Chosen Words

A pollster's recommendations on how to sell Americans on the idea of Israeli settlements.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: HStrumm @ 10/28/2009 12:10:35 PM

    The link to the report does not seem to be functioning. Have you taken 2009 Global Language Dictionary off your site for some reason?

  • Posted By: vidian6 @ 07/20/2009 11:35:15 PM

    IF this idiot thinnks thate he can snow people with this crap then whoever commision this study wasted their money. The settlements are counterproductive in the efforts of piece. Where does he think these people are going to go if Israel is allowed to continue to build these settlements.

  • Posted By: Christiern @ 07/15/2009 11:36:30 PM

    This is an odious piece of propaganda for a country that practices state-sponsored terrorism from behind a veil of self-righteousness. I think the IDF has taken this thing far enough so that few will buy into this propaganda???at least, I hope so. The so-called "settlements" are not only illegal, they are acts against humanity. They should be abandoned, totally, by the squatters and the land returned to its rightful owners, the Palestinian people.

    I am old enough to have lived through the Nazi era and I have a very uncomfortable feeling of deja vu these days.

  • Posted By: Aule Mar @ 07/14/2009 2:09:07 PM

    A solution to settlements in the occupied land. Leave them where they are, don???t force anyone to move, allow them to become a part of Palestine. The people who inhabbit them would become Palestinian citizans. They would keep the land there living on and farming, and provide much needed infastructure support (food, jobs, income) for the new Palestinian state. Security would be provieded, but if they became tax paying Palestinian citizans there no reason for anyone to harm them.

    • Posted By: froy1100 @ 07/14/2009 11:25:37 PM

      Aule Mar, those settlements are built on land illegally confiscated to the Palestinians. It will have to be restituted to their rightful owners. And you won't find one single settler who will agree to live under the authority of the people they have been taught to fear and despise. This is a false option. The only two possibilities are to either let Israel annex the settlements and get away with theft, or either to dismantle the settlements, sent the settlers packing home and restore the stolen land to their legitimate Palestinian owners. We'll see what happens.

  • Posted By: Weary O'Leary @ 07/14/2009 1:08:33 PM

    I have always believed that it takes much more work to cover up a lie than to tell the truth. What we have seen over the last sixty years is the greatest human attempt to convince the world of a lie, and it is only now beginning to become exposed.

    The founding of Israel had nothing to do with religion, particularly the Jewish faith. The introduction of the "Jewishness" of Israel was used to promote it amongst the poor and religiously orthodox Jewish population in the world. Most of the people who make their way to Israel these days are impoverished Jews from Siberia, Yemen, and Ethiopia who the Israeli government treat as "rightful" owners of the land and ends up sending them to Illegal settlements, away from the richer, more "civilized" Isreali population. Now, if you were coming starved from far away and given a house in a settlement, with a pool and free educational and all that, would you ever leave?

    The government of Israel has created a huge quagmire in the Middle East by importing a foreign populations into a land inhabited by Indigenous Palestinians and masterfully brainwashing the imprisoned Israeli population (the are literally surrounded by a 12-foot concrete wall to provide "security" ) with ideas like "Palestinian never existed, what are Palestinians?" and like, "We must get rid of I-ran, it is a threat to the world!"

    Who, in the right state of their sane mind, would suggest getting rid of a country and inflicting harm on it population as a way of dealing with a problem? Bush, Cheney, and Israel only.

    I think that the war on Gaza, should I say, the massacre at Gaza is the turning point in this long conflict that will expose the lie that the world has been made to believe, and hopefully bring about the beginnings of a concrete peaceful solution that is more than Israeli stalling tactics for land grabs.

  • Posted By: vogtcha @ 07/13/2009 2:23:12 PM

    I believe this article illustrates how gullible the American Israeli lobby believe the American population continues to be. After all George Bush has proven that Americans will easily allow divisive rhetoric and propaganda to sacrifice our children for unjust causes. So why should this be any different??

  • Posted By: AbeBird @ 07/13/2009 10:13:48 AM

    froy1100 : You better study history first.
    Your propaganda seems dull and dry. If evacuate Jews from the land of Israel is not racist than evacuate Arabs from Palestine is neither.
    -First, there wasn't any Palestinian peope but the Jews before 1967. Palestinian people in not even mentioned in UN resolusions 242 and 336! Judea and Samaria were occupied by Jordan in 1948 and that occupation was against UN resolution and was illegal. Jordan started the war against Israel and Israel occupied the area in despute. No Palestinian people was then do deliver with Israel but the Jordanians that failed to accomlished peace.
    Jews lived in the "west bank" area priop to the 40th. They lived in East Jerusalm, Hebron, Shchem (aka Nablus), Jenin and Gaza and some smaller places, but the Arabs slaughterd them. drank their blood and only few escaped !!!! Jews have the right to live in their historical national land more than American has the right to live in Florida or Nevada!
    As easy as that.

    Arabs don't want a Palestinian state in the "west bank" but in the whole west bank, which includes all Israel. They say so and they act so. That's why they don't want to end the talks and the terror, that's why they insist in flowding into Israel the all millions of "refugees".

    • Posted By: froy1100 @ 07/13/2009 12:48:10 PM

      Drink their blood?? Man, that is what I call a literal "blood libel". LOL

      Even if resolution 242 doesn't mention the Palestinians by name, it's very explicit about the inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war, and calls for withdrawal from the territories Israel occupied during the 6-day war. The 4th Geneva Convention also states clearly that an occupying power can't settle its own civilian into the occupied territory (article 49). And in general, you can't just occupy other people and keep them under military rule and nationless for 42 years, while you, little by little, nibble away at their ancestral land. Plain common sense.

      On the other hand, Jewish population in the West Bank by 1948 was negligible (10,000 Jews against 725,000 Arabs). Most Jewish colonies had established along the coast and in the Galilee. Before the 1st aliya, at the end of the 19th century there were basically no Jews in what today is the West Bank, excepting the odd Yishuv and the Samaritans of Mount Gerizim. To say that Jews lived in the WB as an argument to justify the occupation and dispossession of the aboriginal Palestinian Arabs, which have accounted for over 95% of the WB population for centuries is intellectually obscene.

      The world no longer believes Israel's lies and distortions. Better get ready to withdraw to your borders.

  • Posted By: AbeBird @ 07/13/2009 9:54:24 AM

    What so bother you? That Israel supporters waking up to defeat you?

  • Posted By: froy1100 @ 07/13/2009 1:06:39 AM

    Wow, a manual about zionist propaganda. Hasbara in pure state. It would be ridiculous if it wasn't so real and wasn't causing so much suffering.

    Just one notion, Mr Luntz, evacuating Jewish settlers is not racist:

    -First, they are not being evacuated because they are Jewish, but because they happen to be living on land that was illegally confiscated from the Palestinians. As easy as that. Settlers who can prove that they legally bought land before occupation should address the government of the new Palestinian State to get back their property, and accept living under Palestinian authority.

    -Second, Israel has never intended to leave its settlements in the new Palestinian State. Its declared intentions are to annex those illegal settlements on illegally confiscated land into Israel, getting away with flagrant theft.

    I just hope that nobody is actually going to buy all of Mr Luntz's load of BS

  • Posted By: mike 2 @ 07/12/2009 4:49:35 PM

    More to the point, those misconceptions won't last forever. The images of Iranian protesters help drive the point that not all Muslims are the same. Also, there are two MAJOR values of the US public (shared by the left and the right alike) that hurts Israel's cause:

    1) Americans are strongly against the notion of a "birthright". Hell, this was the reason behind the Revolutionary War. Kings and Queens, and nobility is one of the most un-American concepts out there. You can't even become a US citizen if you have any titles of nobility to your name, unless you are willing to give them up. It doesn't help that US fundamentalists tend to pick and choose what Bible verses they care about, and guess what. They'll pick the ones that dictate how you should live your life (behavior based) before the ones that talks about God given certain people special privileges based on their bloodline.

    2) Americans are strongly anti-government. Look, racism is one thing. If people want to treat each other like crap because they're racists, thats someone tolerable (eg: Israeli racists towards their own Palestinian citizens). But once the government actually gets involved subsidizing racism, thats a whole different can of worms. Look, don't get me wrong. The Israeli Jews have every right to settle into the disputed Palestinian territory. Let them buy the real estate out of their own pocket, make sure the land isn't already owned by someone else, and be willing to become Palestinian citizens. But since the Israeli government is actively subsidizing a certain class of people to live in a certain area, that doesn't even belong to them, never mind their own domestic land use restrictions; thats not gonna win over too many Americans.

    In related news, a study recently found that pissing in a jar full of girl scout cookies while rubbing your ass on the American flag offends many Americans.

  • Posted By: mike 2 @ 07/12/2009 4:22:21 PM

    Well, at least they're making some effort to understand US culture. You would think they would have done a better job given that many of these settlers are ex-pat US citizens. Go figure.

    US support stems largely of misconceptions. The average person is (I am guessing) thinking "ok, Palestinians = Muslims = making women wear headscarves. Jews = the secular Jews that we know in the US = progress. So EVEN IF the Palestinians have a right to the land, its still better for Israel to have that land." Off course thats just a perception. The Palestinian and Lebanese Muslims are not like the Muslims in Saudia Arabia or Afghanistan, and the Israelis Jews are not so secular. Ok, many are, but can't say the same for the settlers living on Palestinian land.

  • Posted By: Haga @ 07/12/2009 1:47:42 PM

    Perfect. Now we can understand it better. It´s not the best way to live in Israel, I mean as a hostage. Cause this we support Americans for Peace Now. Land for Peace, to have finally a normal life! David C.

  • Posted By: Greg Hullender @ 07/12/2009 1:19:41 PM

    Actually this article doesn't take the side of Israel. it makes the Israeli government look deceitful. But if everything in this article is true, why does Israel still have such strong polling numbers in the US? People disagree with them on the settlements, but still like Israel overall? Actually, that's not far from my own view; I just didn't think many people shared it.

  • Posted By: crazyjew @ 07/12/2009 12:52:53 PM

    I'm surprised Newsweek is taking the side of Israel. They're usually Arab lovers.

  • Posted By: crazyjew @ 07/12/2009 12:51:42 PM

    I'm shocked to see Newsweek publishing an article taking the side of Israel.

  • Posted By: sanityprevail @ 07/12/2009 12:47:50 PM

    The bottom line is that nobody involved really wants peace. If they did, they'd stop teaching their children to hate the other side from birth on. Even if a treaty was signed today, it would take generations before a meaningful peace took hold. Before that ever happened, I'd bet money that one side or the other (probably Israel, since they have the military to sustain it and want to deny one to the Palestinians) would find an excuse to start a new war. I have little sympathy for Israel and it escapes me why their supposed democracy form of government automatically makes them a "special friend" of the U.S.

  • Posted By: Albert Fournier @ 07/12/2009 1:43:41 AM

    The ???Mandate for Palestine??? is Valid to This Day.
    The Mandate survived the demise of the League of Nations. Article 80 of the UN Charter implicitly recognizes the ???Mandate for Palestine??? of the League of Nations.
    This Mandate granted Jews the irrevocable right to settle anywhere in Palestine, the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, a right unaltered in international law and valid to this day. Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria (i.e. the West Bank), Gaza and the whole of Jerusalem are legal. The International Court of Justice reaffirmed the meaning and validity of Article 80 in three separate cases...July 11, 1950...June 21, 1971...[and] July 9, 2004... More at : http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2009/06/jews-have-same-right-to-settle-there-as.html

    • Posted By: Marinegrunti39 @ 07/12/2009 12:26:00 PM

      ???? the UN mandate of 1947 gave Jews who made 33% of the population 55% of Palestine and 45% to the Arabs whot made 66% of the population. The Arabs rightly rejected this offer based on the the colonists have no right to give ltheir land to foreignersr

    • Posted By: noirelion @ 07/12/2009 9:06:42 AM

      Mandate? From who?
      The people who live in the region certainly did NOT grant any such mandate. If you are talking about Imperialist/Colonial powers who live thousands of miles away- what right do they have to take an entire nations peoples' land away from them? Is this just a grand scale white power situation? Seems that way to me. Take what you please land and property from the brown people to benefit the white people. Then claim it is your "divine right".
      Evil dressed up as divinity is still evil.

  • Posted By: Albert Fournier @ 07/12/2009 1:41:58 AM

    Israel has an unassailable legal right to establish settlements in the West Bank.
    Eugene Rostow, a former dean of the Yale Law School who was also under secretary of state in the Johnson years, would write years later that "Israel has an unassailable legal right to establish settlements in the West Bank." He argued that Israel's claims to the territory were "at least as good as those of Jordan." Prof. Stephen Schwebel, who would become the State Department legal adviser and subsequently the president of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, went a step further when he wrote in 1970 that "Israel has better title in the territory of what was Palestine, including the whole of Jerusalem, than do Jordan and Egypt." More at : http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2009/05/israels-forgotten-rights-in-jerusalem.html

    • Posted By: Marinegrunti39 @ 07/12/2009 12:17:30 PM

      Of course who would such illogical statement coming from people that never lived in Palestine and give their opinion based on pressure from AIPAC
      Let???s be clear Israel invaded and occupied the remaining 20% of historical Palestine in 1967. Since then Palestinians have been under 42 years of Israeli oppressive occupation. Whenever Palestinians resist the occupation there are labeled by the US politicians and media as terrorists and when the state of Israel does the same and more they ???have a right to defend???
      With the help of our media the like of Fox news (for which Mr Luntz is a constant guess) CNN and MSNBC have been selling to the Americans that Israel the occupier is the victim not the Palestinians the occupied.
      American people are no longer buying the line that God gave the land to the chosen people been fed by the pro- Israeli line and the media no matter what the Zionist Luntz recommends

      What the US media doesn???t want us to know is that Israeli Jews are methodically ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their home land using biblical passages as a guise to steal someone else land.

    • Posted By: tyler214 @ 07/12/2009 10:46:16 AM

      The territory in dispute is not claimed by Jordan or Egypt so its pointless to bring that up. The territory is claimed by the descendants of the people who were living there when the UN decide to give someone else's land to the Jews from Europe.

      • Posted By: jncc1701 @ 07/12/2009 11:15:21 AM

        You really need to read some history, the Romans expelled Jews in about 73 AD and others were living there until Jews returned as a nation in 1948! that is a long time the land was not empty waiting for the return of the Nation of Israel.

      • Posted By: jncc1701 @ 07/12/2009 11:12:24 AM

      • Posted By: jncc1701 @ 07/12/2009 11:12:22 AM

  • Posted By: what does it mater @ 07/12/2009 7:22:22 AM

    what does God have to say about this
    Gen 15:18 In the same day Jehovah made a covenant with Abram, saying, I have given this land to your seed, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, Gen 12:1 And Jehovah said to Abram, Go out of your country, and from your kindred, and from your father's house into a land that I will show you.
    Gen 12:2 And I will make you a great nation. And I will bless you and make your name great. And you shall be a blessing.
    Gen 12:3 And I will bless those that bless you and curse the one who curses you. And in you shall all families of the earth be blessed.
    Gen 12:4 And Abram departed, even as Jehovah had spoken to him. And Lot went with him. And Abram was seventy-five years old when he departed from Haran.
    Gen 12:5 And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had gained in Haran. And they went forth to go into the land of Canaan. And they came into the land of Canaan.
    Gen 12:6 And Abram passed through the land to the place of Shechem, unto the Oak of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.
    Gen 12:7 And Jehovah appeared to Abram and said, I will give this land to your seed. And he built an altar there to Jehovah who appeared to him.

    • Posted By: jncc1701 @ 07/12/2009 11:14:56 AM

      How is using myth to support fairy tails - yes this is how we form foreign policy.

      • Posted By: Marinegrunti39 @ 07/12/2009 12:07:25 PM

        what does it mater - this is another fairy tales if you believe it

    • Posted By: MRW08 @ 07/12/2009 11:34:24 AM

      And where did you get all this? These passages were added 150 years ago after the word 'nation' was created.

      Here's the oldest extant copy of the the Bible. Show me where these passages exist in the original.
      http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/

  • Posted By: mkf1 @ 07/12/2009 12:03:23 PM

    Dan Ephron's article is a brazen attempt to aid and abet the violation of American and International law. The Geneva conventions, which are American law, prohibit the transfer of populations into occupied territories. Israel's "settlements" are just that, a transfer of populations into occupied territories, and a violation of American and International law. Ephron's biased attempt to sell Americans on lawbreaking should be shamed for what it really is.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse