SPONSORED BY:

Old, Armed and Dangerous?

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

The Manson-family members may have truly rehabilitated themselves over the years—unlike von Brunn, who seems to have become only more hateful. However, they could still serve as a malevolent influence on other less-enlightened souls. Atkins and the others declare themselves different people from the ones who committed those awful crimes four decades ago, but America is also a different country. In the 40 years since those murders shocked a nation not yet fascinated with serial killers, Manson admirers have exploded in number. There is a Charles Manson fan club (several, in fact), a thriving market in Manson-family memorabilia, and Manson himself receives tons of mail and visitation requests every year.

What kind of signal would it send, not only to the families of the victims, but also to those who consider the Manson family role models, if the government were to release them for the last 10 or 20 years of their lives simply because they were old? And who considers 60 old anymore? Indeed, the U.S. Parole Commission's guidelines say that early release of a prisoner should be denied if that release would "depreciate the seriousness of the crime or promote disrespect of the law." And in light of the bizarre hero-worship status that some famous murderers attain in the U.S., releasing them for any reason, including age, might promote the idea that there's a happy ending for these folks.

Should he be convicted, von Brunn will almost certainly die in prison. But if we have any chance of stopping these kinds of horrible acts in the future, we have to stop thinking of older people as incapable of serving their time. Yes, it seems harsh, but I hope that in the excited debate about elderly criminals in the wake of the heinous act that von Brunn is alleged to have committed, and later when the Manson family returns to the news, we can also remember that time does not depreciate these sorts of crimes. Indeed, in the eyes of some, it serves only to glamorize them.

© 2009

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Solving the Palin Puzzle
Solving the Palin Puzzle

See how well you can see Sarah from your house, by taking our trivia quiz.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Dial 'A' for Accessory
Dial 'A' for Accessory

This season's top i-Phone add-ons.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: vpucsekberman @ 07/05/2009 8:46:58 AM

    Violence among the elderly is on the rise in many nursing homes Paranoid delusions can become more pronounced with ageing. If he is not under medical supervision he is more likely to act on his hateful ideation.

  • Posted By: smacked @ 07/01/2009 10:01:43 PM

    Good thing OJ has remained such an upstanding citizen since he got away with murder, huh?

  • Posted By: Pogi @ 06/23/2009 8:12:10 PM

    Mrs. Kelley, Very nice article..Thanks....I disagree with your assessment somewhat though, concerning the motivation of Mr. von Brunn. After reading "Federal Reserve Caper & Precedents" written by James von Brunn, I concluded that this act in the extreme twilight of his life, was motivated not so much by hate, but more out of frustration. I am sure you have read the fore mentioned piece so I will not elaborate on it.

    The first thing that came to my head after reading that piece was babes and sages (I'll explain later). I feel that James von Brunn though dabbling, placed himself above the Neo Nazi crowd in his own mind; using their resources and connections to bring to light his main antagonist "The Federal Reserve". His attempt to perform a citizens arrest on the Federal Reserve Board armed, (with no bullets for his weapons), to me carried no more significant s or weight that any other non violent act of civil disobedience at that time or now. In his mind, this act was civil "enforcement" of existing law; to him a patriotic duty and COVERED BY EXISTING LAW. His ultimate goal however was exposure, as that he knew would be all he could reasonably obtain.

    I highlight 'Covered By Existing Law" because it is important to my point...Civil disobedience for the most part is the realm of the young, the idealistic the babes of this world. The demand to want to be heard is strongest among this group, but usually does not involve existing laws, rather; the creation of new ones.

    James von Brunn case was a bit different, he was trying to modify or have thrown out an "existing law" which he deemed unconstitutional. His method of civil disobedience as well (citizens arrest) is something that rarely if ever is used in what we would consider to be "traditional" civil disobedience techniques. I would note as well that he remained non violent throughout his life (as far as my research uncovered anyway).

    I think James von Brunn considers himself a sage that is not being heard or respected. At 88 years of age with a full history to reflect upon behind him, he decided what the hell, I'm going to wake the babes up. He did not expect to survive in my opinion. The financial crisis gave him the perfect opportunity to bring his antagonist "The Federal Reserve" again to light.

    I guess it has worked to some degree, I would have never have known about "Federal Reserve Caper & Precedents" if this incident had never occurred.

    James von Brunn is most assuredly a racist, but in my opinion hate was not the motivating factor in this particular case.

    Moral:

    Maybe we should listen to both babes "and" sages.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now