Microsoft, in Search of an Edge

The company's third attempt at a viable rival to Google is proving to be better than anyone expected. 

 
TECHNOLOGY
See how much you know about Google and search engines like it. No Googling allowed.
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

For years Microsoft has watched in frustration as Google dominated the online-search market, raking in billions of dollars in search-related advertising. No matter what Microsoft tried, it seemed, Google just got stronger and stronger, gaining ever more market share. All this was driving Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer a little bit crazy. If there's one thing Ballmer simply can't stand, it's watching dollars go to Google (or anyone else, for that matter) that he thinks should be going to his company. Especially when those dollars are counted in billions. For Ballmer, this is like living in a nightmare, and he will do anything—anything—to make that nightmare stop. As a former Microsoftie once told me, "Don't ever get between Steve and the money." 

But Microsoft is very persistent, and very patient. They're also very good at adapting ideas from other companies and sometimes even improving on them. And now, guess what? After a decade of flailing and failing, Microsoft rolled out a new search engine in June, its third attempt to compete with Google on that front. This one, called Bing, has managed to gain a bit of share in the Internet search market. What's more, Microsoft has done it the old-fashioned way: by being better and more innovative. Weirder still, Bing is actually getting loads of positive buzz from hardcore techie types, the folks who usually deride any product Microsoft introduces simply because it comes from Microsoft. (To use a Star Trekanalogy, when it comes to techies and their biases, Microsoft is like the Mirror Universe of Apple: Apple can do nothing wrong, Microsoft can do nothing right.)

Suddenly the Borg, as Microsoft is not-so-affectionately known, seems to have a bit of a hit on its hands. Could this turn things around in the fight against Google? The short answer is, it's too early to tell; Bing only went live last month. According to research firm StatCounter, over the course of that month, Microsoft saw its share of U.S. Web searches inch up a tiny bit, from 7.2 percent to 8.23 percent. Last week, on July 9, Bing actually leapt ahead of Yahoo to become the No. 2 search engine in the U.S., with a 12.9 percent share versus Yahoo's 10.15 percent. That was just for one day, and Microsoft has beaten Yahoo on isolated days in the past. But it's still noteworthy, considering how new Bing is.

Bing and Yahoo remain way behind Google, which handles more than 70 percent of U.S. Web searches on any given day. (In fact, a different researcher, Hitwise, just put out numbers showing Google continuing to gain share in June, even after Bing came out.) The best anyone can say at this point is that Bing seems to be doing better than other search engines that have sprung up to challenge Google—like Cuil, which got loads of buzz last year and then quickly fizzled out. "Bing is gaining some traction," says Aodhan Cullen, CEO of StatCounter. "It's slow but steady. I think they're going to capture some market share."

Folks at Microsoft say they're seeing some encouraging data too. For example: the number of "unique visitors" using Microsoft search products has grown 8 percent since Bing was launched. They've seen a threefold jump in the number of people using the search engine for shopping. "We're not breaking out the champagne yet. But we're cautiously optimistic," says Danielle Tiedt, general manager of Microsoft's Online Audience Business Group. 

Certainly Bing is getting a boost simply because it's new, and because everyone has been talking about it thanks to Microsoft's marketing push. It's also getting some great reviews from David Pogue of The New York Timesand from Katherine Boehret of The Wall Street Journal.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 07/21/2009 6:45:43 AM

    The reason why I use Google, is because it is very simple and convenient to use. People usually know what they are looking for, when they use a search engine, perhaps, they know more than me, when I use a search engine. So, the most convenient layout for a search engine, is what people look for. I feel, that Chrome, the web browser, complements the virtues of the Google search engine admirably. I use Chrome, because I feel it is the best for Google.

  • Posted By: brenhegarty @ 07/14/2009 11:59:59 AM

    According to Toolheads logic, if I wanted to do a search on the former presidents Bush I should make sure to include their names or title in the search phrase as there are many more bushes in areas relating to horticulture etc than politics.
    I am sorry but I would expect at least some hits on the presidents as well as garden plants. He seems to be confusing quantity with quality.

    As to his comment on searching for McDonald I would expect more hits on the fast food business rather than an obscure baseball player. The fast food chain is world wide and may be listed in connection with results relating to the environment, business, nutrition etc whereas most non Americans have no knowledge or interest in baseballl. I would expect the results to reflect this. I had no problem with Bing listing results on small town America but I would have expected some reference in the first 10 pages of results to a major figure of the second world war.

  • Posted By: dantalion @ 07/14/2009 6:31:51 AM

    I think the logic of toolhead's criticism is more problematic than the choice of search words used by brenhegarty... To put it bluntly toolhead, the fact that Google responded correctly to the non-specific search terms while Bing did not is the reason that Google has dominated the search market for the past eight years. It great that you can sit smug and offer us your infinite wisdom about the lack of intelligence of human beings, but I would like to see how smart you would be if you decided to Google a subject you genouinely had no clue about. What search terms would you pick then? How would you know if these search terms were the most appropriate ones (remember, your intelligence cannot help you here because you are in the dark)? Google has proven itself as probably the most successful Artificial Intelligence project in history precisely because it can return relevant results based on vague searches. This is exactly the way Google and Bing should be compared. Everything else mentioned in this article is gimmicks, which are not the point of search. But I guess for truly intelligent people like toolhead, gimmicks are more important.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now