We Want More Government

Just don't ask us to pay for it.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 07/15/2009 10:21:51 AM

    Why do "green" light bulbs contain the deadly metal, mercury?

    Why do required vaccinations contain a mercury derivative?

    • Posted By: rswedlow @ 07/26/2009 12:07:33 AM

      wow scary very scary

  • Posted By: John14John @ 07/24/2009 2:22:20 PM

    We? Maybe anyone who has made a poor effort in life is for more govt. Anybody with a half of a brain knows the complete failure of more government. Look around the world for 5 minutes. Bigger the govt / more welfare for idiots, the bigger the failure. Govt has never solved one problem, just made things worse. We fought and broke free from Europe, more / intrusive government. We attained great heights like never before. Now what are we doing? Going backwards. You peeps are just setting yourself up for more socialist misery. How you don't see that is mind-boggling and should be studied. RUN from the dems/socialist. Save this country.

    • Posted By: rswedlow @ 07/26/2009 12:06:23 AM

      Well put John. The more govt funding we take, the more opportunity we give them to pry into our lives. However, as a displaced autoworker, please dont ask me to give up those unemployment checks ... at least not until i graduate school. Yes, as soon as I got laid off last year I took out student loans [unsubsidized] and went to school to retrain for a new career.

  • Posted By: rswedlow @ 07/25/2009 11:58:07 PM

    We want healthcare reform and an economic recovery today. However, public funding of these objectives will only serve to raise our debt and future inflation rates. We must find a way to fund this recovery with private funding. The question is - how? The answer is right under our noses yet no one sees it. Rather than taxing the rich to pay for healthcare reform, the government needs to focus on creating a new treasury bond. Maybe label it an R series, standing for recovery. These bonds should have a minimum of a five to ten year term with an interest rate no less than 5%. This process will get that private money out of savings accounts paying peanuts, and into funding healthcare and recovery measures. If you want to get wealthy Americans to pay for health reform, do not simply tax them. They will only resent you, find better ways to hide their money, and ultimately vote you out of office. Instead, give them incentives for funding health reform and recovery, while allowing them to feel good about their investment.

    The author is absolutely correct in asserting that private money is preferable in funding our recovery. Let us work to give private money an incentive to return to the market. By the way ... this post is not written by a wealthy American. It is written by an out of work autoworker ... just in case anyone thinks I am plugging for the rich ... I am not. I am merely making the observation that until we give them a reason to invest in our recovery, they will fight against every dollar we take from them.

  • Posted By: s.e.perez @ 07/23/2009 10:57:31 AM

    I don't understand why you cite the following: "As defense declined???from 9 percent of GDP in the late 1960s to 3 percent in 2000." It's misleading and doesn't reflect our current situation. In FY 2008, defense and security accounted for 21 percent of the federal budget (http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1258). How about a little intellectual honesty?

  • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/11/2009 3:46:39 PM

    "Republicans want to cut taxes without cutting spending. Democrats want to increase spending without increasing taxes, except on the rich":
    GOP part looks like reasonable idea - it was historically proven that cutting taxing percentage (to the point) often increase the absolute tax income.
    The Democrats part looks like a moronic joke, simple math tell us that increased spending adds to deficit, and history teaches us that riches tax percentage increase above some point (and we are already above) in fact decreases their contribution.
    Good luck, Obama supporters, in 2010 you will pay dearly (in money equivalent) for this year craziness.

    • Posted By: gusdicksin @ 07/12/2009 4:46:38 PM

      • Posted By: DieselAddict @ 07/13/2009 4:32:09 PM

        Cutting the tax percentage to increase tax revenue may or may not work, and if it does it's usually just temporary and the deficit increases anyway because of out of control spending. Why do you think Reagan had to increase taxes shortly after cutting them? What's moronic is expecting the deficit to shrink or not even care about it while giving people (mostly the rich) massive tax cuts and increasing spending at the same time, i.e. what Bush did.

        • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/13/2009 4:59:34 PM

          Could not agree more. Bush booted the economy in all the usual pansyass ways republicans tend to do. Nonetheless, who wants to be the President of a spiritually and economically bereft nation? What did he have to work with? Who was he standing in for anyway?

          We're broke... broken. No Democrat or Republican is good enough to fix us. How do you tell a 2 year old there is no more ice cream? You either go out and steal some, sell the silver, or go to Argentina. Otherwise the tantrums begin, as they have now.

          We either step up as a nation or we will be another asterisk in history before you know it. It is not about Obama, Bush, Reagan, Clinton, or even the lovely Sarah. They just sell tabloid stuff some call "news."

          It is about a greed drenched culture that is finding the bottom.

          A poet for the ages, Robinson Jeffers, wrote something apropos (actually a lot of things) of the emptiness of all this childish clamoring a few years back, (the Eagles said the same thing, they called it "Get Over It."):

          "I'll tell you
          What the world's like: a stone for no reason falling in the night from a
          cliff in the hills, that makes a lonely
          Noise and a spark in the hollow darkness, and nobody sees and nobody
          cares."

          I'll bet against Jeffers' gloomy assessment, only because I am an unreconstructed romantic.

          I still hope for a miracle of unmerited mercy. Ya think?

          • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/13/2009 11:07:54 PM

            OK, Skybox, I think you correctly explained Obama program. I wish, Obama would have explained his program this way, nobody would have voted for him.

            • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/14/2009 3:23:52 PM

              Then what?

              Are you the kind of warrior who keeps coming back for more when it's evident that he has already been mauled? Brave, but dumb? Neither of the above?

              Who, who, in their right minds would rather Sarah Palin was running the economy?

              Poor old John admitted he didn't no nuthin 'bout no economy. He just like to blow stuff up. We already had 8 friggin' years of that disaster. You wanted more? Lord, have mercy.

              Take a cold shower and try again tomorrow, Bosco.

              • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/14/2009 7:14:09 PM

                First, it is President who choses nis staff, and John would not let Palin do it. Second, usually President has very little knowledge of economy, he choses economists who will implement his very generally formulated program (tell me that Reagan undestood anything in economy, but he fixed it). Third, even I was not implessed with Palin, even she is 100 times more qualified than ordinary "community organizer" with big ambitions. Forth, it could be Hillary, who again is much smarter and xperienced that current White House "genius".
                And fifth, chnging moron to idiots never solved any problems.

                • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/14/2009 8:27:03 PM

                  All the above points are well presented. Most thoughtful and persuasive, methinks.

                  That 5th one was the clincher.

        • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/13/2009 10:51:28 PM

          Yes, some tax cuts can be temporary, to jump-start economy. When economy has rebounded - you can return them back, exactly what Reagan did. And I agree that Bush was a moron, but don't forget that his military spending had positive side effect (of course Bush did not mean it) - economy was booming for 4 years, very unlike event to hapen right after Net bubble, and current financial crisis was influenced very little by Bush spending.
          Just opposite, tax increase during recession never ever worked, and only complete idiots, like those in White House and "around", can believe it would help now.

  • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/12/2009 5:26:58 PM

    Aside from the fact that we don't have the money to do all these things at once, there are fundamental issues of responsibility, fairness, even justice.

    How to be fair in a society, a nation, where every man woman, child, corporation, business, organization, school, college, university, and transgender person believes with a pure and abiding faith that hesheitthey isare entitled to some form of government support. And with good reason. Don't you think?

    Think it was the dirty Democrats? OK. Think it was the dirty Republicans, the Independents, the Socialists, the Communists, the Dixiecrats?

    Just stop it. Stop with the whiney laments and face the greater reality. The enemy is indeed US. You too Sammy. You know what I mean.

    Reality also includes its shadow: the wheels stop turning when the money runs out, but the wheels grind, screech, and freeze when the golden goose stops getting laid (a hot summer metaphor mix!).

    Point being: we would not recognize the world of balanced budgets. Honduras, Uganda, Sri Lanka, come to mind. Switzerland has managed to keep their little fiefdom fat and sassy without heavy taxation, but I have lived in Switzeland and believe me, we are no Alpine anonymous account paradise here in these already socialism soaked American states. Our banks yodel a way different tune here.

    When the longest line in America is a que-up of generous folks divesting themselves of every last social "benefit," direct, indirect, or invisible, then we can dream the impossible dream.

    But then we will have to learn all over how to make the wheels go around and how to keep the golden goose happy.

    OK. Who'll be the first to bend over?

    • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/12/2009 9:55:12 PM

      You know, it is funny in a perverse sort of way. 3 times here today I have issued a simple challenge:

      Who will give up their "benefits," their kids' benefits, their family's benefits, their community's benefits, even the benefits, the entitlements, as it were, of the nation which we, personally support/want/need?

      Who is patriotic enough to be the first to fly through the air with the greatest of ease without the social net provided by the putative "evil empire," our own American government?

      Step up or shut up.

      What is the sound of no babies crying.... no whining? Silence.

      I guess no one is ready to step up and bend over for America.

      There you go. Cheap patriotism, to say the least.

      Step up or shut up.

      • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/13/2009 11:04:17 PM

        Skybox, what "benefits" are you talking about? Welfare? Huge tax break for poor? Free housing? This are the biggest money suckers, received mostly by Democrat supporters. Do you challenge them to stand up and drop their benefits? Partly it would be reasonable, because one half of those "beneficiaries" could work but don't want to, but you know, that group of people will never "stand up".
        May be you want me to sacrifice my benefits? I always "stood up" and don't have any. Even my health insurance I buy ( I am a contractor).

        • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/14/2009 3:17:44 PM

          Nice try big, but you are no martyr until you have bent over.

          • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/14/2009 7:28:09 PM

            Bad answer, Skybox. Probably bkrummel was right about your habits. Still, I think I "bent over" enough, and don't want to be a martyr. I don't know about you, but why would not you ask fellow Democratic bums to "bend over", stop sucking our money and report to work? Without their collective "sacrifice" ( which will be enforced anyway) we can not fix economy.

            • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/14/2009 8:24:25 PM

              Big, Apologies for providing a bad answer. To your credit, you have demonstrated amply here the seemingly insurmountable problems we face in this country.

              You make a good case for not bending over for the common good when you are already lying down for the creeps who have raped our nation and stolen our future.

              Sweet dreams, scooter.

      • Posted By: bkrummel @ 07/13/2009 2:38:59 AM

        Skybox, this is not a simple challenge, this is a trap. I see these from time to time. You issue some challenge for people to answer some question. When someone responds, even if they deliver a good and thoughtful response, you immediate act dismiss the answer and repeat your question or criticism. You never reply to the answers to the challenge themselves. You never answer your own challenge. This is just an attempt to make yourself feel special or cast others in a bad light. Attempting to answer your question is a waste of time.

        The challenge itself is a little silly. Yes, people should be willing to make sacrifices and trying to gauge who would make those sacrifices has its place. But the point isn't to make random sacrifices. Sacrificing goats to the gods obviously will not fix our budget issues. We need to find sacrifices that will actually address the problems. Often these budget problems are involved and the average person does not know enough to offer a solution. Even the experts struggle with them. Moreover, there are a lot of good government programs that work and people rely upon. People shouldn't give up good benefits that they need. They should offer the wasteful benefits they don't want or need. They should also be more open to accepting a modest tax increase, which I am.

        You are avoiding the issue anyways. It is clear that the United States has fiscal issues to deal with. Telling people to "step up or shut up" indicates that you just want to ignore these issues, which is not a real option.

        • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/13/2009 2:26:19 PM

          Thank you bk. Well said.
          You have indeed stepped up.

      • Posted By: bahanson @ 07/13/2009 12:41:15 AM

  • Posted By: DL13 @ 07/13/2009 11:55:05 PM

    Big government never can equal the same quality of work as that done in the private sector because there is no competition to bring the best out in people; that is why we should consider turning more and more government jobs over to the private sector. The more government meddles with our jobs, the more they screw things up.

  • Posted By: jordan c. fan @ 07/13/2009 9:49:30 PM

    Jordan C. Fan, Prophet of Environment.

    Obama and his supporters especially Blacks currently are engaged in an ingenious criminal dirty trick. Obama supporters or Black businessmen formed some financial and legal consulting companies advertised extensively on TV telling people that they will help people get out of debts, taxes, mortgages or refinance. Those advertisements or commercials are unusually long taking up many minutes. More than half of the length of those commercials are Obama's speeches telling people how supportive he is in helping people out of debt and how great he is all over. These are extremely cunning acts and dirty tricks by Blacks to profit from people suffering from debts and financial crisis while making political statements and advertisement at the same time.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 07/13/2009 11:10:14 PM

      Don't worry, whites are better con artists.

  • Posted By: pastafarianism @ 07/13/2009 6:06:37 PM

    How about a flat tax rate and no loopholes? Simplify the tax code and make everyone pay an equal share.

    They system is broken and will remain so until something drastic happens to force a change. Greed is too strong of a motivator for it to happen before that.

    I would also be interested to see historical references where lowering the tax rate has increased overall tax revenue independant of other major factors (end/beginning of wartime, etc etc.) I dont think you can find one. Having the ability to shuffle your assests around to avoid paying more taxes is part of the reason this system is so broke. You make a loophole and it will be abused by everyone that knows it is there, THAT is a fact.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/13/2009 2:42:32 PM

    We are a daring society. We like to walk tightropes, dance on the edges of precipices, sky dive, and even sky box. Sky boxing is done by two parachutists jumping from an airplane with parachutes and boxing gloves. The contestants box on their way down and the last one to pull the ripcord wins the bout. We are also daring with budgets, enjoying spending money without collecting money, on credit, of course. Our government is best at this, having monstrous credit. It might be due to pull a ripcord, though, before it hits the ground.

    • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/13/2009 3:00:25 PM

      All true. Yet we do get older and wiser. A sky-box is also a good place for old warriors to sit back and watch the game. Have a seat, friend. Here's to wisdom!

      • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/13/2009 5:52:45 PM

        Let the games begin.

  • Posted By: DieselAddict @ 07/13/2009 4:28:00 PM

    Great article and right on the money about wanting big government but not wanting to pay for it. I do want a public health insurance plan, but I'm willing to pay for it with increased taxes if it's a good plan. Am I the only one?? I'm just tired of seeing my private insurance money going to CEO bonuses, stock dividends and massive administrative costs. There's no good reason why health insurance needs to be for profit. I also like the idea of going through all govt spending and making cuts wherever possible. Things like farmer subsidies, military deployed all over the world, etc. could certainly use some cuts if you ask me. I'd also like to see the tax code simplified and the IRS downsized. I'll take higher taxes over national debt any day. The national debt will have to be paid eventually anyway, and it'll cost more because of interest. It's time to close the deficit and have a serious discussion about what govt services we actually want and need.

  • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 07/13/2009 10:31:32 AM

    I don't think anyone actually wants an expansion of Government, and the article is not clear on that point unless it is the possible expansion of health care administration.
    After Bush expanded government 40%; I doubt the administration of heath care would equal just Bush's expansion of the IRS.
    The fact is Medicare is one of the most efficiently run government programs. The IRS is out and out dysfunctional.
    No one likes tax's and we are seeing increases everywhere particularly in sales tax to support the government we now have, not to support an increase in the size of government.
    As the middle class contracted and continues to do so the deficit will continue to expand simply because America can no longer support the government.
    The number of homeless continues to rise and many of these people were once taxpayers for example.
    The problem isn't so much government wants it both ways as it is individuals.
    Don't for get we now have a free market economy and it is now private individuals; most notably Wall Street that dictates economic policy without the regulation of government
    And they demand lower wages for the working class, lower taxes to increase profit without a thought to a deficit.
    Many it would seem would do away with government altogether in their demands for smaller government.

    • Posted By: libertyfirst @ 07/13/2009 12:31:24 PM

      You can't be serious with respect to Medicare being "one of the most efficiently run government programs?" They continually run massive deficits and have created one of the costliest, most complicated fee-for-service systems one can imagine. If your conclusion is based on the mythical 3% administrative costs that we've recently seen tossed around for discussion, that number is both outright false, but intentionally misleading. It costs billions for providers just to stay abreast of the rules and regulations affecting how we bill, what we bill and whether we can bill. Medicare runs continuously in the red; and costs everyone else's administrative budgets to sky-rocket. Their regionalized authorization structure is enough to make your head spin. So, to call them "efficient" is truly an oxymoron.

  • Posted By: ProfBob @ 07/13/2009 5:05:26 AM

    As a Californian living in Norway I have experienced both ends of the taxing continuum. Americans want much but don't want to pay. Pay with plastic then go bankrupt. Borrow the maximum on the home, then walk away if the value goes south. Today in Norway's Aftenposten there is a survey of popular and unpopular taxes here. The 100% tax on new cars and the gasoline taxes that triple our per gallon cost over what Americans pay are in the top 5. But remember Norway pays for its services and is one of three countries without debt. The popular free ebook series "And Gulliver Returns"--In Search of Utopia-- discusses the maximum tax rate people will tolerate (in Book 4 at http://andgulliverretturns.info) Perhaps every spending bill should be required to list how it will be paid for.

  • Posted By: sieg6529 @ 07/13/2009 10:37:40 AM

    The role of government spending is to provide for the people that which they cannot or will not provide for themselves, like the highway system or emergency services. National defense and infrastructure alone are hugely expensive, and even the reddest Republican won't allow cuts in the former. The truth is both parties are about very big government; the difference is how that money is spent.

  • Posted By: reba80 @ 07/12/2009 10:39:18 PM

    I'm sorry to say but this country is done for. I'll tell you why this recession despite being horrible for my finances, has been a blessing in disguise. I don't think no matter how rich, how great your job is, how high-rolling you've become, it could ever be a substitute for good friends and family. So our nations values should be really simple, help your family, your friends and your neighbors and just be glad you have people in your life. With all the greed and people living beyong their means, the depression rate has soared because i think at the end of the day you just want good people around you. Goverment shouldn't have to be so involved but this country has become such a mess, they have no chioce. CEOs and VPs that were collecting multimillinion dollar a year paychecks need to get over themselves. Everyone deserves a decent income based on how hard they work but come on. And then the argument that welfare recipients and people collection unemployment are bums is ridiculous, that's not a nice life and if those recipients had the means and wearwithall to get off it I'm sure they would. I think most people aren't lazy, they want to work, but the job situation has become dire. I don't know i'm saddened by where this country has gone, and i wish that people would get back to reality and make it better. More cooperating and less bickering.

  • Posted By: bkrummel @ 07/12/2009 4:15:15 PM

    This article is excellent. The article is correct on a number of points. We do have unprecedented and possibly permanent government expansions going on right now that we may or may not want and we need to be discussing this. Someone absolutely needs to tackle the growing budget problem and entitlement reform. Do to our desire for government services, especially the entitlements, and a lack of desire to be taxed, no one on either party is addressing these important issues and is responsibly managing our government's money. I sure hope Obama addresses entitlement reform like he says he would as he must, but so far he's been all talk and done "just the opposite" with his health-care proposal. (Why when we have an entitlement problem is Obama going to add a Medicare-like public option and pay for health care reform by reforming Medicare? Did he forget about the Baby Boomers or that Medicare is an entitlement?) However, I must say that I certainly have an appetite for someone to address these issues and would gladly vote for the politician who finally steps up to actually address these issues.

    Keep writing good stuff like this Robert Samuelson!

    • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/12/2009 4:56:22 PM

      And you and Sammy will be the first to sacrifice your "entitlements?"

      Tell us here and now what you personally would give up to balance the national budget?

      Oh, it's not about you? Them?

      Got it. Brilliant.

      Next.

      • Posted By: bkrummel @ 07/12/2009 8:13:02 PM

        First let's clarify that by "entitlements" I do not mean general government support for its citizens through programs and funding. I am talking about Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. It is well known that with the Baby Boomers coming up, we will have trouble paying for many of these entitlements (for example listen to David Walker or watch the movie IOUSA). Note this is before all the other spending Obama intends on. The government needs to do something to address this issue. I'm not asking for balanced budgets every year (modest debts are actually healthy), just for the government to have some sort of fiscal responsibility and to address the entitlement issue.

        Your response to the entitlement problem seems to be to argue that since no one would sacrifice to address the entitlement issue and other budgetary issues, that we should ignore the issue and do nothing. In particular, you try to act me by suggesting that I would sacrifice nothing and thereby discrediting voices like myself that demand we do something. This is a great way to ignore the issue, but it will not address the issue and this issues does need to be addressed.

        There are a few in congress with ideas for entitlement reform, including Rep. Paul Ryan. I am not an expert on the specifics of the proposals. Unfortunately, there has been too much talk and avoidance of entitlement reform for any of these ideas to amount to anything.

        If there are good proposals to address the issues, I would gladly accept some sacrifices for the reform so that we can pay for my parents retirement benefits and I don't have to pay substantially higher taxes a few decades down the road. That includes having my taxes increased. Moreover, I really don't want the government paying for my retirement through any of the entitlement programs I listed and would happy forgo such benefits. But we as a country have agreed to providing such entitlement benefits, which is fine as long as we can pay for them.

        • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/12/2009 8:39:49 PM

          demand we do something... that has a ring to it, does it not?

          demand, demand, demand... damn the torpedoes!


          Without presenting solutions in which we are the first to support with our own income, family, and future, then what is the point of another hollow demand?

          Do it. Do it now or stop whining.!

  • Posted By: jstepp590 @ 07/12/2009 8:29:33 PM

    I want an old Reagan idea brought back. He wanted to have some corporate downsizing firms cut loose on the government to find where we could save money. If everthing is efficinet, then we need to raise taxes to balance the budget. If it isn't efficient then we can save alot of money.

    Reagan dropped the idea back then because of all the toes it would have stepped on, keeping him from being president. That doesn't mean it isn't a great idea whose time has come.

  • Posted By: lvUSAproud @ 07/12/2009 7:58:11 PM

    I think what we need is for American tax dollars to stay in America. The time as come for us to stop supporting every country but our own. Show me where it says we must support so many other countries? Get rid of NAFTA and other things like it. Help small companies get started. If the companies that have outsourced our jobs do not like the new rules then no more tax breaks, period. Stop allowing companies to bring people from other countries to take American jobs and if you are an illegal you have jobs here. America for Americans by Americans. Time to take our country back. The money going overseas (millions everyday would help to stop the collapse of this country and its people.

    • Posted By: lvUSAproud @ 07/12/2009 8:01:03 PM

      I meant that if you are an illegal you have NO, I mean NO jobs here, period.

  • Posted By: chotiius @ 07/12/2009 7:38:27 PM

    The worst of all this is, without a doubt, that Government Programs Never Go Away. Once they become established, they remain in perpetuity; what began as a 'crisis management tool' or 'safety net' becomes first an expectation and then a god-given right which is demanded and depended upon. Think of it: during the Depression, people would work for ANYTHING, would do ANY kind of work, and could be put to work at jobs we today relegate and delegate to immigrants...because people were too proud to take a handout. Now, you see healthy people who could certainly work, with their hands out. If those hands don't get filled, the hands turn into fists. How DARE they not receive their DUE?

    Government programs get larger and larger over time. They do not shrink, they do not become better-managed or more responsible. They waste money, lose money, and spend it like...it was theirs to spend, and was not taken by force from taxpayers, on threat of imprisonment or confiscation of their possessions.

    We don't need bigger government. We need our individual pride back.

    • Posted By: Skybox @ 07/12/2009 8:00:20 PM

      That individual pride thing works great when you run up a 6 figure bill saving the life of a young mother without adequate health coverage from breast cancer.

      That individual pride thing is a great response to the devastated parents of a kid killed by an IED in Iraq because the Hummer in which he was riding was only partially armed (fiscal conservatism!).

      That individual pride thing is a real team builder when your folks move in with you because their pensions have been stolen by their betters (bettors?)

      Yeah. Individual pride and a six pack can get you drunk and disorderly.

      Dig it. Individual pride: the mother's milk of America!

  • Posted By: eskildsonloyd @ 07/12/2009 6:42:48 PM

    The first major underlying problem is that private incomes are being strangled by job losses through outsourcing and illegal immigration. Second is that lawmakers have failed to confront runaway spending in major areas such as health care (twice the cost/patient as other developed nations), education (K-12- college spending per-pupil, inflation-adjusted has doubled over the last several decades, while pupil perform as poorly as ever and dropout rates have slightly increased), the "War on Drugs," public pensions, and the military (do we really need to spend as much as the rest of the world, combined?) The third problem is that lawmakers have played games with the numbers to cover up the total costs of major programs - eg. Social Security and Medicare. A fourth problem is that we've allowed our devotion to Israel to create enormous anti-American hatred in the Muslim world, thereby "rationalizing" waste in the War of Terror, the military, and foreign aid.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse