What Pittsburgh (Don’t Laugh) Can Teach Obama

Struggling cities like Detroit could learn a lot from the Pennsylvania city's rebirth.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jsbuford @ 11/26/2009 10:29:04 AM

    Give it a break Fineman and everyone else for that matter. Obviously, you have love for your city, just as most people love where they actually reside. Detroit is suffering from a tempest of dispraise that in some respects is unwarranted. Yes, Detroit is suffering. There is room for improvement (a whole lot of improvement) and the state of Michigan for that matter. However, Detroit has what it takes to be first class city again: infrastructure (water system), housing stock, natural resources (border with this country's largest trading partner), and a ctizenry (despite the borderline racist characterizations constantly being employed to caricature Detroiters) that is as gritty, and prideful as they come. For those who want to continually question the intellect or pride of the city's residents, I challenge you to stop in any number of restaurants up and down Woodward Ave. and spark a socio-politico conversation. I'm certain you'll quickly discover just how myopic your perspectives are. In the end though, people respond to economic imperatives and incentives...just as Pittsburgh, Chicago, and any other hosts of cities that experienced such dire straits. The federal government is not the answer, however there is much the government can do to provide incentives for and support to cities like Detroit that are suffering from the recalibration of the U.S. economy.

  • Posted By: nuclear22 @ 09/22/2009 11:17:40 AM

    As someone who has lived in Detroit for the last 51 years (by choice) I can tell you that this comparison is indeed not fair. While the devestating effects of white flight are painfully obvious everywhere, what we have now is upper and middle-class black flight as well. While there are still small "villages" within Detroit where some of us persevere, I'd bet that 600,000 of Detroit's remaining population of 900,000 is funtioinally illiterate. Education, among black youth, is viewed as a requisite evil and not as a means to an end: Forr all too many, evil itself is now their menas to an end. Until this mind-set changes, things in Detroit will only get progressively worse.

  • Posted By: Ecomcon @ 06/15/2009 4:34:53 PM

    A number of writers on this site make very good points. I appreciate Howard Fineman's work in general, but I think he's off-base on a number of issues. Firstly, I don't think you can compare either the cities (Detroit and Pittsburgh) nor their primary industries (automobiles and steel, respectively). Anyone who was old enough in 1967 remembers the terrible riot in Detroit in 1967, in which 43 people died and 1187 were injured. The city literally has not recovered from that summer 42 years ago. Do we still want to point a finger at the few people who initiated that riot with everything bad that has happened in Motown since then? I think most people would admit that the big U.S. automaker executives made some big mistakes over the years. But anyone who reads automotive periodicals or websites knows that American quality has increased substantially in the last few years. If you don't agree with that, I certainly understand that you won't purchase an American vehicle. But while the American manufacturers have continued to rise in ratings such as J.D. Power, Toyota has had its quality problems, including major engine sludge problems and trucks that rust out underneath. Further, the average MPG of U.S.-based manufacturers continues on the rise, whereas the figures for Toyota and Honda have dropped, in large part because of the huge trucks that those manufacturers have added.

    Some on the right blame unions, but they tend to overlook that fact that Japanese manufacturers have been subsidized right along, and that Toyota's hybrid Synergy drive was developed as a partnership between industry and the Japanese government.

    Further, as HalcyonBlue points out, Detroit has a population of 837,000 (it was once over 2 million) while Pittsburgh has a population of less than 300,000. Pittsburgh, being a smaller city, was able to diversify its economy more quickly, where Detroit, which once depended almost exclusively on the auto industry, was more like a large ship that could not possibly change its course quickly. In that comparison, Pittsburgh was much more like South Bend, which was a model of diversification when Studebaker ceased its operations there in 1964.

  • Posted By: HalcyonBlue @ 06/08/2009 10:23:49 AM

    US Census Bureau
    Pittsburgh Population 296,324 White 197.792 Black 78,359.
    Detroit Population 837,711 White 87,090 Black 693,377

    Demographics are hard to overcome.

    • Posted By: BloodofPatriots @ 06/12/2009 8:37:25 AM

      Evil bigots are hard to overcome.

  • Posted By: Innocent Bystander @ 06/07/2009 10:56:08 AM

    You know what I'm really tired of, people who want to pretend that education is going to cure what ails America. We have roughly 3 million kids get out of high school each year. Of those, roughly 1.2 million continue their education. So even if we were able to somehow pay for another 50% of our kids to go to college, which will likely double tuition rates, assuming we can actually find enough space available since colleges are turning down applicants each year now. That will still leave us 1.2 million kids that can't, don't, or should not go on to college. What do we do with them? Let them wither on the vine in low wage, benefit-less jobs with no future?
    As manufacturing (or making things) continues to slip away from the US so too will the engineering, management and other associated jobs. As the boomers enter the golden years healthcare jobs will boom we are told, but in one more generation (17 years) they will begin to die off in large numbers as well. So what then? We will have a huge number of people educated for a dwindling number of jobs, that will drive down the wages for them as well. Eventually we will end up with a lot of well educated people folding sweaters at JC Penney. Yes, there will be a lot of jobs in education, but since education is largely a public sector expense there will have to be cut backs there as well as wages are forced down and revenues dwindle.
    No, the real lesson we should learn from Pittsburgh and its half sized population is that we either need a lot less people in America, or we need to reverse the trend of not actually making things here. Any country that attempts to build an economy without actually making things is doomed to fail.

    Dick

    • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 06/07/2009 5:45:45 PM

      You're right that we need to make things, and you're half right about education. Top-notch education is not a panacea for society, it's just an essential nutrient. Providing it, alone, won't cure our diseases, but it is something we need to have in order to get, and stay, healthy. Let's not pretend there's no correlation between our economic situation and the meltdown of our schools. "No Child..." ran good teachers into other professions in droves, aided by failing infrastructure, parental apathy, misallocated budgets and (of course) embarrassing salaries. Art and music are all but nonexistent, despite their undeniable benefits in a dozen scholastic areas and otherwise. Education isn't THE key to recovery, it's just A key to recovery, and as necessary as any other.

      As for returning to manufacturing, well, we tried that. The trouble? We refused to buy what we made. The next time I see a Toyota with an American flag on it, I'm gonna puke. Maybe what we need is a dose of non-hypocritical patriotism. Naah - that's way too much to ask.

      • Posted By: AnnieT101 @ 06/11/2009 3:19:52 AM

        American auto execs wrote off all of us Americans who wanted small, fuel-efficient cars, repeatedly stating that Americans wanted big cars and didn't care about fuel efficiency. And certainly many Americans wanted the cars that Detroit was producing. But the success of Toyota and Honda in the U.S. was very much a result of the fact that they gave the rest of us Americans what we were looking for when Detroit wouldn't. I fail to understand the argument that I should buy an American-made car simply because it's American-made when that car does not even begin to meet my criteria for a car. Detroit could have give me and millions of others what we wanted, but since big cars made them more money, in their greed they chose not to.

    • Posted By: paradelady @ 06/08/2009 5:54:36 PM

      How about trade schools, where kids can become plumbers, electricians, heathing/cooling/ventilation installers, auto repair experts, body shop workers, police, firefighters, all of which are solid middle-class jobs. In the medical field there are dential hygienists, radiologists, technicians, none of which require a great deal of eduction but can offer a decent lifestyle. These are not low paying jobs. If I could live my life over again, I'd become a plumber rather than a journalist - in both jobs you put up with a lot of crap, but one pays better.

    • Posted By: Galasso @ 06/07/2009 9:33:58 PM

      You are right on the money. We have morphed into a service economy for foreign made products. My father refused to buy anything he could avoid that was made in Japan because his brother was killed on the Bataan death march. Today, however, monies paid to an Amercan-made automobile dealer goes right to the UAW and the Democratic Party with monstrous campaign contributions. The Japanese companies are successful in right-to-work states because of two things - they make a quality car and the efficiency of the plants aren't suffocated with the politics and the Union creating make-work for job-specific hires - ie. stop the line until we can find the Union approved person to move this - repair that - everyone gets paid regardless of productivity and so on. We did it to ourselves. The Union people check out at quitting time and the salaried employees hang in there on the weekends to put out fires. Enough!!

      • Posted By: motorless @ 06/08/2009 3:34:19 PM

        Wow...I was unaware that buying a car was directly responsible for the success of the Democratic Party! Thanks for opening my eyes!

  • Posted By: jbaccordian @ 06/10/2009 1:59:36 PM

    Bull. Fineman in his zealotry to dismiss federal guidance keeps alive the right wing mantra of "the government is the problem" bull. Pittsburgh would not have had a revival without strong state and federal leadership, guidance and financial support. The former J&L Steel mill was acquired, contaminents removed, infrastructure installed - guess how? With a significant slug of state and federal financial and technical guidance. I didn't hear many Pittsburghers complain that the federal bureaucrats were too intrusive in this process. Yes, a slag dump in the City's Squirrel Hill neighborhood was cleaned and safely converted into a new urbanism residential neighborhood. A polluted stream was also cleaned up as part of this project. Guess how? With significant federal and state financial and technical guidance. So, beware of Fineman's easy answer that "government is the problems". Like many other sound bite zealots, he misses the nuance of how a region can be transformed with the appropriate involvment and support from our government. From a lifetime Pittsburgh resident.......

  • Posted By: oliverclaudio @ 06/10/2009 5:25:43 AM

    Is Fineman just missing the point or is he trying to make a false analogy? The auto bailout had as much to do with saving Detroit (the city) as the bank bailout had to do with sprucing up Lower Manhattan or Charlotte, NC. These are national industries, and their failure would have consequences for the national economy. Whether or not the good people of Detroit can diversify their economy and turn things around the way (apparently) Pittsburgh has done, the steps the administration has taken so far have been about much more than just Wayne County, Mich.

  • Posted By: AlexS @ 06/09/2009 2:45:18 AM

    Pittsburgh is a republican city? HA!! I was born here and I'll probably die here. And if you knew anyone FROM here, you'd have heard this a thousand times before: If Jesus Christ himself ran for mayor as a republican, he wouldn't get a single d@mned vote.

    This is a city where hard work and integrity count. And it's also a place where greed won't earn you a single friend.

    There isn't one person from this city who doesn't have a parent or grandparent that knows about hard times. And when times were hard, your friends and neighbors looked out for you. Nobody around here is going to let their neighbors starve to save a few bucks on their taxes.

    Which brings me to another point... Someone mentioned how Braddock is suffering today? Braddock is a great example of what makes this city so wonderful. John Fetterman is out there busting his @ss trying to turn that place around by bringing in artists and business and fostering a sense of community.

    Yeah, you may visit once a month and think you know what's going on, but brother, you're only looking skin deep.

  • Posted By: AlexS @ 06/09/2009 2:39:00 AM

    I can't believe that some fool would make a statement along the lines of "Pittsburgh is a republican city."

    I was born here, I've spent my life here, and I'll probably die here. And there's one thing I can say with certainty -- and if you actually knew anyone from here, you've heard the EXACT same words come out of their mouths -- If Jesus Christ himself ran for mayor of Pittsburgh as a republican, he wouldn't get a single d@mned vote.

  • Posted By: brydges @ 06/08/2009 8:53:23 AM

    The article fails to mentin the reason why Pittsburgh is doing well is because of conservative values Unlike Philadelphia Pittsburgh is primarily Republican. What Obama could learn is to stop being a socialist and start being a real American

    • Posted By: paradelady @ 06/08/2009 5:58:05 PM

      This is bunk. You could fire a machine gun in Down town Pittsburgh at lunchtime and not hit a Republican.

      • Posted By: BloodofPatriots @ 06/08/2009 11:51:15 PM

        I'll second paradelady. Pittsburgh may be a conservative city, but it's a city full of conservative Democrats.

        I'll add that the charges of Obama's socialism ring really hollow. Our "socialist"president has nationalized less than one percent of our economy. Let that sink in for just a second. Less than one percent. The idea that Obama's a socialist is just another smear from a senile GOP that can't remember how to do anything but lie, and can't even do that convincingly any more.

  • Posted By: LMarcT @ 06/07/2009 4:45:13 PM

    Other than each city being totally beholden to a single industry, the comparisons are pretty weak. The steel industry failed over a fairly wide span in time and the equation was not "pushed" by one of the worst recessions in recent history. The writing on the wall for the steel industry and Pittsburgh was exceedingly clear. For GM, Chrysler, and Ford, and the cities that rely on them, the writing is much less clear. They are ALL being "pushed" to failure by the recession. Obama's attempt at giving GM and Chrysler a second chance and, now, a shot at a less crashing bankruptcy makes a great deal of sense. It does NOT mean that, ultimately, Detroit and others won't need local ingenuity or won't recreate itself on other industries... in fact, they have a better chance to do this now.

    This is yet another attempt to point to a "fact" to say that we should have done the Republican Plan (NOTHING!) and let the banks, wall street, AIG, GM, and Chrysler fail all at once and just live through the unbelievable consequences that scenario would have brought us... I don't know about you, but if we complete the plan as is: Balance the budget AFTER the jobs picture improves and get the Feds out of the private sector as soon as practical, I will be perfectly please with the actions we took.

    • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 06/07/2009 5:39:23 PM

      Well stated, LMarcT. Everyone knows (though not all of us can say it) that if McCain had won, the economy would be the same or worse now, and much, MUCH worse in 5 years. But he didn't, which gives the Republicans free license to crow that Obama (and the rest of Them Librils) is responsible for all their woes, has Bankrupted Amurrica for Generations, blah, blah, ad nauseam, and they can therefore root for the failure of our President and our leading industries (while loudly proclaiming themselves patriots, of course).

      In reality, of course, President Obama has done what he needed to do, and what he said he was going to do, and the indicators are turning around. Another article I just read said that cancer takes years to develop; diet changes and crystal-gazing won't make it go away - you need decisive medical intervention. Well, folks, the same is true of the economy. The cancer we've got now took years (oooh, say, 8 of them) to develop. We're in remission, but only because decisive action was taken. I can only imagine how much faster it would be working if those who yammer so much about being good Americans actually behaved like it and got behind this recovery. But that would mean they voted wrong. We all know that, but not all of us can say it.

      • Posted By: Tea6 @ 06/08/2009 9:46:17 PM

        It is ironic, but the odds of a Democrat balancing the budget are much higher than that of a Republican.
        It didn't used to be that way, but that is the way it has been for the last 30 years.

  • Posted By: paradelady @ 06/08/2009 6:12:32 PM

    Credit for Pittsburgh's survival should also be given to the late Mayor Richard Caligiuri, who began the transition from manufacturing to eds and meds, at a time when every other politician was trying to hang onto the past, including every Washington politican.

  • Posted By: detroitjohn @ 06/08/2009 2:56:57 PM

    It will be difficult indeed for Detroit, without a world-class institution the likes of Carnegie Mellon, to follow the ed/med pathway. Detroit suffers from a paucity of undergraduate and graduate institutions that reflect the decades of dependency on easy, high-paying jobs that did not require such. We are decades away from even approaching what Pittsburgh has on that score.

  • Posted By: chris722 @ 06/08/2009 1:37:03 PM

    At least Pittsburgh is in touch with reality. Detroit still has division between suburbia and the inner city. Suburbs are just plain out stupid thinking that what happened in the inner city won't happen to them. It won't be until the suburbs of Detroit are just as much of a slum if not worse than the inner city that anyone will really pay any attention. Detroit has its head in the sand; what is happening there is going on for a very good reason ...

  • Posted By: tempacct @ 06/08/2009 10:28:31 AM

    Viva la Pittsburgh! I'm a native, and I think what makes Pittsburgh great is that culturally it's half way between a metropolis like New York, and a very small town you might find in the midwest. It's got a sense of community, and continuity, but it's also a serious business center. Basically, it's a REAL place - whereas bigger cities are more about having a glamorized image, and smaller towns are less self-reliant in terms of industry. Am very proud they'll be hosting the G20! It's amazing. I hope protesters don't destroy any part of the city...

  • Posted By: xjscave @ 06/08/2009 10:02:04 AM

    I was born in 10 miles east of the city in what is known as the Monongahela Valley. My father was a Steel Worker for 33 years before he finally managed to retire. What everyone needs to understand is that Pittsburgh is STILL struggling for survival decades after the steel industry collapse of the 70's and 80's. I lived through it. My family lived through it. I go visit my parents there every month and see the devastation that still exists. Places like Braddock and Homestead that are mostly barren of life. Braddock was once one of the most vibrant towns in the valley. As I child I remember that's where we did all of our shopping. It was a beautiful town. Today, it is dead. Homestead is the same. People, like me, had to leave to get a life and a career. I was fortunate enough to get loans and pay for my own college education, the first in my family's history. Most are not so fortunate. Property taxes are outrageous. The infrastructure is a disaster. The pictures they show on TV are of downtown Pittsburgh and it's immediate neighborhoods. Go 10-15 miles in any direction from the city center and see what a three decade reoovery looks like. You won't like what you see.

  • Posted By: North Coaster @ 06/08/2009 9:56:09 AM

    Ooops, didn't know my first rant actually posted.

  • Posted By: North Coaster @ 06/08/2009 9:54:24 AM

    What worked in Pittsburgh is not going to work in Detroit. Pittsburgh always had other assets - Heinz, Alcoa, PPG, Westinghouse, Pitt, Carnegie Mellon. Detroit uses to have some other companies but they all were bought out and merged away. There is nothing there now except the auto industry. And the auto industry is much bigger than the steel industry in Pittsrburgh every was. Pittsburgh never had the degree of middle class white flight in the 60s and 70s that Detroit did. Detroit has no Pitt or Carnegie Mellon bringing in billions in research dollars. Almost everyone living in the city limits are living in porverty. It is not capable of helping itself anymore. GM used to put some money into local development activities but it can't do it anymore either. Detroit is totalled without outside help. I know both cities VERY well. Years ago one of my college majors was urban studies and I have followed the fortunes of both cities over the decades. They might seem similar at first glance, being old industrial giants, but they are very different.

  • Posted By: North Coaster @ 06/08/2009 9:47:38 AM

    The Pittsburgh story won't work in Detroit. Pittsburgh always had assets besides the steel industry - Heinz, PPG, Westinghouse, Alcoa, etc. etc.. And the impact of Pitt and Carnegie Mellon cannot be overstated. Detroit has nothing. The non-auto companies that used to be there have been bought up and merged away. There is no Pitt or Carnegie Mellon, let alone both. Pittsburgh never had the amount of white middle class flight in the 60s and 70s like Detroit did. Today Detroit is an all black city with the majority below the poverty line. Detroit is totalled without outside help. It is way beyone helping itself. Believe me, I know both cities very well and one my college major years ago was urban studies.

  • Posted By: 202life @ 06/08/2009 9:46:50 AM

    The most accurate assesment of Pittsburgh is from the real estate agent at the end of the article. The city was hit hard by the closure of the steel mills and there was a ripple effect as small businesses closed due to lack of customers and towns felt the impact as their tax base dried up. I currently reside in Las Vegas, but as a Pittsburgh native I've learned the meaning of hard work and sacrifice and can survive anywhere. Detroit will survive but it will be a long and bumpy road ahead for them. They will have to reinvent themselves as Pittsburgh did. They may not become the city of 'eds and med', but I'm sure they will find something that works for them. It took two decades for the Burgh to recover, lets hope it doesn't take that long for Detroit.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse