SPONSORED BY:

NEWSWEEK looks at celebrity tombs, from simple to spectacular

 
  • Social Networks
  • Links to this article
 
  • Digg It!
  • Newsvine
  • Del.icio.us
  • Post to MySpace! MySpace
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jade_knight1 @ 07/19/2009 6:44:15 PM

    Money problem solve. Guess you missed the the notice. SOME ONE BOUGHT NEVER LAND AFTER IT WAS FORECLOSED ON AND SOLD AT AUCTION. THE PLACE HE WAS LIVING WAS RENTED. Would you want the previous owner of your home to be buried on your property?

    If the present owner allowed it. It would benifit him. By the way.. If you ever drove by the Ranch. It is located on one small county type road. Sorry, I would not want the traffic

  • Posted By: Mari-Chu @ 07/19/2009 4:00:46 PM

    Yes, I do believe that Michael Jackson's final resting place should be like Princess Diana's or Jimmy Hendrix. People from all over the world would like to pay their respect now and forever, and to bury him next to others is an injustice to the "others". It should be a beautiful but public and away from others buried in the same cemetery. Michael was a public figure, one that will be loved for ever and ever and as such, the family should pay tribute to him.

  • Posted By: Curecka @ 07/19/2009 12:11:07 PM

    Michael Jackson should definetly be buried in a mausoleum....this MJ. i dont know why they just dont turn Neverland into something like Graceland for Elvis.It would definetly help clear out his debt and certainly help the state of California with there debt problems attracting tourism since they even tried to get fans to pay for memorial...problem solved.Espically as soon as it would all be setup.fans from all over the world would flock there immediately...."money problems solved" RIP M.J.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

View All Comments »