseline standard of the West. It is also disappointing whilst documenting everyday Iranian life the author felt the need to sign off on a political note.

    I have a tourist visa for Iran and am quite relieved having not paid 4.50 Euro to read this article, which, for me, offers little insight other than a widespread narcotics trade.

  • Posted By: Still Free in the USA @ 05/26/2009 3:18:16 PM

    Could you please help me find these things Sir?
    1. Occidental College records -- Not released
    2. Columbia College records -- Not released
    3. Columbia Thesis paper -- "Not available"
    4. Harvard College records -- Not released
    5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
    6. Medical records -- Not released
    7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available
    8. Your Illinois State Senate records -- Not available
    9. Law practice client list -- Not released
    10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released
    11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
    12. Record of your baptism -- Not available
    Oh and one more thing Senator, I can't seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago. Can you explain that to me Sir??
    Oh but, hey -- listen! I know you're busy! If this is too much for you right now -- I mean -- tell you what. I'll come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, You know? I mean, I know you're busy. I'll just let myself out. I'll be back tomorrow. And the day after. .?
    What's that Mr. President? Who wants to know these things??
    We the People of the United States of America ! You know, the ones that vote.
    ??

    • Posted By: Alexa2 @ 05/30/2009 10:46:55 PM

      And how long ago was that may I ask? Iran has not attacked any country for over 200 years while I can't say the same thing about the US. In fact don't forget we encouraged, supported and financed the former dictator of Iraq to invade Iran using the chemical and biological weapons we supplied him. Remember the same WMDs we were looking for???

    • Posted By: George Dorn @ 05/27/2009 4:27:06 PM

      The ones that voted him in don't seem to be as obsessed as you.

  • Posted By: maggiejay @ 05/30/2009 2:16:26 PM

    You people arguing below me is what's wrong with America. You cannot simply state your case over and over and over again. You have to LISTEN. We are all AMERICANS. This is our HOME. This bi-partisan BS has gone on long enough. It's the reason nothing ever gets done in Washington. Everyone is too busy arguing and bad mouthing eachother to start working TOGETHER to get our country back on track.
    You're all idiots.

  • Posted By: makeyourself @ 05/30/2009 12:56:47 PM

    An enjoyable and insightful read. I must also say I have a great fondnes for the Iranian people and their culture. However whilst painting a more innocent picture of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the author seemed to miss out the bit where the government has, for several decades, systematically persecuted religious minorities in Iran.

    "He [Ahmadinejad] declared that Iranians were waiting to witness real deeds from Washington, not mere rhetoric."

    Yes, and right back at you. The Christmas message released by Ahmadinejad was very lovely and peaceful indeed. However, arresting 7 members of the Bahá'í community, putting them in prison for over a year with no access to lawyers simply because they are Bahá'ís, denying Bahá'í youth the access to education in Iran, destroying their holy places and homes and generally making life dangerous for them is not what I would call matching his deeds with his words. I am skeptical of anything positive the current government has to say.

  • Posted By: Galasso @ 05/25/2009 4:14:49 PM

    This photo shoot of selected Iranians is not an accurate reflection of the reality in Iran. The US has hoped that the younger Iranians would at some point change the mood and the relationship of Iran to the rest of the international community. This has been a false hope since the Shah was overthrown and has not changed. When outside the country, Iranians will speak of the difficulties they face in day to day life and the restrictions of living in an Islamic State. Liberty as we know it cannot emerge in a State where punishment is swift and severe and torture is still practiced. The Black Turbans still have the final say in the direction of the Iran and control it absolutely - the "titular" President is the public face - but the clerics are still in control - let there be no doubt.

    • Posted By: Uday Salizar @ 05/26/2009 2:27:50 PM

      "Liberty as we know it cannot emerge in a State where punishment is swift and severe and torture is still practiced."

      Is like America, yes?

      • Posted By: Galasso @ 05/26/2009 5:23:59 PM

        There is no comparison between the US and Iran. Having known Iranians in the US, I sincerely hope that their country is able to peacefully progress and be prosperous because they are truly an intelligent and talented race of people with a remarkable history. And they are are also very appreciative of the fact that there are no 11th Century clerics running the country in America - il hamdu lillah.

        • Posted By: Uday Salizar @ 05/27/2009 2:31:07 PM

          "There is no comparison between the US and Iran. "

          Is both elect president, yes? Is both torture peoples, yes? Is both have crazy religious peoples run show from background, yes?

          Is same.

          • Posted By: zz333 @ 05/28/2009 11:43:28 AM

            Why do a good portion of the Iranian want to leave Iran and settle in the west. Finally, for you to make a statement as you made above, show your infantile mind. Therre is no point even reading your scribble.

            By the way, why to the women look so much more beautiful than the men. Could it be the male Arab lineage?

            • Posted By: George Dorn @ 05/28/2009 2:02:19 PM

              Iranians aren't Arabs, you idiot.

              • Posted By: jh35180 @ 05/28/2009 4:43:28 PM

                You are right, the Iranians are not Arabs. However, you don't exactly win diplomacy points by calling someone an idiot.

                • Posted By: George Dorn @ 05/29/2009 12:44:07 PM

                  It's a good thing that I'm not a diplomat, then. I'd starve to death.

                • Posted By: Quid Pro Quo @ 05/29/2009 12:27:46 PM

                  It is a common misconception that Iranians are Arab. Among other reasons, the misconception is fueled by the fact that Ahmadinejad supports the Arab Hamas terrorist group and their continued effort to destroy Israel.

                   

                  Actually, Iran consists of about 50 percent Persian and 24 percent Azeri. The balance includes 7 percent Kurd and 3 percent Arab (which equates to well over 2 million people.)

                   

                  Mr. Dorn should check his facts before he labels others as idiots, as you weren't entirely wrong.

  • Posted By: WhereAmI @ 05/28/2009 11:48:38 PM

    I keep reading commentaries on the Hostage crisis, human rights records, and all other negatives on Iran, from some of the commentators, who have been completely brainwashed by the very biased and narrow media in US. These comments are interesting coming from a country who keeps meddling in other countries affairs openly and self righteously; who is the proud manufacturer of Abu Gharib and other secret torment chambers managed by Mossad; who has openly contributed directly and indirectly to MILLIONS OF DEATHS of locals in the middle east and Africa, etc... Who tries to dictate to everyone how to do things their way or else; has been unable to address the numerous racial issues within their own country after all this time; is merciless to its own people; steals from its own people and fills the pockets of lobbyists; has not been able to provide healthcare, social justice, financial stability, compassion, and peace for its own nation; the youth and future generation is highly neglected as budget cuts first hit schools and the poor within a system; which has made education completely useless; the old and retired are treated mercilessly by the system, by the culture, and their selfish oriented families, forced to work or starve to death, and die alone; etc... And yet they have the nerve to criticize and demonize others. First fix the issues that plague your own shack and then try to remodel other people's homes!

    • Posted By: Quid Pro Quo @ 05/29/2009 12:04:24 PM

      You're meddling comment made me chuckle. I'm sure John Gottie and Al Capone thought anyone trying to interfere with their "activities" were meddling.

       

      And leave Abu Ghraib behind. Don't equate our military with the actions of a few. The whole thing was little more than a college hazing incident.

       

      Your lackadaisical attitude of leaving dictator-type imbeciles such as Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-Il to their own devices is what leads to war.

       

      By the way... your user name is appropriate. You don't appear to have a clue.

  • Posted By: WhereAmI @ 05/29/2009 10:02:36 AM

    What belief?!! Truth hurts ha?

  • Posted By: MichaelX @ 05/29/2009 9:43:23 AM

    Go away. The world does not need your rehtoric. You can take your "belief" and shove it.

  • Posted By: lestatdelc @ 05/28/2009 7:37:28 PM

    A little thought experiement. If in 1953 Iran had engineered a coup that overthrew the Eisenhower administration installed a puppet despot, looted the country 8 ways from Sunday, sold said puppet despot arms it would not even sell its closest allies, trained and armed his secret police, had a front company for its spy agency install the phone system... what would Americans do and think about Iran? Give me a break. Americans would have dropped everything form an A bomb to a Z bomb, and waged non-stop war on anyone even remotely allied with Iran. That is exactly what we did to Iran. Iranian antipathy towards the United States is shockingly mild by comparison to what would have occurred if the roles were reversed.

  • Posted By: delicieuxz @ 05/24/2009 7:07:39 PM

    >> "Let us not forget that Iran held Americans hostage while President Carter was in office."

    umm, did you not know that the US overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran and installed their own? The people Iran held hostage were those who had helped organized the coup to take over Iran. The US was fully in the wrong, and holding hostage the people who had just been holding their whole country hostage is not a bad thing.


    >> "Let us not forget that Iran killed up to one million Iraqis in the war."

    The US green-lighted Iraq to attack Iran. Let us not forget that. It appears you're, astoundingly, suggesting that it was wrong of Iran to fight back. Let's not forget the US responsibility for the Iraq-Iran war then, and the responsibility for the US-Iraq war now.

    >> "Iran is a xenophobic country."

    Let us not forget, the US is a xenophobic country. So are other prominent first world countries, perhaps most notably, Japan. Iran is not xenophobic. You clearly are not a world traveler. I suggest you head to Iran instead of spreading falsehoods.

    • Posted By: artar @ 05/25/2009 7:04:33 PM

      I agree with you that the students had legitimate reasons to takeover the U.S. embassy. However the CIA engineered the coupe in 1953, 26 years before the embassy seizure. As far as I recall no one in 1979 was left from 1953 and only 2-3 people during the embassy seizure had much affiliation with the CIA. Ironically one of them (CIA) was released early "because he was black" and the other recently was transferred to Tehran, a man who didn't know his way around town and couldn't speak the native language of Farsi - neither very helpful if you plan on doing some spying. The majority of the hostages were U.S. Marines who were their to guard the embassy and diplomats who issued American visas to Iranians.

      • Posted By: jh35180 @ 05/28/2009 4:47:51 PM

        Although the U.S. has done some things that were wrong, taking over an embassy is never right. Iran committed an act of war in 1979. On April 25, 1980, a recue mission had been planned and had it not been for a sand storm it might have worked and Jimmy Carter might have been reelected Prseident that year.

      • Posted By: zz333 @ 05/28/2009 2:51:28 PM

        Hogwash, there is no reason to occupy a sovereign land (which is an embassy) as part of diplomacy. If Iran wanted to break ties with the US, they should have done so and then declared war, We would have welcomed it.

        Remember what happened when Genghis khan sent his emissory to Samarkand, who then got slaughtered.

        The US had every right to retaliate, and should have using the scorched earth method.
        Look at your own Iranian history, it is not very conciliatory as the agressor.

    • Posted By: Catahoula @ 05/25/2009 1:38:59 AM

      Actually no. The Sha overthrew his father, the previous Sha. His father was mentally ill, eratic, and abusive to his people. The Sha (son) was western educated, concerned about his people and generally thought to be a beneficial choice for his people. Given that Iran had no democratic tradition, was on the border with the Soviet Union and this occured during the darkest days of the Cold War, it was concidered a good choice. And he did a good job for a number of years but eventually became over controlling (tried to micro-manage everything) and started hurting the economy. His real sin in the eyes of the religious fanatics, however, was that he was not a religious fanatic - way too open with to the west. Then in the later days of his reign after he was becoming more isolated, his troops fired on college students who were protesting. With this he lost their parent's support (the middle class) and was doomed. We could have worked a transition but Carter, either not knowing history & culture of the region (or not caring to know) or understanding Iran's critical location, ignored the country and allowed the crazies to take over. Ideal options are seldom available but Carter allowed the worst of all possibilities to take effect.

  • Posted By: Soui @ 05/28/2009 3:57:29 PM

    I feel very sorry for all these people who do not have any knowledge about Iran and its amazing and magnificent culture and history.Iran is the emperor of the middle east and every one knows that ..How dare you people to be so blinded and judgmental about the Iranians who are now in very high and respectful positions all around the world.I am Iranian and i am proud of my nationality and culture , yes I dislike the government and absolutely reject their political points and views But please stop stereotyping Iranians are very civilized and educated .. I really suggest some books for those people who do not have accurate information about Iran because there is so many good things about Iran that's hidden under international media, which says nothing but a bunch of lies about Persia!

  • Posted By: Ahora @ 05/28/2009 12:52:51 PM

    OK.whatever happened in India doesn't change anything right now.i can say Arabs destroyed Iran , bringing the Islam by force in there.we are talking about making a nuclear weapon in Iran and how should be stooped.

  • Posted By: david12 @ 05/25/2009 6:35:52 PM

    The gentleman wrote that it is time to stop pointing fingers. That is easy to say but there are still fundamental differences which cannot be erased. Iran is a belligerent country. Unfortunately, I cannot find it excusable that just because the hostages came home that that should make the Iranian regime any less culpable. I would like to know what common ground this writer is referring to. Is he referring to the idle threats that Iran makes or the fact that Iran attempted to do everything in its power to destabilize Iraq? One would have thought that the Iranian regime would have been grateful that America decided to spare Iran and invade Iraq. I also find the point about discovering each other a little mystifying. This is a country which would rather fight the U.S through proxies in Iraq. Is this a sign of a noble country? This is a country which has no respect for the dictates of war.

    • Posted By: stagh @ 05/26/2009 3:22:54 PM

      america had a really good reason for "sparing" iran. If it hadn't the problem with picking up the pieces would be bigger than what we have right now in Iraq. for every drum in Iraq beating at it's own rythm, there are 10 in Iran. we thought invading Iraq would be a quick: invade-hit-dethrone-handover-leave, look what happened after, trust me the bush administration knew what it was doing when it decided to invade iraq.

  • Posted By: aflatooni @ 05/26/2009 10:23:08 PM

    Mr. Majd's analysis is misses one important point about the nature of the IRI and that's its human rights records. As long as Islam rules Iran as a political and social force, people's rights are not and will not respected. Here, we are dealing with a lawless country where the rights of the ethnic and religious minorities are ignored or violated. Mr. Majd should have asked Iranian officials about the their human rights polcies with regards to Kurds, Baha'is and other persecuted minorities. Mr Majd like many other Iranian intellectuals always avoid these taboo subjects togain access to Iranain political elites. We should not compromise our principales for short term political gains.

  • Posted By: Still Free in the USA @ 05/26/2009 4:36:52 PM

    ???I said that the terrorists intercepted by the FBI on the way to my house in February of 1987 to kill my wife, children and me were Libyans, dispatched from the People???s committee for Libyan Students in McLean, Virginia. I did say that the Federal government had moved my family out of our home to a military base until they could dispatch more than 30 agents to protect my family from those terrorists because a liberal Federal judge had allowed the Lybian assassin to post bond and they fled. Those federal agents remained at our home until I retired from the marines and was no longer a ???government official. By then, the United States government had spent more than 2 million dollars protected the North family. The terrorists sent to kill us were never re-apprehended.???

    Semper Fidelis,
    Oliver L. North

    The Abu Nidal terrorists in Rome who blasted 11 year old American Natasha Simpson to her knees, deliberately zeroed in and fired an extra burst at her head, just in case.

  • Posted By: Uday Salizar @ 05/26/2009 3:56:13 PM

    Is look at cover of magazine. Is Ahmadinejad only need puppy. Maybe he happy then, no more act like angry little child, yes?

  • Posted By: Still Free in the USA @ 05/26/2009 3:45:37 PM

    ???I said that the terrorists intercepted by the FBI on the way to my house in February of 1987 to kill my wife, children and me were Libyans, dispatched from the People???s committee for Libyan Students in McLean, Virginia. I did say that the Federal government had moved my family out of our home to a military base until they could dispatch more than 30 agents to protect my family from those terrorists because a liberal Federal judge had allowed the Lybian assassin to post bond and they fled. Those federal agents remained at our home until I retired from the marines and was no longer a ???government official. By then, the United States government had spent more than 2 million dollars protected the North family. The terrorists sent to kill us were never re-apprehended.???

    Semper Fidelis,
    Oliver L. North

    The Abu Nidal terrorists in Rome who blasted 11 year old American Natasha Simpson to her knees, deliberately zeroed in and fired an extra burst at her head, just in case.

    • Posted By: Uday Salizar @ 05/26/2009 3:54:46 PM

      "Semper Fidelis"
      - Oliver North?

      Is Oliver North no the oath-breaking funny man who forget that American military is the subservient to American civil authority, yes?

  • Posted By: Still Free in the USA @ 05/26/2009 3:19:28 PM

    A Harley rider is passing the zoo when he sees a little girl leaning into the
    lion's cage. Suddenly, the lion grabs her by the cuff of her jacket and tries to
    pull her inside to slaughter her under the eyes of her screaming parents.
    The biker jumps off his bike, runs to the cage and hits the lion square on the
    nose with a powerful punch. Whimpering from the pain the lion jumps back,
    letting go of the girl, and the biker brings her to her terrified parents, who
    thank him endlessly.
    A New York Times reporter has watched the whole event. The reporter says, "Sir,
    this was the most gallant and brave thing I saw a man do in my whole life." The
    biker replies, "Why, it was nothing, really, the lion was behind bars. I just
    saw this little kid in danger, and acted as I felt right."
    The reporter says, "Well, I'm a journalist from the New York Times, and
    tomorrow's paper will have this story on the front page... so, what do you do
    for a living and what political affiliation do you have?"
    The biker replies, "I'm a U.S. Marine and a Republican."
    The following morning the biker buys The New York Times to see if it indeed
    brings news of his actions, and reads, on front page:
    "U.S. MARINE ASSAULTS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT AND STEALS HIS LUNCH."

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse