Alexander Hassenstein / Getty Images

Google’s Bid to Shatter Windows

Should Microsoft be worried about the search giant's new operating system? Not yet.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Silicon Valley watchers like to view the competition between Google and Microsoft through the prism of all-out war. And the search giant's announcement that it is developing a free operating system, dubbed Google Chrome OS, certainly seems to fit the metaphor: an invasion onto Microsoft's home turf, the bedrock of the $200 billion company, just as Microsoft's new search offering, Bing, has finally chipped away at Google's lead. (NEWSWEEK is a content partner of Microsoft's MSNBC and MSN.)

"Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It's Made of Chrome," read one headline at TechCrunch. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer called the operating system "a new cannon to shoot over Microsoft's bow." And pretty much everyone else described the news as a bombshell, an assault, or a bid for supreme hegemony.

Perhaps. But those hoping for immediate fireworks may be disappointed. The Chrome OS is still a long way off—it won't be released until the second half of 2010, an unusually long lead time for Google, which likes to make services available as soon as they are announced. The OS will initially be used to power netbooks (small and cheap devices used mainly for Web browsing), whose sales have been growing substantially, but still represent just a sliver of the overall PC market. And the Chrome browser itself has struggled to catch on with consumers, eking out a roughly 2 percent market share eight months after its release, a fourth-place showing.

Make no mistake—Google entering the operating-system arena is a major development. It's likely to spur innovation because Chrome OS will be open source, meaning that programmers around the world will be able to tinker with it. The software will be free, so machines that run it will be cheaper for consumers. Google promises that Chrome-based devices will boot in seconds, resist malware, and not need frequent updating. "Operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no Web," the company wrote in a blog post announcing Chrome. "It's our attempt to rethink what operating systems should be."

Not everyone is sold. "It's way overhyped," says Michael Silver, a research vice president at Gartner, about Google's chances at challenging Microsoft's longtime OS dominance. "This really won't amount to anything for a year, and in terms of significant competition to Microsoft, we're talking much longer before this has the possibility of making any sort of dent." Google says that Chrome, initially targeted at netbooks, will eventually be able to power full-size desktop PCs. Microsoft declined NEWSWEEK's request for comment.

Businesses could then opt for Google's free OS over Microsoft's Windows. But corporations have been slow to adopt Google's free version of the Microsoft Office suite—Google removed its longtime "beta" tag from its e-mail and document apps this week in part to better appeal to corporate users. Silver thinks Microsoft's lead is safe for now. "The corporate market will care the day the CEO or CFO brings in a netbook running Chrome and says, 'I want my mail on this,' " he says.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: AnythingButApple @ 07/11/2009 12:38:51 AM

    I give Microsoft a better chance of toppling Google's dominance in search than I give Google of toppling Microsoft's dominance in the OS arena. Both companies are going after the other's bread and butter, but Bing is an actual product that is taking market share away now, and Steve Ballmer has committed $4-5 billion over the next few years to improving Bing and going after Google. Chrome is an anouncement not yet a product.

    Second, both companies have a lot of money and both companies hire the best and the brightest in the industry. But Microsoft is in the top 10 on Fotune's list of most profitable companies. They made $17 billion in profit last year. They have the resources to fend off any of Google's attacks on their OS while still funding their attack on Google's search dominance.

    Google is still a one-trick pony, whereas Microsoft is more diversified. It seems to me that Google is the more vulnerable of the two.

  • Posted By: no0ne_007 @ 07/09/2009 11:17:06 PM

    "As a Firefox user, I do get frustrated when I have to work some sites with IE. But I understand. A company cannot afford to have developers optimizing a web site for all possible browsers"

    I think you have that backwards. Take Base64 encoding (embedding images in html), which Firefox and most other browsers support, but not IE. So it???s not the company???s lack of coding skills that's your problem, its Microsoft???s lack of abilities in web browsers...

  • Posted By: no0ne_007 @ 07/09/2009 11:17:04 PM

    "As a Firefox user, I do get frustrated when I have to work some sites with IE. But I understand. A company cannot afford to have developers optimizing a web site for all possible browsers"

    I think you have that backwards. Take Base64 encoding (embedding images in html), which Firefox and most other browsers support, but not IE. So it???s not the company???s lack of coding skills that's your problem, its Microsoft???s lack of abilities in web browsers...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse