Theocracy and its Discontents

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 07/02/2009 8:58:24 AM

    The Solidarity movement was aided by Western intel agencies. All kinds of non-lethal help, computers, fax machines, etc. IRAN is a different animal. This regime has no qaulms about killing its own populace, so right there the similarity ENDS. This is gonna end up horribly. There is now no question military action will be used. God forbid, low-yield, PGM's will be used to destroy sub-terranian facilities, and the rain of ruin will be sqaurely on the old, belligerent mullahs, who should be part of a DECAP strike. As usual, China and Russia have gone against us. Israel may get the green, but it will be a coalition of Western and possibly Gulf nations that fear Iran's nuke program. Obama has made his case, extended his hand, but it's been slapped away. Nice try CINC, but they are begging for a whuppin'. Time is ticking, the stall tactics are nearing an end. Its almost time to strike.

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 06/27/2009 12:48:56 AM

    Why would anyone want to bring down a theocratic regime so hastily?

    The bottom line lies in the fact that people crave for power, the greater the better. There is no guarantee that a new regime would not form a new core of individual or group power. At the end of the day, what difference would that make?

    Let Iranians decide for themselves.
    (btt1943)

  • Posted By: jstepp590 @ 06/26/2009 2:02:49 PM

    I agree with the author of this article far more than the people who think we need to push ourselves into this situation for exactly the reasons mentioned. The Iranians are perfectly capable of changing their own country and are, even if these protests fail to change the outcome of the election, because notice has been served.

    I always have to giggle at the "conservatives" on this one. We should butt into their democracy, again? If we were so involved in wanting their democracy to succeeed then why did we overthrow their democratic republic to install the Shah of Iran, our pet dictator? Why did we use the Savvak, the Iranian intelligence service, to kill and jail their people who didn't like that? How do these igno's think that Iran ended up as a theocracy in the first place? Through our meddling.

    President Obama is correct in his handling of this situation. Let the other nations take the lead in this, since our meddling makes it worse for the protestors and makes it easier for the theocracy to use us as a whipping boy, as well as being incredibly hypocritical. Maybe we should have invaded China for Tianenman Square! Maybe France should have invaded us for our own version of the Square in between WW1 and WW2! Get real and try to form your own opinion instead of parroting what you're told to think people.

  • Posted By: Ethan30 @ 06/26/2009 5:27:21 AM

    You have an army on one side, and just plain people on the other, fighting for their freedom, for women's rights (really basic women's rights, by the way) and domocarcy.
    The people who have no guns, can't overthrow that ones that have an organized army. Especially since Obama has done everything he can to strengthen his support of the regime of the Ayatollahs and made it clear that he respects an opressive fanatic regime.

    Moreover, Obama has lately sent a message of support to the regime in Syria- which is a puppet for the Ayatollahs of Iran. So the muslims who do want democracy and freedom, get the message that Obama is not behind them, but rather shows weakness and support of the most opressive governments in the regime.

  • Posted By: Ethan30 @ 06/26/2009 5:26:57 AM

    You have an army on one side, and just plain people on the other, fighting for their freedom, for women's rights (really basic women's rights, by the way) and domocarcy.
    The people who have no guns, can't overthrow that ones that have an organized army. Especially since Obama has done everything he can to strengthen his support of the regime of the Ayatollahs and made it clear that he respects an opressive fanatic regime.

    Moreover, Obama has lately sent a message of support to the regime in Syria- which is a puppet for the Ayatollahs of Iran. So the muslims who do want democracy and freedom, get the message that Obama is not behind them, but rather shows weakness and support of the most opressive governments in the regime.

  • Posted By: 771979 @ 06/25/2009 12:03:23 PM

    The mystery about the Iranian election crisis is now unfolding as the protests enter the second week with death and injuries to many demonstrators. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the challenge put up by Hassan Mousavi was not simply to dispute the election results, which were fair, but to shake up the whole infra and political structure of Iran and remove the present regime from power. It is sad and unfortunate that this election crisis is prolonging unnecessarily and could lead to its disintegration. It is also pathetic that the Iranian middle class is helping a foreign conspiracy to destabilize their country.

    I suspect that the West would like these demonstrations to become more violent and bloodier because it wants to see Iranian mullahs and their regime so much demonized in the world that it would become a reasonable excuse for the Israelis and the USA to attack Iranian nuclear installations by air and at the same time support their already clandestine operations inside Iran to dismantle it.

    The present civil disorder is leading Iran into anarchy and with weakened Iran; the conspiracy cooked up by the Zionists and the Americans will easily bring down the mullah's regime. The West would like to see a boot-licking regime of the like of Nuri-ul-Maliki of Iraq set up in Iran and control 20% of the oil reserves and natural resources lying under its soil and manipulate the whole of Middle East and Central Asia, which has abundant oil and natural resources.

  • Posted By: TomJones123 @ 06/24/2009 3:31:35 PM

    It is bizarre that the author would claim British and American "interference" in Iran. History clearly shows the opposite. It has been Iran interfering with British and American interests, such as funding terrorists across the world and calling for the death of writers in the West for exercising their free speech rights. Talk about interference.

    Also, it is absurd to claim that Britain "took over" Iran's oil industry in 1901. Iran (which wasn't Iran at the time) had no oil industry in 1901. In fact, a private developer bought the rights to explore for oil and almost went bankrupt trying to find it. It is Iran that later expropriated what private British businessman had worked to discover.

  • Posted By: tired and old @ 06/24/2009 12:48:33 PM

    ITS NICE TO SEE THAT RELIGIOUS LEADERS THAT PROFESS TERRORIST ACTS ARE AS CORRUPT AS POLITICIANS.

    NICE TO SEE CONFLICT IN IRAN AND FIRE UNDER A REPRESSIVE RELIGIOUS DIC(K)TATOR.

    NOT NICE TO SEE PROTESTORS BEING SLAIN BY GOVERNMENT THUGS.

    • Posted By: George Dorn @ 06/24/2009 1:17:56 PM

      Unfortunately, the two often go hand-in-hand.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/23/2009 6:39:25 PM

    John McCain is Corrected by CSPAN'S Joe Klein...

    "Be Quiet," said Klein. "You don't need to do this. You know? You know what you're doing is a self-indulgent at this point. Sen. McCain...


    Note: If he's going to talk about this, should also talk about the fact that the United States supported Saddam Hussein in the Iran/Iraq war for eight years.

    ------------------------------------------------------

    Sen. John McCain continued to rap President Barack Obama for his measured reaction to the crisis in Iran, which McCain said was inadequate in its support for the protestors of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's contested re-election.

    Appearing on C-Span's Washington Journal on Tuesday morning, the Arizona Republican said that when it came to Iran, Obama response "has not been enough."

    Saying that he expected Obama to "come out more strongly" during his press conference on Tuesday, McCain urged the man who defeated him in the 2008 campaign to "follow the example of our founding fathers that declared that all of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights."

    "Sen. Daniel Webster, when the Greeks rose up against the Turks in 1823, I would love to give you the full quote, but he said it is our duty to stand up for people who are struggling for freedom," McCain said. "That is what America is."

    As for George Washington's famous farewell address, warning of the perils of foreign entanglements, McCain did not mention it.

    The line pushed by McCain has become the de-facto Republican criticism of Obama since the crisis in Iran began. The president has expressed his concern with the rising violence in the country as well as the obvious inaccuracies in the presidential vote. But he has avoided outright support for the seating of opposition candidate Mir Hossein Moussavi.

    The measured manner of Obama's response, while criticized by some, has been described as essential by many foreign policy observers. On Monday night, Time Magazine's Joe Klein applauded the president for his approach. And when asked about earlier McCain's remarks, he urged the Arizona Republican to stop talking.

    "Be Quiet," said Klein. "You don't need to do this. You know? You know what you're doing is a self-indulgent at this point. Sen. McCain...


    Note: If he's going to talk about this, should also talk about the fact that the United States supported Saddam Hussein in the Iran/Iraq war for eight years. Every one of those protesters out in the streets, every last one of them believes the United States supplied Saddam Hussein with the poison gas that has debilitated tens of thousands of Iranian men."

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/24/2009 10:25:23 AM

      Klein is not wrong in that American-made ammunition and weaponry has been the death or disability of many young Iranian men, and women and children too, whether or not we were shooting the guns ourselves at the time or not..

      • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/24/2009 12:08:07 PM

        I Meant Klein, But George Will has said the same thing. We should stay out of it. I Agree

      • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/24/2009 12:06:46 PM

        Il-Logical

        I Givce a Man Guns & Chemical Weapons to Kill and I Finance their Work [CIA] and You Claim George Will is Right But Its Not Our [fault or our Doing]


        Please

        I'm Finished talking about it.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/24/2009 11:50:02 AM

    An Some of You Low Lie's are Worried about [Iran]


    SEOUL, South Korea ??? North Korea threatened Wednesday to wipe the United States off the map as Washington and its allies watched for signs the regime will launch a series of missiles in the coming days.

    Off China's coast, a U.S. destroyer was tailing a North Korean ship suspected of transporting illicit weapons to Myanmar in what could be the first test of U.N. sanctions passed to punish the nation for an underground nuclear test last month.

    The Kang Nam left the North Korean port of Nampo a week ago with the USS John S. McCain close behind. The ship, accused of transporting banned goods in the past, is believed bound for Myanmar, according to South Korean and U.S. officials.

    The new U.N. Security Council resolution requires member states to seek permission to inspect suspicious cargo. North Korea has said it would consider interception a declaration of war and on Wednesday accused the U.S. of seeking to provoke another Korean War.

    "If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," the official Korean Central News Agency said.

    The warning came on the eve of the 59th anniversary of the start of the three-year Korean War, which ended in a truce in 1953, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula in state of war.

    The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect against an outbreak of hostilities.

    Tensions have been high since North Korea launched a long-range rocket in April and then conducted its second underground atomic test on May 25.

  • Posted By: VinnyL @ 06/22/2009 3:39:13 PM

    Lee Holmes Says: and it should be observed that two of the above nations trade with Iran while the US does not

    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wrong!

    Iran does tons of business with th U.S. They uses to do business with Israel to...

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/24/2009 10:22:33 AM

      Iran trades oil with everybody. If not, they'd be impoverished.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 06/23/2009 7:55:12 PM

    Joe Klein is a liberal creature of TIME, not ''CSPAN'',and he has no damned business whatever telling McCain to ''be quiet''.
    Chris Hitchens. eminantly more honest and knowlagable than Klein on his best day, observes that the fates of the two regions are interconnected. What one does will absolutely have influences on the other. We cannot ''stay out of their business'' when their ''business'' is to inject themselves into ours. As we write, the wheels are coming off of Zakarias thesis, as the mullahs are moving to reassert control with show trials and the expulsion of foreign diplomats [ for our portion,the Iranian striped-pants get hotdogs and fireworks on the 4th of July].

    Obama can do a few things that can placate the ''anti-World Cop'' critics and the ''Screw Iran'' hardliners.

    Freeze every damned dime the Iranians have in Europe and the US, and back this play with sanctions that have teeth, especially in US-based companies that use Euro fronts in order to do business with the Mullahs [ such as GE, the owner of NBC and MSNBC].They pull this crap, and we haul their CEO in front of a Senate hearing in order to explain himself.
    Include embargoes and treat them as the pariahs that they are.The Sunni states will have few problems with this arrangement.
    Get the Russians on board, as these are chief trading partners. We can say to the world that while we will not ''invade'' Iran,neither will we support your crummy regime.

    • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/24/2009 9:45:41 AM

      Not a bad plan, all things considered...

      • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/24/2009 9:49:41 AM

        The problem is that ANY intervention in Iran's affairs recalls shades of Mossadegh, and can be used to incite anti-American fervor in the country.

      • Posted By: Vigilance @ 06/24/2009 9:47:57 AM

        Here's a good article on the history of U.S.-Iranian interactions...happens to be in favor of the neutral approach.

        http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/martin.obama.iran/index.html

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 06/24/2009 9:40:48 AM

    Iran has a long history of religious and intellectual greatness. A great Iranian religious leader has his mausoleum in Ajmer in India. If this greatness is stifled, then the nation of Iran will exist no more. Iran has many Sufi leaders still, I am sure, but the leaders of the nation do not know how to confront the modern world. The leadership of Iran is at odds with the reality of the modern world, when their Prophet has asked them to embrace the world, and their surroundings. Iran must reclaim their greatness in the world, and the west must regard Iran, like they have done in the past.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/24/2009 8:28:36 AM

    May 29.09: Iran Official Accuses USA over Mosque Bombings !!

    Those Damn Persians are Trying to Set Us Up & get Us Involved in our 3rd Persian Gulf War.

    Gates,Obama,Emmanuel, Our Security Chiefs & Axelrod Know Better..


    Those People would Do Anything to Prolong our Stay, to [Bankrupt] this Nation

    The Cost in Lives & Money would be Astronomical !!! Instead of 20 Billion Per Month to China, it would be 30 Bbillion Per Month to [Communist-Socialist China] with Interest.

    Iraq:10 Billion Per Month

    Afghanistan: 10 Billion Per Month

    Iran: Another 10 Billion Per Month With Interest

    Damn That Unstable & War Mongering Persian Nation...

    You Gung Ho Freedom Fighting Tea Baggers Go DIE for that Islamist Republic

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 06/24/2009 7:24:27 AM

    http://www.rferl.org/content/Tehran_Again_Blames_Western_Meddling/1759571.html
    -------------------------------------
    You People Know NOTHING,Whether Ahmadinejad or Mousavi,IRAN WILL STILL BE an Islamist Regime,

    Mousavi Or Ahmadinjad, Have NO POWER OR CONTROL OF THE IRANIAN MILITARY & MAKE NO MILITARY DECISIONS...

    ONLY THE SUPREME LEADER. NOT THE PRESIDENT OF IRAN..

    IRAN IS A THEOCRACY, A GOVERNMENT RULED BY MUSLIM CLERICS & EITHER PRESIDENT WOULD SAY WHATEVER THE SUPREME LEADER WANTS HIM TO SAY OR GREEN LIGHTS HIM TO SAY...DUH
    ----------------------------------------------

    Mousavi: "Call the People to the [Islamic Revolution] the way that it was and to the [Islamic Republic] the way that it Should Be."
    ------------------------------------------------

    Mousavi: Instead, he charged, the current scene "goes beyond attempts to impose an unwanted government on the people. I rather view it as an attempt to impose a new form of political life on the country.....

    Mousavi: " He warned the Public against allowing "Liars and Cheats to Steal the Banner of Defending the [Islamic System] from you."

  • Posted By: tim roth @ 06/24/2009 2:44:14 AM

    the matter is clear.Iranian goverment have stolen milions of votes.so the question is"whats the rule of national communities like UN at this moment?whats they reaction to the crimes happend in the Iranian society?!!the fact is that Iranian regime dosent have any pity about the iranian people sowhen they reach nuclear bombsin the future they will not care about other people and this regim will change their language with national society.

  • Posted By: tim roth @ 06/24/2009 1:21:10 AM

    its very clear ...they have stolen milions of votes from the people in Iran.every day military forces kill people many protestes,arrest them,put alot of forces on them....so the question is "whats the duty of national communities like UN at this moment?!!will they accept legitimacy of ahmadinejad's goverment?!!this goverment dosent have any pity for his people so tomorrow when they armed with nucleare bomb...they will not care for others and this goverment will change their language with national society...believe me

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 06/23/2009 3:47:31 PM

    I cannot agree.

    It should not have devolved to the French president to deliver a more stinging rebuke of the mullacracy than has Obama thus far. Obviously,there are vast differances between engineering CIA coups in regime overthrows and forcefully backing the protesters and particularly the Iranian women without the use of such intrigue. The Mullahs will blame the west regardless, thus there is little to lose by calling their abuses on the table and referring these to the General Assembly [ which remains a world platform despite its weakness and corruption]. The GOP garners the lions share of media attention due to being more forceful than Obama on this subject which is already creating peevish consternation among Obamas WH clique. Then too, ''backing off and not stirring the pot'' will create the precise conditions that the Mullahs desire and they will use this blueprint in order to create mayhem wherever they turn their eyes . Sarkozy instantly sees this, as does Merkel and Cameron. Why Obama does not is a mystery, and why he would place a propaganda victory into the hands of the GOP is even more so.[ the invitation to the Iranian embassy corps to celebrate the upcoming 4th of July, the Iranians, being a form of Redcoats themselves, hence the head-scratching over this decision].

  • Posted By: thearch @ 06/23/2009 1:19:14 PM

    Theocracy is permanently and irreversibly weakened in Iran. They already engaged in corrective measures by repealing the corporal punishment(stoning a woman to death). Women sloganeering in Teheran streets demanding freedom is a rude awakening for Iranian men and now they know the womens lib is in full swing. Even the arab countries will take notice and work towards liberating their womenfolk. Sarkogy and his France are leading the way for muslim women liberation. Great.
    Help is on the way woman!!!

  • Posted By: thearch @ 06/23/2009 1:18:46 PM

    Theocracy is permanently and irreversibly weakened in Iran. They already engaged in corrective measures by repealing the corporal punishment(stoning a woman to death). Women sloganeering in Teheran streets demanding freedom is a rude awakening for Iranian men and now they know the womens lib is in full swing. Even the arab countries will take notice and work towards liberating their womenfolk. Sarkogy and his France are leading the way for muslim women liberation. Great.
    Help is on the way woman!!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse