Don’t Shoot

You can hide an Israeli, especially in Europe - they come from everywhere. How do you hide a six-foot four corn-fed lunker from Nebraska who's working off the CIA abstract for wherever he is?

Like before, it's far easier to raise up a force of 'allies' who take direction well. Heck they'll even find their own targets for you. Just ask anybody in Southest Asia or the other two Americas.

Doing that, it isn't necessary to 'blend in' - just call it 'foreign aid work', being a 'missionary' or a 'good will ambassador'.

According to the 9/11 commission, in December 1998, four months after Al Qaeda attacked two U.S. embassies in Africa, President Clinton signed a "memorandum of notification" that first authorized the CIA to use Afghan tribesmen to kill Osama bin Laden, if it became necessary
Who gives a s__t about these people they all hate us anyway so give them a real reason

Ahem, idiots.George Bush ordered the CIA to launch Hellfire Missiles at "Kamel Derwish, a U.S. citizen."
"neither the intelligence community nor the White House was especially concerned about whether the proposed kill teams violated the law."

Despite what you fools think the CIA is not empowered to assasinate US citizens at home or abroad. The Constitution clearly states that we are entitled to"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Bush ordered a murder of a US citizen, just like he did so many on 9/11.

IT SEEMS THAT THE ENEMY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ,CIA,POLICE ,US MILITARY AND FBI ARE OBAMA,HOLDER AND THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS WHO [ ARE ANTI-AMERICA,ANTI-MILITARY,ANTI-COP,ANTI -CIA] ARE DEFENDING THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS RATHER THAN THE 3,000 INNOCENT AMERICAN CIVILIANS MASSACRED ON 9/11. THE INVESTIGATION OF THE CIA BY OBAMA, HOL;DER AND THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS [TO COVER PELOSI POLITICALLY AFTER SAYING THAT THE CIA ALWAYS LIE TO CONGRESS] WILL BACKFIRE AND WILL RESULT IN THE ASSASSINATION OF OBAMA AND HOLDER BY AGENTS OF THE CIA,US MILITARY,FBI AND POLICE. THIS IS A VERY REAL POSSIBILITY BECAUSE THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS ARE ABUSING,DEMONIZING,NEGLECTING, DEMEANING,ATTACKING AND LEAVING VULNERABLE OUR ULTIMATE DEFENDERS OF THE US CONSTITUTION,FREEDOM,HOMELAND AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Killing our enemies in a time of war. What a strange concept Can't we just pin a scarlet T on them and let them go?!

Current events re the row about Congress and CIA fidgiting about kill teams has the MSM all a twitting about nothing new.

The MSM has been known to spike such stories as far back as 1971 when Mike Wallace sent me a plane ticket to fly to New York City for a two day interview at CBS headquarters in Manhatten, two blocks from the Holiday Inn where I was provided a room.

Sixty Minutes, then in it's infancy, did not follow up on any of the material I provided for copying at Wallace's office.

Same thing happened at Bob Woodwards office at the Washington Post in May, 1984. No follow up.

Now Greg Miller of the LA Times is writing about Cheney and the hit squads recently exposed by Seymour Hersch. Miller has been ignoring my information since 1995.
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id1.html
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id48.html

It mattered not that I was mentioned in the Congressional Record in September, 1969 when Congress was rejoicing about the dropping of murder charges against eight 'Green Berets' in Vietnam.

Located in 2000 were once top secret minutes of National Security Council minutes unilaterally declassified by the State Department, much to the angst and chagrin of the CIA, which irrefutably show blatant disregard for Presidential Directives issued during NSC meetings, during wartime. LBJ did not want the Vietnam War expanded into 60,000 square miles of Cambodia, but CIA had other designs to expand the war in spite of Presidential Directives. Some would call that treason.

The MSM is dead and gone re being the governments 'watchdog'. They have been neutered by The Secret Team.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/

Kudo's to NEWSWEEK Magazine who place a paragraph about myself in the Periscope Section of the November 11, 1970 edition with William Calley on the front cover.

John McCarthy
vpocv@hotmail.com

The CIA has done enough creepy things in the past that have been far outside the realm of American ideals. The thought of them having secret assassination teams is certainly something that would require Congressional oversight. It's ironic that they've been working on this for eight years and they say that if Congress had known about it that Congress would have approved---and yet they didn't tell Congress and thus violated the law. The law says that they have to report to Congress on their programs AND on "anticipated" programs. If they've had at least three high level meetings this year about it, why is it that they didn't bother to tell the Director of the CIA about those meetings? It smells. It's likely that the reports of Cheney's secret assassination squad that came out last year were in fact true. Bush told Congress in his 2003 state of the union address that they had detained 3,000 terrorists and that there were a lot more who wouldn't be causing any more trouble. And yet there are only about 200 prisoners at Gitmo. They have released thousands of people who they had erroneously called terrorists but found out that they were innocent. How many of the ones they killed had never been terrorists? When the CIA goes hotdog, America usually gets egg on it's face. Instead of Republicans in Congress blaming Panetta for obeying the law, how about if we find out the names of the people who broke it and hold them accountable? I thought that Republicans were the ones who wanted rule of law. You can't chant USA while you're trashing the Constitution and the laws of the land.

''Ultra -secret'' all right.

The New York Times Dec.14,2002:''Bush Has Widened Authority Of CIA To Kill Terrorists''

Wasn't this one of the topics discussed shortly after 9/11? Why didn't the CIA do more? Why didn't the President do more? Why didn't the military do more? Well people their doing more!!! Why don't we sit back and let them do their jobs????

France's Expeditonary Special Forces pursued Somali pirates, captured them on land and spirited them off to stand trial in France. I believe there was not as much as a negative peep about it. They were, in fact, admired for their bravado and their success. The Mossad on the other hand has several times botched its rogue assassination attempts. Other than the unfortunate man in Norway, an agent injected a man in Jordan with what turned out not be a lethal dose. While these two incidents may boil down to a few people who didn't do their homework or prepare adequately enough, it indicates that sub rosa missions based on narrowly defined security parameters can and do backfire. The CIA and Cheney should have learned something from previous clandestine subterfuges with Allende in Chile and the Iran-Contra legerdemaine. That said, I'll bet if you polled Americans, a majority would say they wouldn't lose sleep over ridding the world of terrorists one way or the other.

Perhaps the US government won't need to inflate its terrorism-arrest stats after it implements the Defense Science Board's recommendation. This influential committee inside the Pentagon has proposed a terrifying way to fight evil-doers: Goad them into making terrorist attacks. Yes, you read correctly. Instead of waiting for a plot to be hatched and possibly executed, go out and make it happen.
In summer 2002, the Defense Science Board outlined all kinds of ways to fight the war on terrorism around the world. The scariest suggestion involves the creation of a new 100-man, $100-million team called the Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group, or P2OG.
This combination of elite special forces soldiers and intelligence agents will have "an entirely new capability to proactively, pre-emptively provoke responses from adversary/terrorist groups," according to the DSB's report.
Just how the P2OG will "provoke" terrorists into action is not specified, at least in the unclassified portions of the report. United Press International - which apparently has access to the full, classified version of the report - says that techniques could include "stealing their money or tricking them with fake communications." The Moscow Times offers further possibilities, such as killing family members and infiltrating the groups with provocateurs, who will suggest and even direct terrorist strikes.
Once the terrorists have been provoked, what then? UPI says that by taking action, the terrorists would be "exposing themselves to 'quick-response' attacks by US forces." In other words, the plan is to hit the hornet's nest with a stick, while waiting nearby with a can of bug spray. The flaws in this approach are obvious. Although not spelled out in the UPI article or the report itsef, the idea seems to be that the P2OG will cause terrorists to make an attack but supposedly stop them right before the attack actually occurs. Will the P2OG always be able to prevent terrorism it creates from taking place?
Will it always be able to "neutralize" all of the terrorists during that crucial window after a plan has been put into motion but before it's been carried out? I wouldn't want to bet lives on it. But that's exactly what's happening.
Whenever any future terrorist attack occurs - an embassy is truck-bombed, a nightclub is blown to smithereens, prominent buildings are hit with hijacked passenger jets - we'll never be 100 percent sure that this wasn't an operation the P2OG provoked but then was unable to stop in time.