Just to add something, I have a Windows 7 machine, and a Macbook, and the Mac OS has crashed as many times, if not more, than my Windows 7 machine. I think the author needs a bit more objectivity in his article.
Love him or hate him, Apple needs its CEO back. Now.
Just to add something, I have a Windows 7 machine, and a Macbook, and the Mac OS has crashed as many times, if not more, than my Windows 7 machine. I think the author needs a bit more objectivity in his article.
Excellent, well written words of truth.
Dear Dan, please note that "whiz" is something done at a commode. I suspect you intended to use "wiz," as in wizard or a person as gifted as one.
Viz.: "The wizened wiz whizzes whimsically."
That should be in a children's book.
Praises Apple, spreads Apple propaganda and then adds some Windows dissing for good measure. Smells like a Apple zealot, writes like one and acts like one. He's definitely a big Apple zealot.
Praises Apple, spreads Apple propaganda and then adds some Windows dissing for good measure. Smells like a Apple fanboy, writes like one and acts like one. He's definitely a big one.
This was quite possibly one of the worst articles I've ever written. I generally anticipate that if Apple is in a tech story, they're going to be fawned over and get their D slobbered on but this takes it to a whole new level.
I think this article may have transcended journalism and moved into the world of fan-fic erotica. Seriously, the take-away message I got was that the author has a literally crush on Steve jobs. He's got his head so far up Job's *** he looks like a Ridley Scott Alien when he opens his mouth. Seriously why don't you give Jobs every penny you own and worship him like a God?
The World needs Steve Jobs? WTF is wrong with you you'd even say that? The first line in your article was about how you didn't need anything he sells. Now the world can't do without him? What is this a 4th grade essay? Make up your mind. I've got news for you, cemeteries are filled with indispensable men. Steve Jobs is going to die and the world isn't going to miss a step.
Someone else will sell you your overpriced crap and tell you you're cool for buying it. Don't worry.
test
Comparing Microsoft to Apple is like comparing a democracy to a dictatorship. Of course a democracy is going to be more complicated and have more problems but it offers you the freedom of greater options and is therefore, in my opinion, worth the price. PS. You upgraded your old PC. Have you ever tried to upgrade an old Apple? I mean, WITHOUT replacing it outright?
Jeroen, You're really conflating two different things here - new products coming out and old products breaking down. Dan's iPhone is not broken, he just wanted a better one (from what I could tell from his story). In fact he could sell his old iPhone on eBay for $300 or more. Even the 2007 iPhone is still popular and selling for about $200, used! Likewise used Macs have higher resale values than used PCs. This suggests that Apple products are not "designed to fail" but actually have lasting appeal both in function and design.
Recently I wrote an argument against "planned obsolescence". How timely of Mr. Gross to make a semi-compelling case for continual improvement:
"...Apple and its loyal customers (like me) have made a deal: it'll keep improving its products at a fantastic pace, and killing off its own products. In return, we'll keep buying whatever it makes..."
Perhaps "better the devil you know" plays out in technology brands as much as it does in my social circle.
Reference: http://www.sockitmonkey.com/sims/2009/06/not-designed-to-fail.html
Bless Daniel Lyons' tender heart and evidently, neurotic nature. As he writes, it wasn't somebody named Cook who created those lines outside the Apple stores the other day. One component of one of those lines was a technoluster who seems to think the other kids will laugh at him if he can only flash last year's iPhone. No reason to believe he was alone in this.
i believe he likes rise against "... extremely exageratted!"
Fanboy comment there: You're comparing an admittedly BETA version of software to a stable platofr you've been running on the macbook since you got it.
Well, forgive the poor use fo the english language but, DUH.
I run Windows XP on one machine, Vista business on another, and Linux on a 3rd. I've owned 4 Macs.
The XP is now stable as a rock. Vista is even more so, the only issues I had were fixed by a patch as a result of my running a beta software product from another vendor.
And I own all three machines, for less than the cost of 1 Mac of comparable hardware.
Good reporting implies fair comparisons. comparing beta to release software isn't a fair comparison. You did at least admit to the fanboy behavior, over paying for a product that's bleeding edge, and for which you know you don't need.
We are controlled by the COMSUPTION INDUSTRY, but we need be strong and go agaist it.
How many times have you run your machine with the beta version of leopard
Why don't you take that money and donate it to a worthwhile family or a cause? What a waste of $299. It's that ME ME ME philosophy and GREED that is just making me sick. Why do you "NEED" something that's essentially the same as what you have? People amaze me!!
Why do you feel the need to get "the next big thing" every single Summer when Apple comes out with a new one every year???? Why don't you donate that money to a worthwhile cause or a family in need. It's this kind of "ME ME ME" philosophy and GREED that is bringing down America.
If you're out looking for trouble, you'll likely find trouble. Trying to crash on a beta version of Windows 7 that has not been released is no different than asking to run into problems.
You forgot the #1 reason Apple needs Steve Jobs: to direct the company when times are bad. When Jobs left after the launch of the Macintosh, the company was riding high and then management stopped innovating, lead it to near bankruptcy 10 years later. Jobs returned and things are riding high again. And, once again, the media thinks Apple can do fine without him. They probably can for about a decade before the lack of Steve's brilliant leadership results in a steep declne.
I think there is a little bit of revisionist history here. It was in the 80s that Apple almost went under and it wasn't because they stopped innovating. They simply couldn't sell their products. Apple was reeling from the court's decision to not protect the "look and feel" of their graphics user interface. The Apple II line was actually paying the bills for the Macintosh division in the mid 80s. It was sad, almost tragic. To see Microsoft not even making an attempt to hide their copying of the Mac interface hurt the Macintosh organization deeply from a psychological standpoint.
There were monumentally poor decisions made from a marketing and manufacturing perspective. These decisions lie at Steve's feet. If it wasn't for somewhat of a mutiny on the part of a few individuals who refused to carry out some of Steve's more absurd edicts the company would have been in even worse shape. Despite the fact that I idolized the man then and still do now, Steve had to go.
Apple may just have made their most mind blowing achievement in the decade that Steve was gone: they didn't go under. I was so happy to see Steve's return in the late 90s however. He came back a decade wiser. Wiser in the areas of technology and marketing but certainly not in people skills however. Shortly after Apple purchased Steve's "sabbatical" project, NeXT, whose software would soon morph into Mac OS X.
It is certainly not Steve's brilliant leadership that makes him so indispensable to Apple as jd_in_SB states. It's his visionary magic when it comes to new ideas and their execution. His magic works whether it's at Apple or NeXT or Pixar. I admit that it is a bit scary how he has been elevated to an almost god like status to many people. It reminds me of the "Clapton is God" scrawlings that popped up in England in the late sixties or the way so many people worship John Lennon. It's not surprising that Steve is a big Lennon fan and sought out Yoko Ono's friendship when she briefly lived with her son Sean in San Francisco in the 80s. Master Lennon at the age of only eight or nine received his own personal tour of the Macintosh factory in Fremont, CA. Little did his mother know that Apple's pledge to never infringe on the identity of Apple Records by involving themselves in the music business would end up being a hollow offering. Twenty years later Apple became the world's largest provider of music content via their iTunes creation. I've often wondered if at some level Steve was trying to best or please his deceased idol. No matter what, it is fascinating how Steve's life ended up being so intertwined with John Lennon's legacy.
Sorry Apple haters. Love him or hate him, Steve Jobs will go down in history as one of the great minds of the 20th and 21st centuries.
I wanted to buy an apple imac pro, just because Steve Jobs was the CEO of the company. The fact, that the imac pro is the most awesome desktop, was a secondary consideration. I wanted to know, that Steve Jobs was behind the making of the imac pro. I hope he gets over his liver condition, and has a longer tenure at apple, than Justice Thurgood Marshall had at the U S Supreme Court.
There's either the iMac or the Mac Pro. There is no iMac Pro. Not sure which one you are referring to.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss